Cannabis Sativa

Content deleted Content added
→‎Pre-ATP ranking No. 1s: It is certainly possible to total them, it has just been decided here not to do it.
Tag: Reverted
Undid revision 1057126980 by Fyunck(click) (talk) "Editors should not compare statistics from sources that use different methodologies." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research
Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 1,537: Line 1,537:


===Pre-ATP ranking No. 1s===
===Pre-ATP ranking No. 1s===
*'''Note''': Calculating how many years each player was world No. 1 before the ATP rankings is more difficult as there were separate tours and no point ranking systems for most of the years.
*'''Note''': Calculating how many years each player was world No. 1 before the ATP rankings is not possible as there were separate tours and no point ranking systems for most of the years.
<gallery class="left" widths="120" heights="120">
<gallery class="left" widths="120" heights="120">
File:Bill-Tilden.jpg|[[Bill Tilden]], a top player in the 1920s–30s.
File:Bill-Tilden.jpg|[[Bill Tilden]], a top player in the 1920s–30s.

Revision as of 17:28, 25 November 2021

World number 1 ranked male tennis players is a year-by-year listing of the male tennis players who were ranked as world No. 1 by various contemporary and modern sources. The annual source rankings from which the No. 1 players are drawn are cited for each player's name, with a summary of the most important tennis events of each year also included.

History of rankings

Before 1913

For the period between the birth of lawn tennis to 1913, few contemporary worldwide rankings exist. Some national tennis federations such as the USLTA (USTA) in the United States did create national rankings, however. Also, British publications ranking British players are listed. Retrospective world rankings made by the International Tennis Hall of Fame are also listed.

Between 1913 and 1973: opinion-based worldwide rankings and professional tournament series point rankings

Before the Open Era of tennis arrived in 1968, opinion-based rankings for amateur players were generally compiled either for a full year of play or in September following the U.S. Championships. Professional players were ranked by journalists, promoters, and players' associations in opinion-based rankings either at the end of the year or in the spring or summer when the world pro tours finished. There were also performance-based point ranking systems attached to professional tournament series in 1946, 1959, 1960, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967 and 1968, and performance-based pro rankings from the pro tours in 1942, 1954, 1961, and 1963. Even for amateurs, however, there was no single official overall ranking that encompassed the entire world. Instead, national rankings were compiled by the national tennis association of each country, with world rankings being the preserve of tennis journalists or newspaper reporters. The end-of-year amateur rankings issued by official organizations such as the United States Lawn Tennis Association were based on judgments and opinions and not on mathematical formulae assigning points for wins and losses.

Professional tennis in Europe before 1926

Thomas Burke, tutor of the Tennis Club de Paris and former teacher of two-time Wimbledon champion Joshua Pim, was reportedly as good a player as the leading amateurs.[1] Charles Haggett was the best English teaching professional during the early 20th century. In 1913, Haggett settled in the United States, having been invited by the West Side Tennis Club of Forest Hills, New York and became the coach of the American Davis Cup team. In practice matches, he beat the leading amateurs Anthony Wilding, Wimbledon winner and Maurice McLoughlin, Wimbledon All Comer's winner.[2]

In the 1920s, Karel Koželuh, Albert Burke (son of Thomas Burke), and Roman Najuch were probably the most notable, as well as the best, of these players. The Bristol Cup, held at Beaulieu or at Cannes on the French Riviera and won seven consecutive times by Koželuh, was "the world's only significant pro tennis tournament."[3] Koželuh went on to become one of the best of the touring professionals in the 1930s. He and Burke, however, were not listed among the top players before 1928, as this was the first year when a retrospective ranking was published for all the top players, amateur and professional.

Major professional tournaments before 1968

Three major tournaments held a certain tradition and usually had the best of the leading players. The most prestigious of the three was generally the London Indoor Professional Championship. Played in most years between 1934 and 1990 at the Wembley Arena in the United Kingdom, the tournament was authorised by the Lawn Tennis Association from the 1950s onwards. The oldest of the three was the United States Professional Championship, played between 1927 and 1999 (except 1944 and 1996) with the approval and participation of the USPLTA from 1928 to 1954. In 1950, the USPLTA U.S. Pro was held in Cleveland. In 1951, the USPLTA U.S. Pro was held at Forest Hills, however there was also in 1951 the PTPA-approved U.S. Pro (under the billed name International Pro) held at Cleveland. Between 1952–53 and 1955–62 the PTPA version of the U.S. Pro was played in Cleveland (under the billed name International or World Professional Championships). The USPLTA U.S. Pro was held again at the L.A. Tennis Club in 1954 under Kramer's management, however the Cleveland version of the U.S. Pro was also held in 1954 under the billed name World Professional Championships. The third major tournament was the French Professional Championship, played at Roland Garros in the years 1930–1932, 1934–1939, 1956, 1958–62 and 1968, and at Stade Coubertin from 1963 to 1967. The British and American championships continued into the Open Era, but devolved to the status of minor tournaments.

These three tournaments (Wembley Pro, French Pro and U.S. Pro) through 1967 are often referred to retrospectively as the major pro events by tennis historians.[4] However, in some years other tournaments had stronger fields and larger money prizes. The 1957 Forest Hills Tournament of Champions was broadcast live in its entirety on the CBS national television network in the U.S.[5][6] The Forest Hills professional tournament in 1966 boasted the largest prize money of the season, and a film was made of the final.[7] The Wimbledon Pro in 1967 was broadcast complete in colour on BBC television in Britain and awarded the largest prize money of any pro tournament up to that time.[8]

Before 1973, there were only a few rankings based on the points players obtained for achieving a certain level of performance in particular tournaments, but there were journalists or officials (on their personal behalf) or promoters or players themselves who listed their own subjective annual rankings. In 1946, 1959, 1960 and 1964–1968 there were point ranking systems and seeding lists applied to professional series of tournaments involving all of the best pros. In 1946, 1959 and 1960 there were also World Professional Championship tours with a small number of pros, which did not produce point rankings. The winners of the 1946, 1959 and 1960 World Professional Championship Tours were described as "world champion" in many reports, as distinct from the point series "world No. 1".[9][10] In 1961 and 1963, the ITPTA World Championship Tour produced an official ranking order for the contract professionals. In some years, however, only a small number of professional promoters, players or journalists released opinion-based rankings at the end of the tennis year. Retrospective opinion-based-rankings by tennis historians or sports statisticians many years after the tennis year ended (e.g. in the 2000s for a year in the 1950s) are also listed.

From 1973 onward: modern ATP rankings

In August 1973, the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) introduced its own rankings.[11] These mathematical merit-based rankings were published 11 times that year and with increasing frequency the following years until they were published weekly from 1979 onward.[12] In the 1970s and 1980s they did not take into account certain events, such as the Davis Cup, the WCT Finals and the year-end Masters (currently named the ATP Finals). Stan Smith, a leading player in the 1970s when ATP rankings started said "there was a great deal of conversation and tweaking during the formative years as to the weight of the various tournaments and even the weight of the rounds in the tournaments. The prize money per round was also debated in conjunction with the ranking points."[12] Since 1990 the ATP has awarded points for ATP Finals.[13]

Disputed rankings

In the early years after the ATP rankings were introduced, other rankings proposed by tennis experts or by the players themselves were possibly more accurate because they included those events and adjusted the rankings to reflect the actual importance of particular tournaments. In 1977, Connors was No. 1 in the ATP ranking but it was generally considered that Borg and Vilas were the top two players in the world.[citation needed] Since the 1990s, the ATP rankings have generally been accepted as the official rankings. Since 1978 the ITF (represented initially by a panel of experts consisting of Don Budge, Lew Hoad and Fred Perry) designated the yearly ITF World Champions.[a][14]

List of No. 1 ranked players

1877–1912: National and world rankings

Early tennis era rankings are more variable in nature due to limited sourcing. Few contemporary worldwide rankings exist for this period.

Year Sources of ranking and tournament results summary
1877 Rankings:
  • Spencer Gore was number one according to Tennis: Lawn Tennis.[15]

Year summary:

Gore was the Wimbledon champion.

1878 Rankings:

Year summary:

Hadow was the Wimbledon champion.

1879 Rankings:

Year summary:

Hartley was the Wimbledon champion.

1880 Rankings:
  • John Hartley was number one according to Methven Brownlee: Lawn Tennis.[16][page needed]

Year summary:

Hartley won the only match he played, against Lawford in the Wimbledon final.

1881 Rankings:

Year summary:

William Renshaw was the Irish and Wimbledon champion.

1882 Rankings:
  • William Renshaw ranked British number one by The "Field" Lawn Tennis Calendar.[19]

Year summary:

William Renshaw was the Irish and Wimbledon champion, his brother Ernest being the challenger both times.

1883 Rankings:
  • William Renshaw ranked British number one by "The Field" Lawn Tennis Calendar.[20]

Year summary:

William Renshaw won the only singles match he played at Wimbledon against Irish champion Ernest Renshaw.

1884 Rankings:
  • William Renshaw ranked British number one by the Pastime classification of British players.[21]

Year summary:

William Renshaw won the only singles match he played at Wimbledon against Irish champion Lawford.

1885 Rankings:
  • William Renshaw ranked British number one by the Pastime classification of British players.[22]
  • Richard Sears ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[23]

Year summary:

William Renshaw won the only singles match he played at Wimbledon against Irish champion Lawford.

1886 Rankings:
  • William Renshaw ranked British number one by the Pastime classification of British players.[24]
  • Richard Sears ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[23]

Year summary:

William Renshaw won the only singles match he played at Wimbledon against Irish champion Lawford.

1887 Rankings:
  • Herbert Lawford ranked world No. 1 by the International Hall of Fame.[25]
  • Herbert Lawford ranked British number one by the Pastime classification of British players.[26]
  • Richard Sears ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[23]

Year summary:

Lawford beat Ernest Renshaw at Wimbledon and lost to him at the Irish.

1888 Rankings:

Year summary:

Ernest Renshaw was the Irish and Wimbledon champion. Hamilton was the Irish challenger, and the Northern England champion.

1889 Rankings:
  • William Renshaw ranked British number one by the Pastime classification of British players.[29]
  • Henry Slocum ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[30]

Year summary:

Renshaw won the Wimbledon title. Hamilton beat William Renshaw at the Irish, won the Northern England title as well, but lost in the Wimbledon semis to Harry Barlow.

1890 Rankings:

Year summary:

Hamilton won Wimbledon, but lost to Pim in Liverpool and Lewis in Dublin (although he was the Irish champ, he had severe defeats by Pim and G. Chaytor).

1891 Rankings:
  • Wilfred Baddeley ranked world No. 1 by the International Hall of Fame.[32]
  • Wilfred Baddeley ranked British number one by the Pastime classification of British players.[33]
  • Oliver Campbell ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[30]

Year summary:

Lewis won the Irish, Baddeley was the Wimbledon champion, but they did not meet. Both of them beat Pim, although Pim also beat Baddeley at the Northern Championships.

1892 Rankings:
  • Ernest Renshaw ranked British number one by the Pastime classification of British players.[34]
  • Oliver Campbell ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[30]

Year summary:

Ernest Renshaw won the Irish, Baddeley was the Wimbledon champion but they did not meet.

1893 Rankings:

Year summary:

Pim won Wimbledon, the Irish and Northern England titles as well (first player to win all three titles in the same year). He defeated Baddeley twice.

1894 Rankings:
  • Joshua Pim ranked British number one by the Pastime classification of British players.[36]
  • Robert Wrenn ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[30]

Year summary:

Pim defended his Wimbledon and Irish titles. Wilfred Baddeley was the Wimbledon challenger and won the Northern England title beating Pim.

1895 Rankings:
  • Wilfred Baddeley ranked British number one by the Pastime classification of British players.[37]
  • Fred Hovey ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[30]

Year summary:

Pim was the Irish champion demolishing Wilberforce Eaves, but he was absent from Wimbledon that Baddeley won narrowly beating Eaves.

1896 Rankings:
  • Wilfred Baddeley and Harold Mahony ranked joint British number ones by The Lawn Tennis classification of British players (foreign and covered court tournaments were not taken into account).[38]
  • Robert Wrenn ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[30]

Year summary:

Baddeley beat Mahony both at the Irish and Northern England Championships, but lost to him at Wimbledon. John Pius Boland won the Olympic gold.

1897 Rankings:
  • Reginald Doherty ranked world No. 1 by the International Hall of Fame.[39]
  • Wilfred Baddeley, Reginld Doherty and Wilberforce Eaves co-ranked British number ones by The Lawn Tennis classification of British players (foreign and covered court tournaments were not taken into account).[40]
  • Robert Wrenn ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[41]

Year summary:

Doherty was beaten by Irish champion Eaves in Dublin, by Baddeley at the Northern England Championships and by Mahony at an international match, however he beat all of them at Wimbledon. Wrenn beat Eaves at the U.S. but lost to Larned in Boston.

1898

Rankings:

  • Laurence Doherty ranked world No. 1 by the International Hall of Fame.[42]
  • G. Chaytor, Laurence Doherty, Reginald Doherty, Wilberforce Eaves and Sydney Howard Smith co-ranked British number ones by The Lawn Tennis classification of British players (foreign and covered court tournaments were not taken into account).[43]
  • Malcolm Whitman ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[41]

Year summary:

Wimbledon champion Reginald Doherty lost to Irish Mahony in Dublin. Laurie Doherty defeated Mahony at Wimbledon, but lost the challenge round final to his brother.

1899 Rankings:
  • Reginald Doherty and Sydney Howard Smith co-ranked British number ones by The Lawn Tennis classification of British players (foreign and covered court tournaments were not taken into account).[44]
  • Malcolm Whitman ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[41]
  • Reginald Doherty ranked No. 1 by Charles Voigt from Boston.[45]

Year summary:

Reginald Doherty won both the Wimbledon and the Irish titles and had an unbeaten season. Whitman won all the important US tournaments, and according to Potter (in his Kings of the Court book) he played magnificently.[46][page needed]

1900 Rankings:
  • Malcolm Whitman ranked world No. 1 by the International Hall of Fame.[47]
  • Reginald Doherty ranked British number one by British author Jackson in the British players in the American Outing.[48]
  • Malcolm Whitman U.S. number one by USTA.[41]

Year summary:

Doherty won both the Wimbledon and the Irish titles. Whitman won all the important US titles and demolished Gore in Davis Cup. Laurence Doherty won the Olympic gold.

1901 Rankings:

Year summary:

Doherty (defending Irish champion) lost his Wimbledon title to Gore. Larned was the best American in the absence of Whitman.

1902 Rankings:
  • Laurence Doherty and Reginald Doherty co-ranked British number ones by The Lawn Tennis and Croquet classification of British players (some continental tournaments were also taken into account).[50]
  • William Larned ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[41]

Year summary:

Irish and Wimbledon champion Laurence Doherty was not selected for Davis Cup. U.S. champion Larned was 1–1 with Reginald, who did not play singles anymore in England.

1903 Rankings:
  • William Larned ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[41]

Year summary:

Laurence Doherty won Wimbledon, the U.S. Championships and Davis Cup. Larned nearly beats Doherty at Davis Cup.

1904 Rankings:
  • Laurence Doherty ranked British number one by the Lawn Tennis and Badminton classification of British players (by the handicapper Simond).[51]
  • Holcombe Ward ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[41]

Year summary:

Laurence Doherty won Wimbledon. Ward won the U.S. Championships.

1905 Rankings:
  • Laurence Doherty ranked No. 1 by the Lawn Tennis and Badminton classification of British players and the American and Australian visitor.[52]
  • Beals Wright ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[53]

Year summary:

Doherty was the Wimbledon champion. U.S. champion Wright beat Wimbledon challenger Brookes twice, but lost to Gore at Wimbledon.

1906 Rankings:

Year summary:

Laurence Doherty was the Wimbledon champion. Clothier won the U.S. Championships. Brookes won the Victorian Championships against Wilding but did not play outside Australia.

1907 Rankings:
  • Norman Brookes ranked world No. 1 by the International Hall of Fame.[54]
  • William Larned ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[53]

Year summary:

Brookes was undefeated in Great Britain, he won Wimbledon, the Northern Championships and the Davis Cup preliminary and challenge rounds. Larned was the U.S. and Boston champion (both Clothier and Wright were absent).

1908

Rankings:

  • William Larned ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[53]

Year summary:

Larned wan the U.S. and Boston champion. Brookes won the Davis Cup but lost his match to U.S. No. 2 Wright and narrowly beat Fred Alexander. Arthur Gore was the Wimbledon champion in a weak field. Gore won the Olympic indoor tennis gold medal while Josiah Ritchie won the Olympic outdoor tennis gold medal.

1909

Rankings:

  • William Larned ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[53]

Year summary:

Larned was the U.S. and Boston and won all his Davis Cup matches. Anthony Wilding defeated Brookes at the Victorian Championships.

1910

Rankings:

  • William Larned ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[53]

Year summary:

Larned was once again the U.S. and Boston champion (he was named the best player of the world next April by British journalist and author, A. E. Crawley).[55] Anthony Wilding was the Wimbledon champion.

1911 Rankings:
  • Anthony Wilding ranked world No. 1 by the International Hall of Fame.[56]
  • William Larned ranked U.S. number one by USTA.[53]

Year summary:

Wilding barely defended his Wimbledon title. Brookes won the Australasian Championships and Davis Cup. Larned was the U.S. and Boston champion.

1912

Rankings:

Year summary:

Wilding was the Wimbledon champion, but lost on wood to Gobert and Dixon. McLoughlin won the U.S. Championships.

1913–present

From 1913 sources are more detailed and better documented. All players who received a world number one ranking citation during the year are listed in the number one column.

Year No. 1 professional No. 1 amateur Source of ranking and tournament results summary
1913 N/A  Anthony Wilding (NZL)

Rankings:

Year summary:

Brookes only played in Australia and gave a walkover in the final of the Victorian Championships (then the most important tournament in Australia even ahead the Australasian Championship). Wilding won all three of the ILTF's World Championships – Wimbledon, the World Hard Court Championships (Clay) and the World Covered Court Championships (Indoor). Maurice McLoughlin won the U.S. Championships.

1914  Norman Brookes (AUS)
 Maurice McLoughlin (USA)
 James Cecil Parke (IRE)

Rankings:

  • McLoughlin was ranked No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers, with Brookes and Wilding tied for 2nd.[59]
  • Brookes was ranked No. 1 by "Austral" (R.M. Kidston[60]).[61]
  • McLoughlin was ranked No. 1 by "Argent" in Lawn Tennis and Badminton", with Brookes, Wilding and R. Norris Williams tied for 2nd.[59]
  • Parke was ranked No. 1 by P. A. Vaile.[62]

Year summary:

Norman Brookes won Wimbledon, Wilding won the World Hard Court Championships (Clay).

1915–
1918
World War I, no world rankings
1919 N/A  Bill Johnston (USA)
 Gerald Patterson (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Johnston and Patterson were co-ranked No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers.[63]

Year summary:
Patterson won Wimbledon. Johnston won the U.S. Championships.

1920  Bill Tilden (USA)

Rankings:

  • Tilden ranked No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers, with Johnston No. 2.[63]

Year summary:
Bill Tilden won Wimbledon and the U.S. Championship.

1921  Bill Tilden (USA)

Rankings:

Year summary:
Bill Tilden won Wimbledon, the World Hard Court Championships (Clay) and the U.S. Championships.

1922  Bill Johnston (USA)
 Bill Tilden (USA)

Rankings:

  • Johnston ranked No. 1 by Capt. B. H. Liddell Hart,[66] with Tilden second.[citation needed]
  • Tilden ranked No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers, ahead of Johnston.[67]
  • Tilden ranked No. 1 by American Lawn Tennis, with Johnston No. 2.[68]

Year summary:
Bill Tilden won the U.S. Championships.

1923  Bill Tilden (USA)

Rankings:

  • Tilden ranked No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers, with Johnston No. 2.[69]
  • Tilden ranked No. 1 by Capt. B. H. Liddell Hart.[70]

Year summary:
Johnston won two of the three International Lawn Tennis Federation (ILTF) designated 'World Championships' – Wimbledon and the World Hard Court Championships (Clay). Bill Tilden won the U.S. Championships.

1924  Bill Tilden (USA)

Rankings:

  • Tilden ranked No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers, with Richards No. 2.[71]

Year summary:
The U.S. Championships, from this year officially designated as a Major Championship by the ILTF,[72] was won by Tilden. The Olympic winner in Paris was Vincent Richards.

1925  Bill Tilden (USA)

Rankings:

Year summary:

Tilden won the U.S. Championships.

1926  René Lacoste (FRA)

Rankings:

1927  Karel Koželuh (TCH)
 Vincent Richards (USA)
 René Lacoste (FRA)

Rankings:

  • Lacoste ranked No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers, with Tilden No. 2.[82]
  • Lacoste ranked No. 1 by Marcel Berger, with Tilden No. 2.[83]
  • Lacoste ranked No. 1 by Émile Deve, with Tilden No. 2.[83]
  • Lacoste ranked No. 1 by Henri Cochet, with Tilden No. 2.[83]
  • Lacoste ranked No. 1 by Jean Samazeuilh, with Tilden No. 2.[84]
  • Koželuh and Richards ranked equal No. 1 professionals by Ray Bowers.[85]
1928  Karel Koželuh (TCH)  Henri Cochet (FRA)

Rankings:

  • Koželuh ranked No. 1 pro by Bowers.[85]
  • Koželuh ranked No. 1 pro by Vincent Richards.[86]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by Pierre Gillou, with Lacoste No. 2.[87]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by Bill Tilden, with Lacoste No. 2.[87]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by W. J. Daish, with Lacoste No. 2.[87]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by A. Wallis Myers, with Lacoste No. 2.[88]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by Vincent Richards.[86]

Year summary:
Cochet won the French and U.S. Championships.

1929  Karel Koželuh (TCH)  Henri Cochet (FRA)

Rankings:

  • Cochet ranked amateur No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers.[89]
  • Cochet ranked amateur No. 1 by Bill Tilden.[90]
  • Cochet ranked amateur No. 1 by F. Gordon Lowe.[91]
  • Cochet ranked amateur No. 1 by Vincent Richards.[92]
  • Cochet ranked amateur No. 1 unanimously in a combined ranking in L'Auto.[93]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 by Bowers, with Lacoste No. 2.[94]
  • Koželuh ranked No. 1 pro by Bowers.[94]
  • Koželuh ranked No. 1 pro by American Lawn Tennis.[95]
  • Koželuh ranked No. 1 pro by Bill Tilden.[96]

Year summary:
Lacoste won the French Championships, Cochet won Wimbledon.

1930  Vincent Richards (USA)

 Jean Borotra (FRA)
 Henri Cochet (FRA)

Rankings:

  • Borotra ranked No. 1 amateur by Bill Tilden, with Cochet No. 2.[97]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 by Bowers, with Tilden No. 2.[94]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by A. Wallis Myers.[98]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by Pierre Gillou, with Tilden No. 2.[97]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by Didier Poulain, L'Auto, with Tilden No. 2.[99]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by Vincent Richards.[100]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by René Lacoste, with Tilden second.[101]
  • Richards ranked No. 1 pro by Bowers.[94]

Year summary:
Cochet won the French Championships, Tilden won Wimbledon.

