Page

Meenakshi Jain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

27.6.240.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 15:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC) ""
2. 13:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780487341 by Kautilya3 (talk)"
3. 11:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780450091 by Tyler Durden (talk)"
4. 04:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780448186 by Tyler Durden (talk)"
5. 04:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780158975 by Tyler Durden (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 12:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Meenakshi Jain. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Persistent vandalism Kautilya3 (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. For some reason, administrators seem to be divided as whether blatant POV pushing is "vandalism", but I say it isn't so I treat it as a stock content dispute. Tyler Durden came close to being 3RR blocked for the same period, especially after this hypocrisy, but he hasn't done 4 reverts in 24 hours so I'll let him off with a warning to make sure you put a discussion on talk page so admins can at least see you have tried to get consensus. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

== [[User:]]

190.249.179.87

reported by User:95.123.53.78 (Result: ) ==

95.123.53.78

Page:  Page-multi error: no page detected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharon_Stone_filmography

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sharon_Stone_filmography&action=history

User being reported: User-multi error: no username detected (help).

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [diff]
2. [diff]
3. [diff]
4. [diff]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:

You are the one doing unexplained and unnecesary changes with quite an ill-mannered response. You are also the one who must be reported. 190.249.179.87 (talk) 23:23, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Malformed report; page semiprotected. El_C 09:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page: Shaun the Sheep Movie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 74.91.2.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [1]

The anon IP has continually reverted to a clear violation of WP:FILM MOS that says a film article lists only the distributor of the country of origin, in this case the UK. This editor insists that despite the MOS that the U.S. of A. must be included:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [2] - of 21:58, 15 May 2017
2. [3] - 23:33, 15 May 2017‎. Edit summary: (Seriously, it was released in the US on August 7, 2015, so it deserves a mention.)
3. [4] 23:38, 15 May 2017, Edit summary: (Oh yeah?! Well, you're not playing tough with me!)]
4. [5] - 23:40, 15 May 2017. His edit summary after my saying, "You are on the verge of 3RR": (NO I'M NOT!)]
5. [6] - 00:02, 16 May 2017, following a second editor reverting his edit.
6. [7] - 00:07, 16 May 2017‎. Edit summary: (I DON'T CARE!)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [8]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [9]

Comments:

• Blocked 31 hours. Bencherlite^Talk 00:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the record, this is User:Nate Speed. I already range blocked this ISP (looks like a webhost service), but my range block apparently wasn't wide enough. I've expanded it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page: Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DC Universe Animated Original Movies#Continuities (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 73.61.13.95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [10]
2. [11]
3. [12]
4. [13]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [14]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [15]

Comments:It's a little odd because it is two different IPs from Massachusetts. They have done nothing ever on Wikipedia except remove this section from the article stating it doesn't belong even though the source says it's DC making an animated Watchmen movie. I tried to get them to use the talk section but they just keep saying it doesn't belong. I don't know if this technically isn't a violation because it's three separate (but similar) IP's, but if it's not I would love for some help with how to resolve this. Thanks in advance.

• Page protected. Semiprotection. El_C 09:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page

Cotabato City (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

AHM22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 07:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780626446 by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk) Informations are factual and none promotional"
2. 07:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780623729 by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk) JThis informations ARE BASIC!! AND FACTUAL INFORMATION IN THE CITY! IT DOES NOT PROMOTING THE CITY!!"
3. 03:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780602294 by JJMC89 (talk) JJMC IS NOT VEIRFYING THE CITATIONS ATTACHED!"
4. 03:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780602045 by JJMC89 (talk)"
5. 03:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780601931 by JJMC89 (talk)"
6. 03:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780295457 by JJMC89 (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 03:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Cotabato City.) (TW"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 03:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "/* NOTDIRECTORY / PROMO */ new section"

Comments:

• *Level Four* grade WP:OWNership problem here undoubtedly. I've removed most of the cruft again; hopefully that's an end to it. Thanks JJMC89 for lodging this. — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 07:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've added a new link. This is ridiculous, reverting instead of posting here. — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 07:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And I've just noticed that, far from using the talk page to discuss the issue, AHM22 actually removed the discussion when it first started! — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 07:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Blocked – for a period of 60 hours. El_C 09:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page

