Added image |
→Anglo-Celtic Australian: Final warning |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]]You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Anglo-Celtic Australian|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Anglo-Celtic Australian]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in '''content disputes''' may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but '''use the talk page to work towards wording and content''' that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. --[[User:HighKing|HighKing]] ([[User talk:HighKing|talk]]) 16:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC) |
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]]You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Anglo-Celtic Australian|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Anglo-Celtic Australian]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in '''content disputes''' may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but '''use the talk page to work towards wording and content''' that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. --[[User:HighKing|HighKing]] ([[User talk:HighKing|talk]]) 16:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br> The next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research policy]] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article{{#if:Anglo-Celtic Australian|, as you did to [[:Anglo-Celtic Australian]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. You have been asked to discuss before changing the article against concensus. Continuing to tendentiously edit the article in this fashion is highly disruptive. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> --[[User:HighKing|HighKing]] ([[User talk:HighKing|talk]]) 23:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:46, 16 January 2009
Welcome!
Hi Goramon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Hi, you are continuing to insert your edits into Anglo-Celtic Australian. It is against policy to add original research into articles (see WP:OR). We're also started discussing on the Talk page - please continue to discuss on Talk page before making these edits again. Please assume good faith - we all want a better article. Also, perhaps the point you are making is valid, but it does not appear that it is being understood - spending a little more time on the Talk page to explain might help to resolve the issue. Thank you. --HighKing (talk) 11:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anglo-Celtic Australian. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --HighKing (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Anglo-Celtic Australian, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have been asked to discuss before changing the article against concensus. Continuing to tendentiously edit the article in this fashion is highly disruptive. --HighKing (talk) 23:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)