I created an article and it has been nominated for deletion severally. I have read the guidelines for article creation and I fully understand. At this point, I am only trying to create visibility for prominent kings and chiefs in Nigeria, especially the Yoruba Land, that is the only reason I am creating this article. Can you kindly tell me why this article is not "okay" yet? Or what I need to delete to make it fit for English Wikipedia page. Thank you. Ọmọladéabídèmí99 (talk) 14:46, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:Madhav V. Nori, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Implying that another editor is lying is a serious violation of the assumption of good faith when there is no specific reason to make this claim. The author of the article did not claim that it had been through AFC. That statement was the result of a misplaced template that causes frequent misunderstandings. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? What is this behavior?  DIVINE  18:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosguill, When I used to see you number 1 reviewers on the enwiki, I used to feel jealous that I could achieve more than you, but you blocked me just now for 31 hours. I feel really happy but i never attacked anyone personally. Thanks. DIVINE (talk) 20:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I figured that the log entry and discussion were enough, but since you requested at AN that I make an explicit note on your talk page: I have removed your NPR right pursuant to the concerns raised and the emerging consensus at Special:Permalink/1100804717#User:Robert McClenon. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was your personal decision, not ANI's. Anyway, Wiki rights don't matter to me as i'm here to volunteer and i know how enwiki works. I believe in "Karma". Peace and Cheers :D DIVINE (talk) 20:12, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse NPR removal and block. Will talk to @Primefac: further about pulling AfC. Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Primefac, I request you to pullback my AFC, you're being victim here because of me. I'm really sorry. DIVINE (talk) 20:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was already removed before you made your request, as per the discussion at ANI. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should i have to dance or cry? Is this an offend? DIVINE (talk) 20:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am only informing you, as the person Primefac notified. How you respond to it is beyond my control. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should really think before you speak to others. You will almost certainly face more sanctions for saying that. I suggest apologizing to Dennis Brown. —VersaceSpace 🌃 20:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine. I expect some venting when someone gets sanctioned, and it is expected that admin like myself will tolerate it to a point. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:38, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair, but he is taunting you, which I wouldn't really categorize as "venting" —VersaceSpace 🌃 20:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A calm mind, a strong physique, short workplace hours; close friends who tell the truth;

A good meal prepared simply; a memorable experience. DIVINE (talk) 21:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WIKT:they-> "(the third-person singular nominative, occasionally proscribed) A single person, previously mentioned, especially if of unknown or non-binary gender, but typically not if previously named and identified as male or female. [since the 1300s] . *(indefinite pronoun, vague meaning) People; some people; people in general; someone, excluding the speaker." You are welcome Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As i am recently blocked let me rest will talk further after getting unblocked. DIVINE (talk) 20:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to discuss really. Merely informing of the history of the singular they Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So why don't you take a chill pill. DIVINE (talk) 22:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Really, after the content you posted at WP:AN when Prax tried to explain this to you, which was insulting and dismissive, it is clear that you need take a "chill pill" yourself. You need to accept correction when you are wrong and admit it. Snapping at people who try to correct your lack of basic knowledge is not a good way to grow as a person or an editor.anks Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a Wikipedia article Singular they. Reading that might be a chill pill. Cullen328 (talk) 03:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you said previously, there's nothing to discuss so I said than take a chill pill. Reading that might be or might not be a chill pill. DIVINE (talk) 04:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked your talk page access and extended your block for another 72 hours. In the meantime, please read Wikipedia:Assume Good Faith and Wikipedia:Civility, and keep the advice given in the guideline and policy in mind when you do return to editing. - Donald Albury 15:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]