Cannabis Sativa

Content deleted Content added
Yakuman (talk | contribs)
rv to stop edit war
Will Beback (talk | contribs)
rm blog used as source
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
In [[1802]], [[James T. Callender]], a Richmond newspaper reporter, published the first claim that Thomas Jefferson was the father of Sally Hemings's son, Tom.
In [[1802]], [[James T. Callender]], a Richmond newspaper reporter, published the first claim that Thomas Jefferson was the father of Sally Hemings's son, Tom.


In 1798, Callender had been incarcerated by President John Adams under the Sedition Act. Three years later, after Callendar had been released and Jefferson had been elected president, Callender asked Jefferson to appoint him Postmaster of [[Richmond, Virginia]]. When Jefferson refused, Callender published his accusation in retaliation.<ref>http://geocities.com/nstix/jeffersonhemings.html</ref>
In 1798, Callender had been incarcerated by President John Adams under the Sedition Act. Three years later, after Callendar had been released and Jefferson had been elected president, Callender asked Jefferson to appoint him Postmaster of [[Richmond, Virginia]]. When Jefferson refused, Callender published his accusation in retaliation.


In 2007, Keshia Jones claimed she was a decendent of Sally Hemmings. Later Marcus Gladden and Kyle Leverett proved that was false as well.
In 2007, Keshia Jones claimed she was a decendent of Sally Hemmings. Later Marcus Gladden and Kyle Leverett proved that was false as well.
Line 35: Line 35:
Through most of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, biographers of Thomas Jefferson dismissed suggestions that he had fathered children by a slave, if they mentioned the issue at all. They generally called Callender's charges too politically motivated to be worth examining, and derided Madison Hemings's statement as an attempt to puff up his status by claiming a famous father. During a visit to Monticello in the 1850s, the biographer Henry Randall interviewed Thomas Jefferson's grandson, who suggested that Jefferson's nephew Peter Carr had fathered the Hemings children; but Randall kept that information confidential at the grandson's request. Some of the grandson's statements about life at Monticello are demonstrably incorrect and cast doubt on his veracity, or at least on the accuracy of his memory.
Through most of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, biographers of Thomas Jefferson dismissed suggestions that he had fathered children by a slave, if they mentioned the issue at all. They generally called Callender's charges too politically motivated to be worth examining, and derided Madison Hemings's statement as an attempt to puff up his status by claiming a famous father. During a visit to Monticello in the 1850s, the biographer Henry Randall interviewed Thomas Jefferson's grandson, who suggested that Jefferson's nephew Peter Carr had fathered the Hemings children; but Randall kept that information confidential at the grandson's request. Some of the grandson's statements about life at Monticello are demonstrably incorrect and cast doubt on his veracity, or at least on the accuracy of his memory.


In his monumental history of early American race relations, ''White Over Black'' (1968), Winthrop Jordan treated the Hemings-Jefferson link as plausible and worth consideration, noting that Jefferson was at Monticello every time Sally Hemings became pregnant. [[Fawn M. Brodie]]'s 1974 biography of Jefferson assembled additional evidence about the Hemings family and the timing of Hemings's pregnancies; but some critics strongly objected to Brodie's psychoanalytic approach to Jefferson. [[Dumas Malone]], Douglass Adair, [[Virginius Dabney]], and other authors produced rebuttals to Brodie's argument, pointing to the Jefferson family's statements about the Carr brothers. While fictional portrayals of the relationship such as [[Barbara Chase-Riboud]]'s ''Sally Hemings'' and the [[Merchant-Ivory]] film ''Jefferson in Paris'' reached large audiences and persuaded many, most mainstream historians continued to assert that Jefferson was unlikely to have had a sexual relationship with any slave.
In his monumental history of early American race relations, ''White Over Black'' (1968), Winthrop Jordan treated the Hemings-Jefferson link as plausible and worth consideration, noting that Jefferson was at Monticello every time Sally Hemings became pregnant. [[Fawn M. Brodie]]'s 1974 biography of Jefferson assembled additional evidence about the Hemings family and the timing of Hemings's pregnancies; but some critics strongly objected to Brodie's psychoanalytic approach to Jefferson. [[Dumas Malone]], Douglass Adair, [[Virginius Dabney]], and other authors produced rebuttals to Brodie's argument, pointing to the Jefferson family's statements about the Carr brothers. While fictional portrayals of the relationship such as [[Barbara Chase-Riboud]]'s ''Sally Hemings'' and the [[Merchant-Ivory]] film ''Jefferson in Paris'' reached large audiences and persuaded many, most mainstream historians continued to assert that Jefferson was unlikely to have had a [[sexual relationship]] with any slave.


