Biography Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Middle Ages Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Europe Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Since this [[1]] [[2]] [[3]](the entire sentence is visible now) comes from a reliable source, I see no reason removing it. It's a nice piece of info that should be add inside.Alexikoua (talk) 22:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The source you are using 1)makes just a hypothesis without even mentioning where it is based 2) Alexandru Madgearu is not reliable because of his known Romanian nationalist books. Moreover he is contradicted by all the other sources. I will revert you and this will be my second revert so stop putting edit-war templates in my talk page, because you are the one who has been warned by admins and blocked for edit-warring not me.--Kushtrim123 (talk) 15:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should read the quote, since it says: ..."but is is sure that at least the Buia family is of Aromanian origin", p. 83 [[4]]. We have:

• No hypothesis, but certainty. Even if it was speculation it needs to be added as a speculation. We have not a reason to hide this option.
• You need to prove that Madgearu is nationalistic, simply stating your personal opinion in a hostile way as you did before [[5]], proves nothing. I see that Madgearu is used as a source in 33 wiki articles so far as a reliable source [[6]].
• Apart from respecting sourced contend please avoid wp:npa violations.Alexikoua (talk) 16:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont remove referenced material diff, Kushtrim123Megistias (talk) 16:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[7] is a typical wp:truth book written by Madgearu. I'm going to revert you now and please stop edit-warring all over wikipedia.--Kushtrim123 (talk) 23:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]