This editor is a WikiGnome. This user is a participant in WikiProject Ice Hockey. Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

Hello to all fellow Wikipedians. GoodDay 22:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC).[reply]

This user has been on Wikipedia for 18 years, 6 months and 14 days.

You may be wondering why my archives only start at August 2007. The reason: I didn't archive my pages before that date, I merely deleted them (as I didn't know how to archive). Therefore, if anyone wishes to see material before August 2007? check out this talkpage's 'history'.

Awards

I've an Awards page, where I keep a list of Wikipedia awards bestowed upon me.

Edit count & Pie chart

Edit records

My Arbcom Case

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GoodDay
Opened/Closed in 2012.
Amended in 2013, 2014 & 2016

Archives

Aug–Sept 2007 Sept 2007–Feb 2008 Feb–Apr 2008 Apr–Jul 2008 Jul–Oct 2008 Oct–Nov 2008 Nov 2008–Jan 2009 Jan–Feb 2009 Feb–Mar 2009 Mar–May 2009 May–Jun 2009 Jun–Jul 2009 Jul–Sept 2009 Sept–Oct 2009 Oct–Nov 2009 Nov–Dec 2009 Dec 2009–Jan 2010 Jan–Feb 2010 Feb 2010 Feb–Apr 2010 Apr–Jun 2010 Jun–Oct 2010 Oct–Nov 2010 Nov 2010–Jan 2011 Jan–Feb 2011 Feb 2011 Feb–Mar 2011 Mar–Apr 2011 Apr–May 2011 May–Nov 2011 Nov 2011–Feb 2012 Feb–May 2012 May–Aug 2012 Aug 2012–Feb 2013 Feb 2013–May 2014 May 2014–Jun 2015 Jun 2015–Feb 2016 Feb–Jul 2016 Jul 2016–Jan 2017 Jan 2017–Jan 2018 Jan 2018–Feb 2019 Feb 2019–Jul 2020 Jul 2020–Aug 2021 Aug–Dec 2021 Dec 2021–present

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christine Fang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Fang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Just wanted you to know that the Queen of Jamaica has been unranked by some user. Peter Ormond 💬 10:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Ormond: got it. I suspect the fellow (Elfast) who boldly made the change, is going to be troublesome. GoodDay (talk) 00:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were right. Peter Ormond 💬 14:15, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Ormond: You're gonna have to revert him as well, unless you're agreeing with him. It can't be entirely my responsibility. Anyways, I'm kinda getting fed up with the 'lack of support' over at Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II. It truly annoys me, when any editor or editors try to pretend that the UK isn't 'special' among the other Commonwealth countries, via ignoring WP:WEIGHT. -- GoodDay (talk) 00:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted another edit today before reading your comment. Also, I think you were waiting for THAT MOVE at Talk:Queen of Ghana for sometime. Peter Ormond 💬 08:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to read my edit. I haven't ever removed the entry for Jamaica, I'm just editing the number 14th for - (for unranked). Please report if you think it's necessary, but reading the history of the article, I'm not the only one who have done this edit and have been reverted by you, and other people notice the inconsistency in the discussion page. You don't think to consider the point (maybe you think I'm removing Jamaica) and I don't see any answer about this specific point (the number ! not the independant entry). (You seem very stubborn and you don't seem to consider the point. If you report other people will be able to read it). Elfast (talk) 09:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, as I'm really not sure you've understood what I'm editing : I'm not removing the independant Jamaican entry, but just the number (which is a compromise). You can't be second and 14th at the same time as a person. Elfast (talk) 10:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Elfast: if you want to make such a big change? go the RFC route. GoodDay (talk) 00:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They are planning to ruin that page! :'( Peter Ormond 💬 16:04, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Ormond: If 'B' is chosen, I hope they'll adopt my version. List UK, Canada, Australia & New Zealand (current version), with an added footnote for the other 11 realms. GoodDay (talk) 19:29, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you revert your reversion of my edit; you are now in violation of the discretionary sanctions on that article. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: I suggest you observe WP:BRD & not try to force changes, without a consensus. GoodDay (talk) 22:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Sunshine!
		Hello GoodDay! Interstellarity (talk) has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding {{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}} to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! Interstellarity (talk) 22:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy first day of summer (or winter) wherever you live. Interstellarity (talk) 22:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Interstellarity:, thanks & to you as well. GoodDay (talk) 22:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Challenging a clusure --Pete (talk) 02:22, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Must you always be a pain in the 'bleep', at least once a year? Settle down & wait the RFC out. GoodDay (talk) 02:24, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing personal. We discussed closure over the past two days, agreeing to leave it open one more day. There was no more input and the consensus was clear. Use the process if you want to challenge closure. --Pete (talk) 02:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I reckon you want to be the boss & you're not gonna stop, until one of us gets blocked for edit warring. @Peter Ormond:, it's your call. Too bad, that article's been made to look stupid. But, I've seen stranger results on this project. GoodDay (talk) 02:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Skyring: Though I must admit. Your version of Option B, is acceptable. GoodDay (talk) 02:43, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I disagree. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When I get a hunch @Deepfriedokra:, it tends to be accurate. GoodDay (talk) 12:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have my own idea of who this sounds like. I assume the Arbs have CU'd so maybe not. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, the lad's soon gonna end up blocked. GoodDay (talk) 14:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to remove this comment before someone replies to it on that talk page. That sort of battleground mentality is really not helpful in what you already know to be an already fraught topic area. Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sideswipe9th:, it's that kinda heavy restriction on those talkpages, that causes such friction. Anyways, if you want to 'remove' my post? then by all means, do so. GoodDay (talk) 23:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my. Those restrictions are quite, quite necessary. If you want to see what unrestricted dialogue between pro and anti trans commentators looks like, Twitter and Reddit are both good places to start.

In any event, per WP:TPO it's not really appropriate for me to remove that comment directly, as it doesn't fit any of the criteria for removal by another. That's why I suggested it here. Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wont't be responding to anybody, who responds to it. I haven't been overly involved with LGBTQ stuff, since earlier this year. When I got the impression that a user can use a gay-pride flag on his userpage, but can't use a straight-pride flag? That pretty much told me, what direction the majority of editors in the LGBTQ topic, were pointing. GoodDay (talk) 23:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, @Emli89:, @Crossroads:, @Taramalan:. I shouldn't have stuck my nose into your business. GoodDay (talk) 15:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No apologies needed as far as I am concerned. I was able to have civil conversations with you, without pointlessly dragging the topic. I will continue to look forward to your edits, and hope we can have a good editing time ;D Emli89 (talk) 16:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thinker78:, I gave up on trying to bring NPoV to the Donald Trump page or discuss its lack of NPoV on its talkpage, months ago. GoodDay (talk) 23:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. Certainly the talk page has too many, too passionate, impatient and/or hostile responses to seemingly conservative ips, editors or otherwise, non-liberal posts that seem to favor Trump. I am no fan of Trump, but I am against undue censorship and biased or hostile gatekeeping. I do want to see more accommodation according to Wikipedia's guidance to seemingly conservative posts and critiques, because in Conservative media they consider Wikipedia a biased, liberal operation.^[1] Thinker78 (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]