In 1997, however, law professor Annette Gordon-Reed published a thorough examination of the arguments and available evidence, ''Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy.'' She pointed out how most historians had used double standards to evaluate the evidence for and against the statement of Madison Hemings. For example, Hemings's statement about his father was labeled unreliable "oral history" while the tales passed down in the Jefferson family were treated as trustworthy even though they contradicted each other and the documentary record. Historians accepted statements about Sally's father being John Wayles based on little evidence, but insisted on much more proof about Sally's children.
In 1997, however, law professor Annette Gordon-Reed published a thorough examination of the arguments and available evidence, ''Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy.'' She pointed out how most historians had used double standards to evaluate the evidence for and against the statement of Madison Hemings. For example, Hemings's statement about his father was labeled unreliable "oral history" while the tales passed down in the Jefferson family were treated as trustworthy even though they contradicted each other and the documentary record. Historians accepted statements about Sally's father being John Wayles based on little evidence, but insisted on much more proof about Sally's children.

Revision as of 21:22, 11 April 2007

Sally Hemings (Shadwell, Albemarle County, Virginia, circa 1773 or 1773Charlottesville, Virginia, 1835) was a quadroon slave owned by Thomas Jefferson. It has intermittently been claimed since 1802 that Jefferson was the father of one or more of her children [1]. Her mother, Betty Hemings, daughter of a Captain Hemings and a black slave woman brought from Africa, and other members of her family, were owned by Jefferson's father-in-law, John Wayles, who died in 1773, leaving nearly all of the Hemings to his daughter Martha Jefferson, wife of Thomas Jefferson. Most historians believe that Martha and Sally were half-sisters, both fathered by John Wayles. Martha Jefferson died in 1782, leaving Sally to Thomas.

In 1784, Thomas Jefferson took up residence in Paris as the American envoy to France. In 1787, Jefferson sent for his daughter, nine-year-old Maria (Polly) Jefferson, to come live with him. He asked that Isabel, an older woman, be sent as a companion for Polly, but because Isabel was pregnant, the teen-aged Sally Hemings accompanied her instead. Hemings returned to the United States with Jefferson in 1789. She lived the rest of her life at Monticello or in nearby Charlottesville, where she moved after Jefferson's death. According to Jefferson's records, she bore six children:

  • Harriet Hemings (I) (October 5, 1795 - December 7, 1797) [2]
  • Beverly Hemings (possibly born William Beverly Hemings) (April 1, 1798 - after 1873) [3]
  • daughter (possibly named Thenia, after Hemings's deceased sister) (December 7, 1799 - ca. 1802)
  • Harriet Hemings (II) (May 22, 1801 - after 1863) [4]
  • Madison Hemings (possibly born James Madison Hemings) (January 19, 1805 - 1877) [5]
  • Eston Hemings (possibly born Thomas Eston Hemings) (May 21, 1808 - 1856) [6]

Sally Hemings served as chambermaid at Monticello. As an adult she lived in a room which was accessible to the Monticello mansion through a covered passageway. Hemings was never officially freed, perhaps because the laws at that time required freed slaves to leave the state within a year[citation needed]; Jefferson's daughter Martha Randolph is believed to have given Hemings her "time", a form of unofficial freedom[citation needed].

Descendants of Thomas Woodson long claimed that he was Sally Hemings' son, and that he had had been fathered by Thomas Jefferson. This claim was conclusively disproved by DNA testing in 1998. However, the same DNA testing strongly indicated that Sally's last child, Eston Hemings, was a male line descendant of Jefferson's paternal grandfather, which means that Eston was fathered by one of 25 patrilineal candidates.


Controversy over Sally Hemings's children

In 1802, James T. Callender, a Richmond newspaper reporter, published the first claim that Thomas Jefferson was the father of Sally Hemings's son, Tom.

In 1798, Callender had been incarcerated by President John Adams under the Sedition Act. Three years later, after Callendar had been released and Jefferson had been elected president, Callender asked Jefferson to appoint him Postmaster of Richmond, Virginia. When Jefferson refused, Callender published his accusation in retaliation.

In 2007, Keshia Jones claimed she was a decendent of Sally Hemmings. Later Marcus Gladden and Kyle Leverett proved that was false as well.