1931  Bill Tilden (USA)  Henri Cochet (FRA)

Rankings:

  • Tilden ranked No. 1 by Bowers, with Cochet No. 2; this was the first year a professional was ranked either No. 1 or No. 2 in Bowers' rankings.[102]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by A. Wallis Myers.[103]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by Sport magazine of Zürich, with Austin No. 2.[104]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by Pierre Gillou, with Vines No. 2.[105]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by Didier Pioline, L'Auto.[106]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by R. M. Kidston.[107]
  • Cochet ranked No. 1 amateur by Stanley Doust, Daily Mail.[108]

Year summary:
Cochet had only three tournament wins (Monte Carlo being the most prestigious); Tilden, aged 38, turned professional and, in a World (Pro) Championship[109] head-to-head tour, defeated Koželuh 50 to 17 in the North American tour. The two players also competed in the first European tour with Martin Plaa, Albert Burke, Frank Hunter and Hans Nüsslein: many results are unknown nevertheless Tilden lost only one match against all these opponents (Koželuh at Amsterdam); Tilden also defeated Richards, who had abandoned his retirement, either 12–1 over the year (McCauley) or 10 to 0 (Bowers); Tilden beat Richards in the U.S. Pro.

1932  Martin Plaa (FRA)

 Bill Tilden (USA)

 Ellsworth Vines (USA)

Rankings:

  • Vines ranked No. 1 amateur by Pierre Gillou, with Cochet No. 2.[110]
  • Vines ranked No. 1 amateur by A. Wallis Myers.[111]
  • Vines ranked No. 1 amateur by Jean Borotra, with Cochet No. 2.[112]
  • Vines ranked No. 1 by Bowers, with Tilden No. 2.[113]
  • Plaa ranked No. 1 pro by Tilden, with Tilden second.[114]
  • Tilden ranked No. 1 pro by Bowers.[113]

Year summary:
Vines, a 20-year-old, won Wimbledon and the U.S. Championships; in the pros Tilden beat Vinnie Richards 12–1 and had a leading record against Nüsslein; Koželuh beat Nüsslein in the U.S. Pro and beat Plaa at Beaulieu.

1933  Hans Nüsslein (Weimar Republic)
 Bill Tilden (USA)
 Jack Crawford (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Crawford ranked amateur No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers.[115]
  • Crawford was ranked No. 1 by Bowers, with Perry second.[113]
  • Crawford ranked No. 1 amateur by Ellsworth Vines, with Perry second.[116]
  • Crawford ranked No. 1 amateur by Pierre Gillou, with Perry second.[117]
  • Crawford ranked No. 1 amateur by Didier Poulain, L'Auto, with Perry second.[118]
  • Crawford ranked No. 1 amateur by John R. Tunis, with Perry second.[119]
  • Nüsslein ranked No. 1 pro by Albert Burke, with Tilden second.[120][121]
  • Nüsslein ranked No. 1 pro by Bowers, with Tilden second.[122]
  • Tilden ranked No. 1 pro by Ellsworth Vines with Cochet second.[116]

Year summary:
Crawford won 13 consecutive amateur tournaments, including the first three of the Grand Slam tournaments, the Australian Championships, the French Championships, and Wimbledon, finally losing in five sets to Perry in the 4th, the U.S. Championships.

1934  Ellsworth Vines (USA)  Fred Perry (GBR)

Rankings:

  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers.[123]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by Pierre Gillou.[124]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by J. Brookes Fenno, Jr.[125]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by Bill Tilden.[126][b]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by Harry Hopman.[128]
  • Perry ranked No. 1 by Bowers, with Vines No. 2.[129]
  • Vines ranked No. 1 by Tennis Italian newspaper, with Tilden second and Perry third.[130]
  • Vines ranked No. 1 by Pierre Gillou, with Perry second.[131]

Year summary:
Perry won three of the four Grand slam tournaments; Australian Championships, Wimbledon and the U.S. Championships, Gottfried von Cramm won the French Championships; Vines, aged 22, turned pro; in their initial segment of the World Professional Championship[132] head-to-head tour, Vines defeated Tilden 11 matches to 9; then in a USA-France tour Vines beat Cochet 10–0 and Plaa 8–2; Bowers says that by the end of May, having played somewhat more than 50 matches, Vines led Tilden by 19 wins; Nüsslein beat Vines and Koželuh in the U.S. Pro; Vines beat Nüsslein in the first Wembley Pro and in the Paris Indoor (not to be confused with the French Pro).

1935  Ellsworth Vines (USA)  Fred Perry (GBR)

Rankings:

  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers.[133]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by Pierre Gillou.[134]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by The Times.[135]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by Bunny Austin.[136]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by "Forehand", Ashburton Guardian.[137][138]
  • Perry and Vines were co-ranked No. 1 by Bowers.[139]
  • Vines was ranked No. 1 by Henri Cochet, with Tilden second and Perry third.[140]

Year summary:
Perry won Wimbledon and the French Championships; Vines beat Tilden in the Wembley Pro and in the Southport Pro; Vines beat Nüsslein in the French Pro; Vines beat Les Stoefen 25–1 in a World (Pro) Championship[141] head-to-head tour; after Stoefen fell ill, Vines beat Nüsslein in another tour about three-quarters of the time (and also Tilden in their few meetings).

1936  Ellsworth Vines (USA)  Fred Perry (GBR)

Rankings:

  • Vines ranked No. 1 pro by Fred Perry, with Nüsslein No. 2.[142]
  • Vines ranked No. 1 by Robert Murray in Sports Illustrated, with Perry No. 2.[143]
  • Vines ranked No. 1 by L'Auto, with Perry No. 2, cited by Bowers.[144]
  • Vines ranked No. 1 by Don Budge, with Perry No. 2, cited by Bowers.[144]
  • Vines ranked No. 1 by Bill Tilden, with Nüsslein No. 2.[145]
  • Perry ranked No. 1 by Bowers, with Vines No. 2.[144]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by A. Wallis Myers.[146]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by Harry Hopman.[147]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by Pierre Gillou, with Budge No. 2.[148]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by The Times (London), with Von Cramm No. 2.[149]
  • Perry ranked amateur No. 1 by Mervyn Weston, Daily Telegraph (Sydney), with Budge No. 2.[149]

Year summary
Perry won Wimbledon and the U.S. Championships; in the American tour Vines easily defeated Les Stoefen (finals standings are unknown but on March 29, Vines led 33–5) and in the Asian tour Vines led Tilden 8–1 at the end of the Japanese part of the tour; Bowers states that a) Vines and Nüsslein never met between the French Pro in 1935 and the Wembley Pro in 1939 and b) Vines didn't enter any tournament from 1936 to 1938 included.

1937  Fred Perry (GBR)
 Ellsworth Vines (USA)
 Don Budge (USA)

Rankings:

  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by A. Wallis Myers of The Daily Telegraph.[150]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by Mervyn Weston, Daily Telegraph (Sydney).[151]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by Pierre Gillou.[152]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by The Times.[153]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by Harry Hopman.[154][155]
  • Perry, Vines and Budge ranked co-number ones by Bowers.[156]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 by Pierre Goldschmidt, L'Auto.[157]

Year summary:
Budge won Wimbledon and the U.S. Championships, Vines defeated Perry in the World Professional title[158] head-to-head tour 32–29 while Perry won a short British Isles tour 6–3; Perry defeated Tilden 4–3 in America; Vines and Perry didn't enter any tournament.

1938  Ellsworth Vines (USA)  Don Budge (USA)

Rankings:

  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by Bowers.[159]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by A. Wallis Myers of The Daily Telegraph, with Austin No. 2.[160]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by Pierre Gillou, with Bromwich No. 2.[161]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by Pierre Goldschmidt, L'Auto, with Bromwich No. 2.[162]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by The Times (London), with Bromwich No. 2.[163]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by F. Gordon Lowe of The Scotsman, with Bromwich No. 2.[163]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by Dr. G. H. McElhone of The Sydney Morning Herald, with Bromwich No. 2.[163]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 amateur by "International" of The Referee.[164]
  • Buge ranked No. 1 amateur by Mervyn Weston, Daily Telegraph (Sydney).[164]
  • Vines ranked No. 1 pro by Bowers.[159]

Year summary:
Budge became the first amateur player to win all four of the Grand Slam tournaments; in the pros, in the World Professional Championship[165] tour Vines defeated Perry 49–35; Vines still didn't enter any tournament as probably in 1936 and surely in 1937.

1939  Don Budge (USA)  Bobby Riggs (USA)

Rankings:

  • Budge ranked No. 1 by Bowers, with Vines second.[166]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 by Didier Poulain of L'Auto, with Vines second.[167]
  • Riggs ranked No. 1 amateur by F. Gordon Lowe.[168]
  • Riggs ranked No. 1 amateur by Pierre Gillou.[169]
  • Riggs ranked No. 1 amateur by Ned Potter.[170]
  • Riggs rankd No. 1 amateur by The Times.[171]

Year summary:
Budge defeated Vines 22–17 in the World Professional Championship[172] tour and also defeated Perry 28–8; Vines beat Perry, Budge defaulted, in the U.S. Pro; Budge beat Vines and Tilden in the French Pro and beat Nüsslein, Vines, and Tilden in the Wembley Pro; Vines lost to Nüsslein at Southport; Budge, Vines, Tilden, and Stoefen competed in a spring-summer European tour that was mainly a succession of 4-man tournaments; Budge was the winner, in particular beating Vines 15–5.

1940  Don Budge (USA) N/A

Rankings:

  • Budge was ranked No. 1 by Bowers, with Perry second (there were no more world rankings by The Daily Telegraph due to World War 2).[173]

Year summary:
Budge beat Perry in the U.S. Pro.

1941  Fred Perry (GBR)

Rankings:

  • Perry ranked No. 1 pro by Bowers.[173]

Year summary:
Riggs won the U.S. Championships; Perry completely dominated Tilden in a summer tour; Perry won 5 pro tournaments out of 5 including the U.S. Pro over Dick Skeen; Skeen was runner-up to Perry in 4 tournaments.

1942  Don Budge (USA)

Rankings:

  • Budge ranked No. 1 by Ray Bowers, with Riggs and Sabin tied for No. 2.[174]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 pro by the USPLTA, No. 2 Riggs.[175]

Year summary:
Riggs and Frank Kovacs turned pro; in round robin matches Budge was the winner, 52–18; Riggs was 36–36, Kovacs 25–26, Perry 23–30, Stoefen 2–28; Kovacs won his first five matches against Budge, but missed one month of play due to arm injury; Perry broke his arm, missed significant time; Budge beat Riggs in U.S. Pro.

1943–
1944
World War II, no world rankings
1945 N/A N/A

Rankings:

  • Kovacs ranked No. 1 by WPTA rankings for 1945, issued in March 1945 following the World Pro Championships in San Francisco, with Van Horn and Budge third and Riggs fifth.[176] Budge was reported as out of condition due to military duties.[177]
  • Van Horn was ranked No. 1 by USPLTA, in July 1945 rankings following the USPLTA U.S. Pro Championships, with Budge, Riggs, Sabin, Kovacs, Barnes, none of whom played in the U.S. Pro, not ranked due to insufficient data.[178]
  • Budge ranked No. 1 by Tilden, ahead of 2) Kovacs and 3) Riggs.[179]

Year summary:
In the pro circuit the business return was slow: Riggs defeated Budge in the biggest pro tournament of the year, the US Pro Hardcourt Championships held at the Los Angeles Tennis Club, missing Kovacs and Van Horn; on December 27–30 Riggs won a second tournament, the Santa Barbara Invitational Pro Tournament, California, defeating Perry; Kovacs defeated Welby Van Horn in the final of the World Professional Tennis Championships (WPTA) in San Francisco in March; in the summer before the soldiers came back to civilian life a 5-meeting series under the Davis Cup format was held between the US Army Air Corps, with Budge (pro) and Parker (amateur), and the US Navy, with Riggs (pro) and Sabin (pro), Riggs overcame Budge 3–2 and amateur Parker 3–2, thus indicating that Riggs was probably the best player in the world in 1945.

1946  Bobby Riggs (USA)  Jack Kramer (USA)

Rankings:

  • Riggs finished top of PPA Tournament series final points standings, Riggs 278, Budge 164, Kovacs 149, van Horn 143. Official PPA rankings for the year were 1) Riggs, 2) Budge.[180]
  • Kramer ranked amateur No. 1 by Pierre Gillou, with Schroeder No. 2.[181]
  • Kramer ranked amateur No. 1 by Ned Potter, with Parker No. 2.[182]
  • Kramer ranked amateur No. 1 by Harry Hopman, with Schroeder No. 2.[183]

Year summary:
Riggs defeated Don Budge 24–22 on the Jack Harris World Pro Championship[184] tour (Budge making a recovery from 1–12 down),[185] Tilden and the Professional Players Association organized a series of 31 tournaments with a points system: Riggs won 14 of them, Kovacs 7, Perry 4, Budge 3, Van Horn 2, and Skeen 1. Riggs beat Budge in U.S. Pro Championships at Forest Hills (included in PPA series); Riggs lost to Kovacs in final of Great Lakes Pro Clay Court near Chicago (included in PPA series).[186]

1947  Bobby Riggs (USA)  Jack Kramer (USA)

Rankings:
Arriving at a number one pro ranking for 1947 is difficult, because in the pro ranks there was no long annual tour and Riggs, Budge and Kovacs all achieved significant wins.

Year summary:
Tilden was imprisoned for sexual offenses and his series of tournaments fell apart; Riggs organized a head-to-head USA Pro Challenge tour between Riggs and Kovacs. Riggs lost the tour to Kovacs 6 matches to 5, the deciding match a best-of-five sets final after a tie at 5 to 5, played in September.[c] Riggs and Kovacs in head-to-head matches were 7–7. Kramer won 8 of 9 amateur tournaments and 48 of 49 matches (among them his two singles in the Challenge Round of the Davis Cup);[201] Riggs beat Don Budge both in U.S. Pro Championships at Forest Hills and in U.S. Pro Indoor.[202] Budge won a European tour against Riggs. In December 1947, in the first few matches of their world pro championship tour, Riggs held a 2–1 edge in play against Kramer and continued to lead into January 3–1 and 8–5.[203]

1948  Jack Kramer (USA)  Pancho Gonzales (USA)
 Frank Parker (USA)

Rankings:

  • Kramer ranked No. 1 by USPLTA, followed by Riggs.[204]
  • Parker ranked amateur No. 1 by John Olliff.[168]
  • Parker ranked amateur No. 1 by Pierre Gillou.[205]
  • Gonzales ranked amateur No. 1 by Ned Potter, with Parker No. 2.[206]

Year summary:
Kramer defeated Riggs 69–20 on the World Pro Championship head-to-head tour after trailing Riggs 6–8 and then equalizing at 14–14; in the preliminary matches Dinny Pails beat Pancho Segura 41–31 according to Kramer;[207] Kramer beat Riggs in U.S. Pro Championships at Forest Hills the most important pro tournament by far this year; then the 4 touring men played a short tour in South America in July on slow courts enabling Riggs to win his fair share of matches against Kramer (according to Pails in his book Set Points); Kramer ended the year by winning the Australian Pro tour in September–November, with the incomplete standings being as follows: Kramer 19–4 (1 match unfinished), Segura 14–9 (1 unfinished), Riggs 7–17, Pails 6–16 (2 unfinished).

1949  Bobby Riggs (USA)  Pancho Gonzales (USA)
 Ted Schroeder (USA)

Rankings:

  • Riggs ranked No. 1 by USPLTA, Kramer not ranked because it is said "did not play in a pro tourney this year".[208]
  • Gonzales ranked amateur No. 1 by John Olliff.[209]
  • Schroeder ranked amateur No. 1 by Pierre Gillou.[210]
  • Schroeder ranked amateur No. 1 by Harry Hopman.[211]

Year summary:
In the pro circuit Kramer won the Wembley Pro over Riggs and Scarborough Pro over Budge; Riggs won the U.S. Pro Championships at Forest Hills over Budge, Kramer did not play; in the amateur circuit Gonzales won the U.S. Championships; then Gonzales played his first pro match against Kramer on October 25 on the head-to-head World Pro Championship tour (ended on 21 May 1950): at the end of November Kramer still led 22–4.

1950  Pancho Segura (ECU)  Budge Patty (USA)
 Frank Sedgman (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Segura ranked No. 1 by the USPLTA ahead of No. 2 Kramer. According to McCauley it was difficult to understand how the rankings were arrived at.[212]
  • Segura ranked No. 1 by the PTPA (Professional Tennis Players Association).[213]
  • Patty ranked amateur No. 1 by John Olliff.[214]
  • Patty ranked amateur No. 1 by Pierre Gillou.[215]
  • Sedgman ranked amateur No. 1 by Harry Hopman.[216]

Year summary:
Kramer finished beating Gonzales on the World Pro Championship head-to-head tour ended on May 21 (begun on 25 October 1949) 96–27 (97–26 according to Kramer himself); Segura beat Frank Parker "comfortably" in the head-to-head preliminary matches;[217] Kramer dominated Segura in the next World Pro Championship tour which began on October 26 (finished in March 1951): mid-November Kramer led 10–4; in tournaments Segura beat Kramer in Paris and once again in the semifinals of the Cleveland U.S. Pro Championships (approved by USPLTA) before overcoming Kovacs in the final; Gonzales defeated Kramer at Philadelphia U.S. Pro Indoor final; Gonzales won at Wembley.

1951  Frank Kovacs (USA)
 Pancho Segura (ECU)
 Frank Sedgman (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Kovacs ranked No. 1 in July by the PTPA (Professional Tennis Players Association) with Segura second.[218][213]
  • Segura ranked No. 1 by the USPLTA with Gonzales second, "Kramer not ranked due to insufficient data".[219] Kramer had withdrawn from the U.S. Pro at Forest Hills and did not play in the Cleveland tournament.
  • Sedgman ranked amateur No. 1 by Pierre Gillou.[168]
  • Sedgman ranked amateur No. 1 by Harry Hopman.[220]

Year summary:
Kramer finally defeated Segura 64–28 on the World Pro Championship head-to-head tour finished in March (begun on 28 October 1950);[221] Kramer beat Segura and Gonzales in Philadelphia Pro; Kovacs defeated Earn in final of U.S. Pro Clay Court Championships; Kovacs beat Segura on cement in a close final at Cleveland U.S. Pro (according to PTPA) or Cleveland International Pro (billed title); Segura beat Gonzales in U.S. Pro Championships at Forest Hills (authorized by USPLTA); Kramer and Riggs did not play in the Cleveland U.S. Pro. Kovacs did not play Forest Hills U.S. Pro. Segura lost to Gonzales in final of Wembley Pro.

1952  Pancho Gonzales (USA)
 Pancho Segura (ECU)
 Frank Sedgman (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Segura ranked No. 1 by USPLTA.[219]
  • Segura ranked No. 1 by PTPA (Professional Tennis Players Association), with Gonzales second.[222]
  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 by his International Tennis Hall of Fame profile, which states that he "rose to the world No. 1 ranking" in 1952, and categorized him as "Top ranking: World number 1 (1952)".[223]
  • Sedgman ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[224]
  • Sedgman ranked amateur No. 1 by Pierre Gillou, with Drobný No. 2.[225]
  • Sedgman ranked amateur No. 1 by Harry Hopman.[226]

Year summary:
In his book McCauley has traced only 9 tournaments and a small US tour, among these 9 tournaments 2 seemed to be domestic Nationals (British Pro and German Pro) so there left 7 tournaments for the leading pros. Segura entered the 7 and Gonzales played 5 of them and won 4 and reached 1 final. Moreover, Gonzales defeated Segura 5 times out of 7 (including some tour matches in Paris in June). Gonzales defeated Segura and Kramer and lost one match to Kovacs in Philadelphia Pro. Gonzales defeated Segura and Kramer to win Wembley Pro; Segura overcame Gonzales in U.S. Pro Championships (according to PTPA) or Cleveland International Pro (billed title) and in a tournament at Roland Garros, where Segura won the event. Sedgman won Wimbledon and the U.S. Championship.

1953  Pancho Gonzales (USA)
 Jack Kramer (USA)
 Frank Sedgman (AUS)
 Lew Hoad (AUS)
 Ken Rosewall (AUS)
 Vic Seixas (USA)
 Tony Trabert (USA)

Rankings:

  • Sedgman ranked No. 1 pro by the editors of Tennis de France in a full season ranking.[227]
  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 pro in October by Ken McGregor.[228]
  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 pro in June by the Players Committee of Jack March's Cleveland U. S. Pro or "World's Professional Championship"[229] tournament, with Segura second.[230]
  • Kramer ranked No. 1 pro in October by Frank Sedgman.[231]
  • Kramer described in The Sacramento Bee, 2 January 1954, as "professional tennis' No 1 player".[232]
  • Trabert ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay in September.[233]
  • Trabert ranked amateur No. 1 in November by Ned Potter in World Tennis.[234]
  • Trabert ranked amateur No. 1 by Gardnar Mulloy.[235]
  • Trabert ranked amateur No. 1 by Bill Talbert.[235]
  • Trabert ranked amateur No. 1 by Ham Richardson.[235]
  • Trabert ranked amateur No. 1 by Grant Golden.[235]
  • Seixas ranked amateur No. 1 by Hal Burrows.[235]
  • Rosewall ranked amateur No. 1 by Noel Brown.[235]
  • Hoad ranked amateur No. 1 by the editors of Tennis de France in a full season ranking.[236]
  • Hoad ranked amateur No. 1 by Harry Hopman.[237]

Year summary:
Kramer retired on July 9 and never met Gonzales that year and Gonzales met Segura and Sedgman for the first time of the year only in November. Kramer defeated Sedgman 54–41 on the World Pro Championship head-to-head tour, Sedgman's results declining after a shoulder injury; during tour breaks these four men played three 4-man tournaments with Kramer winning two of them, the results included in the Kramer/Sedgman head-to-head tour; Kramer's whole 1953 record was 56–41 to Sedgman and 1–1 to Segura; Sedgman beat Gonzales in Wembley Pro, in Paris and in Geneva but the Australian trailed Segura 3–7 in head-to-head meetings. Kramer, Sedgman, and Segura did not participate in the Cleveland U.S. Pro Championships[238] or Cleveland World Pro (billed title). Kramer ended his season in early July, and retired from the world tours.

1954  Pancho Gonzales (USA)  Jaroslav Drobný (EGY)
 Vic Seixas (USA)
 Tony Trabert (USA)

Rankings:

  • Gonzales ranked pro No. 1 for 1954 season by International Professional Tennis Association, with Segura second.[239][240]
  • Drobný ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[241]
  • Seixas ranked number one by Harry Hopman, with Drobný second.[242]
  • Trabert ranked amateur No. 1 by Ned Potter in World Tennis.[243]
  • Trabert ranked amateur No. 1 by panel of 8 experts in The New York Times.[244][245][d]

Year summary:
In 1953–1954 there was only one Australian tour during these two years in November–December 1954 and Gonzales won it (16–9 to Sedgman; 4–2 to Segura; 15–0 to McGregor); Gonzales also won the North American tour (January 3 – May 30), a succession of 70 tournaments, all but one being 4-man events. On 2 June a report stated that Gonzales won 29 tournaments and had an 85–40 win-loss. In head-to-head meetings the results are not certain: Gonzales win-loss record against Segura was about 30–21 (or 30–20) and was possibly exactly equal against Sedgman, 30–21 (or 30–20) too. In a 1975 article in the L.A. Times, this tour was referenced as a world championship title for Gonzales.[246] In tournaments Gonzales defeated Segura in Kramer's L.A. U.S. Pro (with the USPLTA Benrus Cup) and Sedgman in Cleveland U.S. Pro or Cleveland World Pro (billed title); Wembley Indoor Pro and French Pro not held. Drobný won the Wimbledon Championships, defeating Rosewall in a four-set final.

