Cannabis Sativa

Content deleted Content added
DYKadminBot (talk | contribs)
Giving DYK credit for Maison royale de Saint-Louis on behalf of Materialscientist
{{subst:cfd-notify|Cook Baronets|2009 November 29}}
Line 330: Line 330:
|On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#November 21 2009|November 21, 2009]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Maison royale de Saint-Louis]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <sub>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]])</sub> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#November 21 2009|November 21, 2009]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Maison royale de Saint-Louis]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <sub>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]])</sub> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|} [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 13:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
|} [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 13:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


==[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|Categories for discussion]] nomination of [[:Category:Cook Baronets]]==

[[Image:Info non-talk.png|left|36px|]]'''[[:Category:Cook Baronets]]''', {{#if:|which is under the purview of this WikiProject|which you created}}, has been nominated for [[Wikipedia:Category deletion policy|deletion]], [[:Category:Categories for merging|merging]], or [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)|renaming]]. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 November 29#Category:Cook Baronets|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|Categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you.

Revision as of 06:35, 29 November 2009


WikiProjects etc.
Military history
Kent
Opera
Christianity
Translations
Other Projects
Images
DYKs
Official
France
Other talk
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016






Translation from Dutch Wikipedia

All existing talk on this topic is stored here. Unlike the other sections in my archive, this is meant as an active talk-archive, so if you have any additional discussion on any of the topics stored there, or on a new topic related to such translations, do not hesitate to add it there. Neddyseagoon - talk 12:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please place interwikis at the end of the article

I have noticed on a few articles that you have created that the interwiki links [[fr:french equivalent]] have been placed before the category. I have fixed the ones that Wikiproject Check Wikipedia has identified [1]. Please place the interwikis at the end of the articles you create, thank you.Naraht (talk) 15:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - June 2009

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:H75982.jpg

File:H75982.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:HMS Northumberland 1890 USNHC NH 75982.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:HMS Northumberland 1890 USNHC NH 75982.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hilariontemptation.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hilariontemptation.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:PaintbyNumbers10rs.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Temptation of Saint Hilarion.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Indidle2.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Indidle2.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:33, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:IMG 4972.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Site of St Olave Silver Street.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:IMG 4461.JPG is now available as Commons:File:St Botolph Aldersgate west front.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:IMG 4470.JPG is now available as Commons:File:St Botolph Aldersgate from Postmans Park.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:33, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:IMG 4380.JPG is now available as Commons:File:St Lawrence Jewry.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:SavoyChapel.jpg is now available as Commons:File:SavoyChapel.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:IMG 6713.JPG is now available as Commons:File:St Michaels Church Camden Town.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mw60446.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Tomb of John Tradescant the elder and John Tradescant the younger.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris-Ponts-StMichel.png is now available as Commons:File:Paris-Ponts-StMichel.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris-Ponts-StLouis.png is now available as Commons:File:Paris-Ponts-StLouis.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris-Ponts-Petit.png is now available as Commons:File:Paris-Ponts-Petit.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris-Ponts-National.png is now available as Commons:File:Paris-Ponts-National.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris-Ponts-Concorde.png is now available as Commons:File:Paris-Ponts-Concorde.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Current Opera Project discussions

Hello from the Opera Project. I'm writing to all members on the active list to let them know that we could use your input on several issues currently under discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera:

  • The use of italics in article titles
  • Possible changes to the article guidelines concerning "Selected Recordings"
  • Suggestions for the July Composer of the Month and Opera of the Month

Please drop by if you have the time. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 08:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

made a pass per your request, do you want the coat of arms stuff? (i left out) thanks for the credit template for talk page. i'll go through les duc de mouchy. lot's of french nobility work to do Pohick2 (talk) 21:40, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - July 2009

