Cannabis Sativa

Content deleted Content added
Only (talk | contribs)
Only (talk | contribs)
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 68: Line 68:


:please discuss this at the talk page of the article. Not here. It's long standing consensus not to have this kind of information in. Please discuss at the talk page and get consensus rather than just restoring your changes again and again. [[User:Only|only]] ([[User talk:Only#top|talk]]) 23:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
:please discuss this at the talk page of the article. Not here. It's long standing consensus not to have this kind of information in. Please discuss at the talk page and get consensus rather than just restoring your changes again and again. [[User:Only|only]] ([[User talk:Only#top|talk]]) 23:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

== John Taylor (reality show star) ==

Removed autobiography message. There is no external relationship. Just did my homework on the subject after watching the tv series. Cited everything well. Please stop posting message. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tayl2104|Tayl2104]] ([[User talk:Tayl2104|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tayl2104|contribs]]) 23:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:the tv show aired in 2010, right? So if you "did your homework...after watching the tv series," how come you first started making articles on Taylor in 2007? Based on your edits and your user name, it's pretty clear you're the subject of the article. [[User:Only|only]] ([[User talk:Only#top|talk]]) 01:54, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
::Note that [[:File:John Taylor & Tanisha Mitchell-the obesity crisis.jpg]] says Tayl2104 <s>was at backstage with John Taylor</s> was with Tanisha Mitchell, but does not mention being with John Taylor although mentions both as subjects of the image. The description vaguely hints that Tayl2104 is '''not''' John Taylor. Generally speaking the person who took the photograph is also the copyright holder, which implies it's '''unlikely''' that Tayl2104 would be John Taylor. I see that there's still a conflict of interest for being closely associated with the subject(s). Maybe the [[Wikipedia:OTRS|OTRS]] team should also verify the image, as I have no access to the source linked. Further talk should be raised at the article's talk page. (Feel free to quote me there.) [[Special:Contributions/80.221.159.67|80.221.159.67]] ([[User talk:80.221.159.67|talk]]) 10:05, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Because if you noticed, I also wrote about his father, Jerry Balisok, who was an FBI fugitive featured in numerous publications. Then learned more about the family. see contributions under review. Please stop with this. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tayl2104|Tayl2104]] ([[User talk:Tayl2104|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tayl2104|contribs]]) 02:38, 20 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:the first time you wrote about Balisok was in July of this year. You wrote about Taylor in 2007 and 2011 and 2013. You're clearly lying. [[User:Only|only]] ([[User talk:Only#top|talk]]) 12:06, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:06, 20 August 2016

Welcome to my talk page! I tend to reply to messages directly on here, so I suggest watching my page if you're looking for a reply. I watch user talk pages I comment on so we can keep conversations organized. I reserve the right to modify excessive signatures left here.


Archives
IIIIIIIV - V - VI - VII - VIII - IX - X - XI - XII - XIII - XIV - XV

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
I know this might seem silly – giving a barnstar to the editor who has not done one's rollback request. But really, the barnstar is for the diligent effort you've taken to lucidly explain your position – after analysing my contributions. It takes effort and time and I thank you for that. Xender Lourdes (talk) 14:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar. I hope you follow the advice! If you feel you've put in good work with vandalism work over the next few weeks, feel free to drop a note here to ask for permission, or request again at the permissions board. only (talk) 22:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

YGM

Hello, Only. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Beeblebrox (talk) 18:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sent a reply. only (talk) 20:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cross country

For the edit on the cross country page my photo was of a cross country meet. Most high school and college cross country meets run the last part on a track. Nevertheless, I will look through my photos to see if I can find a cross country photo that is not on a track for people who think they know it all like you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glumdog (talk • contribs) 05:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While it's true that that frequently happens, that wasn't a cross country meet. It's the Oregon Relays. It's a track meet held every spring. On top of that, the photo has now been deleted from Commons since it was a copyright violation. only (talk) 10:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:MMAGuy8

