Hello, SpectresWrath, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Panda619 (talk) 02:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 23:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Is It Wrong to Try to Pick Up Girls in a Dungeon? into List of Is It Wrong to Try to Pick Up Girls in a Dungeon? light novels. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:15, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime episodes into That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime (season 1). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Nura: Rise of the Yokai Clan episodes ‎ into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beyblade: Metal Fusion (season 1), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 06:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Beyblade: Metal Fusion (season 1), you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 02:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Just to clarify, this reversion] was inappropriate for two reasons. Per infobox instructions, country names are not linked so Japan should not be linked. The episode list that you added is inconsistent with the parent article, Beyblade: Metal Fusion, lists Beyblade: Metal Fusion (season 1) as the episode list for the series and you have provided no justification for your edits. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! AussieLegend (✉) 02:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• You need to slow down with the CSD tagging, such as here and here. Incorrect speedy deletion tags can be very disruptive. Moreover, there doesn't appear to be anything wrong with most of the redirects that you've been tagging. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Haikyu!! (season 1). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 00:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Just to clarify, it does appear that a number of the episode summaries have been copied from the sources mentioned on the deletion tag. If you wish to contest the deletion you should remove all of the summaries that appearto have been copied from other sources. --AussieLegend (✉) 00:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even you can by reading them that they written here first, then copied on to another website. I seen this happened alot of times. I even left a in the talk page that that everything was copied from List of Haikyu!! episodes. SpectresWrath (talk) 00:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I checked back to the first version of List of Haikyu!! episodes, on 31 August 2015‎, created by Aninonymous. The apparently copied text was present in that version, and in all later versions. And in those cases where minor changes were made to the text, the older version was closer to that now on themoviedb.org /tv/60863-haikyuu/episodes?credit_id=5a0b0acf925141310f01ac20&person_id=5385d0180e0a26144d001421, which appears to date from before 2015. This is a classic situation when the Wikipedia text was in fact copied long ago from an external source, and then gradually modified. I am very aware of the "backwards copy" kid of situation, where another site copies from Wikipedia and is then claimed to be the source, and I have rejected a number of tags for speedy deletion when I could show that it applied. It doesn't appear to me to be th4e case here. I have therefore deleted Haikyu!! (season 1), and all but the few recent revisions of List of Haikyu!! episodes that do not contain the episode summaries. If you can show me any trustworthy evidence that the external page was first created after 31 August 2015‎, that would make a difference.Unfortunately the Internet Archive does not apparently does not capture this site, I suspect because it is generated dynamically from a database. I am sorry, and this was none of your doing, but the copyright policy on Wikipedia is strict. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 01:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, before you do significant copies from one page on Wikipedia to another, please read Copying within Wikipedia for the proper procedures. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 01:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you at least show me the history link from 17:54, 28 June 2020 so I can restore the page without the summaries because this isn't right for other people. SpectresWrath (talk) 02:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SpectresWrath, greetings. I have noticed your recent actions in terms of moving for anime season summary articles. While I agree with the naming conventions as per WP:TVSEASON, I believe all summary articles of a particular series should be renamed, including season 1 as well as per WP:TITLECON. All summary articles of a particular series should be consistent. Unnamelessness (talk) 06:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give me an example. SpectresWrath (talk) 22:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What I've done:

Date A Live (season 1) → Date A Live I for the consistency of "Date A Live + [a roman numeral]".

Some other series should've done:

1. A Certain Magical Index (season 1) → A Certain Magical Index I for the consistency of "A Certain Magical Index + [a roman numeral]".
2. Psycho-Pass (season 1) → Psycho-Pass 1 for the consistency of "Psycho-Pass + [a natural number]".

Naming conventions need to be consistent as per WP:TITLECON. It just cannot be like XXX (season 1) for the first season, XXX 2/3/4 for the rest seasons. Article names should be fixed in one style. Unnamelessness (talk) 03:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SpectresWrath:, You obviously don't understand what I mean. Unnamelessness (talk) 08:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I understand after seeing it, but the official title for season one doesn't have the one in it, so renamed it with (2013 TV series) like how High School DxD season one has it. SpectresWrath (talk) 20:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SpectresWrath:, The High School DxD series is another situation. Season 2/3/4 have their independent names, i.e. New, Born, Hero, so the naming conventions are their official names. However, the official name of season 1 is High School DxD, which has already been occupied, so we need an extra "(2012 TV series)" for disambiguation as per WP:NCTV.

