Pol Pot is a communist, communism is a socialist ideology, he does belong in the category. Alex Salmond is a member of the Scottish National Party, a social democratic party. If you didn't know social democracy is a socialist ideology. The project is not biased as you are saying, the project centers on all socialist ideologies, two examples of this are Pol Pot and Alex Salmond, who both are/were affiliate with a socialist party.

Progressism and New Left is my fault, i didn't (and still don't) know much about those movements, i have removed them now. --TIAYN (talk) 22:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What social democratic sandbox are we talking about... are we talking about the templates on the talk page or the main page? The SNP is a self-declared social democratic party if i've understood my research. --TIAYN (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That infobox was created before the project was created. Reformism should be there, seeing that social democracy was conceived by reformism. Why progressivism is there i don't know, but ask som of the editors who created the infobox before you remove it. --TIAYN (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --TIAYN (talk) 22:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been reading alot about the new left, but the movement varied from region to region. In France, Germany, Scandinavia and Britain the movement had many ties to socialism, particuarly social democracy and communism. Progressivism as it seems, was an ideology which evolved from socialism, just as social democracy. But im not sure about the last one. --TIAYN (talk) 09:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link: Template:Social democracy sidebar --TIAYN (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alpha. You've made the same edit to this page many times now, without referring to or engaging in, the extensive discussion on the talk page, which has reached the current consensus. Why not engage in that discussion yourself, rather than continuing to make reverts without explanations, especially in the light of [WP:3RR]? Riversider (talk) 10:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Labour Party UK. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Riversider (talk) 10:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]