1955  Pancho Gonzales (USA)  Tony Trabert (USA)

Rankings:

  • Gonzales ranked pro No. 1 for 1955 season by International Professional Tennis Association.[247]
  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 pro by Lawn Tennis and Badminton, with Segura second.[248]
  • Trabert ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[249]

Year summary:
Gonzales-Trabert head-to-head World Professional Championship tour began in December, primarily on portable indoor canvas, and Gonzales led Trabert from the beginning; Gonzales dominated the pros beating Segura in U.S. Pro Championships or Cleveland World Pro (billed title); Wembley and French Pro not held; Sedgman played very little in 1955 and underwent surgery for appendicitis.

1956  Pancho Gonzales (USA)  Lew Hoad (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 pro by Jack March, promoter of the Cleveland tournament, for the 1956 season, with Sedgman second.[250]
  • Hoad ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[249]
  • Hoad ranked amateur No. 1 by the editors of Tennis de France in a full season ranking.[251]

Year summary:
World Professional Championship head-to-head tour, played mostly indoor on portable canvas, Gonzales defeated Trabert 74–27; Gonzales beat Segura in U.S. Pro or Cleveland World Pro (billed title); Gonzales beat Sedgman both in the round-robin inaugural L. A. Masters and in Wembley Pro; Gonzales lost to Trabert in final of French Pro. Sedgman missed the first five and a half months of 1956. Sedgman won round robin tournaments in December at Brisbane and Kooyong against Trabert, Segura, and Hartwig. Trabert won a South American tour against Gonzales 6 matches to 3, and led Gonzales in outdoor matches 15 to 11 on the year. Hoad won 16 amateur tournaments and 88% of his matches.

1957  Pancho Gonzales (USA)  Ashley Cooper (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 pro by Jack March for the 1957 season, with Segura number two.[252]
  • Gonzales described as "the world's top professional tennis player" in The Montana Standard, 28 January 1958.[253]
  • Cooper ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[249]

Year summary:
Gonzales defeated Rosewall 50–26 in the World Professional Championship head-to-head tour, Segura defeated Dinny Pails 51–8 in the head-to-head preliminary matches; Rosewall won a South African tour over Hoad, Kramer and Segura and an Australian tour over Hoad, Sedgman and Segura; Gonzales lost to Segura in Sydney Tournament of Champions; Gonzales beat Segura in U.S. Pro or Cleveland World Pro (billed title); Gonzales also won the Forest Hills Tournament of Champions and the Masters Round Robin Pro in Los Angeles; Rosewall beat Segura in Wembley Pro.

1958  Pancho Gonzales (USA)  Ashley Cooper (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 pro by Jack March for the 1958 season, with Hoad second.[254]
  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 in Jack Kramer's pro rankings for 1958, with Sedgman second, Rosewall third and Hoad fourth.[255]
  • Cooper ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[249]

Year summary:
Gonzales defeated Hoad 51–36 in the World Professional Championship tour; Gonzales beat Rosewall in the deciding match of Forest Hills Pro Tournament of Champions; Gonzales beat Hoad in U.S. Pro or Cleveland World Pro (billed title); Hoad won the Australian subtour over Gonzales 8–5; Hoad beat Sedgman and Gonzales in deciding matches to win the Kooyong Tournament of Champions; Hoad beat Gonzales in Sydney Masters and in the round-robin at Forest Hills Tournament of Champions; Hoad beat Trabert and Gonzales before losing to Rosewall at French Pro at Roland Garros.

1959  Pancho Gonzales (USA)
 Lew Hoad (AUS)
 Neale Fraser (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 pro by Jack March for the 1959 season, with Hoad number two.[256]
  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 by Sedgman in World Tennis, with Hoad second.[257]
  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 by Robert Roy in L'Équipe in a pro-amateur combined ranking, as of 17 December, with Hoad fifth.[257]
  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 in Kramer's personal pro ranking (which differed from Kramer's Ampol point ranking) with Hoad fourth.[257]
  • Hoad ranked pro No. 1 by Robert Barnes (Kramer's Australian manager) with Gonzales second.[258]
  • Hoad in Sydney Morning Herald on 10 January 1960 described that he had won "the title of world's top professional tennis player".[259][260][e]
  • Hoad ranked No. 1 on Kramer's Ampol point rankings with 51 points, Gonzales was second (43 points).[257]
  • Hoad ranked No. 1 by Mal Anderson in World Tennis, who stated that Kramer had established a point system to determine the world rankings with the final results 1) Hoad 2) Gonzales.[257]
  • Fraser ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[249]
  • Fraser ranked amateur No. 1 by Ned Potter.[277]

Year summary:
North American 4-man World Pro Championship tour, decided on the basis of money won, results: Gonzales 47–15, Hoad 42–20, Ashley Cooper 21–40, Mal Anderson 13–48; Hoad, however, defeated Gonzales 15–13 on the tour; Kramer's office stated Hoad led Gonzales 24 to 23 in matches against each other on the year.[278][279][280][281] Hoad won the 12-player field Ampol Open Trophy in a 15 tournament series with a point system. Hoad beat Gonzales and Rosewall to win the Forest Hills Tournament of Champions; Hoad beat Gonzales to win at Memphis (not included in Ampol series), at Perth in November and at Memorial Drive stadium in Adelaide in December; Hoad also won earlier tournaments at Perth and at Norwood Cricket Oval in Adelaide; Hoad won the final event, Qantas Kooyong in Dec./Jan. 1960. Gonzales beat Hoad at Melbourne Olympic Velodrome in January, at Sydney Marks Athletic Field, in the L.A. Masters, in U.S. Pro or Cleveland World Pro (billed title) (not included in the Ampol series), and at White City Tournament of Champions; Hoad was 3 to 5 against Gonzales in the Ampol series.

1960  Pancho Gonzales (USA)
 Ken Rosewall (AUS)
 Neale Fraser (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by L'Équipe.[citation needed]
  • Gonzales and Rosewall co-ranked No. 1 by Robert Geist.[282]
  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 in Kramer's personal pro ranking, with Sedgman second, ahead of Rosewall and Hoad.[283]
  • Gonzales ranked world's number one in Valley News, 15 January 1961, with Hoad No. 2.[284]
  • Gonzales described in The Times (San Mateo) on 20 January 1961 as "still ranks as the No.1 tennis pro".[285]
  • Fraser ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[249]

Year summary:
World Series 4-man matches for the World Pro Championship among 4 players: Gonzales 49–8, Rosewall 32–25, Segura 22–28, Alex Olmedo 11–44; just after this, Gonzales won a minor tournament and then retired for a short time; Rosewall beat Segura in Wembley Pro; Rosewall beat Hoad in French Pro at Roland Garros; Rosewall won 7 tournaments in the 1960 series and beat Hoad 4 to 3 in tournament finals (although this tally does not include the Kooyong final in January won by Hoad, which concluded the previous tournament series). Rosewall was defeated by Gonzales 20 to 5 in matches on the season. Gonzales and Hoad did not play against each other in 1960. According to Pacific Stars and Stripes (Nov. 1960), Kramer kept a points system for tournaments, with no apparent bonus prize award. Gonzales had withdrawn in May, just before the first tournament of the series in Melbourne. Hoad withdrew with back trouble following marathon final at Tokyo Japanese Pro in November. Rosewall was leading in points until Tokyo Japanese Pro, with Hoad No. 2, although Rosewall lost to Hoad in Tokyo, the lead then was uncertain. Final tournament in Australia was not played. Final results of tournament point series unknown.

1961  Pancho Gonzales (USA)
 Ken Rosewall (AUS)
 Rod Laver (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Gonzales was the official world number one as determined by the World Series ranking results, Rosewall (did not play) and Hoad (withdrew with an injury) were not officially ranked.[286]
  • Gonzales ranked No. 1 by McCauley's 1961 chapter which is entitled: Gonzales Still World Champion but says in the text that Rosewall had a good claim to being No. 1.[287]
  • Gonzales ranked top pro for the year by The Miami Herald on 28 December 1961 (syndicated in other newspapers).[288]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by L'Équipe, with Gonzales second.[289]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by Robert Geist.[282]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 for 1961 in 1962 Yearbook of the USPLTA.[290]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 in a Time magazine article from May 1965.[291]
  • Laver ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[249]

Year summary:
There were 47 World Series Round Robin one-set matches for the world championship among 6 players, followed by 28 head-to-head one-set matches between the top 1 & 2 and 3 & 4 to determine the final champion and an official ranking for the contract pros. Rosewall, however, opted not to play in the World Series, and Hoad withdrew from the tour due to injury. Substitutions were permitted for injured players in the round robin: Gonzales-(sub. Segura) 33–14. No. 1 Gonzales then defeated No. 2 Gimeno 21–7. In tournaments, Rosewall beat Hoad (Gonzales lost to Hoad in semi-final) in Wembley Pro; Rosewall beat Gonzales in French Pro at Roland Garros; Gonzales beat Sedgman in a depleted U.S. Pro or Cleveland World Pro (billed title), Rosewall and Hoad did not play. Rosewall beat Gonzales in a 7-match tour of France, mostly on clay; Gonzales lost to Hoad in a 10-match tour of the British Isles, largely on grass. In late October Gonzales retired once again (for 20 months).

1962  Ken Rosewall (AUS)  Rod Laver (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by Robert Geist.[282]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 in a Time magazine article from May 1965.[291]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 in The Canberra Times of 7 January 1963, which stated Rosewall was the world's "top" professional tennis player.[292]
  • Laver ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[249]

Year summary:
No official pro championship tour or point tour (apart from Trofeo Facis, a point tour), very little tennis from late March to late July; Rosewall won 10 pro tournaments including Wembley and French Pro; Rosewall beat Hoad in the Kooyong final; Rosewall beat Hoad in Wembley Pro; Rosewall beat Gimeno in French Pro at Roland Garros; Hoad beat Rosewall in the Adelaide Pro, Hoad won the Trofeo Facis tour of Italy (Rosewall third place), Hoad won the Zurich tournament (Rosewall lost to Segura in semifinal); Hoad won a 5-match tour of Britain against Trabert 4 to 1.

1963  Ken Rosewall (AUS)  Rafael Osuna (MEX)

Rankings:

  • Rosewall finished top of The IPTPA World Championship Tour with Laver second.[293]
  • Rosewall voted number one by The International Professional Tennis Players Association.[294]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by Robert Geist.[282]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 in January 5, 1964, when he was described as having the mantle of "world's top tennis player".[295]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 in a Time magazine article from May 1965.[291]
  • Osuna ranked amateur No. 1 by Lance Tingay.[249]

Year summary:
In the Australia and New Zealand Tour, Rosewall dominated the new pro recruit Rod Laver, 11 victories to 2 in matches in Australia and New Zealand, although they were 2 to 2 in best-of-five set matches (Laver winning at Kooyong and Adelaide), and Laver lost to Hoad 8 to 0; then the World Championship Series was held in the US with six players, two U.S. players, Buchholz and MacKay, one Spaniard Gimeno, one Chilean Ayala and only two Australians Rosewall and Laver. In the first phase Rosewall ended first (31 wins – 10 losses) ahead Laver (26- 16). In the second (and final) phase Rosewall won the tour, beating Laver 14–4. Then Rosewall captured five tournaments including the three majors of that year and Laver reached the finals of two majors and also won five tournaments; Rosewall defeated Laver in U.S. Pro at Forest Hills; Rosewall defeated Laver in French Pro at Stade Coubertin; Rosewall defeated Hoad in Wembley Pro; Rosewall lost to Hoad in final of televised series; Rosewall lost to Hoad in Tokyo Japanese Pro; Laver won the Trofeo Facis tour of Italy.

1964  Rod Laver (AUS)
 Ken Rosewall (AUS)
 Roy Emerson (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 after South African challenge match win over Laver.[296]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by Buchholz, writing in World Tennis (going with the official No. 1 based on the pro tournament point ranking system)[297]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by Laver, who is quoted after the Wembley Pro final: "I’ve still plenty of ambitions left and would like to be the World's No. 1. Despite this win, I am not there yet – Ken is. I may have beaten him more often than he has beaten me this year but he has won the biggest tournaments except here. I’ve lost to other people but Ken hasn’t. We are working on a points system which is the soundest way so that everyone has to try hard all the time and Ken has the most points".[298]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by McCauley's 1964 chapter entitled: Rosewall Tops Again But Only Just.[299]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by Norris McWhirter in The Observer in December 1964.[300]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by British Lawn Tennis magazine.[301]
  • Laver and Rosewall co-ranked No. 1 by Tennis Australia in partnership with the Australian Sports Commission.[302]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 in a Time magazine article from May 1965.[291]
  • Rosewall ranked No. 1 by Michel Sutter.[303]
  • Laver and Rosewall co-ranked No. 1 by Robert Geist.[282]
  • Laver ranked No. 1 on Australia Day Honours List website.[304]
  • Laver ranked No. 1 on International Tennis Hall of Fame profile.[305]
  • Laver ranked No. 1 by Raymond Lee.[306]
  • Laver ranked No. 1 in The New York Times in article by John Clarke on 19 September 2018.[307]
  • Laver ranked No. 1 by Justine Cohen in World Tennis Magazine.[308]
  • Laver ranked No. 1 by official Australian government gallery portrait.[309]
  • Emerson ranked No. 1 amateur by Lance Tingay.[249]

Year summary:
The pros established a ranking system based on points awarded at 19 tournaments (7 points for the winner, 4 for the runner-up, 3 for 3rd place, 2 for 4th and 1 for each quarter-finalist); the final official positions were: 1) Rosewall, 2) Laver. Laver beat Rosewall and Gonzales in U.S. Pro at Longwood; Rosewall beat Laver in French Pro at Stad Coubertin; Laver beat Rosewall in Wembley Pro. Rosewall won 11 tournaments in all and finished first in the Trofeo Facis tour of Italy and in the European Cup tour. Laver won 12 tournaments in all and won a tour of Queensland over Hoad. However, Laver, Rosewall, and Anderson finished behind Hoad in a 4-man 16-day 24-match New Zealand tour (Laver tied Hoad at 7 wins, 5 losses, but lost his series with Hoad 1 to 3 and finished second). Rosewall, Laver, Hoad, and Anderson lost to Gonzales in the U.S. Pro Indoor at White Plains, N.Y., the final against Rosewall a long five-set match. In all known matches throughout the year, Laver beat Rosewall 17–7. Rosewall won a World champion Challenge match against Laver in Johannesburg at the end of October.[310]

1965  Rod Laver (AUS)  Roy Emerson (AUS)
 Manolo Santana (ESP)

Rankings:

  • Laver finished as the official No. 1 in the pros' point ranking system, with Rosewall second.[311]
  • Emerson ranked No. 1 amateur by Lance Tingay.[249]
  • Santana ranked No. 1 amateur by Ned Potter.[312]

Year summary:
Though Rosewall won 2 of the 3 most important tournaments, Laver was the new undisputed king of tennis. Laver won 21 tournaments in all (to Rosewall's 7). Rosewall beat Laver in U.S. Pro at Longwood; Rosewall beat Laver in French Pro at Stad Coubertin; Laver beat Gimeno in Wembley Pro; Laver beat Rosewall 16–7 in head-to-head matches. Rosewall and Laver both lost to Gonzales in the richest tournament of the year, the CBS Dallas, played on clay with a $25,000 total purse.

1966  Rod Laver (AUS)  Manolo Santana (ESP)

Rankings:

  • Laver finished as the official No. 1 in the pro point ranking system.[313]
  • Santana ranked No. 1 amateur by Lance Tingay.[314]

Year summary:
This was the year of the greatest rivalry between Laver and Rosewall; they shared all the important tournaments, with Laver slightly ahead: in the world circuit played by the leading pros, Laver won 15 tournaments including Forest Hills Pro, the U.S. Pro at Longwood and Wembley Pro over Rosewall runner-up the three times, Rosewall won nine tournaments including Madison Square Garden Pro and the French Pro at Stad Coubertin over ... Laver finalist both times; Laver and Rosewall were tied 7–7 in head-to-head matches.

1967  Rod Laver (AUS)  John Newcombe (AUS)

Rankings:

  • Laver finished as the official No. 1 in the pro point ranking system.[citation needed]
  • Laver described as "world's No. 1" in Daily Mirror in December 1967.[315]
  • Newcombe was ranked No. 1 amateur by Lance Tingay.[249]

Year summary:
Laver probably was at the peak of his whole career, at least on fast courts, winning 19 tournaments including all the most important events: the Madison Square Garden Pro, the U.S. Pro at Longwood, Wimbledon Pro, the French Pro at Stad Coubertin and Wembley Pro; Rosewall stayed the No. 2 in the world capturing seven tournaments and reaching three important finals in Madison Square Garden Pro, Wimbledon Pro and Wembley Pro; in head-to-head matches Laver beat Rosewall 8–5 and Gimeno 12–4, Rosewall and Gimeno were equal, 7–7.


Open Era

  • Professional players were allowed to compete with amateurs in one unified tour starting 1968 (all players in the Open Era are professional unless otherwise indicated).
Year No. 1 player Source of ranking and tournament results summary
1968  Rod Laver (AUS) Rankings:
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by the panel of journalists for the 'Martini and Rossi' Award, with Rosewall second.[316]
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 (with 150 points) by a panel of 15 journalists, with Ashe second (129 points).[317]
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by Joe McCauley, with Ashe second.[318]
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by Lance Tingay, with Ashe second.[319]
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by Rino Tommasi, with Rosewall second.[320]
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by Bud Collins, with Ashe second.[321]

Year summary:
The Open Era began in April and at least 10 open tournaments were played with professionals winning 8 and amateurs 2 with the pros leading in matches won 199 to 45.[322] Most pros played either the National Tennis League or World Championship Tennis circuits, so only 3 tournaments featured all the best players: 1) Wimbledon, where Rod Laver defeated Tony Roche in the finals, after they beat Arthur Ashe, an amateur, and Ken Rosewall in the semi-finals; 2) the Pacific Southwest Open, where Laver defeated Rosewall, who defeated Ashe in the SFs; and 3) the US Open, where Ashe defeated Tom Okker, a "national registered" professional (Okker was awarded the first prize money at the US Open), with Laver losing in the 4th round. In major pro events with both NTL and WCT players, Laver won both the U.S. Pro at Longwood and the last-ever French Pro at Roland Garros, both over Newcombe. Overall, Laver won 13 titles, although 5 of his wins were in 4-man invitationals; his wins included 7 of the 11 NTL tournaments and he was 1–0 vs. Ashe and 5–2 vs. Rosewall. Ashe won 10 tournaments,[323] including the U.S. Amateur Championships, and 8 other amateur titles and was 11–1 in the Davis Cup, which allowed only amateurs and national registered professionals to participate.

1969  Rod Laver (AUS) Rankings:
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by the panel of 13 international journalists for the 'Martini and Rossi' Award.[324]
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by Tingay, with Roche second.[319]
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by Collins, with Roche second.[321]
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by Tommasi, with Roche second.[320]
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by World Tennis magazine in October.[325]

Year summary:
Rod Laver won the Grand Slam: At Wimbledon Laver beat John Newcombe, who defeated Tony Roche in the SFs; at the US Open Laver defeated Roche; at the French Open, Laver beat Ken Rosewall, after they beat Okker and Roche in the semifinals (7 of the top 10 players played); and, at the Australian Open Laver defeated Roche in the SFs (7 of top 10 played). Of the 8 tournaments with at least 6 of the top 10 players participating, Laver won 4 (he played all 8), including: the U.S. Pro Indoor and the Wembley Pro, both over Roche; South Africa over Okker; and the U.S. Pro over Newcombe; while among the other 4 events, Roche won Sydney over Laver. Laver won 18 tournaments, including 6 of the 9 National Tennis League events, for a 106–16 record[326] and was 3–0 vs Okker, 2–1 vs Newcombe but only 4–5 vs Roche. Roche won 5 titles with 5 runner-ups with a 63–13 record[f]

1970  Rod Laver (AUS)
 John Newcombe (AUS)
 Ken Rosewall (AUS)
Rankings:
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by the panel of 12 journalists which made the WCT draw for 1971, with Rosewall 2nd.[327]
  • Laver ranked No. 1 by Rex Bellamy, with Rosewall No. 2.[328]
  • Laver, Newcombe and Rosewall were co-ranked No. 1 by Robert Geist.[282]
  • Laver was ranked No. 1 by John Newcombe.[329]
  • Newcombe was ranked No. 1 by Tingay ahead of Rosewall and Laver.[319]
  • Newcombe was ranked No. 1 by World Tennis ahead of No. 2 Rosewall.[330]
  • Newcombe was ranked No. 1 by Collins ahead of Rosewall and Laver.[321]
  • Rosewall was ranked No. 1 by the panel of 10 international journalists for the 'Martini and Rossi' Award, with 97 points (out of 100), with Laver second (89 pts).[331]
  • Rosewall was ranked No. 1 by Tommasi with Newcombe second.[320]
  • Rosewall was ranked No. 1 by Judith Elian ahead of Laver.[citation needed]

Year summary:
Newcombe won Wimbledon final over Rosewall, the strongest and largest draw field that year; Rosewall won the US Open over Newcombe and Roche (SFs) (Rod Laver lost 4th round at both). Of the 5 other tournaments with 8 of the top 10 players playing, Laver won 4: the WCT U.S. Pro Indoor over Roche; the WCT Dunlop Sydney Open over Rosewall; the Grand Prix Pacific Southwest Open over Newcombe; and the Grand Prix Wembley Pro. In the 5th, the U.S. Pro (joint Grand Prix-WCT), Roche beat Laver. Of the next 9 events with 4 or more of the top 10 players, Laver won 2 of the 5 he entered. In total, Laver won 12 ATP events, plus the Tennis Champions Classic, a series of two-player events, defeating Rosewall in the final, and 2 other invitational events. He was 84–14 including 5–0 vs. Rosewall, 3–0 vs. Newcombe, and 1–2 vs. Roche.

1971  John Newcombe (AUS)
 Ken Rosewall (AUS)
 Stan Smith (USA)
Rankings:
  • Newcombe was ranked No. 1 by Tingay ahead of Smith.[319]
  • Newcombe was ranked No. 1 by Collins ahead of Smith.[321]
  • Newcombe was ranked No. 1 by World Tennis ahead of Smith.[332]
  • Rosewall was ranked No. 1 by Tommasi, with Laver second.[320]
  • Newcombe and Smith were joint recipients of The 'Martini and Rossi' Award, voted for by 11 journalists, with 96 points each (out of 110).[333]
  • Newcombe and Smith were co-ranked No. 1 by Elian.[citation needed]
  • Newcombe, Rosewall and Smith were co-ranked No. 1 by Geist.[282]

Year summary:
WCT and independent players played separate circuits with top WCT players playing only 1 or neither of the U.S. and French Opens in order to rest. Wimbledon, which had most top players playing, was won by John Newcombe over Stan Smith and Ken Rosewall (SFs). The US Open was won by Smith defeating Kodeš, who beat Newcombe in the 1st round (event had 7 of the top 10; Laver and Rosewall of WCT absent). Smith won 6 titles overall, including 3 significant Grand Prix events, and was 70–13.[334] Newcombe also won the U.S. Pro Indoor over Laver for a total of 5 titles for a 53–14 record, including 1–1 vs. Smith, 3–1 vs. Rosewall and 1–1 vs. Laver.

