Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 00:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thank you. Kablammo (talk) 00:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be more moderate with your changes please ?--Jacurek (talk) 00:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, some articles on Polish Jewish subjects have been written in biased way and nobody seems to care about it. Since they were written in such manner, what does it take to change it ? Being moderate ? I see couple of users here showing great bias towards Poland and even greatest willingness to depict Poland and Poles in worst light possible. History demands truth, not confabulation. 76.15.185.72 (talk) 01:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The truth" is in the middle.--Jacurek (talk) 01:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I think, that there are four kinds of truth here. Holy truth, entire truth, also truth and shitty truth. I opt for the last one. Its the honest one.76.15.185.72 (talk) 01:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please read the notice above regarding three reverts in a 24-hour period. Also please read the Wikipedia policies on Verifiability on the necessity of citing reliable sources for controversial statements. Kablammo (talk) 01:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Leon Feldhandler. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[::User talk:Malik Shabazz|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 04:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.