• Please post discussion about a specific entry on that topic's talk page.
• If you do post on my talk page, you give me the right to add any commentary or extra headings I wish. You also waive ALL rights to complain or take action regarding any changes I make to this page.
• Please note that I am not interested in receiving canned, scripted messages without my express consent. I consider them spam. If I am worth "talking" to, I insist that you use your own words.
• I get very upset when people send me warnings, treats, accusations or insults, especially when they are false. This page is not "happy fun slander corner." DO NOT DEFAME ME. I am determined to defend my reputation and integrity. I also insist on the right to respond in kind to any post.
• Apparently, some people use talk pages to defame the named user, without giving that person the ability to delete material that may be considered libellous. Therefore, defamatory statements posted here should not be presumed true.
• I am not active in any political party or public policy organization. Please do not assume that my statements represent an agenda.
• An admin once tried to block me. I ate her liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti.
• I reserve the right to update this notice without notice. All such updates are retroactive to my registration in 2005. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission or waiver of any of my rights or remedies, all of which are hereby expressly reserved.

Those who behave like insolent IT admins will be asked to do something useful... like change the toner in my LaserJet... and to quit using my T1 for serving up unlicensed reruns of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." Remember, there are starving people in Carjackistan who will gladly run my help desk for a bag of Skittles and some Gatorade. --Yakuman (数え役満)

I like this guy.

Again, welcome! DickClarkMises 14:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, this guy can send me canned messages, but not you... or that silly perl script you call a bot.Yakuman archive

Happy Cute Puppy

One the urls you added to misc external links is broken, typo perhaps? Fwend 16:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yakuman: Kudos to you too for knowing both the great Charles Goyette and "talk show host man" Ron Smith! I love those guys! (I never sent a personal message before to someone on Wikipedia...so hopefully you will see this...) --PHX-WIKI

Here I am subjected to threats, defamation, false charges and outright censorship, yet given no recourse to defend myself.

Another policy you should know about

Wikipedia:Three-revert rule - you can be blocked for reverting a page more than three times in 24 hours. You've actually exceeded this already, but I'm not aware that you've been specifically informed of the policy, so I'm not interested in having you blocked at this point. You will need to edit in accordance with policy in the future, however. --Michael Snow 21:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 3RR rule does not apply to articles about living persons! The above constitutes a defamatory statement against me that injures my reputation. I am determined to defend my reputation and integrity. I accordingly request you immediately cease and desist from this and all other acts of harassment or defamation.Yakuman 00:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Yakuman, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at Paul McKenna and have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. The 3RR rule applies to all articles, including biographies of living persons. In future, please discuss your edits on the talk page with other editors when there are objections. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 03:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I violated no rules and this charge is absolutely unfounded. "The three-revert rule does not apply to such removals." Also, you are not a legal agent of the Wikimedia Foundation. While I respect your right to comment about Wikipedia content, the statements presented to me in this matter go beyond what could be considered legitimate criticism. The above constitutes a defamatory statement against me that injures my reputation. I am determined to defend my reputation and integrity. I accordingly request you immediately cease and desist from this and all other acts of harassment or defamation. I ask that you restore my access, rescind these outrageous defamatory allegations forthwith, and publish a full retraction and apology on all suitable forums. I reserve the right to seek any and all available remedies. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission or waiver of any of my rights or remedies, all of which are hereby expressly reserved. Your cooperation in amicably resolving this matter will be greatly appreciated. Please give me your assurance that you will comply with these requests as soon as possible. Yakuman

Removing legitimate editing tags is essentially vandalism. Please do not do it again. Since you kept removing the "unsourced" tag from Ron Smith (radio host) article, I instead removed the unsourced info. Please find sources so that the info in the article is verifiable. Thanks, -Will Beback 04:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing trivially unsourced material is also vandalism. Please remember that admins are subject to the same rules as everybody else. Assume good faith and all that. The above constitutes a defamatory statement against me that injures my reputation. I am determined to defend my reputation and integrity. I accordingly request you immediately cease and desist from this and all other acts of harassment or defamation.Yakuman 07:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Defamatory statement? No, not intended as such. I do assume good faith, but then you repeatedly removed the "unsourced" tag, while at the same time removing material added by others because it contained, in your words, "unsourced claims". Let's all wok on the same page by contributing material which is verifiable and NPOV. Thanks, -Will Beback 08:47, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Unfortunately, you accused me of vandalism, a charge that is patently false and meets the test of defamation: “any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation.” See also WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF. You also removed material from the aforementioned page that is trivially easy to verify. You could have shown willingness to work, in your words, “on the same page” by simply adding easy-to-find cites instead of making an inflammatory accusation towards me. Please stop and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Do not remove legitimate content, nor place inappropriate content on my talk page. If you have a problem with what has been written, then address the issues on a case by case basis. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Yakuman 02:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your charge of defamation constitutes a legal threat against Will Beback for which you can be banned from Wikipedia. Please withdraw the threat. WAS 4.250 07:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]