Madison Hemings, one of Sally's sons, stated in an 1873 interview that Thomas Jefferson was his father and the father of all of Sally's children, but this was proven to be false by DNA testing in 1998.

Around 1900, descendants of Thomas Woodson began to publish claims that he was Sally Hemings's son by Thomas Jefferson, conceived in France and born at Monticello in 1790.

The truth of these rumors was long debated. Evidence advanced in support of the claim included (1) the fact that Hemings was living with Jefferson, either in Paris or at Monticello, at the time of the conceptions of all of her children; (2) statements made by Madison Hemings and another former slave from Monticello who agreed with his account; (3) claims that Hemings's children strongly resembled Jefferson physically; and (4) the fact that Hemings's children were either manumitted or allowed to slip away from Monticello by Jefferson's descendants.

Thomas Jefferson himself never commented directly on the issue, though some of his remarks have been interpreted as indirect denials. For example, he publicly stated his opposition to miscegenation (a word not yet coined at the time): "Their [blacks'] amalgamation with the other color," he wrote, "produces a degradation to which no lover of his country, no lover of excellence in the human character, can innocently consent."[1]

Two of Jefferson's grandchildren stated long after Jefferson's death that the resemblance to Jefferson was because the Hemings children had been fathered by either Samuel or Peter Carr, the sons of Jefferson's sister. One grandchild insisted all of the Hemings children were Samuel's; the other said they were all Peter's. In 1998, DNA testing ruled out the possibility that the Carrs could have fathered Hemings's child Eston but confirmed that Eston Hemings was a male line descendant of Thomas Jefferson's uncle, Field Jefferson.

The historians' debate

Through most of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, biographers of Thomas Jefferson dismissed suggestions that he had fathered children by a slave, if they mentioned the issue at all. They generally called Callender's charges too politically motivated to be worth examining, and derided Madison Hemings's statement as an attempt to puff up his status by claiming a famous father. During a visit to Monticello in the 1850s, the biographer Henry Randall interviewed Thomas Jefferson's grandson, who suggested that Jefferson's nephew Peter Carr had fathered the Hemings children; but Randall kept that information confidential at the grandson's request. Some of the grandson's statements about life at Monticello are demonstrably incorrect and cast doubt on his veracity, or at least on the accuracy of his memory.

In his monumental history of early American race relations, White Over Black (1968), Winthrop Jordan treated the Hemings-Jefferson link as plausible and worth consideration, noting that Jefferson was at Monticello every time Sally Hemings became pregnant. Fawn M. Brodie's 1974 biography of Jefferson assembled additional evidence about the Hemings family and the timing of Hemings's pregnancies; but some critics strongly objected to Brodie's psychoanalytic approach to Jefferson. Dumas Malone, Douglass Adair, Virginius Dabney, and other authors produced rebuttals to Brodie's argument, pointing to the Jefferson family's statements about the Carr brothers. While fictional portrayals of the relationship such as Barbara Chase-Riboud's Sally Hemings and the Merchant-Ivory film Jefferson in Paris reached large audiences and persuaded many, most mainstream historians continued to assert that Jefferson was unlikely to have had a sexual relationship with any slave.

In 1997, however, law professor Annette Gordon-Reed published a thorough examination of the arguments and available evidence, Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy. She pointed out how most historians had used double standards to evaluate the evidence for and against the statement of Madison Hemings. For example, Hemings's statement about his father was labeled unreliable "oral history" while the tales passed down in the Jefferson family were treated as trustworthy even though they contradicted each other and the documentary record. Historians accepted statements about Sally's father being John Wayles based on little evidence, but insisted on much more proof about Sally's children.

Gordon-Reed did not argue that documentary records proved Madison Hemings's claim, only that authors had unfairly dismissed it. As to the Hemings children's paternity, she wrote, the answer might lie in developing more evidence through DNA analysis.

November 1998 Nature article

The November 5, 1998, issue of the British scientific journal Nature contained a study on the available DNA evidence by a team led by Eugene A. Foster. The study compared the Y chromosomal haplotypes of four groups of men: descendants of Thomas Jefferson's grandfather; of Thomas Woodson; of Madison Hemings's brother Eston Hemings (who later took the name Eston Jefferson); and of John Carr, grandfather of the Carr brothers. The DNA data from the study is available in more detail here.

In each case, the men had to be patrilineal descendants: sons of sons of sons. Only in those lines did the original Y chromosomes survive. As a result, no direct descendants of Thomas and Martha Jefferson could be included in the study, nor descendants of Madison Hemings. No patrilineal descendants in those lines could be identified.