As for series like Date A Live, they are in another scenario. Their naming conventions are "[series name] + [season number]", except for season 1, which is inconsistency in terms of Wikipedia's naming rules. Season 1 should've named in the same format, not just its official name. For some other examples, you can go and check The Amazing Race series. Unnamelessness (talk) 02:55, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I see you are moving article content again, without proper attribution. You know, or you should know, how to do this properly. Drmies (talk) 21:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• SpectresWrath, I saw the three requests left above by Diannaa. You again copied a bunch of content. You must not have read WP:Copying within Wikipedia: the very first paragraph tells you how to do it. Now I revert you, and you revert again, and I do the actual work for you at List of Fairy Gone episodes--and you have nothing to say? You need to explain what is going on or you might end up blocked for WP:CIR. Drmies (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • One, I mentioned and linked the new page in my edit summary to tell everyone where the info was going. Two, I also used the template:copied on the new page's talk page as well. You just reverted my edit so fast without even checking. SpectresWrath (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you. I wish you had given attribution in the edit summary, like the first paragraph of that page says--and I wish I didn't have to twist your arm for you to communicate. Drmies (talk) 23:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • I did as "Moved to new page" with the link in the edit summary. SpectresWrath (talk) 00:08, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • Lesigh. You should have put the attribution in the edit summary of the first creation of the new article. Seriously. It is in the NEW article that attribution needs to be given. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, wanna talk with whatever account you're using? Join with random name here [1]. Avdald (talk) 20:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, still not interested on having a real conversation? Avdald (talk) 23:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copy pasted from Cwmhiraeth talk page, still no response:

Ok, firstly I told you that I did not see any problem with that hence why I corrected the note to precise that all english titles used in this table, unless stated otherwise are the "official licensed" ones but yet you are the one changing it to "literally translated" which doesn't necessarily mean official and is completely false since the licensed version will never literally translate word by word, they will always omit/change some words and/or not respecting the proper ellipsis and exclamation marks from the episode's original names so you are contradicting yourself here. Secondly why do you only mention this first point and not the others? I will mention them another time and hopefully you won't ignore them again. Concerning the romanization of the title of episode 943, the furigana on the kanji "地獄" (Jigoku) is "インフェルノ" (Inferuno) meaning that the kanji shoud follow the pronunciation as well as the romanization of the katakana and not the usual hiragana "じごく" (Jigoku) if you're not aware of that simple Japanese fact, you should refrain from editing Japanese related article in the future. Now moving on the staff, you stated that the page didn't list the storyboard, thing which is again false, if you took the time to actually read the article you care so much about, you would know that the storyboard staff has already been listed on episode 900, 903, 906, 912, 916, 921 and 923 or am I hallucinating? And finally, concerning the title of the episode 944, the official english licensed one still not known yet, a provisional one was literally translated - yeah now you can use this term - and presented by an annotation perfectly stating it. None of my contributions are against any rules and are, unlike yours, in favor, they are simple facts and doesn't need all those explanations to be implemented into the article, now if you want proof, please ask for it I have time to actually check the page unlike you, if you're not able to contradict me and just saying "we do this and we do that" then you obviously don't have any argument and just wasting everyone's time. Avdald (talk) 09:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Demon Slayer will be replacing Samurai Jack on the 10th. Zap2it and my DVR are both reporting this. Here's a shot of the page and my DVR: https://imgur.com/a/q0lTyW9 I'm kinda surprised by this myself, but here we are. Matty-chan (talk) 21:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edit again without giving me a reason here, or in the summary, or on the talk page there, or my talk page. I gave proof. Please stop reverting that edit unless we talk about it or I will report you for vandalism. Matty-chan (talk) 22:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on One Piece (season 20); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. jp×g 05:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My last edit for that page was at 23:33 and I gave a reason for undoing the edit. I'm not engaging in a edit war now. SpectresWrath (talk) 06:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on One Piece (season 20); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please see the talk page and at least make an attempt to reach consensus before simply reverting people you disagree with. Furthermore, the IP editor on that article has an extremely suspicious resemblance to you. jp×g 05:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. jp×g 05:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:SpectresWrath, you should read all about edit warring, because you need to stop doing it. Your account will be disabled for months to years if you are not able to be civil and follow Wikipedia's rules.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Quisqualis (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --Quisqualis (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]