Cannabis Sativa

Content deleted Content added
name of article title is "arab citizens of Israel" so its the neutral term - most identify as palestinian [http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=2528], not israeli arabs
Undid revision 350571472 by Tiamut (talk) "arab israeli" is also a neutral term. go to talk if you want to change this, per BRD.
Line 9: Line 9:
| death_date = {{death date and age|2005|8|4|1986|7|9}}
| death_date = {{death date and age|2005|8|4|1986|7|9}}
| death_place = [[Shefa-Amr|Shfar'am]], [[Israel]]
| death_place = [[Shefa-Amr|Shfar'am]], [[Israel]]
}}'''Eden Natan-Zada''' ({{lang-he|עדן נתן-זדה}}, born 9 July 1986, died 4 August 2005) was an [[AWOL]] [[Israel Defense Forces]] soldier who opened fire in a bus in [[Shefa-Amr|Shfar'am]] in northern [[Israel]] on August 4, 2005, murdering four [[Arab citizens of Israel]] and wounding twenty-two others. He was restrained, disarmed and cuffed when he tried to reload to prepare for another round of shooting.<ref>[http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=6969 Israeli Government Bears Responsibility for Shfaram Massacre] Kibbush.co.il 7 August 2005</ref> A video released later shows him being [[lynching|beaten to death]] by the crowd after he had been handcuffed while he was still on the bus.<ref>[http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART/967/940.html Last moments of Natan-Zada] Maariv, 8 August 2005</ref> It has been inferred that the shooting was a personal protest against the Israeli government's [[Israel unilateral disengagement plan|disengagement plan]], since an orange ribbon was found attached to Natan-Zada's pocket. (Orange was an emblem color of anti-disengagement activism).
}}'''Eden Natan-Zada''' ({{lang-he|עדן נתן-זדה}}, born 9 July 1986, died 4 August 2005) was an [[AWOL]] [[Israel Defense Forces]] soldier who opened fire in a bus in the northern [[Israel]]i town of [[Shefa-Amr|Shfar'am]] on August 4, 2005, murdering four [[Israeli Arab]] civilians and wounding twenty-two others. He was restrained, disarmed and cuffed when he tried to reload to prepare for another round of shooting.<ref>[http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=6969 Israeli Government Bears Responsibility for Shfaram Massacre] Kibbush.co.il 7 August 2005</ref> A video released later shows him being [[lynching|beaten to death]] by the crowd after he had been handcuffed while he was still on the bus.<ref>[http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART/967/940.html Last moments of Natan-Zada] Maariv, 8 August 2005</ref> It has been inferred that the shooting was a personal protest against the Israeli government's [[Israel unilateral disengagement plan|disengagement plan]], since an orange ribbon was found attached to Natan-Zada's pocket. (Orange was an emblem color of anti-disengagement activism).


No group has taken credit for the terror attack, and most officials in the settler movement have denounced it {{fact}}. Natan-Zada was [[desertion|absent without leave]] and in hiding from the IDF at the time of the shooting. He had recently [[Baal teshuva|become religious]] after getting involved with far-right activists.<ref>[http://www.sptimes.com/2005/08/09/Columns/No_group_holds_patent.shtml ''No group holds patent on terrorism'' St Petersberg Times, Susan Taylor Martin, August 9, 2005]</ref>
No group has taken credit for the terror attack, and most officials in the settler movement have denounced it {{fact}}. Natan-Zada was [[desertion|absent without leave]] and in hiding from the IDF at the time of the shooting. He had recently [[Baal teshuva|become religious]] after getting involved with far-right activists.<ref>[http://www.sptimes.com/2005/08/09/Columns/No_group_holds_patent.shtml ''No group holds patent on terrorism'' St Petersberg Times, Susan Taylor Martin, August 9, 2005]</ref>
Line 43: Line 43:
</ref>
</ref>


