Boeing 777 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 12, 2012.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 31, 2007 Featured article candidate Not promoted December 17, 2008 Featured article candidate Not promoted April 14, 2009 Good article nominee Listed August 21, 2009 WikiProject A-class review Approved October 5, 2009 Peer review Reviewed November 8, 2009 Featured article candidate Promoted Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 12, 2014, June 12, 2019, and June 12, 2020. Current status: Featured article

Template:Vital article

Aviation: Aircraft FA‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles FA This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the aircraft project. This article has passed an A-Class review.

How can this article be considered "good" if the units are given American-only first, and then the metric? Please, reorder them, this is a disgrace to any international reader on Earth.--Adûnâi (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a US product and US customary units are primary. See the manufacturer's spec data for example. Also this is why unit conversions are listed. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The current Denver engine failure is relevant. The aircraft has been grounded in multiple countries, zo I will had appropriate links shortly. Carandol (talk) 08:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken the word 'Uncontained' out for now. As per NTSB it has a specific meaning within the industry that this doesn't appear to match though clearly it's an ugly failure with stuff all over the place. Happy to revisit that as either the definition moves or more info becomes available. Skenu (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC) ^[1][reply]

max TO thrust of GE90-94B is 97,300 lbf (433 kN)^[1] . The value in specifications is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.76.218.195 (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article states "It has a maximum design range of 8,555 nautical miles (15,844 km) as of 2017.", isn't the maximum design range according to Boeing 17,205 kilometres (with 314 pax) (cite: https://www.boeing.co.kr/resources/ko_KR/Seoul-International/BCA/777-300ER-200LR.pdf )? As the "maximum design range" actually employs all 3 auxiliary fuel tanks in Center Aft (displacing cargo space). While I don't believe there is evidence of any of the operators currently keeping their tanks installed/using them as the range of the 77L is just so massive without them that they are uneconomical to sacrifice cargo space for further unneeded range. (Cited as one of the potential reasons why the type didn't have further success, even after not being chosen for SIN-EWR route). And while Boeing's current public website indeed cites the range without the auxillary tanks (I presume to make the type more marketable/reflect a more common configuration), the design of the aircraft & even Boeing's Fuel Management System are all built for the Auxiliary tanks if desired ( https://studylib.net/doc/8775156/b777-fuel---smartcockpit ). It also would make sense to cite the range of "17,205 km" as the previous cited facts in the article (connecting almost any two airports),setting the world record for flight, both would require keeping those tanks installed.

What are people's thoughts? As this is a very active article, I didn't want to make this change without discussion! DigitalExpat (talk) 07:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Air India One Chennai.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The references O_D_summ, 777_O_D_summ, and BoeingOD are invoked but never defined. I couldn't find them in previous versions of the pages in 2022 and 2021. A455bcd9 (talk) 14:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]