Hello, Harshrathod50, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 07:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot insert your own formatting preferences in a Wiki article. There are instructions in Template:infobox film and a default template is given. There's a purpose for everything designed within it. Wikimedia server space is not your concern as far as the designers of Infobox film (after discussions and consensus) are not worried about it.

1. The spacing is to easily view and identify the parameters at-a-glance while source editing.
2. Parameter "film name" is not for adding phonetics as you did, and should not be used in Indian articles per WP:INDICSCRIPT.
3. 'India' should not be linked since well known cities and countries are not linked, it's Wiki guideline.
4. Parameter "border" is not in Infobox film, thus you are trying to add a deprecate field not even part of the template.
5. Your query on "narrator" parameter - are you sure there is no narrator in the film ? and it's part of the infobox.
6. The template specifically suggests to use Plainlist, not Ubl. Same in the case of Film date df.

If you have any problem with these, start a discussion for making changes at Template:infobox film, not edit against it.--Let There Be Sunshine 20:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I already did this thing to many articles. I accept all my faults here. But is it a crime to use better templates if they are available? Every admin here just go on explaining what is this and that. Can't you accept all edits just like this guy: Sitush. This infobox layout I changed on many major articles: Camila (album), Revival (Selena Gomez album), Revival (Eminem album), etc. No one has problems with it. And then out of nowhere you appear here. One thing you must know that when working on Wikipedia, do it neutral point of view and with a poker face and accept what others did if it is right. There was massive chopping of the text I asigned to the alt parameter and look, did I do anything? And I don't think there is any problem with my edit. It is not hurting the sentiments of the article and there is no impact on the appearance (one of the best reason). Don't act like you are the massiah here on Wikipedia who will bring piece and order. Just you wait, it is a matter of time until I become a template editor. I'm gonna bring that infobox film template in order. HARSH RATHOD (talk) 02:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to edit as far as you follow the given manual of style and guidelines in Wikipedia. Not in your own style. What you are saying is admins and fellow editors should stand back and shut their mouth as you don't want to be taught or interested in learning to how to edit Wikipedia. You could get blocked if you continue this way. Sitush probably have given up on you and must have more important things to be worried about. Most editors see infobox editing as trivial, that's probably why your edits went unnoticed. And yes, you did something in "alt" text; who said they are 'protagonists' who are holding hands ? it's something you don't know. Having said you have changed the style in many infoboxes, you shall refrain from doing that again. BTW, I have reverted one edit you made on Film date, don't do that it will only count as vandalism. Thanks, I seriously hope you understand. --Let There Be Sunshine 09:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That means you are trying to say that you are the ultimate massiah here. I didn't say editors should shut their mouth and stand back. I said they should only hinder if something very wrong is going. See this page: Venom (2018 film). I prevented vandalism here. I am too working for the good of WP. And film date template I just changed the value asigned to df parameter from text to binary. What is wrong in that? Give explanation for this. And for that alt value I was saying that I accept what happened to it and made changes accordingly. DON'T INTERPRET THINGS THE WAY YOU LIKE! You a an admin here, does not change the fact that you won't make vandal-oriented edits in future. And I didn't make those edits again after you warned me for second time. HARSH RATHOD (talk) 10:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I said templates are designed after discussions and consensus, there may be a good reason why they suggest it that way. We should be following those. If you have suggestions, please start a discussion at Template talk:Infobox film. Who knows, may be it could become fruitful and may even bring a change in template. Thanks. --Let There Be Sunshine 16:55, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou. I was thinking of doing this but I might not get enough support. But I can at least try. I want this on every infobox template pages. Believe me, this is gonna save lots of space if implemented. Editors like you will definitely hinder but I will request them to take at least two 2 minutes to reconsider my suggestion. I will tag/mention you when making this suggestion. END OF THIS FIGHT. HARSH RATHOD (talk) 15:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Previously I was attacked by these two admin users: User:Let There Be Sunshine and User:Sitush for adding Indic-script on the WP pages. They were so concerned about the use of it that they speedily undone my edits. Assuming good faith, I accepted what they did in accordance with WP:INDICSCRIPT, but when I saw many articles using Indic-script I was so confused what is going on. Therefore, I am seeking admin help in this matter. Thankyou. These articles are in question: Aksar, Aksar 2, Arko Pravo Mukherjee and many more. Harsh Rathod 06:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)"Being master editor doesn't make you a god"

You have not made clear what you want done that needs an administrator, so I am not sure that I can give you whatever help it was that you wanted. However, I will make a few comments, which may or may not be helpful to you.

