Welcome to Off2riorob's talkpage. If you are unable to post here follow this link to post at my unprotected talkpage.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

You have removed a block of text on the talk page. I take it this was a good-faith edit and you did not intend to do this, however there was more to the edit you reverted than I think you may have realised.

If you know how to archive a talk page (or at least parts of it) I would be grateful for any assistance. Thanks, regards, Mtaylor848 (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,

Kind regards Mtaylor848 (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well said. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it needs saying or it will be like Groundhog day, I know your busy as well Moon. I will try to assist as I can, best. Off2riorob (talk) 21:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Rob. There are never enough hours in the day. :/ That copyright problem pile gets bigger and bigger and bigger. :P --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that User:Sir Stanley is wasting quite a bit of time with his contributions and I noted that you've reverted him at least once. Please let me know if this behaviour continues, as I don't think we should tolerate such an approach. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help in this recent mess The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 01:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes, welcome back. Off2riorob (talk) 11:29, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:HBC_Archive_Indexerbot/logs reports "Not writing to User talk:Off2riorob/Archive index as I cannot find permission (sourced from: User talk:Off2riorob)". Replace the User talk:Off2riorob/Archive index with initiation code to start the indexing process with an index page up-to-date. If you don't want an index, then remove the Indexerbot code snipper from your page. Let me know if you need help. --Kslotte (talk) 12:06, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As (legitimately) suggested by you here in "Talk:Afro-Brazilian", Ninguém sourced most or all of the claims that this or that person named in Afro-Brazilian was "black". While I don't claim that he did this as well as anyone might hope, this work by him strikes me as well-intentioned and solid -- and I imagine that it took him a considerable time. On 18 September, you reacted to it with the comment:

these links are more like spam than worthwhile supporting WP:RS for a cited claim of colour and ethnic ancestry

I suppose that this struck him as surprisingly dismissive. (It certainly struck me that way.) He responded:

So which of those authors are spammers, exactly?

I wrote a longer reply on this and also on your comments on the desirability of English sources or translations.

You haven't replied, even though your list of contributions shows that you have found time to edit many other articles. Please return to that talk page and respond there. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 08:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]