The study's major findings were that the Y chromosome of the Jefferson family matched that of Eston Hemings family, while the Y chromosomes of the Woodson and Carr families were each different. The implications for the paternity question were clear. The Jefferson grandchildren's contention that Sally Hemings's children had been fathered by one or the other Carr brother was not tenable. Neither was the Woodson family's claim to have been descended from Jefferson. On the other hand, Eston Hemings was undoubtedly the son of a Jefferson.

Of all the accounts of the Hemings children published before 1998, only Madison Hemings's was completely consistent with the DNA tests. Nature therefore headlined the study "Jefferson fathered slave’s last child."[2]

The Foundation and Commission reports

Following the Nature article, the controversy continued to grow, and in 2000 and 2001 two major studies of the Jefferson-Hemings allegations were released. Both studies drew from a range of sources, including both scientific and historical, to arrive at their conclusions.

In January 2000, a group of specialists from the Thomas Jefferson Foundation, which owns and operates Monticello, produced a study on the controversy initiated soon after the Nature paper. Their near-unanimous [3] report [4] stated that "although paternity cannot be established with absolute certainty, our evaluation of the best evidence available suggests the strong likelihood that Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings had a relationship over time that led to the birth of one, and perhaps all, of the known children of Sally Hemings." [5] One member of the committee, White Wallenborn, dissented, noting that "the historical evidence is not substantial enough to confirm nor for that matter to refute his paternity of any of the children of Sally Hemings."

Later in 2000, the newly formed Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society created a "Jefferson-Hemings Scholars Commission" to examine the paternity question [7]. On April 12, 2001, they issued a report; at 565 pages, it was far longer than the Foundation report, though many of those pages were devoted to a review of the evidence that the Thomas Jefferson Foundation study examined. The conclusion of most of the Scholars Commission was that "the Jefferson-Hemings allegation is by no means proven"; those members' individual conclusions ranged from "serious skepticism about the charge" to "a conviction that it is almost certainly false" [8]. The majority suggested the most likely alternative is that Randolph Jefferson, Thomas's younger brother, was the father of Eston—a possibility that had not been raised by Jefferson's grandchildren or anyone else in the nineteenth century. (The first person to publicly link Randolph Jefferson to Sally Hemings was playwright Karyn Traut in 1988; her husband, biologist Thomas Traut, became a member of the Scholars Commission.)

The lone dissenter on the Scholars Commission, Paul Rahe, wrote that he considered "it somewhat more likely than not that Thomas Jefferson was the father of Eston Hemings," [6], and added "there is ... one thing that we do know, and it is damning enough. Despite the distaste he expressed for the propensity of slaveholders and their relatives to abuse their power, Jefferson either engaged in such abuse himself or tolerated it on the part of one or more members of his extended family."

Robert Turner, who chaired the commission, suggested that evidence for a sexual relationship between Jefferson and Hemings had been "rushed to press" because of the political climate surrounding the impeachment of Bill Clinton [7], as did David Mayer, a commission member, who was also scathingly critical of the Foundation report. [8]

Further findings

Further studies have been conducted. The William & Mary Quarterly published a probabilistic analysis of the timing of Jefferson's visits to Monticello and Hemings's pregnancies which concluded that it was highly likely that the two series of events were related. The National Genealogical Society Quarterly of September 2001 concluded that four children of Sally Hemings were fathered by Thomas Jefferson. Its article was explicitly critical of the Scholars Commission report.[9] The Woodson family continues to press their case in the book A President in the Family. The book points out: (1) an erasure in Jefferson's farm book in the section on slaves born in 1790, (2) Thomas Jefferson's record of gifts in the years 1800 and 1801 to a 'servant' named Thomas. (Callender's "Tom" would have been ten years old at the time of the gifts.),(3) the unethical nature of Ellis' early entry into the reporting process. Dr. Foster, the DNA test organizer, had promised the DNA test participants that historians would not be involved with the test or the reporting, but he lost control of the process. [10]

The current consensus among American historians appears to have undergone a sea-change. Once, most scholars dismissed the idea that Jefferson fathered Hemings's children without examining the evidence closely. Now most historians agree that the story is more likely than not, again without necessarily having read the full record. Scholars remain open to more evidence, but it is unclear where it might be found.