1972  Ken Rosewall (AUS)
 Stan Smith (USA)
Rankings:
  • Rosewall was ranked No. 1 by Tommasi, with Laver second.[320]
  • Smith won the 'Martini and Rossi' Award, voted for by a panel of journalists, with 97 points. Năstase was second (91 points).[335]
  • Smith was ranked No. 1 by Elian.[336]
  • Smith was ranked No. 1 by Tingay.[319]
  • Smith was ranked No. 1 by World Tennis.[337]
  • Smith was ranked No. 1 by Collins.[321]
  • Smith ranked No. 1 by Rex Bellamy, with Năstase No. 2.[338]

Year summary:
WCT and independent players played separate circuits most of the year with WCT players banned from the French Open, Wimbledon and the Davis Cup by the ILTF. An agreement allowed WCT players to play the US Open and Grand Prix events thereafter, but the top players of the two groups did not play each other aside from Ilie Năstase defeating Arthur Ashe (WCT) in the finals of the US Open after Ashe beat Stan Smith in the QFs. Smith won the Pacific Southwest Open, an "A" Grand Prix tournament with some WCT players (Rosewall lost QFs; Nastase and Ashe lost 3rd round; Laver and Newcombe absent), the Stockholm "A" Grand Prix, which had some lower-ranked WCT players, as well as the depleted Wimbledon over Năstase. Smith won 4 of the 7 "A" or "B" Grand Prix he entered and 9 titles overall for a 79–12 record (including 7–1 in the Davis Cup; defeated Nastase in the finals) with a 4–1 record vs. Nastase. Năstase also won the Masters over Smith (no WCT players) for 12 titles in total (2 "A" or "B" Grand Prix) for a 110–19 record.

ATP Ranking was introduced in 1973 to establish proper tournament seeding.
1973  Ilie Năstase (ROM)
 John Newcombe (AUS)
Rankings:
  • Năstase finished top of the new ATP Point Rankings (based on average points earned per event excluding the Masters and WCT Finals, minimum 12 events), Newcombe No. 2.[339]
  • Năstase won the 'Martini and Rossi' Award, voted for by a panel of journalists.[340]
  • Năstase was ranked No. 1 by an international poll of 17 tennis writers.[341]
  • Năstase was ranked No. 1 by Tennis Magazine (U.S.), with Newcombe No. 2.[342]
  • Năstase was ranked No. 1 by Collins, with Newcombe No. 2.[321]
  • Năstase was ranked No. 1 by Tommasi, with Connors No. 2.[320]
  • Năstase ranked No. 1 by Rex Bellamy, with Okker No. 2.[343]
  • Newcombe was ranked No. 1 by Tingay, Smith No. 2.[319]
  • Newcombe was ranked No. 1 by Elian, Năstase No. 2.[344]

Year summary
Ilie Năstase won the French Open (no other the top players made the SFs) and the year-end Masters defeating Tom Okker and Jimmy Connors (SFs) (John Newcombe made SFs; Stan Smith lost round robin). Newcombe beat Jan Kodes to win the US Open after they defeated Ken Rosewall and Smith in the SFs (Nastase lost 2nd round) and won the Australian Open, Rosewall, who lost in the 3rd round, being the only other top 10 player entered. Nastase won 15 of 31 events he entered, including 3 of 5 USTLA Indoor Circuit events he played and 2 Group A Grand Prix tournaments (of 6 played), including the Italian Open; he was 1–0 vs. Newcombe and Smith and 4–1 vs. Connors. Newcombe only won 1 other title but was runner-up in 5, including in 2 of the 3 Group A Grand Prix events he entered. Smith and Newcombe did not play each other, apart from a climactic Davis Cup match in the final at Cleveland, probably the finest match of the year, won by Newcombe. Nastase lost to Smith in the Davis Cup semi-final.

1974  Jimmy Connors (USA) Rankings:
  • Connors finished top of ATP Point Rankings, with Newcombe No. 2.[345]
  • Connors won the 'Martini and Rossi' Award, voted for by a panel of journalists.[346]
  • Connors was ranked No. 1 by Tennis Magazine (U.S.).[347]
  • Connors was ranked No. 1 by Tommasi,[320] with Newcombe No. 2.
  • Connors was ranked No. 1 by World Tennis.[348]
  • Connors was ranked No. 1 by Collins,[321] with Vilas No. 2.
  • Connors was ranked No. 1 by Elian, with Borg number two.[344]
  • Connors was ranked No. 1 by Tingay, with Rosewall No. 2.[319]

Year summary:
Jimmy Connors won Wimbledon and the US Open, both over 39-year-old Ken Rosewall (who defeated John Newcombe at both (QF and SF)), plus the Australian Open (Newcombe lost QFs; 3 top 10 players played and its ATP points were equal to a mid-level ("B") Grand Prix tournament), but was banned from playing the French Open by its organizers because he signed to play World Team Tennis with a season overlapping the event. Connors won 15 titles on a record of 99–4, including 3 of the 6 top-level ("AA") Grand Prix events he entered (including the US Clay Court over Björn Borg, their only match). Connors did not play the WCT circuit in the winter/spring instead playing the USLTA's indoor circuit, winning 7 of his titles, and did not play Newcombe or Vilas this year. Newcombe won 10 events, including 4 of 10 in 1 of the 3 groups of the WCT circuit, the non-tour affiliated Palm Springs (with 7 of top 10 players), and the WCT Finals over Borg (Guillermo Vilas and Rosewall did not play) and played few GP events, winning 3 mid-level events, defeated Rosewall in a final; Newcombe was 2–0 vs. Borg. Vilas won the year-end Masters defeated Ilie Nastase in the finals, plus defeated Newcombe (their only match) and Borg in the round robin (Connors absent; Laver and Rosewall ineligible) plus 6 clay GP events (out of 20), including 3 AAs out of 9, but did not make the QFs of a Grand Slam.

ATP Player of the Year was introduced in 1975, but the ATP Ranking Year-end points leader wasn't always the ATP Player of the Year.[g]
1975  Arthur Ashe (USA)
(ATP player of the year)

 Jimmy Connors (USA)
(ATP year-end points leader)

Rankings:
  • Connors finished top of ATP Point Rankings, with Vilas No. 2, Borg No. 3 and Ashe No. 4.[349]
  • Ashe was named first "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Connors was ranked No. 1 by Rino Tommasi, with Vilas second.[320]
  • Ashe was ranked No. 1 by all other sources. Bellamy,[351] Collins,[321] Elian[344] and Lorge[citation needed] ranked Borg No. 2; Tingay ranked Orantes No. 2,;[319] World Tennis[352] and Tennis Magazine (U.S.)[353] ranked Connors No. 2. Ashe was awarded the 'Martini and Rossi' Award, voted for by a panel of journalists.[354]

Year summary:
Arthur Ashe won Wimbledon defeating Jimmy Connors (their only match of the year) and Björn Borg (in the SFs) (Guillermo Vilas lost QFs; Manuel Orantes absent); Manuel Orantes defeated Connors on the new clay at the US Open (Connors defeated Borg in SFs; Vilas also made SFs; Ashe lost 4th round); and Ilie Nastase won the Masters over Borg and Vilas (Borg beat Ashe in SFs; Orantes lost in round robin; Connors absent). Ashe won 9 tournaments (out of 29) including the WCT Finals over Borg (Connors, Vilas and Orantes ineligible and mostly did not play the WCT circuit), 2 top-tier ("AA") Grand Prix titles (out of 10 entered) and 4 of his 9 WCT group events. Ashe was 97–18 including 4–3 vs. Borg, 1–1 vs. Vilas and 1–2 vs. Orantes. Borg beat Vilas (was 3–1 vs. Vilas on the year) to win both the French Open (Orantes lost 1st round; Ashe and Connors absent) and the U.S. Pro AA Grand Prix event, won 1 "A" Grand Prix event, and won 2 of his 9 WCT group events for a 77–17 record. Connors also made the finals of the Australian Open losing to John Newcombe (they were the only top 10 players competing) and won 9 tournaments, none of them AA Grand Prix events (he only entered 2 of those beating Borg a 2nd time in the SFs of one) with an 82–8 record. Orantes won 8 tournaments, including 3 AA Grand Prix events, one being the US Clay Court (over Ashe), and was 87–18 (4–0 vs. Vilas and 1–0 vs. Connors).

1976  Björn Borg (SWE)
(ATP player of the year)

 Jimmy Connors (USA)
(ATP year-end points leader)

Rankings:

Year summary:
Björn Borg won Wimbledon over Ilie Nastase (Jimmy Connors and Guillermo Vilas made QFs; Manuel Orantes absent) and Connors won the US Open over Borg and Vilas (Borg beat Nastase in SFs and Orantes in QFs). Connors won 12 tournaments, including 3 top-tier Grand Prix (GP) events of 6 entered (1 being the US Clay Court), plus the U.S. Pro Indoor over Borg and the non-tour affiliated Palm Springs (8 of top 10 players playing), defeating Borg in the SFs, compiling a 90–8 record (4–0 vs. Borg). Borg won 7 titles including 1 top-tier GP event (the U.S. Pro) of 2 entered, and the WCT Finals over Vilas (Connors, Orantes and Nastase did not play) compiling a 63–14 record.

1977  Björn Borg (SWE)
(ATP player of the year)
chosen by majority of sources in 1978.
 Jimmy Connors (USA)
(ATP year-end points leader)

 Guillermo Vilas (ARG)
chosen by about half of sources by the 2010s.
Rankings:
  • Connors finished top of ATP Point Rankings, with Vilas No. 2, Borg No. 3.[361]
  • Borg was named "Player of the Year".[362][350]
  • Borg was rated number one by Tennis Magazine (France),[363] Tennis Magazine (U.S.),[364] John Barrett,[365] Barry Lorge,[366] Bud Collins,[358] Lance Tingay,[319] Rino Tommasi,[320] Judith Elian[367] and Rod Laver.[367]
  • Vilas was rated number one by Collins and Barrett by the 2010s.[368][369][370]
  • Vilas was rated number one by World Tennis,[371] France Presse,[372] Tennis de France,[citation needed] Le Livre d'or du Tennis,[373] Gene Scott,[374] Peter Bodo,[375] Christian Quidet,[376] and Michael Sutter.[303] The International Tennis Hall of Fame inscription for Vilas stated "it was generally considered Vilas was the real No. 1 for 1977".[377]

Year summary:
Björn Borg won Wimbledon over Jimmy Connors and Vitas Gerulaitis (Guillermo Vilas lost in 3rd round) while Vilas won the US Open over Connors (Borg and Gerulaitis lost 4th round, Borg retiring due to injury) and a partially depleted French Open over Brian Gottfried (Borg and Connors played World Team Tennis; Gerulaitis and 2 further top 10 players absent). Borg won 13 of 20 tournaments for an 81–7 match record, including 3–0 vs. Vilas (a 4th match between them in the final of the Johannesburg Open, a top-tier event, was cancelled) and 2–1 vs. Connors. Vilas won 17 out of 32 tournaments for a 145–14 record (including 4-match non-ATP title at Rye, New York and 6–0 in the Davis Cup), plus won 50 matches in a row, although some events had no top-10-ranked players; for the year Borg was 16–3 vs. Top 10 players; Vilas 13–6. Vilas was 2–0 vs. Connors and made the finals of the January Australian Open (he was the only top 10 player who entered) losing to Roscoe Tanner.

ITF award was introduced in 1978. From now on, players listed in the number one column were ATP Point leaders, ATP Players of the Year and ITF award recipients only.
1978  Björn Borg (SWE)
(ATP player of the year & ITF world champion)

 Jimmy Connors (USA)
(ATP year-end points leader)

Rankings:
  • Connors finished top of ATP Point Rankings, with Borg. No. 2.[378]
  • Borg was named "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Borg was named as first ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Tennis Magazine (France),[380] World Tennis[381] ranked Borg No. 1 and Connors No. 2. as did Collins[358] and Tingay.[319]
  • Tennis Magazine (U.S.)[382] and Tommasi[320] ranked Connors No. 1, Borg. No. 2.

Year summary:
Björn Borg won Wimbledon, defeating Jimmy Connors, and the French Open (Connors absent, but 7 top 10 players participated). Connors won the first hard-court US Open defeating Borg. Borg won 9 titles out of 17 ATP events entered compiling a 70–7 ATP record; he also won 9 additional titles in 10 special or invitational tournaments (draws of 4 to 16 players) plus was 9–0 in the Davis Cup. Connors won 10 titles, including the US Pro Indoor (most top players present), in 16 ATP events entered for a 66–6 record, plus won 4 titles in special or invitational events. Borg had an 18–3 record versus top 10 players (defeated 7 more at special events) while Connors was 14–3 versus top 10 players. Borg was 3–2 vs. Connors (including 1–1 at special events).

1979  Björn Borg (SWE) Rankings:
  • Borg finished top of ATP Point rankings, McEnroe No. 3.[383]
  • Borg was named "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • Borg was named ITF World Champion.[384][379]
  • World Tennis,[385] Tennis Magazine (US),[386] Tennis Magazine (France),[387] Collins,[358] Tingay[319] and Tommasi[320] ranked Borg No. 1, McEnroe No. 2.

Year summary:
Björn Borg won 3 of the 4 most important events: Wimbledon defeating Jimmy Connors in SFs (John McEnroe lost 4th round); the French (Connors lost SFs; McEnroe absent but 8 of the top 10 players participated); and the Masters defeating McEnroe in SFs (Connors lost in SFs). McEnroe won the US Open defeating Connors in SFs (Borg lost QFs), and the WCT Finals defeating Borg and Connors (SFs). Borg won 4 of the 5 Super Series events he played and 13 titles out of 20 tournaments for an 84–6 record. McEnroe won 2 of 6 Super Series he played for 10 titles total with a 91–14 record, including 8–0 in the Davis Cup. Borg was 4–0 vs. Connors and 4–2 vs. McEnroe while McEnroe-Connors were 2–2.

1980  Björn Borg (SWE) Rankings:
  • Borg finished top of ATP Point Rankings, with McEnroe No. 2.[388]
  • Borg was named "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • Borg was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Tennis Magazine (U.S.),[389] Tennis Magazine (France),[390] Collins,[358] Tingay[319] and Tommasi[391] ranked Borg. No. 1 and McEnroe No. 2.

Year summary:
Björn Borg won 3 of the 4 most important tournaments and lost in 5 sets in the finals of the 4th, the US Open. At Wimbledon he defeated John McEnroe (who beat Jimmy Connors in the SFs); at the Masters he defeated Connors (SFs) (McEnroe was 0–3); and he won the French (Connors lost SFs; McEnroe lost 3rd round). Borg also won 3 of the 5 Super Series events he entered and 9 titles in total in 14 events for a 70–6 record. McEnroe won the US Open over Borg and Connors (SFs), 2 of the 8 Super Series he entered (including the U.S. Indoor over Connors) and 9 titles in total for an 84–18 record. Borg was 3–1 vs. McEnroe.

1981  John McEnroe (USA) Rankings:
  • McEnroe was ranked No. 1 at year-end with Borg No. 4;[392]
  • McEnroe was named "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • McEnroe was named the ITF World Champion.[393][379]
  • World Tennis,[394] Tennis Magazine (France),[395] Tennis Magazine (U.S.),[396] Collins,[358] Tingay[319] and Tommasi[391] ranked McEnroe No. 1, Borg No. 2.[397]

Year summary:
John McEnroe won Wimbledon and the US Open defeating Björn Borg in the finals of both after Borg defeated Jimmy Connors in the SFs of both. Borg captured the French Open defeating Lendl (McEnroe and Connors lost QFs). McEnroe also won the depleted WCT Finals, with none of the year's other top 5, plus 2 of the 5 Super Series tournaments he entered for 10 titles with a 76–10 record, including 7–1 in the Davis Cup. McEnroe was 4–0 vs. Borg (including an invitational event), 1–1 vs. Connors, but 0–3 vs. Lendl. Borg played a reduced schedule winning 3 titles in the 9 events with a 35–6 record (2–0 vs. both Lendl and Connors) and semi-retired in October.

1982  Jimmy Connors (USA)
(ATP player of the year & ITF world champion)

 John McEnroe (USA)
(ATP year-end points leader)

Rankings:
  • McEnroe finished top of ATP Point Rankings, Connors No. 2, Lendl No. 3.[398]
  • Connors was named "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • Connors was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Tennis Magazine (France),[399] Tennis Magazine (U.S.),[400] and Collins,[358] and Tingay[319] all ranked Connors No. 1, Lendl No. 2.
  • Tommasi ranked Lendl No. 1, McEnroe No. 2.[391]

Year summary:
Jimmy Connors won both Wimbledon, defeating John McEnroe (Ivan Lendl and Guillermo Vilas absent), and the US Open, defeated Lendl and Vilas (Lendl beat McEnroe in SFs). Lendl won both the Masters (first year of 12-player knock-out format) over McEnroe and Connors (McEnroe defeated Vilas in SFs) and the WCT Finals, beating McEnroe (only 1 other top 10 player present). Connors won 7 out of 18 tournaments, but did not win a Grand Prix Super Series out of 4 entered, compiling a 78–10 record. Lendl won 15 out of 23 events (although 8 were WCT events, most with no top 10 players entered) including 2 of the 4 Super Series he played (one being Cincinnati with 6 of the top 10), for a 106–9 record. Connors was 1–2 vs. Lendl and 2–2 vs. McEnroe with Lendl 4–1 vs. McEnroe.

1983  John McEnroe (USA) Rankings:
  • McEnroe finished top of ATP Point Rankings, Wilander No. 4.[401]
  • McEnroe was named "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • McEnroe was named The ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Tennis Magazine (France)[402] and Collins[358] had McEnroe first, Wilander second.
  • Tommasi had Wilander first, Lendl second, McEnroe third.[391]
  • Tingay had McEnroe first, Connors second.[319]

Year summary:
John McEnroe won Wimbledon defeating Ivan Lendl in the SFs (Jimmy Connors lost 4th round; Mats Wilander 3rd round) and the Masters (knock-out format) defeated Lendl and Wilander (Lendl beat Jimmy Connors in SFs) to claim the ATP No. 1 Ranking. Wilander lost to Yannick Noah in the French Open. For the first time since 1971 the Australian Open featured top-ranked players (but only 3 of the top 10) as Wilander defeated Lendl and McEnroe to capture the title. In the depleted WCT Finals McEnroe beat Lendl (other top 5 absent). Of the Grand Prix Super Series, McEnroe won 3 of 6 entered, including the U.S. Pro Indoor, again over Lendl, while Wilander won 2 of 6, including Monte Carlo (with 6 of top 10 playing) and Cincinnati (7 of top 10), over McEnroe. McEnroe was 63–11 with 7 titles and 2 titles in non-ATP events and was 5–2 vs Lendl, but 1–3 vs Wilander. Wilander won 9 titles in total with an 82–11 record, including 8–0 in the Davis Cup.

1984  John McEnroe (USA) Rankings:
  • McEnroe finished top of ATP Rankings had McEnroe No. 1.[403]
  • McEnroe was named "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • McEnroe was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Tommasi ranked McEnroe No. 1, Connors No. 2.[391]
  • Collins[358] and Tingay[319] ranked McEnroe No. 1, Lendl No. 2.

Year summary:
John McEnroe lost only 3 matches (82 wins) and won 3 of the 4 most important tournaments losing in 5 sets in the finals of the 4th, the French Open. At Wimbledon he defeated Ivan Lendl after defeated Mats Wilander in the SFs (Lendl defeated Jimmy Connors in SFs); at the US Open he defeated Lendl and Connors (Wilander lost QFs); and at the Masters (12-player knock-out format) he again defeated Lendl after they beat Wilander and Connors, respectively, in the SFs. At the French Open Lendl came from down 2 sets to defeated McEnroe after they defeated Wilander and Connors in the SFs. McEnroe missed the Australian Open with a wrist injury (Lendl lost 4th round; Connors absent; 3 of the top 10 players played). McEnroe also won a depleted WCT Finals over Connors (Lendl and Wilander absent). McEnroe won 13 events (8 indoors, 2 grass, 2 hard, 1 clay) of 15, including 4 of the 5 Super Series he played including the U.S. Pro Indoor over Lendl and the Canadian Open (which had 6 and 7 of the top 10). McEnroe was 5–1 vs Lendl, 6–0 vs Connors and 3–0 vs Wilander, plus 7–1 in the Davis Cup, his loss coming in the finals as Sweden won the Cup. Lendl won 3 events, including 1 of 6 Super Series, and was a finalist in 8 with a 62–16 record.

1985  Ivan Lendl (TCH) Rankings:
  • Lendl finished top of ATP Point Rankings.[404]
  • Lendl was named "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • Lendl was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Tommasi ranked Lendl No. 1, McEnroe No. 2.[391]
  • Collins ranked Lendl No. 1, Becker No. 2.[358]
  • Tingay ranked Lendl No. 1, Wilander No. 2.[319]

Year summary:
Ivan Lendl won the US Open over John McEnroe and Jimmy Connors (Mats Wilander lost SFs) and the 16-player knockout Masters over Boris Becker (Wilander lost QFs; McEnroe 1st round; Connors absent). Wilander beat Lendl and McEnroe at the French Open (Lendl beat Connors in SFs). Lendl also won the WCT Finals defeated Connors in the SFs (McEnroe and Wilander lost QFs) and won 5 of the 7 Super Series tournaments he entered, including the Tokyo Indoor (with 7 of the top 10) over Wilander. Lendl won 11 of the 17 events he entered with an 84–7 record overall, including 3–2 vs McEnroe and 3–1 vs Wilander. Wilander won 3 titles (0 of 7 Super Series) but was a finalist in 10 events compiling a 69–21 record.

1986  Ivan Lendl (TCH) Rankings:
  • Lendl finished top of ATP Point Rankings, with Becker No. 2.[405]
  • Lendl was named "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • Lendl was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Collins,[358] Tingay[319] and Tommasi[391] ranked Lendl No. 1, Becker No. 2.

Year summary:
Ivan Lendl won 3 of the 4 most important tournaments of the year, but lost in the finals of the 4th, Wimbledon. Lendl won the US Open over Miloslav Mečíř and Stefan Edberg, with Mecir beating Boris Becker (SF); the French Open defeating Mikael Pernfors, who defeated Becker in the QFs; and the Masters defeated Becker and Wilander (event returned to 8-player round robin). Becker won Wimbledon defeated Lendl with Wilander losing in the 4th round. There was no Australian Open that year as it was switching to January from December. Lendl defeated Wilander to win the Lipton International (with 9 of the top 10 players present), this year upgraded to a Super Series event with a 128-player draw considered to be the "5th Grand Slam" (was worth more ATP points than the Australian Open this year through 1989). Lendl won 2 other Super Series (of 7 entered), the U.S. Pro Indoor (6 of the top 10 present in its last year as a Super Series) and the Italian Open (8 of top 10 present) and finished the year with 9 titles and a 74–6 record, but only 2–3 vs Becker. Becker won 3 of 7 Super Series, including the Canadian Open (6 of the top 10), for 6 titles altogether and a 69–13 record.

1987  Ivan Lendl (TCH) Rankings:
  • Lendl finished top of ATP Point Rankings, with Edberg No. 2, Wilander No. 3.[406]
  • Lendl was "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • Lendl was named the ITF World Champion.[407][379]
  • Collins ranked Lendl first, Wilander second, Edberg third.[358]
  • Tommasi ranked Lendl first, Edberg second.[391]
  • Tingay ranked Lendl first, Cash second.[319]

Year summary:
Lendl won the US Open, the French Open and the Masters, each time defeating Mats Wilander in the finals; Wilander defeated Boris Becker in the SFs of the French Open and Stefan Edberg in the SFs of the other two (Edberg lost 2nd round of French). Lendl lost to Pat Cash in the finals of Wimbledon after Lendl defeated Edberg in the QFs (Wilander also lost QFs). Edberg won the last grass-court Australian Open, with 6 of the top 10 players present, over Cash, who defeated Lendl in the SFs (Wilander absent). Lendl also won 3 of the 5 Super Series tournaments he entered for 8 titles in total for a 74–7 record, including 2–1 vs Edberg and 3–0 vs Wilander. Edberg won 3 Super Series out of 7 for 7 titles total with a 78–12 record with a 2–2 split against Wilander. Wilander won 2 of 6 Super Series, including the Italian Open and Monte Carlo (both 8 of top 10) with 5 titles total with a 71–18 record.

