Promoting 'Perijá tapaculo' to Featured Article status |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:I know, I've declined the speedy and added some references. Technically you shouldn't have removed the speedy deletion tag yourself, but it was clearly inappropiate in this instance. [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 16:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC) |
:I know, I've declined the speedy and added some references. Technically you shouldn't have removed the speedy deletion tag yourself, but it was clearly inappropiate in this instance. [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 16:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC) |
||
*Not much new has been published about this bird since it was named, but perhaps a bit from this paper could be added:[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4467187/] [[User:FunkMonk|FunkMonk]] ([[User talk:FunkMonk|talk]]) 16:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
{{Talk:Perijá tapaculo/GA1}} |
{{Talk:Perijá tapaculo/GA1}} |
Revision as of 16:49, 27 November 2020
Perijá tapaculo is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is actually a real bird discovered in 2015. The French and Spanish articles are well completed. Poppy (talk) 16:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- I know, I've declined the speedy and added some references. Technically you shouldn't have removed the speedy deletion tag yourself, but it was clearly inappropiate in this instance. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Not much new has been published about this bird since it was named, but perhaps a bit from this paper could be added:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 16:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Perijá tapaculo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 20:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Will review it. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for this little nice article! I did a few changes myself (please check if correct), and have two additional suggestions (but nothing serious, so I will let the article pass).
- One of the authors seems to have some additional fotos on flickr which we might use for Wikipedia [2] He also has photos of the Serranía del Perijá , which also would be nice.
- I would suggest adding the following information to the lead: 1) Specimens have long been stored in museums, but the species was only described in 2015. 2) Information on conservation status. For most readers, this is more interesting than a detailed description of the color of the plumage.
--Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:55, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
endemic
Great to see additional work on this article! Just a small comment on the categories: I think no species can be endemic in two countries simultanously, can it? Its endemic to the mountain range, or to South America as a whole, but cannot be an endemic bird of Colombia and an endemic bird of Venezuela at the same time. Having both categories might be misleading. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:30, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- I've replaced the categories. Thanks for spotting that. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:37, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
GOCE copy edit
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|