Among the public, the question of Thomas Jefferson's and Sally Hemings's relationship remains controversial. Members of the Monticello Association, who claim descent from Jefferson through his eldest daughter Martha Jefferson Randolph, have voted not to admit Hemings's descendants. Nevertheless, through the quirks of history and biology, only one set of Americans can show both that their ancestors were born at Monticello and that they share a Y chromosome with the Jefferson family: the patrilineal male descendants of Eston Hemings, Sally Hemings's youngest son.

Joseph Ellis and the Clinton impeachment

The controversy became even more heated because of a side issue: in 1998 Congress was conducting the impeachment of Bill Clinton, and the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Joseph Ellis defended Clinton by comparing him to Jefferson. Ellis had previously written that it would have been out of character for Jefferson to have had a sexual relationship with Hemings, but was convinced by the DNA tests and documentary evidence. He now wrote:

President William Jefferson Clinton also has a vested interest in this revelation.... Jefferson has always been Clinton's favorite Founding Father. Now, a sexually active, all-too-human Jefferson appears alongside his embattled protege. It is as if Clinton had called one of the most respected character witnesses in all of U.S. history to testify that the primal urge has a most distinguished presidential pedigree. The dominant effect of this news will be to make Clinton's sins seem less aberrant and more palatable. If a vote against Clinton is also a vote against Jefferson, the prospects for impeachment become even more remote. [11]

Ellis's claims generated accusations of distortions. Stephen Goode wrote in Insight Magazine that Ellis's statement that the DNA tests established a Jefferson-Hemings relation "beyond any reasonable doubt" was an exaggeration [9]. Foster, principal author of the Nature paper, also asserted the DNA evidence was far from establishing proof of a specific father, though it eliminated other candidates. [12]

Of those who have accepted reports suggesting a Jefferson-Hemings relationship, some disagree with Ellis's claim that the relationship would indicate a "distinguished presidential pedigree". Writing about the relationship in the Nashville City Paper, Molly Secours said "for us to call it anything but 'rape' is disingenuous and dangerous." [10] In USA Today, DeWayne Wickham wrote that "to imply that the sex between him and his slave was consensual, even in a TV movie, is a cruelly dishonest portrayal of the dirtiest secret of American slavery." [13]

Descendants

At least three of Hemings's children passed as white. [14] Frederick Madison Roberts (1879-1952), her great-grandson, has the distinction of being the first person of known African American ancestry elected to public office on the West Coast. He served in the California State Assembly from 1919-1934.

See also

References

Footnotes and citations

  1. ^ http://www.buckinghamhemmings.com/
  2. ^ The title of the article was described as "incorrect" by its authors and the following letter appeared in the Wall Street Journal March 11, 1999, page A23:
    In regard to your editorial "Founding Fatherhood" (Taste page, Weekend Journal, Feb. 26): I assisted Dr. E.A.Foster with the Jefferson/Hemings DNA study and I am aware of a glaring error in data in the British scientific journal Nature of Nov. 5, 1998. The mainstream media took the false headline "Jefferson Fathered Slave's Last Child" and distributed it to the world. Please take this inside information from me: I arranged for the Jefferson blood donors and other family historical information and the DNA results do not indicate Thomas Jefferson.
    Dr. Foster denied Nature valuable historical data that would have resulted in an accurate headline, which would have read "DNA indicates that any one of eight Jeffersons could be the father of Eston Hemings." As a Jefferson family historian for 25 years, my research shows that Thomas Jefferson did not father any Hemings child and he denied that he did. Ask Dr. Foster and Nature if that headline was correct - they both told me it was not correct due to the haste of a media release data.
    HERBERT BARGER
    Ft. Washington, Md.
  3. ^ http://www.monticello.org/plantation/hemingscontro/minority_report.html
  4. ^ http://www.monticello.org/plantation/hemingscontro/appendixj.html
  5. ^ http://www.monticello.org/plantation/hemingscontro/reportstatement.html
  6. ^ http://www.tjheritage.org/documents/SCReport9.pdf
  7. ^ http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=95000747
  8. ^ http://www.ashbrook.org/articles/mayer-hemings.html#VB
  9. ^ http://www.listlva.lib.va.us/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0111&L=va-roots&P=1223
  10. ^ Byron Woodson, A President in The Family, Praeger, 217,246, 222-229.
  11. ^ http://www.warbirdforum.com/ellis.htm
  12. ^ http://www.warbirdforum.com/ellis.htm
  13. ^ http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnists/wickham/wick052.htm
  14. ^ http://www.jessejacksonjr.org/query/creadpr.cgi?id=%22005024%22

Leave a Reply