Film: Indian Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Seems to be "inspired" by the Soviet movie The Irony of Fate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.167.16.211 (talk) 22:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article states a release date of 30 December 2013, citing this source. But the source states "Film releases on 26th April 2013". --Stfg (talk) 14:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fill the #soundtrack table plz - Yasir72.multan ^Talk _Contribs
11:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Love NY (2015 film) → I Love NY (Bollywood film) – The year should not be used for this film for the following reason: A line in the "Release and Reception" section says: "Originally planned for release in April 2013, it was delayed on numerous occasions." Neel.arunabh (talk) 17:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. Planned release dates are irrelevant. The film was released in 2015, so it is a 2015 film. PC78 (talk) 17:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree for this film.Neel.arunabh (talk) 02:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't agree that it was released in 2015? PC78 (talk) 06:51, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree.Neel.arunabh (talk) 01:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose per above and WP:NCF. Infact, you tried a very similar page move recently (above) that failed. Did you not read WP:NCF? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per above & per WP:NCF - Planned releases are irrelevent anyway, Like above I'd advise the nom to read NCF. –Davey2010^Talk 20:48, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice the image?Neel.arunabh (talk) 01:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And now the other film has been moved as well. Neel.arunabh (talk) 02:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And now it's been moved back. Please stop, this is borderline disruptive editing. PC78 (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline disruptive editing why?Neel.arunabh (talk) 16:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The opener should also be blocked or banned from moving pages as his undiscussed moves like the one above and many others are causing a lot of confusion and nonsense. Wikipedia:Competence is required. --Cavarrone 08:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What should be done when moving a page?Neel.arunabh (talk) 16:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't agree with the title "(2015 film)".Neel.arunabh (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]