1988  Mats Wilander (SWE) Rankings:
  • Wilander finished top of ATP Point Rankings, with Lendl No. 2.[408]
  • Wilander was "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • Wilander was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Collins[358] and Tingay[319] ranked Wilander No. 1, Edberg No. 2.
  • Tommasi ranked Becker No. 1, Lendl No. 2, Wilander No. 3.[391]

Year summary:
Mats Wilander captured 3 Grand Slam titles: the first hard-court Australian Open over Pat Cash (6 of the top 10 players present); the French Open defeating Henri Leconte and Andre Agassi (Lendl lost QFs); and, the US Open defeated Lendl 6–4 in the 5th set, an exact reversal of their final from the previous year, after Lendl defeated Agassi in the SFs. Wilander also won 2 Super Series of 6 played, including the Lipton International over Jimmy Connors, and 6 titles total with a 53–11 record. Lendl won 3 Super Series out of 3, including the Canadian Open (6 of the top 10) and the Italian Open, for a 41–8 record only playing 10 events.

1989  Boris Becker (GER)
(ATP player of the year & ITF world champion)

 Ivan Lendl (TCH)
(ATP year-end points leader)

Rankings:
  • Lendl finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings, with Becker No. 2.[409]
  • Becker was awarded "ATP Player of The Year".[350]
  • Becker was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Tennis Magazine (France),[410] Collins,[358] and Tingay[319] ranked Becker No. 1 and Lendl No. 2.

Year summary:
Boris Becker won Wimbledon over Stefan Edberg and Ivan Lendl (SFs) and the US Open over Lendl (Edberg lost 4th round). Lendl won the Australian Open (was worth 260 ATP points compared to 380 or 400 for the other 3 Grand Slams; 6 of the top 10 players were present) while Becker lost in the 4th round and Edberg lost in the QFs. Becker won 3 other titles (in 13 events), including 1 Super Series of 5, the Paris Indoor (7 of the top 10) over Edberg, compiling a 64–8 record including 4–2 vs. Edberg. Becker was also undefeated in 7 Davis Cup matches beating Andre Agassi, Mats Wilander and Edberg as West Germany won for the 2nd straight year. Lendl also won 4 Super Series of 4, including the Lipton International, Stockholm and the German Open (all had 6 of top 10), and 5 other titles for a 79–7 match record, but was 0–2 vs. Becker.

ATP Rankings' (Average system) was replaced with a (Best of) system in 1990.[h]
1990  Stefan Edberg (SWE) (ATP)
 Ivan Lendl (TCH) (ITF)
Rankings:
  • Edberg finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings. In the ranking, Becker was No. 2, Lendl was No. 3, and Agassi No. 4.[411]
  • Lendl was named the ITF World Champion.[412][379]
  • Tennis Magazine (France) ranked Edberg first, Agassi second and Lendl third.[413]
  • Collins ranked Edberg first, Lendl second.[414][i]

Year summary:
For the first time since 1977, no player won more than one of the 5 most important tournaments of the year. Stefan Edberg defeated Boris Becker and Ivan Lendl at Wimbledon. Edberg also won three of the seven ATP Championship Series events (the former Super Series) he played, including Indian Wells and the Paris Indoor (both with 8 of the top 10 players playing). Edberg lost the final of the Australian Open to Lendl retiring in the third set due to injury (the event had the top 4 and 5 of the top 10 players; its ATP points were increased to be 360 vs 400 for other Grand Slams). Agassi defeated Edberg to win the year-ending ATP World Tour Championship (renamed from the "Masters"; points were now awarded for it in the ATP Point Rankings), after they defeated Becker and Lendl in the SFs, and beat Edberg again to win the Lipton International (his only Championship Series win of six). Edberg won seven titles from 12 finals for a 70–15 record, while Agassi won 4 titles for a 45–12 record and was absent from the Australian Open and Wimbledon. Becker was 71–15 with 5 titles from 10 finals including 1 Champship Series of 7 (Stockholm, with 7 of top 10) and Lendl was 54–12 with 5 titles winning no Champship Series of 3. The top 4 had close records against each other except Agassi was 3–0 vs Becker.

1991  Stefan Edberg (SWE) Rankings:
  • Edberg finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings. In the ranking, Courier was No. 2.[415]
  • Edberg was awarded "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Edberg was named the ITF World Champion.[416][379]
  • Collins ranked Edberg No. 1, Stich No. 2.[358]

Year summary:
For the 2nd consecutive year, no player won more than one of the five most important tournaments. Jim Courier did win the French Open, defeating Andre Agassi, Michael Stich and Stefan Edberg (QFs), in succession (Agassi beat Boris Becker in the SFs), and two of the top ATP Championship Series events; the Lipton International and Indian Wells, his only victories of the year. Stefan Edberg won the US Open defeated Courier, after they defeated Ivan Lendl and 39-year-old Jimmy Connors in the SFs (Becker lost 3rd round).

1992  Jim Courier (USA) Rankings:
  • Courier finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings. In the ranking, Edberg was No. 2.[417]
  • Courier was awarded "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Courier was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Collins ranked Courier No. 1, Edberg No. 2.[358]

Year summary:
Jim Courier won both the Australian Open (with 8 of the top 10 playing), defeating Stefan Edberg in the final, and the French Open, defeated Petr Korda and Andre Agassi (Pete Sampras lost QFs and Edberg 3rd round). Andre Agassi won Wimbledon defeated Goran Ivanišević (Sampras and Edberg lost QFs; Courier lost 3rd round). Edberg won the US Open defeated Pete Sampras, after they defeated Michael Chang and Courier in the SFs. Boris Becker won the year-ending ATP Tour World Championship defeated Courier in the final after they defeated Ivanisevic and Sampras in the SFs. Courier (the Italian Open), Edberg, Sampras (Cincinnati with 8 of the top 10), Edberg won three titles total. Courier was 69–18 (including 1–0 vs Edberg and 1–2 vs Sampras), while Edberg was 68–24 (1–2 vs Sampras).

1993  Pete Sampras (USA) Rankings:
  • Sampras finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings. In the ranking, Stich was No. 2, and Courier No. 3.[418]
  • Sampras was awarded "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Sampras was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Collins[358] and Tennis Magazine (France)[419] ranked Sampras first and Courier second.

Year summary:
Pete Sampras won Wimbledon (defeating Jim Courier in the final, who defeated Stefan Edberg in the SFs; Michael Stich lost 4th round), the US Open (defeated Cédric Pioline; Courier and Stich lost in 4th and 1st rounds), and the Lipton International (his only Championship Series win). Sergi Bruguera won the French Open, defeated Courier in the final and Sampras in the QFs (Stich lost 4th round), and five titles including one ATP Championship Series. Courier won the Australian Open (all of the top 10 players were to play but 2 withdrew with injury) defeated Stefan Edberg (who defeated Sampras in the QFs) and Michael Stich in the SFs, plus 2 Champ Series (the Italian Open and Indian Wells). Stich won the ATP Tour World Championship defeated Sampras in the final and Courier in the round robin (Courier and Bruguera eliminated in round robin) and two Championship Series (one being Stockholm with 8 of the top 10). Sampras was 85–16 with 8 titles from 23 events and was 2–0 vs. Courier and 1–1 vs. Stich. Stich won 6 titles, was 76–22 and 1–1 vs. Courier. Courier won 5 titles with a 58–17 record.

1994  Pete Sampras (USA) Rankings:
  • Sampras finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings. In the ranking, Agassi was No. 2.[420]
  • Sampras was awarded "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Sampras was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Collins ranked Sampras No. 1, Agassi No. 2.[358]

Year summary:
Pete Sampras won four of the six most important tournaments of the year: Australian Open defeating Todd Martin (had 7 of the top 10 players; Boris Becker and Andre Agassi absent); Wimbledon defeated Goran Ivanišević, who defeated Becker in the SFs (Agassi lost 4th round); the ATP Tour World Championship defeated Becker (after they defeated Agassi and Bruguera in the SFs); and, the Lipton International Championship Series defeated Agassi. Agassi won the US Open defeated Michael Stich (Sampras lost 4th round; Becker 1st round). Sampras won two more ATP Championship Series out of five played (the Italian Open and Indian Wells both with 8 of the top 10) for ten titles in total and a 77–12 record (3–1 vs Agassi and 1–2 vs Becker). Agassi won two of seven Championship Series, including the Paris Indoor (9 of top 10), and five titles total for a 52–14 record, including 1–0 vs Becker.

1995  Pete Sampras (USA) Rankings:
  • Sampras finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings. In the ranking, Agassi was No. 2 and Muster No. 3.[421]
  • Sampras was awarded "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Sampras was named the ITF World Champion.[379]
  • Collins ranked Sampras No. 1, Agassi No. 2.[358]

Year summary:
Pete Sampras won Wimbledon defeating Boris Becker, who defeated Andre Agassi in the SFs (Thomas Muster absent), and the US Open defeated Agassi, who defeated Becker in the SFs (Muster lost 4th round). Agassi won the Australian Open defeated Sampras (Muster lost 3rd round and Becker 1st round)(from this year forward it usually had as many of the top 10 players play as the other Grand Slams). Sampras also won two of nine ATP Championship Series tournaments played and a total of 5 titles from 9 finals (out of 21 events) for a 72–16 record (2–3 vs Agassi, 3–0 vs Becker and 0–1 vs Muster). Agassi also won 3 of 6 Champ Series, including the Lipton International defeated Sampras (all the other Champ Series had at least 8 of the top 10 players participate), for 7 titles out of 16 events for a 73–9 record.

1996  Pete Sampras (USA) Rankings:
  • Sampras finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings. In the ranking, Chang was No. 2, and Kafelnikov No. 3.[422]
  • Sampras was awarded "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Sampras was named the ITF World Champion.[423][379]
  • Collins ranked Sampras No. 1, Chang No. 2.[358]

Year summary:
Pete Sampras won the US Open, defeating Michael Chang and Goran Ivanisevic (SFs), and the ATP World Tour Championship defeated Boris Becker (a reverse of their round robin match) after they defeated Ivanisevic and Richard Krajicek in the SFs. Sampras did not win any ATP Super Nine events (renamed from Champ Series). Sampras won eight titles for a 65–11 record including 3–0 vs Chang, 2–2 vs Kafelnikov and 2–2 vs Ivanisevic. Chang won one Super Nine and two other titles with a 65–19 record (1–2 vs Ivanisevic but did not play Kafelnikov).

1997  Pete Sampras (USA) Rankings:
  • Sampras finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings. In the ranking, Rafter was No. 2.[424]
  • Sampras was awarded "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Sampras was named the ITF World Champion.[379]

Year summary:
Pete Sampras won Wimbledon (defeating Cédric Pioline in the final), the Australian Open (defeated Carlos Moyà in the final, who defeated Michael Chang in the SFs) and the year-ending ATP Tour World Championship (defeated Yevgeny Kafelnikov in the final and Jonas Bjorkman in the SFs). Patrick Rafter won the US Open, his only title of the year, defeated Greg Rusedski in the final after they defeated Chang and Bjorkman in the SFs (Sampras lost 4th round). Sampras also won two ATP Super Nine events and eight titles in total for a 55–12 record, including 5–0 vs Rafter. Rafter finished 65–29 and was the runner-up in 7 tournaments.

1998  Pete Sampras (USA) Rankings:
  • Sampras finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings. In the ranking, Rios was No. 2, and Rafter No. 4.[425]
  • Sampras was awarded "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Sampras was named the ITF World Champion.[379][426]
  • Tennis Magazine (U.S.) ranked Rafter first.[citation needed]

Year summary:
For the 1st year since 1991, no player won more than one of the five most important tournaments. Pete Sampras won Wimbledon over Goran Ivanišević, plus three other titles, none of them an ATP Super Nine. Patrick Rafter won the US Open defeating Mark Philippoussis and Sampras (SFs) plus won the preceding two ATP Super Nine (Canada and Cincinnati, beating 5 top 10 players) and three other titles, but did not advance past the 4th round in any other Grand Slam. Rios won three Super Nines, including the Lipton International and Indian Wells, and four other titles but withdrew from the ATP Tour Championship after one match with an injury. Sampras was 61–17 (did not play Rios); Rafter 60–21 (2–0 vs Sampras, did not play Rios or Corretja); Rios 68–17 (did not play Corretja).

1999  Andre Agassi (USA) Rankings:
  • Agassi finished top of The ATP year-end point rankings. In the ranking, Kafelnikov was No. 2, and Sampras No. 3.[427]
  • Agassi was awarded "ATP Player of the Year".[350]
  • Agassi was named the ITF World Champion.[379][428]
  • Tennis Magazine (France) ranked Agassi first, Sampras second and Kafelnikov third.[429]

Year summary:
Andre Agassi won the French Open (defeating Andrei Medvedev in the final), the US Open (defeated Todd Martin in the final), a Super Nine event and two other titles for a 63–14 record. Pete Sampras won Wimbledon and the year-ending ATP Tour World Championship (defeated Agassi in both finals), won a Super Nine, but lost in the 2nd round of the French and was absent from the Australian Open and the US Open, the latter due to injury, only playing in 13 events. Sampras was 40–8 with 5 titles and was 4–1 vs. Agassi. Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the Australian Open (defeated Thomas Enqvist in the final; Agassi lost in 4th round), won an ATP Super Nine, and made the SFs of the US Open and the ATP Tour Championships plus won two other titles for a 61–32 record (1–3 vs Agassi and did not play Sampras).

With a streamlined ATP points ranking system, the ATP Player of the Year award must now always go to the year-end No. 1 points leader.[citation needed]
2000  Gustavo Kuerten (BRA) Rankings:
  • Kuerten finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][430] In the ranking, Safin was No. 2.[431]
  • Kuerten was named the ITF World Champion.[379][432]

Year summary:
Gustavo Kuerten won the French Open (defeating Magnus Norman in the final), the year-ending Tennis Masters Cup, renamed from ATP Tour World Championship (defeating Andre Agassi in the final, a win that enabled him to pass Marat Safin for the ATP No. 1 ranking, 4195 points to 4120) and three other titles, including an ATP Masters (renamed from Super Nine). Safin won the US Open (defeated Pete Sampras in the final) and six other titles, including 2 Masters. Kuerten was 63–22, including 2–0 vs Safin and 1–1 vs Sampras; Safin was 73–27, including 2–1 vs Sampras.

2001  Lleyton Hewitt (AUS) Rankings:
  • Hewitt finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][433] In the ranking, Kuerten was No. 2.[434]
  • Hewitt was named the ITF World Champion.[379][435]

Year summary:
Lleyton Hewitt won the US Open (defeated Pete Sampras in the final) and the year-ending Tennis Masters Cup (defeated Sébastien Grosjean in the final) as well as four other titles but no ATP Masters, but did make the SFs of five of those. Gustavo Kuerten won the French Open (defeated Àlex Corretja in the final) and five other titles including two Masters. Hewitt was 80–18, including 1–0 vs Kuerten and 1–1 vs Agassi; Kuerten 60–18 including 0–1 vs Agassi.

2002  Lleyton Hewitt (AUS) Rankings:
  • Hewitt finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][436] In the ranking, Agassi was No. 2.[437]
  • Hewitt was named the ITF World Champion.[379][438]

Year summary:
Lleyton Hewitt won Wimbledon (defeated David Nalbandian in the final), the Tennis Masters Cup (defeated Juan Carlos Ferrero in the final; Marat Safin was 0–3 and Andre Agassi was injured), one ATP Masters tournament and two other titles. Agassi won three Masters titles. Hewitt was 61–15 (2–1 vs Agassi); Agassi 53–12.

2003  Andy Roddick (USA) Rankings:
  • Roddick finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][439] In the ranking, Federer was No. 2, and Ferrero No. 3.[440]
  • Roddick was named the ITF World Champion.[379][441]
  • Tennis Magazine (France) ranked Roddick first, Ferrero second and Federer third.)[442]

Year summary:
Andy Roddick won the US Open (defeated Juan Carlos Ferrero in the final), two ATP Masters and three other titles. Roger Federer won Wimbledon (defeated Mark Philippoussis in the final and Roddick in SFs), the Tennis Masters Cup (defeated Andre Agassi in the final and Roddick in the SFs; Ferrero was 0–3) and three other titles but did not reach the QFs of any other Grand Slam tournaments or win a Masters. Ferrero won the French Open (defeated Martin Verkerk in the final) plus two Masters and one other title. Roddick was 72–19; Federer 78–17 and Ferrero 67–21.

2004  Roger Federer (SUI) Rankings:
  • Federer finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][443] In the ranking, Roddick was No. 2, and Hewitt No. 3.[444]
  • Federer was named the ITF World Champion.[379][445]
  • Tennis Magazine (France) ranked Federer first, Hewitt second and Roddick third.)[446]

Year summary:
Roger Federer won three Grand Slam singles titles: the Australian Open (defeated Marat Safin in the final; Andy Roddick made SFs), Wimbledon (defeated Roddick in the final) and the US Open (defeated Lleyton Hewitt in the final). Federer also won the Tennis Masters Cup (defeated Hewitt in the final; Roddick and Safin made SFs). Federer also won three Masters and 11 titles total compiling a 74–6 record, including 3–0 vs. Roddick, 6–0 vs Hewitt and 3–0 vs Safin. Roddick won an ATP Masters while Hewitt won none with both winning 4 titles.

2005  Roger Federer (SUI) Rankings:
  • Federer finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][447] In the ranking, Nadal was No. 2.[448]
  • Federer was named the ITF World Champion.[379][449]

Year summary:
Roger Federer reached all four Grand Slam semi-finals winning Wimbledon (defeated Andy Roddick in the final) and the US Open (defeated Andre Agassi in the final). Rafael Nadal won the French Open (defeated Mariano Puerta in the final) but lost before the 4th round in the other 3 Grand Slam events. Federer won four of the five ATP Masters events he entered; Nadal won four of eight. Federer was 81–4 winning 11 titles. Nadal also won 11 tournaments and was 79–10. Federer was 1–1 vs Nadal, 2–0 vs Roddick and 3–0 vs Hewitt.

2006  Roger Federer (SUI) Rankings:
  • Federer finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][450] In the ranking, Nadal was No. 2.[451]
  • Federer was named the ITF World Champion.[379][452]

Year summary:
Roger Federer won three Grand Slam singles titles and made the finals of all four. He won the Australian Open (defeated Marcos Baghdatis in the final; Nadal was absent), Wimbledon (defeated Rafael Nadal in the final), and the US Open (defeated Andy Roddick in the final; Nadal made SFs). Federer also won the Tennis Masters Cup (defeated James Blake in the final and Nadal in the SFs). Nadal won the French Open (defeated Federer in the final). Federer also won four ATP Masters events (of seven played) while Nadal won two. Federer compiled a record of 92–5 (4 losses came in his 6 matches with Nadal) winning 12 titles and reached the finals of 16 of the 17 events he entered. Nadal won five titles in total for a 59–12 record.

2007  Roger Federer (SUI) Rankings:
  • Federer finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][453] In the ranking, Nadal was No. 2 and Djokovic No. 3.[454]
  • Federer was named the ITF World Champion.[379][455]

Year summary:
Roger Federer won three Grand Slam singles titles and made the finals of all four tournaments. He won the Australian Open (defeated Fernando González in the final; Rafael Nadal lost in QFs), Wimbledon (defeated Nadal in the final), and the US Open (defeated Novak Djokovic in the final; Nadal lost in QFs). Federer also won the year-ending Tennis Masters Cup (defeated David Ferrer in the final and Nadal in the SFs. Nadal won the French Open (defeated Federer in the final). Federer won two ATP Masters events while Nadal won thee. Federer won eight titles total with a 68–9 record including 3–2 vs Nadal and 3–1 vs Djokovic. Nadal was 70–15 (5–2 vs Djokovic) with six titles

2008  Rafael Nadal (ESP) Rankings:
  • Nadal finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][456] In the ranking, Federer was No. 2, and Djokovic No. 3.[457]
  • Nadal was named the ITF World Champion.[379][458]

Year summary:
Rafael Nadal won the French Open (defeated Federer for fourth consecutive year, the last three in the final, and Novak Djokovic in SFs), Wimbledon (defeated Federer in the final 9–7 in the fifth set. Federer won the US Open (defeated Andy Murray after they beat Djokovic and Nadal in the SFs). Nadal won three ATP Masters, Djokovic and Murray two, Davydenko and Tsonga one, and Federer none. Nadal won eight titles with an 82–11 record including 4–0 vs Federer and 4–2 vs Djokovic. Federer won four titles with a 66–15 record including 2–1 vs Djokovic.

2009  Roger Federer (SUI) Rankings:
  • Federer finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][459] In the ranking, Nadal was No. 2 and Djokovic No. 3.[460]
  • Federer was named the ITF World Champion.[379][461]

Year summary:
Roger Federer reached all four Grand Slam finals, winning two: the French Open (defeated Robin Söderling and Juan Martin Del Potro in the SFs; Rafael Nadal lost in the 4th round) and Wimbledon (defeated Andy Roddick 16–14 in the 5th set of the final; Nadal was absent). Nadal won the Australian Open (defeated Federer in the final). Nadal lost in round robin). Nadal won three ATP Masters, Federer, won two. Federer was 61–12 (1–1 vs Nadal and 2–3 vs Djokovic) with four titles from eight finals; Nadal 66–14 (4–3 vs Djokovic) with five titles.

2010  Rafael Nadal (ESP) Rankings:
  • Nadal finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][462] In the ranking, Nadal was No. 2, and Djokovic No. 3.[463]
  • Nadal was named the ITF World Champion.[379][464]

Year summary:
Rafael Nadal won three Grand Slam singles titles: the French Open (defeated Robin Söderling in the final; Roger Federer lost in the QFs), Wimbledon (defeated Tomáš Berdych after they beat Andy Murray and Novak Djokovic in the SFs; Federer lost in QFs;) and the US Open (defeated Djokovic in the final, who defeated Federer in the SFs). Federer won the Australian Open (defeated Murray in the final; Nadal lost in QFs) and the year-ending ATP World Tour Finals (defeated Nadal after they beat Djokovic and Murray in the SFs). Nadal won three ATP Masters, Federer one. Nadal won seven tournaments total with a 71–10 record (1–1 vs Federer and 2–0 vs Djokovic). Federer won five titles with a 65–13 record (4–1 vs Djokovic).

2011  Novak Djokovic (SRB) Rankings:
  • Djokovic finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][465] In the ranking, Nadal was No. 2, and Federer No. 3.[466]
  • Djokovic was named the ITF World Champion.[379][467]

Year summary:
Novak Djokovic won three Grand Slam singles titles: the Australian Open (defeated Andy Murray in the final and Roger Federer in the SFs; Rafael Nadal lost in QFs), Wimbledon (defeated Nadal after they beat Federer and Murray in the SFs) and the US Open (defeated Nadal after they beat Federer and Murray in the SFs). Nadal won the French Open (defeated Federer after they beat Murray and Djokovic in the SFs). Djokovic won five ATP Masters, a new season-record, one for Nadal , and compiled a match record of 70–6 (6–0 versus Nadal and 4–1 versus Federer) winning ten titles. Nadal was 69–15 (3–1 vs Federer) with three titles in ten finals.