According to witnesses, the bus driver was initially surprised to see a religiously-observant Jewish soldier making his way to Shfar'am (an overwhelmingly Arab city) via public bus, so he asked Natan-Zada if he was certain he wanted to take his current route. Upon arriving in Shfar'am's primary [[Druze]] neighborhood, Natan-Zada stood up and approached the front door as if to disembark the bus. When the door opened, Natan-Zada turned around and began shooting.
According to witnesses, the bus driver was initially surprised to see a religiously-observant Jewish soldier making his way to Shfar'am (an overwhelmingly Israeli-Arab city) via public bus, so he asked Natan-Zada if he was certain he wanted to take his current route. Upon arriving in Shfar'am's primary [[Druze]] neighborhood, Natan-Zada stood up and approached the front door as if to disembark the bus. When the door opened, Natan-Zada turned around and began shooting.


The four victims were Hazar Turki and Dina Turki, two sisters in their early twenties, and two men, Michel Bahus (the driver) and Nader Hayek; all were Arab citizens of Israel. In the days after the attack, 40,000 people attended a funeral service in honor of the victims in the town; the two sisters were buried in an Islamic cemetery, and the two men in the local Christian cemetery.
The four victims were Hazar Turki and Dina Turki, two sisters in their early twenties, and two men, Michel Bahus (the driver) and Nader Hayek; all were Israeli citizens. In the days after the attack, 40,000 [[Israeli Arab]]s formed a funeral service in honor of the victims in the town; the two sisters were buried in an Islamic cemetery, and the two men in the local Christian cemetery.


From some pages in Eden-Zada's handwriting it seems that his motive for the act was to provoke a widespread wave of Arab riots and violent acts, which would keep the police and security forces too busy to carry out the planned evacuation of the [[Gaza strip]] settlers.{{Citation needed|date=March 2009}} However, there were no further mass protests among Arabs after the funeral, which was peaceful.{{Citation needed|date=March 2009}}
From some pages in Eden-Zada's handwriting it seems that his motive for the act was to provoke a widespread wave of Arab riots and violent acts, which would keep the police and security forces too busy to carry out the planned evacuation of the [[Gaza strip]] settlers.{{Citation needed|date=March 2009}} However, there were no further mass protests among Arabs after the funeral, which was peaceful.{{Citation needed|date=March 2009}}
Line 55: Line 55:
While the Israeli government and [[United States Department of State|US State Department]] both consider groups based on [[Kahanism]] to be terrorist organizations, Kahanist advocates insist their ideology only advocates the forced removal of Arabs from the [[Land of Israel]], not murder.
While the Israeli government and [[United States Department of State|US State Department]] both consider groups based on [[Kahanism]] to be terrorist organizations, Kahanist advocates insist their ideology only advocates the forced removal of Arabs from the [[Land of Israel]], not murder.


The [[High Follow-Up Committee for Arab Citizens of Israel]] called on the government to refrain from investigating the death of Eden Natan-Zada. Arab [[Knesset]] member [[Mohammad Barakeh]], a Shfar'am resident himself, warned that protests could erupt if police probe Zada's lynching: "Normally when someone stops a terrorist from continuing to kill he is considered a hero, but in this case it is the heroes who are sitting on the defense stand". However, Shfaram's security officer, Jamal Aliam, told Army Radio that Zada had been attacked by dozens of people after he had been handcuffed and subdued by police.
The monitoring committee of the Israeli Arab leadership called on the government to refrain from investigating the death of Eden Natan-Zada. Israeli Arab [[Knesset]] member [[Mohammad Barakeh]], a Shfar'am resident himself, warned that protests could erupt if police probe Zada's lynching: "Normally when someone stops a terrorist from continuing to kill he is considered a hero, but in this case it is the heroes who are sitting on the defense stand". However, Shfaram's security officer, Jamal Aliam, told Army Radio that Zada had been attacked by dozens of people after he had been handcuffed and subdued by police.


