—Welcome to my talk page, Please start new sections at the bottom  SakiMonk 
21:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC) Welcome!

Hello, Sakimonk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tim Vickers (talk) 16:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Faerie's aire and death waltz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 18:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Libyan woman.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Everything in the article is cited to reliable sources and is directly related to the notability of the individual. Removal of such information is considered a violation of Wikipedia's policies WP:NPOV. If you have issues with specific statements in the article that you believe are not in accordance with Wikipedia policies, please bring them up on the talk page. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 02:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

I have responded on my talk page to keep the conversation in one place. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 16:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

The word certainly has Aramaic connections, but unfortunately for you, the idea that the word as it is used in the Jewish Bible has equal and parallel Aramaic and Hebrew origins is not very credible, while the idea that the Arabic language had significant direct influence on Biblical Hebrew religious terminology is laughable. If people who know more about the details of a subject than you do are telling you that something is not accurate or helpful, then that's usually a useful warning sign. AnonMoos (talk) 08:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Those of us who no longer have the time to bring some objectivity to articles on Islamic topics appreciate those of you who do have the time, and use it wisely. Keep up the good work. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Wahhabi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. David¹²¹⁷ 02:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks I realise this hence why I am making a new section on the Talk page to prevent this continuing. My reversions were intended to enforce WP:NPOV as there was consistant violations from Organometalic1 regarding his edits which User talk:Mark Arsten is also concerned about. Thanks very much Sakimonk (talk) 02:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

• Be careful about 3RR, some admins are very strict about it, others will be more understanding. So the user came right back and started again after his block expired? It might be a good idea to directly contact the blocking admin in this case in lieu of filing another 3RR report, although that's not a bad idea either. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wang Zi Ping2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:47, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Sakimonk, i think your wrong in asserting that I vandalised the athari page. I created the page, which was vandalised by others who clearly (prob like yourself) have assumed wahhabs views are also athari - they are clearly NOT - and at best you should have objectively stated that this is disputed. It seems like there a concerted campaign from misinformed individuals to assert this incorrect info onto wiki. Sad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivegoturnumber (talk • contribs) 22:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

It makes perfect sense to merge them. The Alex Day is a cover. They do sound alike, don't they? --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 22:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

"Perfect sense" to you is not the same for me. Please understand that Wikipedia is impartial and covers and originals are not one and the same. Sakimonk (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

I had commented on the talk page for Lady Godiva (song), but apparently you did not see it. Consensus on Wikipedia has determined that originals and covers of the same song should not be split into separate articles. Please read WP:SONGS where it says: "When a song has renditions (recorded or performed) by more than one artist, discussion of a particular artist's rendition should be included in the song's article (never in a separate article)". See Without You (Badfinger song) and Kansas City (Leiber and Stoller song) as examples. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

This discussion has been taken to the appropriate WikiProject at WT:SONGS#Lady Godiva. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 10:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

And further to the above conversation I have re-merged the two articles. Not sure there was anything to discuss. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

...for the barnstar. I couldn't believe that the same user was back so quickly. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 04:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

That's what you call perseverance I guess! It's a shame it wasn't put to much good :) Sakimonk (talk) 04:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Blocked and the page is semi-protected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 03:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Great news, thanks very much for being so prompt. Sakimonk (talk) 03:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Sakimonk, you replaced dates in an article with an incoherent mess of "CE" and "AH" dates which would lead to persons being born around 700CE and dying around 760AH. That is well over 700 years old. When I reverted this, you got very angry and posted that I am being disruptive. I understand that you are biased and have personal, political interest in replacing commonly-accepted dating with Islamic dating, but that is no excuse for factual error and animus when you are called out on it. Please do not disrupt anymore. 184.77.173.64 (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

To be clear, even Abu Hanifah's page says he died in 148 AH, or 767 AD. So please read that page before you start going crazy and claiming I am being disruptive.

Thank you, your recent corrections, while still censoring out important information, is at least now mathematically correct. 184.77.173.64 (talk) 19:50, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

do you understand? Baboon43 (talk) 02:29, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Baboon43 (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Al-Ahbash. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SudoGhost 23:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Well I'm sorry to see you go but it is certainly understandable. Being at university and working in a contentious area is not the kind of stress you need. I hope that sometime you will be able to return. Good luck with your studies. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 15:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Sakimonk. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Al-Ahbash. Thank you. -- McKhan (talk)

You will be missed. MezzoMezzo (talk) 11:50, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

You are more than welcome to help with Ahbashism_campaign as Baboon43 (talk · contribs) keep on pushing his Al-Ahbash POVs on all the Al-Ahbash related pages. Thank you. McKhan (talk)

Thank you for uploading File:Wang Zi Ping2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Sakimonk! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 14:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Dear Sakimonk, it would be my pleasure to help on the Athari article so please do let me know if I can be of any assistance. Regards. Mbcap (talk) 22:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello. You removed large sections of text which were properly sourced and cited, and which directly relate to the subject's notability—especially as it relates to the Enlish-language WIkipedia project. Please review the five pillars of Wikipedia, especially those that relate to the point-of-view from which articles need to be written and the prohibition against original research. Subsequent violations of Wikipedia policies and guidelines may require measures to be taken to protect the integrity of the project. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 19:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Please be careful, you appear to be starting an edit war on Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais. Please respond to my explanation of why your edits are incorrect on the talk page before blindly reverting again. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 19:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Attention requested on Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais regarding the edits of User:Sakimonk. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 19:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Please note that continued edit-warring will get you blocked. Please stop edit-warring, go to the talk page of the article and discuss the issue refraining from personal attacks.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

“WarKosign” 20:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

All articles related to the Israeli-Arab conflict are subject to a 1RR limitation. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Arab-Israeli_Arbitration_Enforcement . The relevant part, bolded for you, reads: "All articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed, are under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume it is related. . your recent edits on Israel have broken this 1RR. I suggest you stop edit warring over there. Brad Dyer (talk) 00:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Following your edits? It seems more like your following mine. If you do not stop labeling movements as sect I will report you myself. Misdemenor (talk) 21:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mujaddid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andalusian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Dear Sakimonk, Qadiani is a religious slur and therefore shouldn't be added as you did here to the lede on Ahmadiyya just like we don't add the N word in articles. Thanks.--Peaceworld 18:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Qadian is a city... Qadianis come form Qadian. You guys have made up that it's a slur, it's the most common phrase. The only reason you don't like it is because you don't want people to know that the only people in the world following qadianism are a bunch of people who live in like one or two cities. Sakimonk ^talk 23:15, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mujaddid. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --MelanieN (talk) 19:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)