2012  Novak Djokovic (SRB) Rankings:
  • Djokovic finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][468] In the ranking, Nadal was No. 2, and Murray No. 3.[469]
  • Djokovic was named the ITF World Champion.[379][470]

Year summary:
Novak Djokovic won the Australian Open (defeated Rafael Nadal 7–5 in the fifth set in a 5 hour 53 minute match, after they defeated Andy Murray and Roger Federer in the SFs) and the ATP World Tour Finals (defeated Federer in the final; Murray lost round robin and Nadal absent) to clinch the ATP No. 1 ranking. Federer won Wimbledon (defeated Murray in the final and Djokovic in SFs; Nadal lost in 2nd round). Murray won the US Open (defeated Djokovic in the final; Federer lost in QFs and Nadal was absent due to injury) and also the Olympic Gold. Djokovic and Federer each won thee ATP Masters. Djokovic's match record was 75–12 while Federer's was 71–12 both winning six titles with Djokovic leading the head-to-head 3–2.

2013  Novak Djokovic (SRB) (ITF)
 Rafael Nadal (ESP) (ATP)
Rankings:
  • Djokovic was named the ITF World Champion.[379][471]
  • Nadal finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][472] In the ranking, Djokovic was No. 2, Ferrer No. 3, and Murray No. 4.[473]

Year summary:
Rafael Nadal won the French Open (defeated David Ferrer in the final and Novak Djokovic in the SFs) and the US Open (defeated Djokovic in the final). Djokovic won the Australian Open (defeated Andy Murray after they defeated Ferrer and Roger Federer in the SFs) and the ATP World Tour Finals (defeated Nadal in the final who beat Federer in the SFs; Murray was absent). Nadal won five ATP Masters events versus three for Djokovic compiling a 75–7 record winning ten titles; Djokovic had a 74–9 record winning 7 titles; they had a 3–3 record versus each other.

2014  Novak Djokovic (SRB) Rankings:
  • Djokovic finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][474] In the ranking, Federer was No. 2, and Nadal No. 3.[475]
  • Djokovic was named the ITF World Champion.[379][476]

Year summary:
Novak Djokovic won Wimbledon (defeated Roger Federer in the final). Djokovic also won four ATP Masters to two for Federer. Djokovic was 61–8 with seven titles while Federer was 73–12 (3–2 vs Djokovic) with five titles in 11 finals.

2015  Novak Djokovic (SRB) Rankings:
  • Djokovic finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][477] In the ranking, Murray was No. 2, and Federer No. 3.[478]
  • Djokovic was named the ITF World Champion.[379][479]
  • Tennis Magazine (France) ranked Djokovic first, Federer second, Murray third.[480]

Year summary:
Novak Djokovic made all four Grand Slam finals winning three. He won the Australian Open (defeated Andy Murray in the final; Roger Federer lost in the 3rd round), Wimbledon and the US Open plus the ATP Finals (defeated Federer in the finals of all three) but lost in the French Open final to Stan Wawrinka after beating Rafael Nadal in the QFs (Murray lost SFs and Federer lost in QFs). Djokovic won a record six ATP Masters, a season-record and a total of 11 events compiling record of 82–6 (6–1 vs Murray and 5–3 vs Federer) making the finals of 15 of 16 events. Federer was 63–11 with six titles from 11 finals (one Masters) with 2–0 record vs. Murray. Murray was 74–14 with fourt titles including two Masters.

2016  Andy Murray (GBR) Rankings:
  • Murray finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][481] In the ranking, Djokovic was No. 2.[482]
  • Murray was named the ITF World Champion.[379][483]

Year summary:
Djokovic won two Grand Slam titles, the Australian Open and the French Open (defeated Andy Murray in both finals and Roger Federer in the Australian SFs). By doing so he became the 2nd player in the Open Era to win all four Grand Slam tournaments consecutively, although not in a calendar year (a "Non-calendar Year Grand Slam"). Murray then won Wimbledon (defeated Milos Raonic who defeated Federer in the SFs; Djokovic lost in the 3rd round). Djokovic won four ATP Masters and Murray three. Murray won the Olympic Games (no ATP points for Olympics[484]) and the ATP World Tour Finals (defeated Djokovic in the final, a match that decided the ATP No. 1 ranking, and Raonic in SFs).

2017  Rafael Nadal (ESP) Rankings:
  • Nadal finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][485] In the ranking, Federer was No. 2.[486]
  • Nadal was named the ITF World Champion.[379][487]
  • Federer was ESPN's 2017 MVP.[488]

Year summary:
Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal split the Grand Slam titles. Federer won the Australian Open (defeated Rafael Nadal in the final) and Wimbledon for the record 8th time (defeated Marin Čilić; Nadal lost in the 4th round). Nadal won the French Open (defeated Stan Wawrinka; Federer absent) for the record 10th time and the US Open (defeated Kevin Anderson in the final; Federer lost in the QFs). Federer won three of the four ATP Masters he played while Nadal won two of the nine. Nadal had a 67–11 record with six titles in 18 events, thus earning more points than Federer who was 52–5 with seven titles in 12 events (did not play any clay events). Federer was 4–0 vs Nadal.

2018  Novak Djokovic (SRB) Rankings:
  • Djokovic finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][489] In the ranking, Nadal was No. 2.[490]
  • Djokovic was named the ITF World Champion.[379][491]

Year summary:
From July to November, Novak Djokovic won Wimbledon (defeated Kevin Anderson and Rafael Nadal in the SFs 10–8 in the 5th set to even their match-up for the year at 1–1), the US Open (defeated Juan Martin del Potro who defeated Nadal in the SFs), and two out of four ATP Masters tournaments to rise from No. 22 to No. 1 in the ATP rankings unseating Nadal (36 weeks at No. 1 this year). Djokovic had no other titles and finished with a 49–11 record. Nadal won the French Open (defeated Dominic Thiem; Djokovic lost QFs), three ATP Masters out of four played, and one other title to go 45–4 in 9 events (injured in March and after the US Open).

2019  Rafael Nadal (ESP) Rankings:
  • Nadal finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][492] In the ranking, Djokovic was No. 2.[493]
  • Nadal was named the ITF World Champion.[494][495]

Year summary:
Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic split the Grand Slam tournaments. Nadal won the French Open for the record 12th time (defeated Dominic Thiem, after they defeated Roger Federer and Djokovic in the SFs) and the US Open (defeated Daniil Medvedev; Djokovic lost in 4th round) passing Djokovic (after 52 weeks), for the ATP No. 1 ranking the 2nd last week of the season to become, at 33, the oldest year-end No. 1 in the Open Era. Djokovic won the Australian Open (defeated Nadal who defeated Stefanos Tsitsipas in SFs) and Wimbledon (defeated Federer 13–12 (3) in the fifth set; Federer defeated Nadal in SFs). Nadal and Djokovic both won two ATP Masters; Djokovic made one other final but no SFs, while Nadal made no final and four SFs. Nadal was 53–7 while Djokovic was 54–11. The Big 3 had 1–1 records against each other.

2020  Novak Djokovic (SRB) (ATP) Rankings:
  • Djokovic finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[350][496] In the ranking (best of 24 months), Nadal was No. 2, and Thiem No. 3.[497]
  • Tennis Magazine (U.S.) ranked Djokovic first, Thiem second and Nadal third.[498][499]
  • ITF named no World Champion this year.[379]

Year summary:
Year disrupted by COVID-19 pandemic. Novak Djokovic won the Australian Open (defeated Dominic Thiem in the final). Rafael Nadal claimed the French Open for the record 13th time (defeated Novak Djokovic in the final). Wimbledon was cancelled because of the pandemic. Dominic Thiem won the US Open (defeated Alexander Zverev) to win his first major title while Djokovic was disqualified from the tournament in the 4th round. Three ATP Masters tournaments were played during the season, Djokovic won two of them, while Nadal and Thiem none. Djokovic had a 41–5 match winning record, Nadal was 27–7 and Thiem was 25–9. Djokovic was 1–1 vs. both Thiem and Nadal, while Thiem was 2–0 vs. Nadal.

2021  Novak Djokovic (SRB) Rankings:
  • Djokovic finished the season as the ATP year-end No. 1 (ATP Player of the Year).[500] In the ranking, Medvedev was No. 2.

Year summary:
Novak Djokovic won three Grand Slam singles titles and made the finals of all four tournaments. He won the Australian Open (defeated Daniil Medvedev in the final), French Open (defeated Stefanos Tsitsipas in the final), and Wimbledon (defeated Matteo Berrettini in the final). Medvedev won the US Open (defeated Djokovic in the final). Both Djokovic and Medvedev won an ATP Masters title.

Players

Modern rankings

Pre-ATP ranking No. 1s

  • Note: Calculating how many years each player was world No. 1 before the ATP rankings is not possible as there were separate tours and no point ranking systems for most of the years.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ When ITF announced the World Champion title it indicated that it would be based on player performances at the Grand Slam tournaments, the Davis Cup, the Masters and the WCT Finals.[14]
  2. ^ He ranked Von Cramm first on ability.[127]
  3. ^ See:[190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197][198][199][200]
  4. ^ Lance Tingay, London Telegraph; CM Jones, British Lawn Tennis; Réné Mathieu, Smash magazine; Philippe Chatrier, Tennis de France; Umberto Mezzanote, Tennis Italiano; Arthur Goldman, Anson Press; Allison Danzig, New York Times; Jack Russell, Tennis Australia
  5. ^ L'Impartial on 6 January 1960 declared Hoad "world champion" and winner of "the world title" following Ampol Open Trophy win; Australian sources stated Hoad was "world tournament champion".,[261] and referred to the Ampol series as "the world's open tennis championship" and also as "the world series".[262] Sydney Morning Herald on 10 January 1960 stated that Hoad had won "the title of world's top professional tennis player". There were also news reports during the 1960 4-man tour of Gonzales being the defending world champion or winning a "world series".[263] On 10 January 1960, The Philadelphia Inquirer called Pancho Gonzales "world professional tennis champion".[264] On 15 January 1960, Lawn Tennis and Badminton said Hoad was taking a six month rest and the article stated "J. Kramer is urging Hoad not to take this step, as during this year he will have his best chance of taking R. A. Gonzales' world professional title from him".[265] On 24 January 1960, Gonzales was billed as "World Pro Champion" in The Boston Globe.[266] On 29 January 1960, the Los Angeles Times said "Gonzales goes after an unprecedented sixth straight world crown".[267] In April 1960, near the conclusion of the 4-man pro tour of the following year, some newspaper reports described Pancho Gonzales as "world professional tennis champion since 1954".[268][269][270][271][272][273][274][275] Gonzales was described as the "titleholder" of the "World Professional Tennis Championship" in The Age on 12 April 1960.[276]
  6. ^ Match records for players other than Laver are from the ATP website.
  7. ^ See 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1980, 1982 and 1989.
  8. ^ Originally, best of 14 events but expanded to 18 in 2000.
  9. ^ Collins & Hollander (1997), p. 652 has Edberg, Lendl and Sampras equal at No. 2, with no No. 1.