Joan Ryan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

83.151.234.210 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 15:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780677947 by Bbb23 (talk) see talk"
2. 14:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780670026 by Bbb23 (talk) concise, relevant and well sourced."
3. Consecutive edits made from 11:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC) to 11:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
   1. 11:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780643451 by Jim1138 (talk) I will reference her overlooking a golf course later."
   2. 11:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "removing trivia"
4. 10:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780635084 by Jim1138 (talk)"
5. 09:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780631722 by Jim1138 (talk)Factual, relevant and sourced. It is still said she lives in her constituency, among her voters which is false."
6. 08:35, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780624038 by Philip Cross (talk) factual, relevant and sourced"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 15:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Joan Ryan. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

The material being added is not noteworthy and WP:COATRACKy. The IP has been warned multiple times (other things besides edit-warring). Bbb23 (talk) 15:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The information being added is not sourced, likely contentious, and is probably in violation of wp:BLP Jim1138 (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked – 48 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 19:22, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page: Charles Feltman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Reynolds89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), also his sockpuppet User:JohnsonWales (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [16]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [17]
2. [18]
3. [19] (actually User:JohnsonWales, surely a sock
4. [20] User:JohnsonWales again
5. [21] (back to Reynolds89)
6. [22]
7. [23]
8. [24]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [25]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: see Talk:Charles Feltman#Who invented the hot dog. editor has not engaged.

Comments:

Editor (and also User:JohnsonWales, who certainly quacks like his sock -- simultaneous identical attacks on the same page, with similar edit summaries) have zero constructive edits, only edit-warring on the Charles Feltman page. Herostratus (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours Watching JohnsonWales NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke NeilN. Herostratus (talk) 21:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page: Bahá'í Faith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: A35821361 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [26]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [27]
2. [28]
3. [29]
4. [30]
5. [31]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [32]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Ongoing here: [33], most recent here: [34]

Comments:

The five diffs linked as reverts are similar to past edit warring, but those in particular break the 3RR and also are the first to more flagrantly antagonize the other editors by including an obviously POV "in the wake of an apocalyptic insurrection". Cuñado ☼ - Talk 06:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There may have also been a previous violation by the same user when an anonymous account reverted to A35821361's version. Original edit by A35821361 [35], 1st revert by anon [36], 2nd revert by anon [37]. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 06:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page: List of converts to Islam from Hinduism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Drivarum (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [38] 4 May

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 14 May 2017
2. 19:26, 16 May 2017
3. 04:16, 17 May 2017
4. 05:50, 17 May 2017
5. 06:09, 17 May 2017
6. 06:32, 17 May 2017
7. 06:38, 17 May 2017
8. 06:46, 17 May 2017‎
9. 06:56 17 May 2017 (came after he responded to this report)

Violating WP:BLP by claiming A. R. Rahman, Hema Malini to be converts from Hinduism to Islam, while not providing single source of them stating that they converted from one religion to other.

Clearly not a new user, as per this WP:SPI: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anatha Gulati as well. Seems like an account created only for edit warring and disruption.

Me and other editor have reverted his WP:BLPVIO since its exempted from WP:3RRNO to remove BLP violation, but he still continues to violate BLP. Capitals00 (talk) 06:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [39] [40]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [41][42]

Comments:
User:Capitals00 is actually edit warring and keep reverting well referenced texts without participating on the article's talk page despite repeated request from my edit summary. I even responded to resolve on my talk page[43]

His reverts are:

• [44]
• [45]
• [46]
• [47]
• [48]
• [49]

and it should be noted that he has previously socked. The case is here: [50] with 3 blocked socks.

I guess he is using another sock whose diffs are:

• [51]
• [52]

to avoid 3RR until he found out that "WP:BLPCAT exempts from WP:3RR" and keep writing that when reverting my edits. Drivarum (talk) 06:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]