Eventually, on June 13, 2006, seven suspects in the lynching were arrested. The seventh suspect turned himself in to the Police. The police said: "We're responsible for maintaining the law, and you can't take the law into your own hands. Even when it concerns a terrorist who murdered innocent people even though he made a heinous terrorist act".<ref>[http://news.walla.co.il/?w=//922912 Extended detention for the suspects in the murder of Eden Natan-Zada] Walla, 13 June 2006 (in Hebrew)</ref><ref>[http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/1,7340,L-3262195,00.html Police detail seven suspects in Zada lynching] Yedioth Ahronoth, 13 June 2006 (in Hebrew)</ref> Two suspects were subsequently released and five await trial in Haifa. There was general support for their arrest and even left-wing activist [[Yossi Beilin]] said: "Israel can't put up with a lynch made on a handcuffed person even if his actions are heinous and unforgivable. It's a combined interest of both Jews and Arabs that Israel won't close its eyes to such behaviour". The Arab [[Knesset]] members however demanded their release and called their arrest a crime.<ref>[http://www.hazofe.co.il/web/katava6.asp?Modul=24&id=46144&Word=&gilayon=2770&mador= Orlev: It is forbidden to accept surrender to the political terror of Arab MKs] HaTzofe (in Hebrew)</ref>
Eventually, on June 13, 2006, seven suspects in the lynching were arrested. The seventh suspect turned himself in to the Police. The police said: "We're responsible for maintaining the law, and you can't take the law into your own hands. Even when it concerns a terrorist who murdered innocent people even though he made a heinous terrorist act".<ref>[http://news.walla.co.il/?w=//922912 Extended detention for the suspects in the murder of Eden Natan-Zada] Walla, 13 June 2006 (in Hebrew)</ref><ref>[http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/1,7340,L-3262195,00.html Police detail seven suspects in Zada lynching] Yedioth Ahronoth, 13 June 2006 (in Hebrew)</ref> Two suspects were subsequently released and five await trial in Haifa. There was general support for their arrest and even left-wing activist [[Yossi Beilin]] said: "Israel can't put up with a lynch made on a handcuffed person even if his actions are heinous and unforgivable. It's a combined interest of both Jews and Arabs that Israel won't close its eyes to such behaviour". The Arab [[Knesset]] members however demanded their release and called their arrest a crime.<ref>[http://www.hazofe.co.il/web/katava6.asp?Modul=24&id=46144&Word=&gilayon=2770&mador= Orlev: It is forbidden to accept surrender to the political terror of Arab MKs] HaTzofe (in Hebrew)</ref>


On June 7, 2009, twelve Arab citizens were indicted over the lynching. Seven were charged with attempted murder.<ref>[http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1244371030417&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull 12 charged in Shfaram shooter lynching] ''Jerusalem Post'', 7 June 2009</ref> In March 2010, Maher Talhami, their defense lawyer, stated that recently discovered aerial footage of the bus, recorded by an Israeli drone before, during and after the attack took place indicates that Israeli defensse officials were aware of Natan-Zada's intentions.<ref>[http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1156771.html 'Government knew of Jewish terrorist's plan to open fire on Shfaram bus'], [[Haaretz]], March 16, 2010.</ref>
On June 7, 2009, twelve Israeli Arabs were indicted over the lynching. Seven were charged with attempted murder.<ref>[http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1244371030417&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull 12 charged in Shfaram shooter lynching] ''Jerusalem Post'', 7 June 2009</ref> In March 2010, Maher Talhami, their defense lawyer, stated that recently discovered aerial footage of the bus, recorded by an Israeli drone before, during and after the attack took place indicates that Israeli defensse officials were aware of Natan-Zada's intentions.<ref>[http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1156771.html 'Government knew of Jewish terrorist's plan to open fire on Shfaram bus'], [[Haaretz]], March 16, 2010.</ref>


==Burial controversy==
==Burial controversy==
Line 73: Line 73:


