Pending changes reviewer
User:Afyaniuhai
- Afyaniuhai (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Having dedicated significant time to improving BLP articles, I understand the critical importance of maintaining accuracy, neutrality, and reliability in these entries. With review pending changes rights, I aim to contribute to the ongoing efforts to uphold Wikipedia's standards and ensure the integrity of BLP and other content. ANUwrites 16:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
User:Otuọcha
- Otuọcha (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Eager to contribute to the integrity and accuracy of Wikipedia articles as a pending changes reviewer. With a passion for ensuring quality content, I am committed to upholding Wikipedia's standards and guidelines. Have also done edits on reviewing and still eager to help out. Digested as well Reviewing pending changes and it's Requirements" Otuọcha (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
User:CSMention269
- CSMention269 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm active in patrolling at RC page. I have a significant history of addressing vandals on various pages. I understand the utmost importance of improving the accuracy, verifiability and neutrality in BLP pages. I focus to ensure the integrity of BLP and other content.-- CSMention269 (talk) 13:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
User:Manyareasexpert
- Manyareasexpert (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Greetings, following this ANI Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Long time false numbers insertion into Ukrainians article , will need to review changes at Ukrainians article. Thanks! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 19:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
User:Wolverine XI
- Wolverine XI (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I would like to review the pending changes for a number of pages on my watchlist. I'm planning on using the tool for reverting vandalism and unwanted/unconstructive changes. Thanks for your time. 20 upper (talk) 07:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I updated some links in this request after the user was renamed from "20 upper" to "Wolverine XI". DanCherek (talk) 16:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
User:MSincccc
- MSincccc (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I fulfil the first five criteria for gaining pending changes reviewer rights. Further I have read the reviewing guidelines and in the recent past have been tackling edits by IP users that are not constructive to pages of which I am a significant author. I have been a consistent user for past two years as such. Gaining these rights will allow me to further my work on articles with Pending Changes Protection. Regards MSincccc (talk) 07:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Done Hey man im josh (talk) 18:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Jackarrrr
- Jackarrrr (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I feel like I've been on Wikipedia long enough and I have gotten a feel for what the general rules are, so I think that I am ready for this position. Jackarrrr (talk) 01:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
User:14 novembre
- 14 novembre (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have a significant contribution history (over 1300 edits) and some experience in Recent Changes. I think this permission could help me contribute more constructively here. 14 novembre (talk) 18:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 18:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Not done. You have had seven threads on your talk page about your editing over the last week alone, which does not give me confidence you understand policy well enough for this permission. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ingenuity Oh no. Of the 7 recent notices, the 2 speedy deletion notices were of redirects created in moving articles to draftspace. 1 was of an article I created, so nothing serious; 1 was a suggestion to run a tool, which I did, solving completely the problem. 1 was the notice that I was supposed to notify the page creator when moving to draftspace, which is not relevant here, 1 was an advice to not editing other users' pages even if appeared inappropriate; and the last 1 was a notice that 4 nominations for speedy deletion. So you can see, that, except maybe the last one, these "7 threads" are not a strong argument to prove I have not familiarity with the policy. Instead, the contrary may be proved by my numerous patrolling-related contributions. So I ask if you can kindly reconsider the request and provide a more clear evidence if you think it should be still declined. Thank you very much and kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 21:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Do you not remember the ANI thread, only three weeks ago, where you were given a final warning for disruptive editing? Plus, you're still blocked for socking on itwiki, which you last did only a couple months ago. I'm not sure why you are trying to get permissions so fast - you've only been around for a couple months. Sorry, but I am not going to grant any permissions to you at this time. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ingenuity OK. I will try again later. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 10:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Do you not remember the ANI thread, only three weeks ago, where you were given a final warning for disruptive editing? Plus, you're still blocked for socking on itwiki, which you last did only a couple months ago. I'm not sure why you are trying to get permissions so fast - you've only been around for a couple months. Sorry, but I am not going to grant any permissions to you at this time. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ingenuity Oh no. Of the 7 recent notices, the 2 speedy deletion notices were of redirects created in moving articles to draftspace. 1 was of an article I created, so nothing serious; 1 was a suggestion to run a tool, which I did, solving completely the problem. 1 was the notice that I was supposed to notify the page creator when moving to draftspace, which is not relevant here, 1 was an advice to not editing other users' pages even if appeared inappropriate; and the last 1 was a notice that 4 nominations for speedy deletion. So you can see, that, except maybe the last one, these "7 threads" are not a strong argument to prove I have not familiarity with the policy. Instead, the contrary may be proved by my numerous patrolling-related contributions. So I ask if you can kindly reconsider the request and provide a more clear evidence if you think it should be still declined. Thank you very much and kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 21:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)