Islam List‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion List‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Delibzr, Apparently we have been both warned, in that case it is better to first discuss what you consider the issue is with the article and why it needs to be changed. Personally I do not see how your revision makes any sense as it does not take into consideration the majority of the references. If you have an issue with a single reference or a few references, it doesn't mean that you have to delete the majority of the article. Can you therefore explain why you decided to delete the vast majority of the article? Xtremedood (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note in relation to living people: it is not enough just to have a source showing that they were Muslim and are now Hindu. The source needs to show them self-identifying their change of faith. This is in line with how we deal with things under WP:BLPCAT. - Sitush (talk) 09:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sitush already told, and xtremedood you are still edit warring and violating BLP. Delibzr (talk) 03:54, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In general, please discuss contentious issues on the talk page in detail, so that other people can join in and contribute. If you start with a big edit war, people will be put off and they won't bother. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 12:21, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delibrz, you are not justifying your edits. How am I violating BLP? Stay on topic. Xtremedood (talk) 08:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By putting up unreliable rumors about living people, you are violating BLP. Delibzr (talk) 08:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I already have removed what was brought up. What is a rumour? Do you have a source to verify it? You once again deleted my sourced edit. Where in this list [1] is there a BLP violation? Xtremedood (talk) 03:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe following persons should be removed from the list.

"Karima Begum" - non notable mother of AR Rahman.
"Jayabaya" - Never converted, false entry.
"Monica (actress)" - Former Christian.
"Mamta Kulkarni" - Rumored to have married and converted, herself denied doing so.
"Malik Maqbul" - Repeated two times.
"Rekha Maruthiraj" - same as "Monica (actress)
"Wajih-ul-Mulk" - Non notable muzaffarid
"Saroj Khan" - Not a former Hindu.
Rahul^{Text me} 16:36, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it may be fair to remove Karima Begum, due to notability issues, it should however be noted that she does have significant amount of stories about her (i.e. [2]). Perhaps a page should be made about her, but for the time being it may be fine to remove her. Jayabaya however is reported to have converted, according to the source. However due to the nature of the content I can say that it may be worth removing it as we may need a more solid source for the time being. As for Monica, it seems uncertain what her previous religion was from the source indicated. According to her wikipedia page "Monika’s father is Hindu and the mother is a Christian." As for Mamta Kulkarni, you need a source stating that, as the current sources are clear. As for Wajih-ul-Mulk, he seems notable enough. Saroj Khan herself says she was a former Hindu, see the source. Xtremedood (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP editor removed non-notable and dubious entries as described above by Rahuloof, but he also changed POV language a bit. Saroj Khan's name wasn't mentioned above, and I won't believe youtube to be reliable when video is not even hosted on a official channel. D4iNa4 (talk) 12:48, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube videos may be used as legitimate sources, see here [3]. The publisher is Geo TV, which is well-known. Therefore Saroj Khan should stay. I have not read a wikipedia policy which requires a video be uploaded from the official channel (I'm not sure if Geo TV even has an official channel). The video itself is clearly published by Geo TV, which makes it good. Xtremedood (talk) 04:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Self admission and official source is what required most. None of your sources meet that criteria. Bring any self-admission rather than just some report of a rumor. Your video should be really acknowledged by the official website. Your youtube link contains a stolen video, see WP:LINKVIO. D4iNa4 (talk) 16:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should get some more insight into what is allowed and not allowed by Wikipedia. As per Wikipedia's requirements, it does indeed meet the requirement for Saroj Khan. Look at the video, it is as clear as day and not a rumor. Also, for Wajih ul Mulk and Mamta Kulkarni, the sources are not videos and are verified. Xtremedood (talk) 10:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A copyrights violating video hosted on unknown channel is not a source just like other unreliable sources that had followed rumors. You have also ignored the edit summaries of @TheRedPenOfDoom:, who has removed a bunch of other unreliable entries. Don't misrepresent the consensus. D4iNa4 (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Claims about living people, particularly claims about religious identification, require the highest level of sourcing AND per WP:BLPCAT require that sourcing to include the subjects self identification of religious affiliation: in this page it will require two identifications "I was X. I am now Y". While under rare circumstances, youtub videos may constitute reliable sources, illegally hosted pirate copies of copyright material do not qualify. You do not have anything close to consensus or policy compliant content/sourcing for introducing your edits.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of converts to Islam from Hinduism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.deccanchronicle.com/supplementary/%E2%80%98i-followed-my-heart%E2%80%99-807