==Victim compensation==
==Victim compensation==
After the event, the [[Israel]]i [[Defense Minister of Israel|Defense Ministry]] ruled that the four Arab citizens shot dead were not victims of terror because their killer was not part of an organization deemed "hostile to Israel", and are thus not entitled to the usual compensation for life lost due to terror attacks.<ref name = "McGreal1">{{cite web
After the event, the [[Israel]]i [[Defense Minister of Israel|Defense Ministry]] ruled that the four Arab Israelis shot dead were not victims of terror because their killer was not part of an organization deemed "hostile to Israel", and are thus not entitled to the usual compensation for life lost due to terror attacks.<ref name = "McGreal1">{{cite web
| url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/sep/01/israel
| url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/sep/01/israel
| title = Jewish gunman was no terrorist, Israel rules
| title = Jewish gunman was no terrorist, Israel rules
Line 99: Line 99:
| publisher = ''[[Haaretz]]''
| publisher = ''[[Haaretz]]''
}}
}}
</ref> as a lump-sum payment, as opposed to the lifelong monthly annuity given to the families of terror victims.<ref name = ""IIM" /> Representatives of the Arab community in Israel condemned the decision, with [[Mohammed Barakeh]], an Arab member of the Israeli parliament, saying that the "…decision raises a strong scent of racism, which distinguishes between a Jewish terrorist and an Arab terrorist."<ref name = "McGreal1" /> On July 19, 2006, the Israeli government changed the "Compensation Law for Victims of Hostile Acts" to include anyone victimized by violence stemming from the Israeli-Arab conflict.<ref name = "HRA2006">{{cite web
</ref> as a lump-sum payment, as opposed to the lifelong monthly annuity given to the families of terror victims.<ref name = ""IIM" /> Arab Israeli leaders condemned the decision, with [[Mohammed Barakeh]], an Arab member of the Israeli parliament, saying that the "…decision raises a strong scent of racism, which distinguishes between a Jewish terrorist and an Arab terrorist."<ref name = "McGreal1" /> On July 19, 2006, the Israeli government changed the "Compensation Law for Victims of Hostile Acts" to include anyone victimized by violence stemming from the Israeli-Arab conflict.<ref name = "HRA2006">{{cite web
| url = http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78854.htm#ot
| url = http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78854.htm#ot
| title = RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
| title = RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

Revision as of 10:45, 18 March 2010

Eden Natan-Zada
Eden Natan-Zada
Born(1986-07-09)July 9, 1986
DiedAugust 4, 2005(2005-08-04) (aged 19)

Eden Natan-Zada (Hebrew: עדן נתן-זדה, born 9 July 1986, died 4 August 2005) was an AWOL Israel Defense Forces soldier who opened fire in a bus in the northern Israeli town of Shfar'am on August 4, 2005, murdering four Israeli Arab civilians and wounding twenty-two others. He was restrained, disarmed and cuffed when he tried to reload to prepare for another round of shooting.[1] A video released later shows him being beaten to death by the crowd after he had been handcuffed while he was still on the bus.[2] It has been inferred that the shooting was a personal protest against the Israeli government's disengagement plan, since an orange ribbon was found attached to Natan-Zada's pocket. (Orange was an emblem color of anti-disengagement activism).

No group has taken credit for the terror attack, and most officials in the settler movement have denounced it [citation needed]. Natan-Zada was absent without leave and in hiding from the IDF at the time of the shooting. He had recently become religious after getting involved with far-right activists.[3]

Early life

Natan-Zada's parents describe him as having been a "bright and studious Israeli schoolboy" prior to his becoming involved with Kahanism, to which he was introduced via the internet.[4] He then began spending weekends in Kfar Tapuach, an Orthodox West Bank settlement where he eventually hid to avoid further service in the IDF.[4] According to Matthew Gutman of the Jerusalem Post, Kfar Tapuach "became the unofficial headquarters of Kahane Chai in 1990," but supporters deny the existence of a Kahane headquarters.