References

  1. ^ The (London) Times 1920 March 21
  2. ^ "World's best tennis player known to experts" (PDF). The New York Times. 14 September 1913.
  3. ^ "Tennis Server - Between The Lines - History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter 2, part 1: 1927-1928". www.tennisserver.com.
  4. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 256
  5. ^ "Coming events". Sports Illustrated. Vol. 7, no. 2. 8 July 1957. p. 10.
  6. ^ "Mirror News, Los Angeles". 20 July 1957. p. 25.
  7. ^ "The Akron Beacon Journal, 19 June 1966" – via newspapers.com.
  8. ^ "The Canberra Times, 24 August, 1967" – via Trove.
  9. ^ "Gonzales world champ 5th year". The Daily Reporter. 1 June 1959. p. 12 – via Newspapers.com. Pancho Gonzales is the world professional tennis champion for the fifth straight year
  10. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 190
  11. ^ Buddell, James (23 August 2013). "The Rankings That Changed Tennis (Part I)". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  12. ^ a b Buddell, James (23 August 2013). "The Rankings That Changed Tennis (Part II)". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  13. ^ John Barrett, ed. (1991). The International Tennis Federation: World of Tennis 1991. London: Collins Willow. pp. 116, 140. ISBN 9780002184038. Besides the prize money of $2,020,000, there were also ranking points at stake for the first time at a season ending play-off
  14. ^ a b "Tennis champions to be selected by committees". The Canberra Times. 18 January 1978. p. 1 (Sports section) – via National Library of Australia.
  15. ^ Heathacote, JM (1890). Tennis: Lawn Tennis. p. 155.
  16. ^ a b c Brownlee (1889).
  17. ^ "William Renshaw". tennisfame.com.
  18. ^ Guinness book of Tennis facta and feats, 1983, p.247
  19. ^ The Field Lawn Tennis Calendar 1883, p.16 (1882 season)
  20. ^ The Field Lawn Tennis Calendar 1884, p.22 (1883 season)
  21. ^ Pastime, October 1, 1884, p.216
  22. ^ Pastime, September 16, 1885, p.200
  23. ^ a b c d Collins (2016), p. 586
  24. ^ Pastime, September 22, 1886, p.196
  25. ^ "Herbert Lawford". tennisfame.com.
  26. ^ Pastime, September 28, 1887, p.221
  27. ^ Pastime, October 3, 1888, p.245
  28. ^ Lawn Tennis in America, Valentine G. Hall, 1889, D. W. Granbery & Company
  29. ^ Pastime, October 9, 1889, p.244
  30. ^ a b c d e f g h Collins (2016), p. 587
  31. ^ Pastime, October 8, 1890, p.264
  32. ^ "Wilfred Baddeley". tennisfame.com.
  33. ^ Pastime, October 7, 1891, p.252
  34. ^ Pastime, October 12, 1892, p.234
  35. ^ Pastime, October 18, 1893, p.62
  36. ^ Pastime, October 3, 1894, p.26
  37. ^ Pastime, October 2, 1895, p.5
  38. ^ The Lawn Tennis classification of British players, October 14, 1896, p.274
  39. ^ "Reggie Doherty". tennisfame.com.
  40. ^ The Lawn Tennis classification of British players, October 13, 1897, p.372
  41. ^ a b c d e f g h Collins (2016), p. 588
  42. ^ "Laurie Doherty". tennisfame.com.
  43. ^ The Lawn Tennis classification of British players, October 5, 1898, p.371
  44. ^ The Lawn Tennis classification of British players, March 7, 1900, p.481 (for 1899 season rankings)
  45. ^ Golf and Lawn Tennis, April 16, 1900, page 114–115
  46. ^ Potter (1963).
  47. ^ "Malcolm Whitman". tennisfame.com.
  48. ^ N. L. Jackson: Present status of lawn-tennis in England, Outing, May 1901, page 188
  49. ^ "Arthur Gore". tennisfame.com.
  50. ^ The Lawn Tennis and Croquet classification of British players, December 3, 1902, page 534
  51. ^ Lawn Tennis and Badminton, April 26, 1905, page 22 (for the 1904 season)
  52. ^ Lawn Tennis and Badminton, March 7, 1906, page 505 (for the 1905 season)
  53. ^ a b c d e f g h Collins (2016), p. 589
  54. ^ "Sir Norman Brookes". tennisfame.com.
  55. ^ "Lincoln Journal Star, 15 April 1911". newspapers.com.
  56. ^ "Anthony Wilding". tennisfame.com.
  57. ^ 'International Lawn Tennis', The Observer, 24 November 1912
  58. ^ Collins (2016), p. 756
  59. ^ a b "LAWN TENNIS". The Referee (newspaper). No. 1476. New South Wales, Australia. 10 February 1915. p. 10. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  60. ^ "The Bookman". Evening Post (New Zealand). Vol. 85, no. 33. 8 February 1913. p. 13.
  61. ^ "WORLD'S BEST FIVE IN LAWN TENNIS". The Referee (newspaper). No. 1469. New South Wales, Australia. 23 December 1914. p. 10. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  62. ^ Vaile (1915), p. 242.
  63. ^ a b "The World's Best Ten". The Journal (Adelaide). Vol. LVI, , no. 15436. South Australia. 27 May 1921. p. 3 (SPECIAL SPORTS EDITION). Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  64. ^ "Lawn Tennis". The Observer (Adelaide). Vol. LXXIX, , no. 5, 894. South Australia. 14 January 1922. p. 13. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  65. ^ "Experts Pick First Ten Tennis Players". University Daily Kansan. 3 January 1922 – via Newspapers.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  66. ^ The National Review, London
  67. ^ "New Tennis Rating. A. W. Myers Ranks the Players". The Star (Christchurch). No. 16878. 1 November 1922. p. 7.
  68. ^ "THE WORLD'S BEST TEN". Sydney Sportsman. Vol. XVIII, , no. 1230. New South Wales, Australia. 16 January 1923. p. 10. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  69. ^ "GENERAL SPORTING ITEMS". Sunday Times (Perth). No. 1362. Western Australia. 17 February 1924. p. 4 (Second Section). Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  70. ^ "Lawn Tennis: A World's Ranking". Northern Advocate. 24 May 1924. p. 11.
  71. ^ "TENNIS PLAYERS". The Sydney Morning Herald. No. 27, 060. New South Wales, Australia. 26 September 1924. p. 11. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  72. ^ "World Champion titles abolished". The Mail (Adelaide). 17 March 1923. p. 3 – via National Library of Australia.
  73. ^ "THE TALK OF LONDON". The Herald (Melbourne). No. 15, 123. Victoria, Australia. 7 November 1925. p. 8. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  74. ^ "A la manière de... Wallis-Myers..." [In the style of... Wallis-Myers...]. L'Auto (in French). 17 October 1925. p. 1.
  75. ^ "Tennis: A World Ranking". Franklin Times. Vol. 16, no. 3. 8 January 1926. p. 5.
  76. ^ "The World's Best: Anderson Revises Tilden". New Zealand Times. Vol. 52, no. 12279. 27 October 1925. p. 11.
  77. ^ "Lawn Tennis. The World's Ranking". Waikato Times. Vol. 99, no. 16686. 30 December 1925. p. 11.
  78. ^ "Best Tennis Players". The Telegraph. 4 October 1926. p. 2 (City Edition) – via National Library of Australia.
  79. ^ "MLLE. LENGLEN RANKS TILDEN IN 6TH PLACE; Names Miss Wills First Among Women Players -- Lacoste Tops the Men's List". The New York Times. 22 October 1926.
  80. ^ "World's Ten Best Tennis Players: Where is Tilden to be Ranked?". The Star (Christchurch). No. 18046. 5 January 1927. p. 3.
  81. ^ "World's First Ten Players". New Zealand Herald. Vol. 63, no. 19499. 1 December 1926. p. 18.
  82. ^ "Tennis Players". The Sydney Morning Herald. 5 October 1927. p. 15 – via National Library of Australia.
  83. ^ a b c "Etude sur le classement des dix meilleurs joueurs du monde" [Study on the ranking of the ten best players in the world]. L'Auto (in French). 2 December 1927. pp. 1, 5.
  84. ^ "Johnston Unranked: French Writer Can Find No Place for Tennis Star". The Montreal Gazette. 4 November 1927 – via Newspapers.com.
  85. ^ a b Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter 2, part 1: 1927-1928" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  86. ^ a b "Who Are Leaders In Tennis List?". The Star (Christchurch). No. 18621. 24 November 1928. p. 7.
  87. ^ a b c "WORLD'S BEST TEN". The Examiner (Tasmania). Vol. LXXXVI, no. 248. Tasmania, Australia. 19 October 1928. p. 3 (DAILY). Retrieved 17 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  88. ^ "THE FIRST TEN". The Observer (Adelaide). Vol. LXXXV, , no. 4, 448. South Australia. 22 September 1928. p. 46. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  89. ^ "Upper Ten In World Tennis". Evening News. 18 September 1929. p. 1 – via National Library of Australia.
  90. ^ Béla Kehrling, ed. (10 November 1929). "Tilden világranglistája" [Tilden's world rankings] (PDF). Tennisz és Golf (in Hungarian). Vol. 1, no. 13. Budapest, Hungary: Bethlen Gábor irod. és Nyomdai Rt. p. 309. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
  91. ^ "Tennis Champions. World's Best Players". New Zealand Herald. Vol. 66, no. 20424. 28 November 1929. p. 15.
  92. ^ "Frenchmen at Head of Tennis Ranking". The Star (Christchurch). No. 19002. 22 February 1930. p. 21.
  93. ^ "Lawn Tennis". L'Auto (in French). 5 November 1929. p. 4.
  94. ^ a b c d Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter 2, part 2: 1929-1930" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  95. ^ K. De Lang, ed. (14 January 1930). "Lawntennis". Het Vaderland (in Dutch). Vol. 61. Beetsterzwaag, Netherlands. p. 15. Retrieved 25 November 2021.
  96. ^ "Nebraska State Journal, 23 March 1930". newspapers.com.
  97. ^ a b Béla Kehrling, ed. (20 November 1930). "A világ legjobb tiz női jákétosa" [The top ten female players in the world] (PDF). Tennisz és Golf (in Hungarian). Vol. II, no. 21. Budapest, Hungary: Bethlen Gábor irod. és Nyomdai Rt. p. 398. Retrieved 16 November 2021.
  98. ^ "Lawn Tennis". The Sydney Morning Herald. 18 September 1930. p. 10 – via National Library of Australia.
  99. ^ "Les 10 meilleurs joueurs du monde" [The 10 best players in the world]. L'Auto (in French). 21 September 1930. p. 5.
  100. ^ "Frenchmen at Head of Tennis Ranking". The Star (Christchurch). No. 19002. 22 February 1930. p. 21.
  101. ^ "Great Tennis Player. Best in the World". Waikato Times. Vol. 108, no. 18165. 1 November 1930. p. 11.
  102. ^ Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter 3: Tilden's Year of Triumph: 1931" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  103. ^ "Lawn Tennis". The Australasian. 3 October 1931. p. 45 – via National Library of Australia.
  104. ^ Béla Kehrling, ed. (1 October 1931). "Külföldi hírek" [International news] (PDF). Tennisz és Golf (in Hungarian). Vol. III, no. 18–19. Budapest, Hungary: Egyesült Kő-, Könyvnyomda, Könyv- és Lapkiadó Rt. pp. 376–377. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  105. ^ "M. Pierre Gillou donne son classement des dix meilleurs joueurs du monde" [Mr. Pierre Gillou gives his ranking of the ten best players in the world]. L'Auto (in French). 16 September 1931. p. 1.
  106. ^ "Les Dix Meilleurs Joueurs du Monde Sont..." [The Ten Best Players in the World Are...]. L'Auto (in French). 15 September 1931. pp. 1, 5.
  107. ^ "Lawn Tennis". Dunstan Times]. No. 3548. 7 December 1931. p. 6.
  108. ^ "Lawn Tennis: Overseas Jottings". Auckland Star. Vol. 62, no. 267. 11 November 1931. p. 15.
  109. ^ "The Los Angeles Evening Post, 5 March 1931" – via Newspapers.com.
  110. ^ "Les dix meilleurs joueurs et joueuses de tennis du monde : Le classement de M. Pierre Gillou" [The ten best male and female tennis players in the world: the ranking of Mr. Pierre Gillou]. L'Auto (in French). 14 September 1932. p. 1.
  111. ^ "Ranking The World's Best Players Of Lawn Tennis This Year: Wallis Myers Discusses His Placings and Notes a British Decline". Manawatu Times. Vol. 55, no. 7005. 14 November 1931. p. 4.
  112. ^ "TENNIS TOPICS OF MOMENT". The Referee (newspaper). No. 2386. New South Wales, Australia. 14 December 1932. p. 23. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  113. ^ a b c Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars Chapter IV: Tilden and Nusslein, 1932-1933" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  114. ^ "Tampa Bay Times, 14 January 1933". newspapers.com.
  115. ^ "Crawford Ranks First". The Daily Telegraph. Vol. 3, , no. 199. New South Wales, Australia. 5 October 1933. p. 3. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  116. ^ a b "Vines steps out to name ten best tennis players in world". The Cincinnati Enquirer. 5 November 1933. p. 32 – via Newspapers.com.
  117. ^ "Comment M. Pierre Gillou - président de la Fédération Française de Tennis - classe les dix meilleurs joueurs du monde" [How Mr. Pierre Gillou - president of the French Tennis Federation - ranks the ten best players of the world]. L'Auto (in French). 15 September 1937. p. 1.
  118. ^ "Quels sont les dix meilleurs joueurs du monde ?" [Who are the ten best players in the world?]. L'Auto (in French). 14 September 1933. p. 1.
  119. ^ "Le classement des dix meilleurs joueurs du monde" [The ranking of the world's ten best players]. L'Auto (in French). 4 November 1933. p. 4.
  120. ^ McCauley (2000), pp. 23
  121. ^ "Le Professeur Albert Burke Classe Nuesslein Premier Devant W. Tilden" [The instructor Albert Burke ranks Nuesslein first in front of W. Tilden]. L'Auto (in French). 22 November 1933. p. 5.
  122. ^ Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars Chapter IV: Tilden and Nusslein, 1932-1933" – via tennisserver.com.
  123. ^ "Von Cramm Badly Treated In World Tennis Ranking". Sporting Globe. Vol. , , no. 1266. Victoria, Australia. 19 September 1934. p. 11 (Edition2). Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  124. ^ "M. Gillou donne à L'Auto son classement pour 1934" [Mr. Gillou gives his 1934 ranking to L'Auto]. L'Auto (in French). 14 September 1934. pp. 1, 4.
  125. ^ "TEN AT THE TOP IN TENNIS". Crookwell Gazette. Vol. LI, , no. 8. New South Wales, Australia. 16 January 1935. p. 3. Retrieved 24 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  126. ^ "Tilden's World Rankings". Wairarapa Daily Times. 27 August 1934. p. 5.
  127. ^ "Tilden's Ranking List: Von Cramm Placed First". Ashburton Guardian. Vol. 55, no. 1. 12 October 1934. p. 2.
  128. ^ "HOPMAN'S "FIRST 10"". The Herald (Melbourne). No. 18, 201. Victoria, Australia. 16 September 1935. p. 24. Retrieved 25 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  129. ^ Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars Chapter V: The Early Ascendancy of Vines, 1934" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  130. ^ "World's Open Ranking List". Ashburton Guardian. Vol. 55, no. 160. 18 April 1935. p. 2.
  131. ^ "Quels sont les vingt meilleurs joueurs du monde ? Voici deux classements" [Who are the top 20 players in the world? Here are two rankings.]. L'Auto (in French). 12 April 1935. p. 1.
  132. ^ Jack Troy (8 April 1934). "Vines defeats Tilden in five sets". The Atlanta Constitution. p. 1B – via Newspapers.com. Ellsworth Vines, tall, cool and resourceful had what is technically known as controlled speed as he defeated Big Bill Tilden, 4-6, 7-5, 4-6, 6-4, 6-3, in another match of the colorful series for the world's professional tennis championship [...].
  133. ^ "CRAWFORD SECOND". Daily Standard. No. 7099. Queensland, Australia. 18 October 1935. p. 5. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  134. ^ "Le classement des dix meilleurs joueurs de tennis du monde par M. Pierre Gillou" [The ranking of the world's ten best tennis players by Mr. Pierre Gillou]. L'Auto (in French). 15 September 1935. pp. 1, 5.
  135. ^ "World Tennis Stars: The Ranking LIst". Poverty Bay Herald. Vol. 62, no. 18819. 24 September 1935. p. 5.
  136. ^ "Disagreement in World Ranking". The Evening Post (New Zealand). Vol. 71, no. 81. 4 April 1936. p. 23.
  137. ^ "A World Ranking List. The Ten Best Men". Ashburton Guardian. Vol. 55, no. 307. 10 October 1935. p. 9.
  138. ^ "A World Ranking List. The Ten Best Men". Ashburton Guardian. Vol. 56, no. 4. 17 October 1935. p. 7.
  139. ^ Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter VI: Vines's Second Year: 1935" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  140. ^ "Vines first". The Argus (Melbourne). 9 December 1935. p. 12 – via National Library of Australia.
  141. ^ Bernard Brown (23 April 1935). "Hans Nusslein to replace Stoefen on pro tennis card". Times Union. p. 2A – via Newspapers.com. As a matter of fact, the records of the tour show that Nusslein is a better player than Stoefen. Whereas Stoefen lost 25 out of 26 matches to Vines [...].
  142. ^ "The Stockton Independent, 31 December 1936". newspapers.com.
  143. ^ "Open Tennis Ranking". The Press. Vol. 73, no. 22021. 19 January 1937. p. 19.
  144. ^ a b c Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter VII: Awaiting Perry, 1936" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  145. ^ Tilden, Bill (19 January 1937). "Bill Tilden Says: Two Tennis Aces Out-rank Perry". The Seattle Star.
  146. ^ "World Tennis Players". The Age. 24 September 1936. p. 6 – via National Library of Australia.
  147. ^ "World tennis players". The Newcastle Sun. 18 September 1936. p. 7 – via National Library of Australia.
  148. ^ "M. Pierre Gillou donne à L'Auto ses classements masculin et féminin" [Mr. Pierre Gillou gives his men's and women's rankings to L'Auto]. L'Auto (in French). 16 September 1936. pp. 1, 3.
  149. ^ a b "LAWN TENNIS". The Australasian. Vol. CXLI, no. 4, 577. Victoria, Australia. 26 September 1936. p. 31. Retrieved 17 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  150. ^ "World Rankings". Newcastle Morning Herald and Miners' Advocate. 23 September 1937. p. 11 – via National Library of Australia.
  151. ^ "BEST TENNIS PLAYERS OF THE YEAR". The Argus (Melbourne). No. 28, 416. Victoria, Australia. 17 September 1937. p. 22. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  152. ^ "Les 10 Meilleures: M. Pierre Gillou, Président de la Fédération Française de Lawn-Tennis communique son classement annuel qu'il a élaboré pour L'Auto" [The 10 Best: Mr. Pierre Gillou, President of the French Lawn Tennis Federation gives his annual ranking, which he has explained for L'Auto]. L'Auto (in French). 15 September 1937. p. 1.
  153. ^ "Lawn Tennis: World Rankings". Auckland Star. Vol. 68, no. 224. 21 September 1937.
  154. ^ "HOPMAN'S WORLD RANKINGS". The Herald (Melbourne). No. 18825. Victoria, Australia. 16 September 1937. p. 45. Retrieved 25 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  155. ^ "Hopman Ranks Tennis Stars". The Herald (Melbourne). No. 18825. Victoria, Australia. 16 September 1937. p. 48. Retrieved 25 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  156. ^ Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter VIII: Perry and Vines, 1937" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  157. ^ "SCHEMA : deux classements" [OVERVIEW: two rankings]. L'Auto (in French). 10 August 1937. p. 3.
  158. ^ "Perry to meet Vines in main singles battle". The Evening News (Harrisburg). 11 May 1937. p. 14 – via Newspapers.com.
  159. ^ a b Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter IX: Readying for Budge, 1938" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  160. ^ "BROMWICH RANKED BELOW AUSTIN". The Sun (Sydney). No. 9139. New South Wales, Australia. 21 April 1939. p. 16 (LATE FINAL EXTRA). Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  161. ^ "Les Dix Meilleurs Du Tennis : Classement de M.P. Gillou" [The Ten Best in Tennis: Rankings by Mr. P. Gillou]. L'Auto (in French). 27 September 1938. pp. 1, 3.
  162. ^ "Le classement mondial des joueurs et joueuses, consacre la supériorité sans précédent d'un pays : les Etats-Unis" [The world rankings of male and female players consecrate the unprecedented superiority of one country: the United States]. L'Auto (in French). 29 September 1938. p. 3.
  163. ^ a b c "RANKINGS. TENNIS PLAYERS". The Sydney Morning Herald. No. 31, 439. New South Wales, Australia. 6 October 1938. p. 15. Retrieved 17 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  164. ^ a b "World Tennis Rankings". Waikato Times. Vol. 123, no. 20635. 22 October 1938. p. 23.
  165. ^ "Vines and Perry to battle here for World's Professional Tennis Championships". The Desert Sun. 21 January 1938. p. 1 – via Newspapers.com.
  166. ^ Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter X: Budge's Great Pro Year, 1939" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  167. ^ "Il y avait des leçons à prendre hier, au stade Roland-Garros !" [There were some lessons to learn yesterday, at Roland-Garros stadium!]. L'Auto (in French). 3 July 1939. p. 5.
  168. ^ a b c Collins (2016), p. 757
  169. ^ "Les 10 meilleurs tennismen et tenniswomen du monde : Les Classements de M. P. Gillou" [The 10 best male and female tennis players in the world: the rankings of Mr. P. Gillou]. L'Auto (in French). 22 September 1939. pp. 1, 5.
  170. ^ "D'après E.C. Potter Junior : Le classement américain des « dix meilleurs  » du tennis" [According to E.C. Potter Junior: The American ranking of the "ten best" in tennis]. L'Auto (in French). 5 November 1939. p. 3.
  171. ^ "Tennis Rankings: English Writer's Views". Gisborne Herald. Vol. 66, no. 20069. 16 October 1939. p. 4.
  172. ^ "Tennis greats play tonight". The Atlanta Constitution. 3 February 1939. p. 21 – via Newspapers.com. Don Budge, left, and Ellsworth Vines will continue their battle for the world's professional tennis championship [...].
  173. ^ a b Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter XI: America 1940-1941" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  174. ^ Bowers, Ray. "History of the Pro Tennis Wars, Chapter XII: America, 1942" – via tennisserver.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  175. ^ "Don Budge Rated No. 1 Among Pros". The Los Angeles Times. 13 December 1942. p. 28.
  176. ^ "Bill Tilden still rates No.4. ranking in tennis". St. Petersburg Times. Vol. 61, no. 234. AP. 15 March 1945. p. 7. Retrieved 19 March 2013.
  177. ^ "Hanford Morning Journal, 15 March 1945" – via Newspapers.com.
  178. ^ "The Honolulu Advertiser, 25 July 1945" – via Newspapers.com.
  179. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 39
  180. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 43
  181. ^ "Les Meilleurs Joueurs et Joueuses de Tennis : M. Pierre Gillou, Président de la F.F.L.T. donne son classement mondial" [The best male and female tennis players: Mr. Pierre Gillou, President of the FLTF gives his world rankings]. Le Figaro (in French). 7 January 1947. p. 4.
  182. ^ "Overseas Champions : Visit to Hamilton". Putaruru Press. Vol. 25, no. 1302. 21 October 1948. p. 1.
  183. ^ "KRAMER TOPS TENNIS RANKING". The Herald (Melbourne). No. 21, 747. Victoria, Australia. 31 January 1947. p. 12. Retrieved 25 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  184. ^ "Budge here after slight auto crash". The St. Louis Star and Times. 11 April 1946. p. 16 – via Newspapers.com.
  185. ^ Riggs (1949), pp. 120, 171.
  186. ^ B.J.McDonald (14 February 1946). "Pro tennis stars form player group". The Deseret News. p. 17.
  187. ^ "Courier-Post, Camden, 15 January 1948" – via Newspapers.com.
  188. ^ "BROMWICH RATED FOURTH". The West Australian. Vol. 63, , no. 19, 130. Western Australia. 6 November 1947. p. 5 (THIRD EDITION). Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  189. ^ "Jack Kramer : incontestable leader du tennis mondial 1947" [Jack Kramer: indisputable leader of the tennis world for 1947]. L'Auto (in French). 11 October 1947. pp. 1, 3.
  190. ^ "The Philadelphia Inquirer, 10 April 1947" – via Newspapers.com.
  191. ^ "The Washington Evening Star, 12 April 1947". chroniclingamerica.loc.gov. 12 April 1947.
  192. ^ "The Philadelphia Inquirer, 15 April 1947" – via Newspapers.com.
  193. ^ "The Shreveport Journal, 16 April 1947" – via Newspapers.com.
  194. ^ "The Journal from Meriden, 17 April 1947" – via Newspapers.com.
  195. ^ "The Philadelphia Inquirer, 18 April 1947" – via Newspapers.com.
  196. ^ "The Pittsburgh Press, 20 April 1947" – via Newspapers.com.
  197. ^ "Green Bay Press-Gazette, 9 May 1947" – via Newspapers.com.
  198. ^ "The Baltimore Sun, 12 May 1947" – via Newspapers.com.
  199. ^ "Waukesha Daily Freeman, 14 May 1947" – via Newspapers.com.
  200. ^ Jones Memorial Library at Lynchburg regarding the result of the match at Lynchburg on 2 September 1947 (the deciding match of the series was played at Lynchburg months after the original series, which was tied at 5–5). "Kovacs defeated Riggs 6–2,7–5,10–8...The rangy Californian proved too much for Riggs, who was run ragged trying to return a devastating series of well-placed backhand shots and cannonball serves."
  201. ^ Collins & Hollander (1997), p. 122
  202. ^ LeCompte, Tom. "The rise of Jack Kramer and the fall of Bobby Riggs". Tennis Player Magazine. Retrieved 24 December 2020.
  203. ^ "Riggs, Kramer play 11th match tonight". Spokane Chronicle. 12 January 1948. p. 13.
  204. ^ "Kramer finally gets recognition as leading pro". Reno Evening Gazette. 5 November 1948. p. 19 – via Newspapers.com. Jack Kramer of Los Angeles today gained official recognition as the best professional player in the United States. He drew the No. 1 spot in the 1948 rankings of the Professional Lawn Tennis Association.
  205. ^ "L'Américain Frank Parker : No. 1 du tennis mondial 1948" [American Frank Parker: No. 1 tennis player in the world for 1948]. L'Auto (in French). 21 October 1948. pp. 1, 4.
  206. ^ "BROMWICH RANKED 6th". The Daily Telegraph. Vol. XIII, , no. 174. New South Wales, Australia. 11 October 1948. p. 11. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  207. ^ McCauley (2000), pp. 47
  208. ^ "The Bradenton Herald, 18 December 1949" – via Newspapers.com.
  209. ^ "Australian is 3rd on world tennis table". North-Eastern Courier (Perth). Vol. 24, , no. 1359. Western Australia. 4 November 1949. p. 8 (MODERN WEEKLY News Magazine). Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  210. ^ "L'Américain Ted Schroeder : No. 1 mondial 1949 !" [American Ted Schroeder: No. 1 in the world for 1949!]. L'Auto (in French). 20 October 1949. pp. 1, 5.
  211. ^ "TENNIS STARS RANKED". The Herald (Melbourne). No. 22721. Victoria, Australia. 18 March 1950. p. 18. Retrieved 25 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  212. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 53
  213. ^ a b "Kovacs top pro net star". The Shreveport Times. 19 July 1951. p. 17 – via Newspapers.com.
  214. ^ "Sedgman "ranked second"". The News (Adelaide). Vol. 55, , no. 8, 491. South Australia. 24 October 1950. p. 26. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  215. ^ "L'Américain (Parisien) Budge Patty : numéro 1 mondial 1950" [(Parisian) American Budge Patty: number 1 in the world for 1950]. L'Auto (in French). 26 October 1950. p. 6.
  216. ^ "HOPMAN'S WORLD RANKINGS". The Herald (Melbourne). No. 22979. Victoria, Australia. 16 January 1951. p. 16. Retrieved 25 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  217. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 195
  218. ^ "Frank Kovacs given top ranking among net pros". Wilmington Morning News. 19 July 1951. p. 34 – via Newspapers.com.
  219. ^ a b McCauley (2000), p. 57
  220. ^ "Sedgman leads in Hopman ranking". The Herald (Melbourne). No. 23, 290. Victoria, Australia. 16 January 1952. p. 15. Retrieved 25 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  221. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 197
  222. ^ "Segura Ranked No. 1 Net Pro". Arizona Republic. 13 August 1952.
  223. ^ "Pancho Gonzales, Tennis Hall of Fame". tennisfame.com.
  224. ^ "Writer Ranks Tennis Stars". The Age. No. 30, 385. Victoria, Australia. 17 September 1952. p. 8. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  225. ^ "SEDGMAN TOPS FRENCH LIST". Sporting Globe. No. 3191. Victoria, Australia. 3 January 1953. p. 11. Retrieved 17 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  226. ^ "SEDGMAN WORLD'S TOP IN 1952". The Herald (Melbourne). No. 23, 593. Victoria, Australia. 6 January 1953. p. 12. Retrieved 25 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  227. ^ Philippe Chatrier, ed. (February 1954). "Annual rankings". Tennis de France. No. 10. pp. 3, 4, 5.
  228. ^ "Brisbane Courier-Mail". 31 October 1953 – via Trove.
  229. ^ World Tennis, 21 June 1953
  230. ^ 1) Gonzales 2) Segura 3) Kramer 4) Budge 5) Kovacs 6) Sedgman
  231. ^ "Weekly Times (Melbourne), 7 October 1953" – via Trove.
  232. ^ "The Sacramento Bee, 2 January 1954" – via Newspapers.com.
  233. ^ "WRITER RANKS ROSEWALL SECOND TO TRABERT". The News (Adelaide). Vol. 61, , no. 9, 391. South Australia. 15 September 1953. p. 1. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  234. ^ "Sports Foundup". Star-Phoenix. 24 November 1953. p. 15.
  235. ^ a b c d e f "Pittsburgh Sun-Telegraph, 16 December 1953" – via Newspapers.com.
  236. ^ Philippe Chatrier, ed. (February 1954). "Annual rankings". Tennis de France. No. 10. pp. 3, 4, 5.
  237. ^ "HOAD JUST HEADS TRABERT". The Herald (Melbourne). No. 23, 912. Victoria, Australia. 15 January 1954. p. 13. Retrieved 25 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  238. ^ "The Philadelphia Inquirer, 20 December 1953" – via Newspapers.com.
  239. ^ "Gonzales tops". The Akron Beacon Journal. 22 December 1954. p. 34 – via Newspapers.com. A committee of the International Professional Tennis Association today ranked Richard "Pancho" Gonzales of Los Angeles at the top of its ratings. Winner of the world professional championship here last Summer, Gonzales beat out Francisco "Pancho" Segura, second place in the ratings. Australia's Frank Sedgman was third.
  240. ^ The Akron Beacon Journal. 22 December 1954. CLEVELAND (AP)—A committee of the International Tennis Association today ranked Richard “Pancho” Gonzales of Los Angeles at the top of its ratings.
  241. ^ "TRABERT AND CONNOLLY HEAD TENNIS RANKING". The Advocate (Australia). Tasmania, Australia. 30 November 1954. p. 19. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  242. ^ "The San Bernadino County Sun, 7 January 1955". newspapers.com.
  243. ^ World Tennis, February 1955, p.10
  244. ^ "Trabert and Miss Connolly Head Writers' World Tennis Ratings; Five Men and Seven Women From America Are Among Leaders Chosen Under New International Consensus". The New York Times. 29 November 1954. p. 29.
  245. ^ "Trabert, Connolly Ranked No. 1". The Mercury (Hobart). Vol. CLXXVI, , no. 26, 187. Tasmania, Australia. 30 November 1954. p. 27. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  246. ^ Cheryl Bentsen (18 February 1975). "Pancho Gonzales no longer angry man". Los Angeles Times. p. 4, part III – via Newspapers.com. Gonzales was an active player for almost two decades, and between 1954 and 1960 he was the undisputed world champion.
  247. ^ "Classement <<pro>>". Le Soir (in French). 26 January 1956. p. 8.
  248. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 66
  249. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Collins (2016), p. 758
  250. ^ McCauley (2000), pp. 72
  251. ^ Tennis de France, No. 46, "Annual Rankings", February 1957.
  252. ^ Cleveland Plain Dealer, 20 December 1957
  253. ^ "The Montana Standard". 28 January 1958 – via Newspapers.com.
  254. ^ McCauley (2000), pp. 88
  255. ^ The Press (Christchurch), 6 March 1959, p.6 "Sportsman's notebook"
  256. ^ World Tennis, February 1960, 'Around the World' p.45
  257. ^ a b c d e McCauley (2000), p. 97
  258. ^ Around the World... World Tennis. Vol. 7 no. 7. December 1959. p. 44.
  259. ^ Associated Press news report, (AP) — Pancho Gonzales is the world professional tennis champion for the fifth straight year...Gonzales won $29,150 on the tour. Hoad's total was $28,250. The championship is based on money won. Hoad came out on top in matches with Gonzales, 15-13.
  260. ^ Arizona Republic, 29 June 1959, "In prize money, Gonzales leads Hoad by only $65, winning $47,640 to Hoad's S47,575. Hoad picked up $3,750 in this tourney, including $750 as a share of the doubles title with Trabert."
  261. ^ Don Lawrence (4 January 1960). "Tennis final to Lew Hoad". The Age. p. 15 – via Newspapers.com
  262. ^ Cumberland Argus, 23 September 1959
  263. ^ Cairns Post, 20 April 1960
  264. ^ "The Philadelphia Inquirer". 10 January 1960 – via Newspapers.com.
  265. ^ Lawn Tennis and Badminton, 15 January 1960
  266. ^ "The Boston Globe". 24 January 1960 – via Newspapers.com.
  267. ^ The Los Angeles Times, 29 January 1960
  268. ^ "Pasadena Independent". 9 April 1960 – via Newspapers.com.
  269. ^ "The Tribune, Scranton". 11 April 1960 – via Newspapers.com.
  270. ^ "The Ottawa Journal". 16 April 1960 – via Newspapers.com.
  271. ^ "The Cincinnati Enquirer". 16 April 1960 – via Newspapers.com.
  272. ^ "The Salt Lake Tribune". 16 April 1960 – via Newspapers.com.
  273. ^ "The Star Press, Muncie". 16 April 1960 – via Newspapers.com.
  274. ^ "El Paso Times". 16 April 1960 – via Newspapers.com.
  275. ^ "Palladium-Item, Richmond, Indiana". 16 April 1960 – via Newspapers.com.
  276. ^ Don Lawrence (12 April 1960). "Gonzales likely to forfeit title". The Age. p. 26 – via Newspapers.com. Australian Ken Rosewall will win the current world professional tennis championship on a forfeit if, as seems certain, titleholder Pancho Gonzales does not take part in the Australian tour, starting this week.
  277. ^ "World Ranking List: Fraser, Miss Bueno, At Top". The Press. Vol. 98, no. 29033. 23 October 1959. p. 6.
  278. ^ Don Lawrence (4 January 1960). "Tennis final to Lew Hoad". The Age. p. 15 – via Newspapers.com.
  279. ^ David Burke (10 January 1960). "Hoad takes stock". The Sun-Herald. p. 33 – via Newspapers.com.
  280. ^ Deseret Times, 29 June 1959. Forest Hills (UPI) "Lew Hoad's convincing triumph over Pancho Gonzales gave him a wafer-thin edge over Gonzales Monday in their personal battle for the No. 1 spot in professional tennis. The win gave Hoad 21 victories over Gonzales this season while Gonzales has beaten the young Aussie 20 times."
  281. ^ Ottawa Citizen, 29 June 1959 (AP)"...Hoad took a 21-20 lead over the American pro champion in their 1959 matches."
  282. ^ a b c d e f g Geist (1999), p. 89
  283. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 104
  284. ^ "Valley News". 15 January 1961 – via Newspapers.com.
  285. ^ "The Times (San Mateo)". 20 January 1961 – via Newspapers.com.
  286. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 109
  287. ^ McCauley (2000), pp. 108, 111
  288. ^ "Fullmer, Tittle, Sellers Star, But None Measure Up to Maris". The Miami Herald. 28 December 1961.
  289. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 116
  290. ^ 1962 USPLTA Yearbook
  291. ^ a b c d "Tennis:Rocket off the pad". Time. 14 May 1965.
  292. ^ "The Canberra Times, 7 January 1963". Trove.
  293. ^ McCauley (2000), P. 123
  294. ^ "The Fresno Bee". 7 January 1964 – via Newspapers.com.
  295. ^ "The Honolulu Advertiser". 5 January 1964 – via Newspapers.com.
  296. ^ The Johannesburg Star, 31 October 1964
  297. ^ World Tennis, January 1965, p.29
  298. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 128
  299. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 126
  300. ^ "Rosewall Tops Pro. Listing WIth Laver". The Sydney Morning Herald. 21 December 1964.
  301. ^ "The Sydney Morning Herald, 30 November 1964". newspapers.com.
  302. ^ "Friday 10 to 1: Lavers greatest moments". Retrieved 4 May 2021.
  303. ^ a b Sutter (2003).
  304. ^ Australia Day Honours List. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-26/rod-laver-leads-sports-stars-honoured-on-australia-day/7114336
  305. ^ International Tennis Hall of Fame. https://www.tennisfame.com/hall-of-famers/inductees/rod-laver
  306. ^ Tennis Week, 14 September 2007
  307. ^ Clarke, John (19 September 2018). "Laver and the Power of the Laver Cup". The New York Times.
  308. ^ "Rod Laver to be honored with Eugene L. Scott Award". World Tennis Magazine. 29 May 2013. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
  309. ^ "Rod Laver: National Portrait Gallery of Australia". Retrieved 4 May 2021.
  310. ^ "Honolulu star Bulletin, 1 November 1964". newspapers.com.
  311. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 130
  312. ^ "The Miami Herald, 11 October 1965". newspapers.com.
  313. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 135
  314. ^ "Santana 'world's best'". The Canberra Times. Vol. 41, , no. 11, 500. Australian Capital Territory, Australia. 5 October 1966. p. 30. Retrieved 22 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  315. ^ Daily Mirror, 21 December 1967, p.16
  316. ^ "Laver chosen as the player of 1968". The Guardian. 23 January 1969.
  317. ^ "King, Laver Rated Best". Clarion Ledger. 10 November 1968. p. 21.
  318. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 158
  319. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Barrett, John, ed. (1990). World Of Tennis. London: Collins Willow. pp. 235–237. ISBN 9780002183550.
  320. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Almanacco illustrato del tennis 1989, Edizioni Panini, p.694
  321. ^ a b c d e f g h Collins & Hollander (1997), p. 651
  322. ^ McCauley (2000), p. 157
  323. ^ Collins (2010), p. 147
  324. ^ "The Fremont Argus, 16 December 1969". newspapers.com.
  325. ^ Rod Laver, an autobiography, 2013, p.274
  326. ^ Collins (2010), p. 150
  327. ^ "The Honolulu Advertiser, 18 December 1970". newspapers.com.
  328. ^ The Times (London), 22 December 1970, p. 12
  329. ^ Newk-Life On and Off the Court, John Newcombe, 2002, p.85
  330. ^ Muscles, Ken Rosewall as told to Richard Naughton, 2012, p.208
  331. ^ "The Des Moines Register, 10 November 1970". newspapers.com.
  332. ^ The Times (London), 20 November 1971, p. 16
  333. ^ "Fort Worth Star-Telegram, 19 December 1971". newspapers.com.
  334. ^ all player match records for 1971 from Collins (2010), p. 159
  335. ^ "The Baltimore Sun, 13 February 1973". newspapers.com.
  336. ^ La fabuleuse histoire du TENNIS by Christian Quidet (the edition of the second quarter of 1976), pages 750-751
  337. ^ "Evening Herald (Shenandoah), 17 January 1973". newspapers.com.
  338. ^ The Times (London), 13 December 1972, p. 9
  339. ^ "Singles ranking 1973.12.14". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  340. ^ "Herald and Review (Decatur), 3 February 1974". newspapers.com.
  341. ^ "Tennis rankings". Star-Phoenix. 12 December 1973. p. 55 – via Newspapers.com.
  342. ^ "Third Sacker Leads Cheers". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. 24 January 1974. p. 20.
  343. ^ The Times (London), 3 January 1974, p. 7
  344. ^ a b c La fabuleuse histoire du TENNIS by Christian Quidet (the edition of the second quarter of 1976), page 751
  345. ^ "Singles ranking 1974.12.20". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  346. ^ "Statesman Journal (Salem), 25 February 1975". newspapers.com.
  347. ^ "Hartford Courant, 16 December 1974". newspapers.com.
  348. ^ "Tennis Rankings: In With New, Out With Old". Fort Lauderdale News. 18 December 1975. p. 73.
  349. ^ "Singles ranking 1975.12.15". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  350. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as "ATP Awards Honour Roll | ATP Tour | Tennis". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). Retrieved 9 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  351. ^ The Times (London), 30 December 1975, p.6
  352. ^ "Ashe replaces Connor in magazine rankings". The Morning Call. 9 December 1975. p. 38.
  353. ^ "Rankings Dept". The Journal Herald. 16 January 1976. p. 18.
  354. ^ "Times Tribune (Scranton), 8 February 1976". newspapers.com.
  355. ^ "Singles ranking 1976.12.12". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  356. ^ "Jimmy Back on Top". The Tampa Times. 15 December 1976. p. 22.
  357. ^ "The Vancouver Sun, 17 December 1976". newspapers.com.
  358. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Collins & Hollander (1997), p. 652
  359. ^ The Financial Times
  360. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1977)
  361. ^ "Singles ranking 1977.12.31". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  362. ^ "Tennis pros cite Borg, Gullikson". The Milwaukee Sentinel. 13 September 1977. p. 2, part 2.
  363. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1978)
  364. ^ Tennis Magazine US ranking
  365. ^ The Financial Times
  366. ^ "Borg gets nod as tennis player of '77". The Washington Post. 10 January 1978.
  367. ^ a b Terry Belford (8 July 1978). "Money aside, Major, who are the very best?". The Montreal Gazette. p. 114.
  368. ^ "Exigen a la ATP que reconozca a Vilas como Nº 1 de 1977". Ámbito (in Spanish). 31 July 2013. Guillermo clearly deserved to be number one when he won Roland Garros and the US Open in 1977.
  369. ^ Bud Collins (27 January 2008). "Wily old campaigner". The Age. Although the world's best in 1977, Willie is a touch annoyed at the No. 2 ranking behind Connors, whom he beat in the US Open title bout.
  370. ^ Bud Collins "I thought he was the best player of that year. I wrote a story about him in Australia,for a Melbourne newspaper: Vilas says that if the computer at that time used the same system as today, he would be No. 1. But I do not know. Yes, he won two Grand Slam, Roland Garros ... maybe he was lucky Borg did not play ... the US Open had a winning streak of 50 games. I thought it was No. 1, but hey, it was pronounced No. 2" http://www.fuebuena.com.ar/?p=1252
  371. ^ "World Tennis ranks Vilas number one". The Times (Shreveport). 11 January 1978. p. 12.
  372. ^ "Masters não decidiu quem é o primeiro tenista do mundo". Jornal do Brasil (in Portuguese). p. A-27.
  373. ^ "9782263001932: Le Livre d'or du tennis Tome 1977 : Le Livre d'or du tennis (Couleurs de france) - IberLibro - Aguet, I: 226300193X". www.iberlibro.com.
  374. ^ Eugene L. Scott (1979). Gros plan sur le tennis (in French). Paris: Librairie Larousse. p. 103. ISBN 2-03-512101-9. Guillermo Vilas is a real man of the Renaissance. In addition to being the best player in the world in 1977, ...
  375. ^ Peter Bodo: " ... He maxed out on the computer at No. 2, although back in those days some of the more subjective year-end rankings still carried significant weight. I voted for Vilas as the No. 1 player for 1977, and I believe that's where he ended up in our Tennis magazine rankings (at the time, those were highly regarded honors)..." http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2011/12/the-original-bull/41383/
  376. ^ La fabuleuse histoire du Tennis (1984)
  377. ^ "Guillermo Vilas". International Tennis Hall of Fame.
  378. ^ "Singles ranking 1978.12.28". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  379. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap "ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation. Retrieved 18 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  380. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1979)
  381. ^ "Bjorn Borg Selected No. Tennis Player". The Tennessean. 25 January 1979. p. 58.
  382. ^ "SPORT IN BRIEF Australian women ranked among best in tennis". The Canberra Times. Vol. 53, , no. 15, 809. Australian Capital Territory, Australia. 4 January 1979. p. 21. Retrieved 24 November 2021 – via National Library of Australia.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  383. ^ "Singles ranking 1979.12.26". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  384. ^ "World title for Borg". The Canberra Times. 24 January 1980. p. 19 – via National Library of Australia.
  385. ^ "The Press Democrat (Santa Rosa), 18 January 1980". newspapers.com.
  386. ^ "Victoria Advocate, 15 December 1979". newspapers.com.
  387. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1980)
  388. ^ "Singles ranking 1980.12.22". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  389. ^ "Borg and Lloyd top tennis". Tallahasee Democrat. 9 December 1980. p. 18.
  390. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1981)
  391. ^ a b c d e f g h i Almanacco illustrato del tennis 1989, Edizioni Panini, p.695
  392. ^ "Singles ranking 1981.12.21". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  393. ^ "McEnroe, Lloyd tops". The Canberra Times. 24 January 1982. p. 16 – via National Library of Australia.
  394. ^ "Star Tribune (Minneapolis), 20 January 1982". newspapers.com.
  395. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1982)
  396. ^ "John McEnroe Passes Borg In Tennis Magazine Rankings". The Town Talk. 31 December 1981. p. 15.
  397. ^ "McEnroe, Evert Lloyd top world tennis rankings". The Christian Science Monitor. 30 December 1981.
  398. ^ "Singles ranking 1982.12.27". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  399. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1983)
  400. ^ "Connors No. 1, according to magazine". Messenger-Inquirer. 28 December 1982. p. 10.
  401. ^ "Singles ranking 1983.12.19". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  402. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1984)
  403. ^ "Singles ranking 1984.12.24". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  404. ^ "Singles ranking 1985.12.30". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  405. ^ "Singles ranking 1986.12.29". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  406. ^ "Singles ranking 1987.12.28". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  407. ^ John Barrett, ed. (1988). The International Tennis Federation: World of Tennis 1988. London: Willow Books. pp. 27, 29. ISBN 9780002182690. Lendl had added a third successive Masters title and a record fifth in all by the time the ITF panel of great former champions – Fred Perry, Tony Trabert and , by telephone, Frank Sedgman, met to declare the French and US Open winner the World Champion for at least another year, even though he was again unable to master his doubts on grass.
  408. ^ "Singles ranking 1988.12.19". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  409. ^ "Singles ranking 1989.12.18". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  410. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1990)
  411. ^ "Singles ranking 1990.12.31". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  412. ^ "Lendl tops for ITF". The Canberra Times. 20 December 1990. p. 28 – via National Library of Australia.
  413. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1991)
  414. ^ Collins & Hollander (1994), p. 618
  415. ^ "Singles ranking 1991.12.30". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  416. ^ "Edberg ITF champion". The Canberra Times. 19 December 1991. p. 18 – via National Library of Australia.
  417. ^ "Singles ranking 1992.12.28". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  418. ^ "Singles ranking 1993.12.27". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  419. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 1994)
  420. ^ "Singles ranking 1994.12.26". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  421. ^ "Singles ranking 1995.12.25". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  422. ^ "Singles ranking 1996.12.30". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  423. ^ "Sampras, Graf named ITF world champions". Pensacola News Journal. 4 January 1997. p. 2D – via Newspapers.com. Pete Sampras is the International Tennis Federation's world champion for the fourth year in a row [...]
  424. ^ "Singles ranking 1997.12.29". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  425. ^ "Singles ranking 1998.12.28". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  426. ^ "Sampras and Davenport are 1998 World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 4 January 1999. Archived from the original on 10 March 2003. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 10 March 2004 suggested (help)
  427. ^ "Singles ranking 1999.12.27". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  428. ^ "Agassi and Hingis are ITF World Champions in 1999". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 4 January 2000. Archived from the original on 10 March 2004.
  429. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 2000)
  430. ^ "Kuerten Named ATP Player of the Year; Safin, Bruguera, Rochus Also Won Awards". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 10 March 2001. Archived from the original on 10 December 2001.
  431. ^ "Singles ranking 2000.12.25". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  432. ^ "2000 ITF World Champions" (PDF). ITF This Week. Vol. 2001. p. 1.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  433. ^ "Hewitt First Aussie, Youngest Year-end No. 1 in History of ATP Rankings" (PDF). International Tennis Weekly. Vol. 12, no. 41. Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 19 November 2001. pp. 2–3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 July 2004.
  434. ^ "Singles ranking 2001.12.31". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  435. ^ "Hewitt and Capriati named 2001 ITF World Champions" (PDF). ITF This Week. Vol. 2001, no. 48. 20 December 2001. p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2003.
  436. ^ "Hewitt Claims Year-End No.1" (PDF). International Tennis Weekly. Vol. 13, no. 42. Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 12 November 2002. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 July 2004.
  437. ^ "Singles ranking 2002.12.30". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  438. ^ "2002 ITF World Champions announced" (PDF). ITF This Week. Vol. 2002. 3 December 2002. p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2003.
  439. ^ "Roddick Becomes Youngest American to Finish World No. 1" (PDF). International Tennis Weekly. Vol. 14, no. 42. Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 17 November 2003. p. 4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 January 2004.
  440. ^ "Singles ranking 2003.12.29". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  441. ^ "Roddick, Henin-Hardenne named ITF World Champions" (PDF). ITF This Week. Vol. 2003 (51 ed.). 22 December 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 February 2004.
  442. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 2004)
  443. ^ "Federer Earliest to Clinch Year-End No. 1 Spot". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 14 September 2004. Archived from the original on 9 December 2004.
  444. ^ "Singles ranking 2004.12.27". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  445. ^ "Federer, Myskina named 2004 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 20 December 2004. Archived from the original on 6 February 2005.
  446. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 2005)
  447. ^ "FANTASTIC FEDERER SETS NEW MARKS; GUARANTEED YEAR-END NO. 1 FINISH" (PDF). ATP Tennis Weekly. Vol. 16, no. 33. Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 3 October 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 January 2006.
  448. ^ "Singles ranking 2005.12.26". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  449. ^ "Federer, Clijsters named 2005 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 19 December 2005. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007.
  450. ^ "Federer Clinches Year-End No. 1 With Historic Victory". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 11 September 2006. Archived from the original on 11 October 2007.
  451. ^ "Singles ranking 2006.12.25". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  452. ^ "Federer and Henin-Hardenne named 2006 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 11 December 2006. Archived from the original on 7 January 2007.
  453. ^ "Federer Clinches Year-End No. 1 for Fourth Year". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 28 October 2007. Archived from the original on 27 December 2007.
  454. ^ "Singles ranking 2007.12.31". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  455. ^ "2007 ITF World Champions Announced". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 17 December 2007. Archived from the original on 20 December 2007.
  456. ^ "Nadal Clinches Year-End No. 1 For First Time". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 18 October 2008. Archived from the original on 22 October 2008.
  457. ^ "Singles ranking 2008.12.29". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  458. ^ "Nadal and Jankovic named 2008 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 17 December 2008. Archived from the original on 20 December 2008.
  459. ^ "Federer Crowned 2009 ATP World Tour Champion". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 24 November 2009. Archived from the original on 27 November 2009.
  460. ^ "Singles ranking 2009.12.28". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  461. ^ "Federer & Williams named 2009 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 22 December 2009. Archived from the original on 24 December 2009.
  462. ^ "Nadal Clinches Year-End No. 1 For Second Time". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 13 September 2010. Archived from the original on 18 September 2010.
  463. ^ "Singles ranking 2010.12.27". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  464. ^ "Nadal and Wozniacki named ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 14 December 2010. Archived from the original on 18 December 2012. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 18 December 2010 suggested (help)
  465. ^ "Djokovic Clinches Year-End No. 1 For First Time". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 13 October 2011. Archived from the original on 13 October 2011. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 14 October 2011 suggested (help)
  466. ^ "Singles ranking 2011.12.26". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  467. ^ "Djokovic and Kvitova named 2011 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 13 December 2011. Archived from the original on 7 June 2012.
  468. ^ "Djokovic To Finish No. 1 In South African Airways ATP Rankings For 2nd Straight Year". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 29 October 2012. Archived from the original on 31 October 2012.
  469. ^ "Singles ranking 2012.12.31". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  470. ^ "Djokovic and Williams named 2012 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 11 December 2012. Archived from the original on 8 June 2015.
  471. ^ "Williams and Djokovic named 2013 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 19 December 2013. Archived from the original on 19 December 2013.
  472. ^ "Nadal Clinches Year-End No. 1 Emirates ATP Rankings". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 6 November 2013. Retrieved 15 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  473. ^ "Singles ranking 2013.12.30". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  474. ^ "Djokovic Clinches Year-End No. 1". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 14 November 2014. Retrieved 15 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  475. ^ "Singles ranking 2014.12.29". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  476. ^ "Djokovic and Williams headline ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 18 December 2014. Archived from the original on 29 December 2014.
  477. ^ "Djokovic Clinches Year-End No. 1 Emirates ATP Ranking For Fourth Time". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 14 September 2015. Retrieved 15 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  478. ^ "Singles ranking 2015.12.28". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  479. ^ "Williams and Djokovic named 2015 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 22 December 2015. Archived from the original on 25 December 2015.
  480. ^ Tennis Magazine (France) (March 2016)
  481. ^ "Murray Clinches Year-End No. 1 In Emirates ATP Rankings". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 20 November 2016. Retrieved 15 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  482. ^ "Singles ranking 2016.12.26". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  483. ^ "Murray and Kerber named 2016 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 13 December 2016. Archived from the original on 21 May 2017.
  484. ^ "ITF confirms no ATP points will be assigned at Olympic Games in Rio 2016".
  485. ^ "Nadal Clinches Year-End No. 1 Emirates ATP Ranking For Fourth Time". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 1 November 2017. Retrieved 15 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  486. ^ "Singles ranking 2017.12.25". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  487. ^ "Nadal and Muguruza named 2017 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 8 December 2017. Archived from the original on 11 December 2017.
  488. ^ "Federer or Nadal: Who was the men's MVP of the 2017 season?". 18 December 2017. Retrieved 8 November 2021.
  489. ^ "Djokovic Presented Year-End ATP World Tour No. 1 Trophy At 2018 Nitto ATP Finals". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 11 November 2018. Retrieved 15 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  490. ^ "Singles ranking 2018.12.31". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  491. ^ "Djokovic and Halep named 2018 ITF World Champions". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 13 December 2018. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018.
  492. ^ "Rafael Nadal Clinches Year-End No. 1 ATP Ranking For Fifth Time". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 14 November 2019. Retrieved 15 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  493. ^ "Singles ranking 2019.12.30". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  494. ^ "Nadal crowned ITF World Champion for a fourth time". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 19 December 2019.
  495. ^ "Nadal crowned ITF World Champion for a fourth time". International Tennis Federation (ITF). 19 December 2019. Archived from the original on 19 December 2019.
  496. ^ "Djokovic Clinches Year-End No. 1 In FedEx ATP Rankings; Equals Sampras' Record Of Six Year-End No. 1 Finishes". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 6 November 2020. Retrieved 15 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  497. ^ "Singles ranking 2020.12.28". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP).
  498. ^ "The Top 5 Player of the Year male contenders of 2020".
  499. ^ "Tennis.com's 2020 ATP Player of the Year". tennis.com.
  500. ^ "Novak Djokovic Clinches Record Seventh Year-End No. 1 In FedEx ATP Rankings". Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). 6 November 2021. Retrieved 15 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

