I am attempting to stay out of any and all internal conflicts on Wikipedia – having found them to be time-consuming, tedious and enervating – while continuing to edit, albeit primarily in non-controversial areas.

The rules of Wikipedia are used by proponents of ideologically-based falsehoods to harangue those who attempt to keep Wikipedia accurate, factual, and non-partisan, and they receive support in their engagements from people who see "civility" as more important than actually improving the encyclopedia. These conditions make it nearly impossible to edit in controversial areas without attracting the attention of the trolls of disinformation. It is these CPOV-pushers who are the greatest danger to this project and its value to society, but until the community recognizes the absolute value of factuality, and takes steps to support those who work to increase it, these Russian trolls, proponents of fringe science, right-wing extremists, and partisan hacks will continue to undermine Wikipedia and degrade its usefulness.

Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

_______________________________

Thanks for uploading File:Imitation of Life poster2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In 2018, you offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has now accepted that request for arbitration, and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Evidence. Please add your evidence by March 23, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.

All content, links, and diffs from the original ARC and the latest ARC are being read into the evidence for this case.

The secondary mailing list is in use for this case: arbcom-en-b@wikimedia.org

For the Arbitration Committee, CThomas³ (talk) 17:44, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep saying the cropped VHS cover is a theatrical release poster? The original poster was in black and white and had the distributor logos and production information on it. The image you keep uploading is a cropped VHS cover with critic quotes published after the movie was running in theaters. OldUncleRemus (talk) 04:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has no provenance, and has been deleted at least once as being a duplication of the image I uploaded. By re-uploading it, you are breaking Wikipedia rules. Please do not do this again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]