In a letter left behind after his desertion, Natan-Zada expressed dismay to his parents over the disengagement plan , saying 'Just as I couldn't carry out an order that desecrates the Sabbath, I cannot be part of an organization that expels Jews.'[5] He added the anti-pullout slogan 'Jews don't expel Jews' to his letter, and concluded the message with the words: 'I will consider how I will continue to serve.'

His mother claims that prior to the shooting she alerted the IDF and other security services that her son was still in possession of his military-issued weapon. 'We told everyone he's AWOL, that he could do something with his gun. We begged them to take away his gun. He also asked them to take his gun. The army destroyed my child. The army destroyed my life.' According to The New Republic, 'an army psychiatrist warned that he wasn't fit for weapons or uniform, but his professional judgment was awaiting approval by a panel of medical experts that was not very swift in assembling' and that a 'former chief of staff of the IDF' had 'speculated that the killer's parents might have a chance to win damages in court for neglect by the army of the welfare of their son.'[6]

The Shfar'am attack

File:Turki sisters zada victims.jpg
Sisters Hazar (left) and Dina (right) Turki

Natan-Zada boarded the Shfar'am-bound bus on Thursday, August 4, 2005. He was dressed in full IDF uniform, carrying his IDF-issued M16 rifle, and, according to observers, wearing the skullcap, beard, and sidelocks of an observant Jew, as well as an orange ribbon hanging from his pocket.[7] He opened fire on the driver shortly after the bus entered Shfar'am, then turned on the passengers; the driver and two passengers were killed instantly, and a third passenger died from sustained gunshot wounds. When he paused to reload his weapon, Natan-Zada was subdued by streetgoers gathered around the scene of the bus shooting. When the police arrived at the scene he was tied and still alive, but the small police force couldn't prevent the crowd from lynching him.[8] It took the police four hours to remove his body from the scene.[9]

According to witnesses, the bus driver was initially surprised to see a religiously-observant Jewish soldier making his way to Shfar'am (an overwhelmingly Israeli-Arab city) via public bus, so he asked Natan-Zada if he was certain he wanted to take his current route. Upon arriving in Shfar'am's primary Druze neighborhood, Natan-Zada stood up and approached the front door as if to disembark the bus. When the door opened, Natan-Zada turned around and began shooting.

The four victims were Hazar Turki and Dina Turki, two sisters in their early twenties, and two men, Michel Bahus (the driver) and Nader Hayek; all were Israeli citizens. In the days after the attack, 40,000 Israeli Arabs formed a funeral service in honor of the victims in the town; the two sisters were buried in an Islamic cemetery, and the two men in the local Christian cemetery.

From some pages in Eden-Zada's handwriting it seems that his motive for the act was to provoke a widespread wave of Arab riots and violent acts, which would keep the police and security forces too busy to carry out the planned evacuation of the Gaza strip settlers.[citation needed] However, there were no further mass protests among Arabs after the funeral, which was peaceful.[citation needed]

Reactions

Then Prime Minister of Israel Ariel Sharon condemned Natan-Zada's actions unequivocally, calling them "a reprehensible act by a bloodthirsty Jewish terrorist," and "a deliberate attempt to harm the fabric of relations among all Israeli citizens." Vice Premier Shimon Peres and Interior Minister Ophir Pines-Paz visited the bereaved families. "Your pain is the pain of the entire State of Israel. We will not allow crazy men and terrorists to harm your life here," Peres told the families. Sharon's government has consistently referred to the shooting as "an act of terrorism," language usually reserved for Palestinian suicide bombers.[10]

While the Israeli government and US State Department both consider groups based on Kahanism to be terrorist organizations, Kahanist advocates insist their ideology only advocates the forced removal of Arabs from the Land of Israel, not murder.

The monitoring committee of the Israeli Arab leadership called on the government to refrain from investigating the death of Eden Natan-Zada. Israeli Arab Knesset member Mohammad Barakeh, a Shfar'am resident himself, warned that protests could erupt if police probe Zada's lynching: "Normally when someone stops a terrorist from continuing to kill he is considered a hero, but in this case it is the heroes who are sitting on the defense stand". However, Shfaram's security officer, Jamal Aliam, told Army Radio that Zada had been attacked by dozens of people after he had been handcuffed and subdued by police.

Eventually, on June 13, 2006, seven suspects in the lynching were arrested. The seventh suspect turned himself in to the Police. The police said: "We're responsible for maintaining the law, and you can't take the law into your own hands. Even when it concerns a terrorist who murdered innocent people even though he made a heinous terrorist act".[11][12] Two suspects were subsequently released and five await trial in Haifa. There was general support for their arrest and even left-wing activist Yossi Beilin said: "Israel can't put up with a lynch made on a handcuffed person even if his actions are heinous and unforgivable. It's a combined interest of both Jews and Arabs that Israel won't close its eyes to such behaviour". The Arab Knesset members however demanded their release and called their arrest a crime.[13]

On June 7, 2009, twelve Israeli Arabs were indicted over the lynching. Seven were charged with attempted murder.[14] In March 2010, Maher Talhami, their defense lawyer, stated that recently discovered aerial footage of the bus, recorded by an Israeli drone before, during and after the attack took place indicates that Israeli defensse officials were aware of Natan-Zada's intentions.[15]

Burial controversy

File:IMGP0558.JPG
Tombstone of Nathan-Zada

Natan-Zada's funeral was a controversial matter. Jewish law requires a swift burial, but nationwide outrage against his attacks left his body without a willing resting place for two days.

An initial agreement between IDF officials and the Natan-Zada family would have allowed burial in a military cemetery, but with no military honors such as a 21-gun salute or placement of the Israeli flag upon his coffin. However, Meir Nitzan, the mayor of Rishon LeZion intervened before the funeral. The morgue which housed Natan-Zada's body, Abu Kabir Forensic Institute, refused to release the body to friends and fellow Kahane activists to bury, resulting in a bitter protest.

Residents of Kfar Tapuach are divided on the issue. Kfar Tapuach resident Moshe Meirsdorf said Natan-Zada's connection to the community "has been destructive for us. We totally reject everything he did." Meirsdorf claims that Natan-Zada and other extremist youth were not official community members, despite the fact that Natan-Zada had legally updated his address to Kfar Tapuach. "He was never accepted by the absorption committee," said Meirsdorf, whose wife is a member of the committee. Others supported Natan-Zada, including four teenagers from Tapuach who were arrested following the incident. Most locals, however, voiced opinions in line with Tapuach leader David Haivri, who expressed pain over the loss of Natan-Zada and emphasized the tragedy of his death. In early 2006 the central synagogue of Kfar Tapuach began building a library in Natan-Zada's honor.

Some Israeli media outlets initially suggested that Natan-Zada be buried in the West Bank settlement of Kiryat Arba, where Baruch Goldstein, the Kahanist who shot dead 29 and wounded 125 Palestinians in the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre 11 years earlier, is buried. Natan-Zada's body resided for two days in the Abu-Kabir morgue, pending an appeal to Prime Minister Sharon by his parents. On August 7, 2005, the Prime Minister's Bureau overruled Meir Nitzan's ban against burial in Rishon LeZion, and decreed that Zada should be buried in the civilian cemetery there.[16] He was buried in the Gordon neighborhood. Because of the delays, Natan-Zada was buried two days after Jewish law allows. Three of the hundreds of mourners at the burial were arrested with administrative arrest orders, including "New Kach" leader Efraim Hershkovits, American citizen Saadia Herskof, and former Kach activist Tiran Pollack's son Gilad.[6]

Victim compensation

After the event, the Israeli Defense Ministry ruled that the four Arab Israelis shot dead were not victims of terror because their killer was not part of an organization deemed "hostile to Israel", and are thus not entitled to the usual compensation for life lost due to terror attacks.[17] According to Mayan Malkin, a spokeswoman with the Israeli Defense Ministry, an attacker must be a member of the "enemy forces" against Israel to be considered a terrorist under the law.[18] Instead, they received payment "beyond the letter of the law,"[19] as a lump-sum payment, as opposed to the lifelong monthly annuity given to the families of terror victims.Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name (see the help page). Arab Israeli leaders condemned the decision, with Mohammed Barakeh, an Arab member of the Israeli parliament, saying that the "…decision raises a strong scent of racism, which distinguishes between a Jewish terrorist and an Arab terrorist."[17] On July 19, 2006, the Israeli government changed the "Compensation Law for Victims of Hostile Acts" to include anyone victimized by violence stemming from the Israeli-Arab conflict.[20] As a result of this change, the victims and families of Natan-Zada became eligible for terror compensation.[20]

See also

References

  1. ^ Israeli Government Bears Responsibility for Shfaram Massacre Kibbush.co.il 7 August 2005
  2. ^ Last moments of Natan-Zada Maariv, 8 August 2005
  3. ^ No group holds patent on terrorism St Petersberg Times, Susan Taylor Martin, August 9, 2005
  4. ^ a b Farrell, Stephen (August 6, 2005). "Israeli killer was recruited to terror over the internet". London: The Times. Retrieved 2009-03-29.
  5. ^ 'I won’t expel Jews' Ynetnews, 5 August 2005
  6. ^ a b Israel responds to Israeli terrorism The New Republic, 10 July 2005
  7. ^ Israeli police brace for possible riots
  8. ^ Raved, Ahiye (August 5, 2005). "We tried to prevent lynch". Ynetnews. Retrieved 2009-03-11.
  9. ^ Roffe-Ofir, Sharon (June 13, 2006). "Suspects in lynching of Jewish terrorist nabbed". Ynetnews. Retrieved 2009-03-11.
  10. ^ PM SHARON STATEMENT on Jewish terrorist attack IMRA, 4 August 2005
  11. ^ Extended detention for the suspects in the murder of Eden Natan-Zada Walla, 13 June 2006 (in Hebrew)
  12. ^ Police detail seven suspects in Zada lynching Yedioth Ahronoth, 13 June 2006 (in Hebrew)
  13. ^ Orlev: It is forbidden to accept surrender to the political terror of Arab MKs HaTzofe (in Hebrew)
  14. ^ 12 charged in Shfaram shooter lynching Jerusalem Post, 7 June 2009
  15. ^ 'Government knew of Jewish terrorist's plan to open fire on Shfaram bus', Haaretz, March 16, 2010.
  16. ^ Killer to be buried Sunday Ynetnews, 8 July 2005
  17. ^ a b McGreal, Chris (September 1, 2005). "Jewish gunman was no terrorist, Israel rules". The Guardian. Retrieved 2009-02-22. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  18. ^ "Arab victims of attack by extremist Jew not recognized as terror victims". Israelinsider. August 30, 2005. Retrieved 2009-02-22.
  19. ^ Eldar, Akiva (August 30, 2005). "No free lunches from Bush". Haaretz. Retrieved 2009-02-22. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  20. ^ a b Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (March 6, 2007). "RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS". Israel and the occupied territories: Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. United States Department of State. Retrieved 2009-02-22. In 2005 in the wake of the Shfaram attack, after Eden Natan-Zada, a member of the illegal right-wing Jewish movement Kach, killed four Israeli Arabs and wounded others when he fired on a bus, then Prime Minister Ariel Sharon ordered the amendment of existing legislation which authorized compensation only for victims of terrorist actions perpetrated by regular military forces or by an organization hostile to the State of Israel or the Jewish people. On July 19, the government amended the 1970 Compensation Law for Victims of Hostile Acts to include any persons victimized by violence deriving from the Israeli-Arab conflict. Under the amended law, the Natan-Zada victims and their families were recognized as victims of terrorism and eligible for compensation.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

External links

Leave a Reply