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter
Issue X - July 2009
Project news
  • The Christianity project and its related projects currently have 76 FAs, 8 FLs, and 148 GAs. We gained new recognized content in each field, with 4 FAs promoted, 2 FLs, and 3 GAs. Congratulations and a big thank you to all those who worked on these articles!
Member news
Other news
  • I am still working on the categorization matter. With any luck, we should have some results by the end of the month. There are also some discussions regarding project related activities at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/General Forum. One issue in particular that might be addressed is possible elections of new coordinators. Anyone interested in serving in such a capacity is more than welcome to indicate as much.
Related projects news
Member contest of the month
  • The previous contests are still ongoing, because of the extreme amount of time the categorization is taking me. Anyone who can bring any of the few Stub class articles among the project's 1000 most often accessed articles by the end of July will get an award. Please see the details Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity#Project challenge of the month.
Christianity related news
From the Members

Welcome to the Tenth issue of the WikiProject Christianity newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

It has been a long time since the last coordinators election. There is a lot for people to do, and I certainly would welcome seeing any individuals with an interest in such a position put themselves forward as candidates. I in particular would very much like to see some degree of "specialization" in the coordinators, so that, for instance, we might have someone knowledgable about some of the specific Christian faith traditions or other main subjects, like Orthodoxy, Lutheranism, Mormonism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, art, theology, and so on. If any parties who have experience with some of our faith- or- subject-based content would be interested in being candidates, I would love to see them do so. Please feel free to take part in the discussion regading what the minimum number of category items is, and how to deal with the non-qualifying categories, on the General Forum page.

John Carter (talk) 23:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
This newsletter is automatically delivered by ~~~~

John Carter (talk) 23:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been meaning to contact you

You began the project City of Rome. The project is not completly defunct. I am not clear if you are still running the project or if there actualy is a particular editor that runs projects or if they simply take on a life of their own.

If you have lost interest in the project I wanted to take over and perhaps begin to learn how to expand and build other projects.

If you are still intending to run the project please let me know if my work and changes to templates (Roman Monuments} are OK.--Amadscientist (talk) 00:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GWhitehead.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GWhitehead.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:11, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cranbrook Schools

Would you be so nice and have a look on the article "Cranbrook Schools"? Another user constantly tries to change the article into an older version and I don´t know if he is right with doing that. I would appreciate your opinion on that!Thanks very much in advance!--92.227.212.128 (talk) 09:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biographical Dictionary of the Extreme Right Since 1890 (2nd nomination), which you contributed to. Steve Dufour (talk) 03:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for File:RomansLanding.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RomansLanding.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?--Jappalang (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:RomansLanding.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:RomansLanding.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - August 2009

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please translate

Please translate this text from your article: I francesi la mattina del 22 aprile portarono alcuni cannoni presso porta San Zeno con l'intenzione di abbatterla, e furono fermati grazie a dei fortunati colpi di cannone sparati dalle mura da alcuni cittadini, che li obbligarono nuovamente, così, a ritirarsi. Intanto i francesi all'interno di Castel Vecchio erano in grave difficoltà, tanto che alcuni soldati fuggirono dal ponte scaligero. Ci fu anche un tentativo mal riuscito di riconquistare il colle San Leonardo. La polvere da sparo e le munizioni stavano però scarseggiando, ma anche il cibo cominciava a non essere più sufficiente per la popolazione, dato che la città si era riempita di volontari e soldati. Il Senato inviò addirittura una lettera in cui invitava la città alla resa, per cui le maggiori authorità a Verona si riunirono per decidersi sul da farsi. Durante la riunione si arrivò alla conclusione che ormai non sarebbero giunti rinforzi, per cui bisognava cominciare a prepararsi per la resa: i capi militari andarono per le strade invitando a fermare i combattimenti: molti ufficiali Veneti uscirono e così influenzati dalle Venete Cariche, scorsero le contrade tutte di Verona proclamando una tregua conclusa, ed esortando tutti gli abitanti a desistere da qualunque atto di ostilità, poiché trattavasi di pace, né tardarono i migliori tra i cittadini ad unirsi a loro onde calmare il popolo, infruttuosi non furono i loro consigli e la moltitudine si lasciò persuadere dalle voci della ragione e delle necessità: paga di non abbandonare i suoi posti di difesa, vi si tenne tranquilla, e non tirò più un colpo di cannone o di fucile. Così ebbe fine una battaglia, la quale principata entro le nostre mura alle ore ventuna italiane[29] del giorno 17 aprile era durata senza interruzione sino presso alle ore parimenti ventuna[29] del giorno 23. Allo strepito delle armi, al clamore delle voci, al movimento continuo di una numerosa popolazione, successero un cupo silenzio, un nesto riposo, una ferale immobilità.[30]