Bibliography

  • Brownlee, W. Methven (1889). Lawn Tennis. Bristol: Arrowsmith.
  • Collins, Bud; Hollander, Zander (1994). Bud Collins' Modern Encyclopedia of Tennis. Gale Research. ISBN 978-0-8103-8988-5.
  • Collins, Bud; Hollander, Zander (1997). Bud Collins' Tennis Encyclopedia (3rd ed.). Detroit: Visible Ink Press. ISBN 978-1578590001.
  • Collins, Bud (2010). The Bud Collins History of Tennis (2nd ed.). New York: New Chapter Press. ISBN 978-0942257700.
  • Collins, Bud (2016). The Bud Collins History of Tennis (3rd ed.). New York: New Chapter Press. ISBN 978-1-937559-38-0.
  • Deford, Frank; Kramer, Jack (1979). The Game: My 40 Years in Tennis. New York: Putnam. ISBN 0-399-12336-9.
  • Geist, Robert (1999). Der Grösste Meister. Die denkwürdige Karriere des australischen Tennisspielers Kenneth Robert Rosewall. This is a detailed account of Ken Rosewall's career with many statistics and, in particular, his annual rankings during his professional career.
  • Lecompte, Tom (2003). The Last Sure Thing: The Life & Times of Bobby Riggs. Black Squirrel Publishing. ISBN 0-9721213-0-7.
  • McCauley, Joe (2000). The History of Professional Tennis. Windsor: The Short Run Book Company Limited.
  • Potter, E.C. (1963). Kings of the Court. The story of lawn tennis. New York: Barnes and Company. ISBN 9781125572894. Has details about the pre–World War I players.
  • Riggs, Bobby (1949). Tennis Is My Racket.. Riggs's autobiography has information about the 1946 professional tour that is slightly different from the other sources. He also writes at length about his 1948 tour with Kramer but says nothing about his playing record in 1947, about which there is much conflicting information.
  • Shannon, Bill, ed. (1981). Official Encyclopedia of Tennis (3rd, revised and updated ed.). New York [u.a.]: Harper & Row. ISBN 9780060148966.
  • Sutter, Michel (2003). Vainqueurs 1946–2003 [Winners 1946–2003]. Apparently based mostly on information drawn from the French sports magazine L'Équipe, this is an updated edition of his earlier book Vainqueurs 1946–1991. Both books list the winners of many professional tournaments and matches for the years shown in their titles, but the earlier book also listed the runner-ups, scores, and the exact dates as well as some commentary by the author for each year.
  • Vaile, P.A. (1915). Modern Tennis (2nd ed.).
  • Yallop, Richard (1984). Royal South Yarra Lawn Tennis Club: 100 Years in Australian Tennis. Curry O'Neil. ISBN 0-85902-393-1.

Other sources

  • United States Professional Lawn Tennis Association (USPLTA). The USPLTA was composed of a group of professional players in the late 1940s and early 1950s and, for several years, issued its own official rankings of professional players at the end of each year.
  • Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP). The ATP has issued its own year-end ranking of the top male players every year since 1973.

External links

Leave a Reply