Hello, Vinrpm.p6054, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to United States Air Force seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BilCat (talk) 05:37, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT over crowd articles with image(s) per WP:IMAGEMOS. Further do not engaged in an edit warring, you are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users. If you have a specific issue take it up on the talk page of that article, & discuss it there. - Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HaeB. I noticed that you recently removed content from Indian road network without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HaeB (talk) 09:02, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Economy of India. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your edit contradicted the cited reference. David Biddulph (talk) 16:13, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of India. Yet again you contradicted the cited reference. David Biddulph (talk) 09:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Pakistan International Airlines, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have made multiple reverts to edits by you. The main reason is making changes without citing any references and the absence of reasons for your edits. Not adding an explanation for an edit is guaranteed to attract attention, it is in your own interests to give a reason. If you want your edits to stick, you must provide sources. It is important that you build a reputation for trustworthiness in Wikipedia; your track record for reverts and no citations is noted and right now you need to do a lot of work to rebuild trust. I encourage you to keep editing but: give explanations, provide sources. Ex nihil ^(talk) 20:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently removed content from Boeing AH-64 Apache without any explanation why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with a clear and accurate edit summary. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Please provide valid reason(s) for your edit in the edit summary field. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pune, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your edit to Pune does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 17:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vinrpm.p6054:: I second GreaterPonce. You have made unexplained and frankly unnecessary deletions on Brigade Road too. Please follow Ponce's advice and use the edit summaries. Looking at your contribs, it appears that you make a lot of unexplained deletions; please refrain from doing so in the future. Best, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hyderabad, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Prolix 💬 13:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Islamic terrorism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 15:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 20:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Wire (India), you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 01:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please do not add international flights to Indira Gandhi International Airport or Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport without including a reference indicating that the flight is currently being operated. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 14:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Narendra Modi, you may be blocked from editing. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the flags on 2021 Formula One World Championship#Calendar are for the countries that the circuits are located in. The Sochi Autodrom is in the country of Russia, even if drivers and teams cannot use the Russian flag when competing, and so we use Russian flag. Same as how the Emilia Romagna Grand Prix at Imola uses Italian flag (because it's in Italy). There was a discussion about this a few years ago at WT:F1, any changes would need to be discussed there. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Red Bull Racing has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. TylerBurden (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]