Il valore mostrato dai veronesi, che riuscirono a contrastare le incursioni di pattuglie francesi e a sopportare il cannoneggiamento della città, non avrebbe potuto resistere però all'assedio di 15.000 soldati,[31] per cui il 23 aprile era ormai presa la decisione della resa, si inviò quindi un messaggio a Balland in cui si richiedeva un armistizio di 24 ore. Il comandante concesse allora una tregua sino al mezzogiorno del giorno seguente.

Alla fine le morti francesi ammontarono a 500 soldati,[32] i feriti furono circa un migliaio, e i prigionieri 2.400 (di cui 500 soldati e 1.900 loro famigliari).[33] Dunque dei 3.000 soldati francesi di guarnigione[34] circa mille (tra morti e prigionieri) furono messi fuori combattimento.

CfD nomination of Category:Naval lists

I have nominated Category:Naval lists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Military lists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Octane (talk) 23:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Francis I of Beauharnais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on William IV Beauharnais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on William III Beauharnais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jean Beauharnais, seigneur de Miramion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on William II Beauharnais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on William I Beauharnais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neddy, an article I recently created, Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, has been nominated for deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen. Please take the time to weigh in and stop its deletion. Thanks again for all your wonderful contributions to Wikipedia! Caponer (talk) 17:05, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:La Monnaie company has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jafeluv (talk) 11:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also related CfD entry for Category:La Monnaie companies. Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 12:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Acadfrcat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 17:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translations

Hello,

I saw you translate articles from French Wikipedia. It would be nice to indicate in the discussion page that they are translations. I did it for Petites écoles de Port-Royal and Solitaires of Port-Royal, could you think to do for other items you translate? It is important to respect the license. Thank you, --Serein (talk) 23:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

House of Tosny numbering conventions

I've started a discussion at Talk:Raoul IV de Conches, hoping to get a consensus for standardizing the numbering of the various Raouls and Rogers in House of Tosny-related articles. Since I am just a careful observer and not an expert on the topic, I thought I'd solicit your opinion on the subject there since you have been a significant contributor to this group of articles. Thanks. Koumz (talk) 21:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Gladiator Last Days of Pompeii 001.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Gladiator Last Days of Pompeii 001.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Art of ancient Egypt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 02:28, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Bernard Lens, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Lens. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jurgen Ovens

Hello Neddyseagoon, where did you get this information from: The Earl of Arundel owned seventeen paintings by Ovens. Can you supply us with a link, a reference to this inventory? I was not able to find anything on internet. There are too many dukes of Norfolk, Arundel's, I need a better clue. Greetings from AmsterdamTaksen (talk) 07:08, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:La-4

Hello. I noticed that you have a user la-4 template on your Babel. I was wondering if you would be willing to translate my username into Latin (for Vicipaedia and for personal knowledge). I know "Weak" is debilis and "Willed" is animus. So would it be animus debilus since animus is second declension singular? Thanks. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 00:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article A Clue: No has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

nn tv episode

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 21:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maison royale de Saint-Louis

Updated DYK query On November 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maison royale de Saint-Louis, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Cook Baronets, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Leave a Reply