• I thought you were saying that Let There Be Sunshine and Sitush had reverted your edits on the three articles you listed, but I found that neither of them has ever edited any of those articles, so to begin with I was puzzled. On thinking further, I decided that what you probably meant was that those articles contain Indian scripts, which you have been told they shouldn't. If so, then probably the best thing to is to remove it, but since you are in doubt it would perhaps be safer to consult someone with a lot of experience in this area (which I don't have) before doing that. Being an administrator doesn't give anyone any more knowledge of consensus on editing India-related articles than anyone else, and far more relevant than being an administrator is having a lot of experience in that subject area. From my experience I know that Sitush has very extensive knowledge of editing India-related articles, and I am sure that if you ask him he will be happy to help. Let There Be Sunshine may be just as knowledgeable in the area, but I don't have enough experience of him to know. However, it is clear to me from his comments above that he is very willing to try to help you, so you could ask him.
• Incidentally, neither Let There Be Sunshine nor Sitush is an administrator, and I'm not sure why you thought they were.
• While I am here, I will offer a piece of advice on another matter, in case it may be helpful to you. I don't see where either of the two editors you mention has "attacked" you: they certainly haven't on this page. Both of them have tried to help you by explaining things to you which you didn't seem to be aware of. It would be a good idea to bear in mind that suggesting that someone has attacked you when they haven't can sometimes be seen by other editors as an attack itself, so I suggest it would be a good idea to avoid use of that word except in really blatant cases of serious attacks. Also, there is a danger that some editors might think that some of the things you have said have been attacks, such as accusations of "vandalism" where there was none, comments such as "Being master editor doesn't make you a god" and "trying to say that you are the ultimate massiah [sic] here". Since no doubt you would like to avoid the likelihood of editors thinking you are attacking people, it would probably be a good idea to avoid saying things of that kind.

The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:27, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your help. Those were not the pages my edits were undone. One has been deleted. Other is this. My question is that if indic script is not allowed then why the heck articles still have them? Should I remove them? One major problem here on wikiproject India is that everybody wants to contribute but not wonder what is being conveyed. There is no quality on the pages. See this. I fixed English here but still it is filled with jargon. I will not use attack word again. Anyways, this is just a temporary discussion. Harsh Rathod 15:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Please note that your signature needs to include a link, in accordance with WP:SIGLINK. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer my question there. I will change me signature to normal text in an hour. Harsh Rathod 15:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

It doesn't need to be "normal text", it's perfectly fine. It just needs to have a link: for instance, changing <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:80%;color:white;background-color:black;;CSS">Harsh Rathod</span> to [[User:Harshrathod50|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:80%;color:white;background-color:black;;CSS">Harsh Rathod</span>]] would be perfectly fine. -A lad insane (Channel 2) 16:04, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thankyou. Please answer my question here. Harsh Rathod 16:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I Am saddened to see your failed attempt to get the article Anubhav (1986 film) deleted.... anyways, happy editing.... cheers :-)) --Adamstraw99 (talk) 14:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou! Congrats on your win! I had read the article about that Vidyapeeth University you had created. It is great. I assume, you also know that the image used in Anubhav 1986 film article is not a true poster for that film. And if I remove it. It will definitely be of no use. You will add it again. Anyways, I'm currently editing this article: Gold (2018 film). What do tou think about my edit on it? Though, I know your feedback will be biased. 😇 Harsh Rathod 15:09, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hey I did not create Bharti vidyapeeth article but its founder's article instead, that too years ago, ...please check again... by the way your work in Gold (2018 film) look good.... keep it up bro.... and yes, I don't honestly remember when did i last edit in Anubhav film article... i guess i have hardly edited that article...And truly i have no intention to add any poster or anything in that film's article... it was a B grade movie and i am really least bothered about how that article takes shape in future... you are free to delete the poster or anything but with appropriate reasons...thank you -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then why are you defending it? 🤔 Harsh Rathod 15:48, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

-- i defended it because it passes many aspects of WP:MOVIE ... not only this, I will also try to defend notable movies (which might have no music/popular song) which may or may not be flop just like Red Rose (1980 film) , Ek Ruka Hua Faisla or Bheja Fry (film).... come on, flop or B grade films too may deserve an article if notability is there --Adamstraw99 (talk) 16:01, 26 February 2018 (UTC) hi there @ Harsh Rathod , somebody added a new poster of the film in Anubhav (1986 film) (honestly i did not add :-( ) ... happy now?? somebody added sources too....i hope you don't have any complaint on this article now.... cheers....happy editing :-) -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 16:15, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