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at List of converts to Islam from Hinduism. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your disruptive edits on this article are being made in violation of WP:BLPCAT. Unless these people have stated the conversion, don't add them. Capitals00 (talk) 00:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What are poor references there? All sources are from independent reliable sources. --Drivarum (talk) 04:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources say that Hema Malini, AR Rahman converted to Islam from Hinduism, since they are WP:BLP they require self-verification. And your sources about Kamal Dasgupta are not saying that he converted from Hinduism. Misrepresenting sources to make "sourced content" is not justification. Capitals00 (talk) 05:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding? Tell me which sources are not saying that they didn't convert from Hinduism? AR Rahman clearly stated here[4] about his conversion. Also in the book A.R. Rahman: The Spirit of Music By Nasreen Munni Kabir. For Hema Mailini, there are several sources citing his religious conversion which is very notable. These are the sources[5] published by India TV news, [6] by the New Indian Express, [7] Helen: The Life and Times of an H-bomb By Jerry Pinto, [8] by DNA India etc. Regarding Kamal Dasgupta, have you even read the cited sources? The sources clearly states his conversion. Drivarum (talk) 05:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Yes, absolutely. My mother was a practising Hindu. She had always been spiritually inclined. We had Hindu religious images on the walls of the Habibullah Road house where we grew up. There was also an image of Mother Mary holding Jesus in Her arms and a photograph of the sacred sites of Mecca and Medina." Your source on Rehman. Since he doesn't mention he converted from Hinduism and you are misrepresenting them, I urge you to stop violating BLP and cease edit warring, next edit may lead to a block. D4iNa4 (talk) 06:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you miss What I understood by His words was that it is better to choose one path. The Sufi path spiritually lifted both my mother and me, and we felt it was the best path for us, so we embraced Sufi Islam ? Drivarum (talk) 06:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rahman was atheist, not Hindu. And you are continuing to edit war and violate BLP, you will be blocked if you continued floating your incompetence. 06:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by D4iNa4 (talk • contribs)

"Rahman was atheist" - do you have a source to establish that? He said "Yes, absolutely" when he was asked if he was spiritually inclined then how he can be an atheist? Drivarum (talk) 06:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Drivarum: "sprituality inclined" is not Hinduism either. It seems you created this account only for disruption. Don't edit war because WP:3RR exempts from reverting BLP violation. You will lose. Capitals00 (talk) 06:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the sources where it is evident he has been a Hindu plus there are sources on VHP asking him for Ghar Wapsi which wont possible unless he is a Hindu. There is another source mention his conversion to Islam from Hinduism. It seems you created this account only for pushing your POV. I am not here to play with you so there is winning or loosing. I will request you to comment on the content instead of blindly accusing me. Drivarum (talk) 07:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ghar Wapsi seems to be for anyone who is non-Hindu but Indian, "facilitated by Indian Hindu organizations Vishva Hindu Parishad and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, to facilitate conversion of non-Hindus to Hinduism", says the article. Entire page of Ghar Wapsi is not saying that it is targeted only on Muslims or those who were previously Hindu like you are claiming. You are trying to edit war until others give up and agree with your WP:BLP violations, but its not going to happen. Capitals00 (talk) 07:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stop your accusations now. You should stop putting your words on my mouth. I asked you to read the sources and not what Ghar wapsi means. These organizations asked Rahman to revert to Hinduism from Islam. Does that make sense? Drivarum (talk) 07:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you quote the pertinent passage/s that proves conversion, instead? El_C 07:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: I already did sir. Please, check: [9]. Drivarum (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drivarum that's not same as Rahman saying. We need Rahman to confirm he was Hindu before. Sources confirm that atheist,[10] before. I believe its best to ignore you until you bring a source which is likely not possible, better if you just drop this matter. D4iNa4 (talk) 07:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Check this[11] clearly states "AR Rahman was born a Hindu and was named AS Dileep Kumar. However, he converted to Islam later." Drivarum (talk) 07:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you not quoting the pertinent passage? El_C 08:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]