From 19. March, 2006 - 28. July, 2006 From 28. July, 2006 - 12. September, 2006 From 12. September, 2006 - 10. October, 2006 From 10. October, 2006 - 25. October, 2006 From 25. October, 2006 - 20. November, 2006 From 20. November, 2006 - 31. December, 2006 From 31. December, 2006 - 28. March, 2007

Szia! Kérlek benézni ezzel a kérdéssel kapcsolatban az Uncira: [1]

még 1 kérdés: [2]

Kösz, üdv. OsvátA —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.98.106.180 (talk) 17:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Ma a köv. megfigyelést tettem: az Unciklopédiák működnek, kivéve a magyart. Ez valami, ami már régen tép, vagy tökvéletlen? Aláíratlan: 80.98.106.180 15:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Helyzetjelentés: keleten a helyzet változatlan. OA —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.98.106.180 (talk) 07:21, 9 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Szia! Elég érdekes ez a dolog [3], esetleg az Unci számára is; mit gondolsz? És megoldható-e? OsvátA

Wikidézet

Ez is egy kérdés:

• [4]
  • Jóvanna! Tudom, hogy vizsgaidőszakok idejét éljük... OA

Szia! Nézd meg, légy szíves a Wikidézet kocsmafalát. Nem lelem a hibát: megnőttek a betűi és megbolondultak az alcímek. Kösz. OsvátA

Thanks for notifying me about the new collab. --Deryck C. 11:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and one concerned Hungarian :) ....here? This is an article about a tragic massacre of a few hundred civilians, but the article title says "incident" instead of "massacre". We've been debating it for a few days and, with the exception of one grumpy komcsi, we have consensus to move the page. I tried, and it wouldn't let me--said an admin needs to do it. Think you can help?

Thanks in advance, K. Lásztocska 00:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both the Romanian sources linked to at the bottom of the article use the word "masacrul", which is obviously "massacre." Here they are: [5] [6] (sorry they're in Romanian, haven't time to look for English or Hungarian ones right now.) Köszi szépen! K. Lásztocska 14:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ajjajjajjaj! Egy wikipédias gondol (összes megbízható források ellen), hogy mészárlás nem volt, és most figyelj! [7] K. Lásztocska 20:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The vote is on! And thank you for the earlier move; I appreciate it, even if it was thwarted. Biruitorul 07:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please never ever move articles without the proper procedure. --Irpen 18:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like consensus agrees with your initial judgment, and proper procedure has vindicated having moved the article in question. István 05:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Now that five days have elapsed since the poll started, may I formally request that you make the move? Thank you for your consideration. Biruitorul 15:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better jump in here :-) Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles). Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nemtom, milyen gyakran nézel át a magyar wikibe, de üzeneted van ott. – Alensha ^talk 23:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NCurse, you deleted the TOLAS page sighting "It is blatant advertising for a company, product, group or service that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article".

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=TOLAS

TOLAS is no longer marketed, and therefore it is clearly not advertising. The wikipedia page was the only reference to TOLAS on the internet which explained the product and it's history (albiet a brief description). There are a handful of company's still using this software, but it can no longer be purchased.

Original article: TOLAS is a legacy ERP system originally licensed by by GSI Transcomm (later called ADP-GSI Logistics & Distribution / Adonix Transcomm) Written in VAX basic for HP/Compaq OpenVMS Alpha systems, TOLAS provides users with customer order fulfillment along with warehouse-management and inventory-management capabilities."

Note the use of term "legacy ERP system". Google definition: "A legacy system is an antiquated computer system or application program which continues to be used because the user (typically an organization) does not want to replace or redesign it".

You had no right to delete this page. If articles such as TOLAS are not welcome on Wikipedia then they are destined to fade into history. You have no right to judge what is or isnt important history. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Akagus (talk • contribs) 10:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks! Good to be around. Hope all is well Samir 01:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NCurse, I'd love to have your thoughts on history of biology overall. I've done all I think I can without some serious critiques and suggestions from other knowledgeable people. It's on peer review and WP:GAC.--ragesoss 06:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you still need another maintainer for Portal:Medicine, I'd be willing to help out. --Arcadian 21:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I just made my first edit, at Portal:Medicine/Things you can do. I'm new at this, so if I make errors, let me know. --Arcadian 02:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good comments. If im doing a good job, ill continue on with it :).I just thought i make sure incase theres something that im completelly missing, as im still new to the whole wikipedia thing...(Still only been editing here less than a month)... N yeah thats cool, ill make the appropriate redirects to the article. Glad i can help. Btw, keep up the great work with the whole medicine portal, medicine project, and medicine collaborations!Cya later.petze 04:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Just to keep you updated, i finished redirecting all the sub types and sub groups of Arthrogryposis... Now we just need someone to fix up the references so they look better :). Cya then.petze 08:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi there, NCurse. I'm trying to bring this up to FA and recently re-wrote the genetics section. Could you check this over and see if I've made any mistakes? Thanks. TimVickers 22:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with WikiProject Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at GAC to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all members, and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. --Nehrams2020 00:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Acmg-logo.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Acmg-logo.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- you have Herpes zoster on hold for GA for over 7 days now; could you go ahead and either pass or fail it, or take it off hold for another reviewer to look at? It's better to avoid long hold periods if possible. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I read the deletion log backwards--Energman 14:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You still have an oops on the Fvasconcellos RFA; don't forget to remove the extra from the bottom. Hope you're well ! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm almost finished with a book, and hope to collaborate with Colin this summer on completing History of Tourette syndrome—there is a wealth of info on the topic. Good luck on the exams ! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:12, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, NCurse, for commenting on my RfA, which closed successfully with a tally of 76/0/1! I hope I will meet your expectations, and be sure I will continue trying to be a good editor as well as a good administrator :) If I may be of any assistance to you in the future (or if you see me commit some grievous error :), please drop me a line on my Talk page. Again, thank you, and happy editing! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support! Hope the blog and your studies are going well, I haven't checked it out in a while. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've made your recommended edits (and then some) to the article. I think it reads better, and has few more citations. Also, if you could drop me a line on my talk page and give me your thoughts about POV editors who try to put in unsourced naturopathic or even homeopathic edits into medical articles. I consider most of that stuff to be very poorly referenced, and frankly pseudoscience. But I've not edited a medical article, so any ideas you may have will be helpful. I look forward to your comments on the GA nomination. Orangemarlin 06:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]