Hi Only. I see that you have indefinitely blocked User:MMAGuy8 for vandalism. I am wondering if Special:Contributions/Mr. Bellator might be being used for block evasion or be a WP:DUCK. The account was created around the same time you indefed the other, and is being used to edit the same genre of articles. It's also being used to edit various sandboxes of MMAGuy8, which seems to be a bit unusual unless there's a connection between the two. -- 02:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really able to look into it this week (popped in to read an article and saw the new message link). Seems like obvious duck though, so take it to any active admin and they should be able to block. only (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Understand. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heyy Only

Greetings -

I hope I haven't started off on the wrong foot with you. I really did mean well when I restored the messages. I knew that users were allowed the remove messages from the page, but I didn't know about the three-edit revert rule, and I'm glad you're willing to give me a second chance. Gilliam showed me the OW template, which I can use instead. I've reverted edits on the same page WAY more than 3 times before, never being punished or noticed :O. I'm glad this happened now so I can take this in account in the future. I hope that in my past few hundred edits, I haven't made any other mistakes.

I apologize for potentially angering you. Perhaps we can start fresh?

Thank you very much for your time and advice.

3primetime3 (talk) 05:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Winkelvi is edit warring again causing disruption by GRAVEDANCING and edit warring

Hi Only, Could you please take some action even if only warning to user Winkelvi. I looked up their block log and noticed they have a lengthy history of edit warring and getting blocked for it. This time Winkelvi has been carrying on a campaign of GRAVEDANCING an editors subpages causing disruption that is unnecessary. The lengths Winkelvi has been going this time to grave dance now include edit warring, attacking all articles created by the editor. Many of the article s were saved by a group of admins and editors that took responsibility for the article. Winkelvi keeps making statements that the editotlr is a banned sock puppet. This is a lie because the editor in question is an indeffed from editing blocked pending an outcome from an ARBCOM case. Winkelvi has also stated that the editor is a sock puppet of de facto banned editor Carriearchdale. I could be wrong, but I looked up the block log for this Carrie and I only see where she was only ever indeffed from editing blocked, never banned at all much less de facto banned whatever that is. Please help can you get Winkelvi to stop grave glancing and now escalating the grave dancing to include lies and edit warring Thanks. Zpeopleheart (talk) 12:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no clue what's going on here and don't really have the energy/desire to look into this further. Try asking other admins or WP:AN or WP:ANI if other avenues have been tried and failed. only (talk) 20:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FBLA

For both the national officer team and the conferences tab, there is clear precedent from other organization's pages doing this and I believe that FBLA should have the same content. DECA's Wikipedia page features both future and past conferences and both their HS and college officer teams. FFA and TSA also have their officer team on their pages and HOSA has their past and future conferences.

Including the conferences is similar to adding fixtures for a football or rugby team on their page and you never see a team page with just the captain or manager, it shows the entire team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeetfbla (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please discuss this at the talk page of the article. Not here. It's long standing consensus not to have this kind of information in. Please discuss at the talk page and get consensus rather than just restoring your changes again and again. only (talk) 23:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Taylor (reality show star)

Removed autobiography message. There is no external relationship. Just did my homework on the subject after watching the tv series. Cited everything well. Please stop posting message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tayl2104 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the tv show aired in 2010, right? So if you "did your homework...after watching the tv series," how come you first started making articles on Taylor in 2007? Based on your edits and your user name, it's pretty clear you're the subject of the article. only (talk) 01:54, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note that File:John Taylor & Tanisha Mitchell-the obesity crisis.jpg says Tayl2104 was at backstage with John Taylor was with Tanisha Mitchell, but does not mention being with John Taylor although mentions both as subjects of the image. The description vaguely hints that Tayl2104 is not John Taylor. Generally speaking the person who took the photograph is also the copyright holder, which implies it's unlikely that Tayl2104 would be John Taylor. I see that there's still a conflict of interest for being closely associated with the subject(s). Maybe the OTRS team should also verify the image, as I have no access to the source linked. Further talk should be raised at the article's talk page. (Feel free to quote me there.) 80.221.159.67 (talk) 10:05, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because if you noticed, I also wrote about his father, Jerry Balisok, who was an FBI fugitive featured in numerous publications. Then learned more about the family. see contributions under review. Please stop with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tayl2104 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the first time you wrote about Balisok was in July of this year. You wrote about Taylor in 2007 and 2011 and 2013. You're clearly lying. only (talk) 12:06, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply