Archives

1, 2

Why you remove that postal code lookup? It is even more information than www.eindelijkglasvezel.nl. What's the difference in your opinion? Nothing wrong with those lines I added. Beciowa (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you reverting my edits? Lol, I was the editor and the contributor that brought it to the present GAN status, and if you look carefully, there are sources for what I added. Regards, Simon (talk) 09:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because of the reasons I listed on the article's talk page. The new edit with the extra image from The Boys is much better. BTW, bringing an article to GAN status doesn't mean every edit is solid gold or you get to dictate what does and does not go into the article. DragonFury (talk) 09:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the discussion at WT:NFL. I've implemented this style on almost half of the teams in the NFL now and only you and a Ravens editor have objected. I applaud your efforts to keep the Jaguars articles up to date, but the format I am implementing is a standard format for NFL articles (see 2015–16 NFL playoffs) and should be followed for all teams. Some teams have been following this format, but when individual teams choose to implement their own style, we look sloppy as a WikiProject. I hope you'll give your reasoning for reverting me in more detail at WT:NFL. – PeeJay 13:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please at least add the score times to the article. I've literally never seen any other article that omits the fairly obvious detail of when the points were scored. – PeeJay 21:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DragonFury. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

– PeeJay 18:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you saw the above, but if not, here's a little ping to remind you. If you did see it, however, bear in mind that you're not exactly helping to build a better encyclopaedia by ignoring the discussion. But of course, I always assume good faith. – PeeJay 22:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are new messages in the above discussion that you may wish to read. Also, can we please agree to add the score times to the 2016 Jacksonville Jaguars season article now? – PeeJay 21:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please add score times to the Jacksonville season article now? There is literally no reason not to include them. – PeeJay 20:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you had paid attention to those edits you reverted you'd have seen I've been adding the score times for two weeks now. DragonFury (talk) 20:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you had simply responded to my earlier messages, I wouldn't have had to ask. I didn't see you adding them to previous weeks, after all. – PeeJay 21:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revision. It had his name on a transclusion. Only reason I made that edit. Red Director (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Score format in seasons article schedule tables that you may be interested in. Kobra98 (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I frequently see you contribute to articles listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture and would very much appreciate your input on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture#Eradication of variety show sections so that a conclusion towards variety show appearances can be made. Thanks. Abdotorg (talk) 18:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you kindly explain why discussion of Nao Kodaira's mental preparations ahead of her gold-medal Olympics race, which moreover reveals interesting detail about the intricacies of coaching success and speed-skater development, is "pointless"? Hhpop (talk) 08:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to include a paragraph about her time spent training in the Netherlands and how it helped her develop as an athlete that would be relevant to a biographical article about an athlete. An amusing anecdote about a tongue twister is nothing more than fluff to fill space and therefor not suited to an encyclopedic article. DragonFury (talk) 23:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two comments regarding TIAA Bank Field:

1. You're edit-warring and have violated the three-revert rule. Please stop that.
2. Edit summaries such as this constitute personal attacks. Again, please stop that. Huon (talk) 21:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've undone an edit of mine, without bothering to explain why.[1] If you had a reason to do so, you should have said what it was: see WP:REVEXP. If you didn't have a reason, you shouldn't have reverted. Either way, it was disruptive. Pe19 (talk) 19:54, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And you did it a second time, after I left you the previous message. Clearly, your intention is to be a jerk. Go on then - do it again. Pe19 (talk) 22:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it back because whereas suits the intend of the sentence better. *While* suggests that the events in the sentence occurred at the same time, which they may have done but that's not relevant to the information being given. DragonFury (talk) 14:56, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.