😏 Now it looks good. I feel happy for it. Since I liked the movie. I am gonna contribute to this page very soon. So, my nomination to this page deleted was of some use. 😜 Harsh Rathod 04:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there again Harsh Rathod, ... this is about your recent edit/source addition to Gold (2018 film).. I won't directly revert your edit but would definitely want you to read this -->> WP:RS/SPS ... thanks -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 04:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know about this. But the fact is that the twitter account which I used to cite sources is verified by twitter. Even though it is a self published material. It is still reliable. Even Prime Ministers use twitter. On the contrary there is an Instagram post citation before I made these edits here. Is it reliable? Twitter is used more than Instagram. You are free to challenge these citations if you prove that Akshay Kumar twitter page is fake. What is the problem in this? Please quote text from WP:RS/SPS which is not being followed here. Harsh Rathod 04:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

-- Good to know you knew about this...Nobody is saying Akshay kumar account is fake or prime ministers don't use twitter... All I wanted to say is Facebook, twitter and Instagram are not considered reliable sources in wikipedia(no matter whos account is that)...I sent you link for that wiki guideline because i saw you added a "novice editor" badge for yourself in your page and I Want you to earn respect of fellow wikipedians by making constructive and rules abiding edits in the future... thanks -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 05:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Just a moment ago I was searching a page here to give Template Editors my suggestion for creating a new template called { {cite instagram} }. Was I doing right? 🤔 Harsh Rathod 05:32, 2 March 2018 (UTC) sorry, too technical... i have no clue -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 05:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC) @Adamstraw99 (talk): Okay, no problem, I will learn Lua and make that Template on my own since I had encountered many instagram citations. Harsh Rathod 05:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, re: these changes, a minor note, we don't use INRConvert in film infoboxes anymore. This has been the standard for about a year and half. See WT:ICTF discussion archives if you care about the rationale. But broadly, it clutters infoboxes and presents problems with inflation, which, if "fixed", also clutters the infobox. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb (talk): Please provide me an alternative for that. Is this code: ₹XX.XX Crore, okay? Why is this info not mentioned in Template: Infobox film? Harsh Rathod 09:17, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But I saw that you did it on your own. 😤 Why the heck did you ask me here then? Just leaving the info on edit history was enough. I think you are poking me for nothing good. No problem, keep calm and listen to daft punk music: Da Funk. Harsh Rathod 09:35, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the issue as a courtesy, then contacted you here as a courtesy to edify you about community preferences. How could I possibly know whether or not you read edit summaries? The point of talk pages is for discussion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb (talk): You could've used notify instead of edify. Why confuse people unnecessary? Thankyou, end of this useless discussion. Keep calm and listen to Eminem music. Arose. But you didn't answer many of my questions. Harsh Rathod 12:17, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you don't know any thing about INDIA and you are talking about HOLLYWOOD and America, Bengali makes galli films and you are calling it Tollywood,and you don't even know tamil films are Kollywood. (Tollywood means Telugu), (Kannada is sandalwood), who made you an editor. What you can edit without any basic knowledge. Do you think you are from another planet. Madhya pradesh is the neighbouring states of hyderabad, and you don't even know about Telugu language and calling it Tamil Sasianeel (talk) 20:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sasianeel: What are you talking about? Did you read that discussion, carefully? It was USER: Cyphoidbomb, who was explaining about Kollywood, Bollywood, etc. I get that you are here for 12 years or so, but does it mean you should talk rudely to other fellow editors? 🤔 Harsh Rathod 02:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sasianeel: It might do you some good to relax. I mistakenly wrote Tamil when I meant Telugu. See also Tollywood. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Harshrathod50. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox: I don't feel any advantage of this feature. It isn't as I expected it to be. Please revoke this privilege from my account. I am aiming to become an admin. 😚 You were right that getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. Harsh Rathod 10:17, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I’ve never cared for it myself, I prefer Twinkle. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:41, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox: Can I have this privilege again because now I'm more frequent with mobile edits and it is very tedious undo each and every vandalism on mobile. Thankyou! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 05:40, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Harsh You just added Bestoftheyear.in as a reference on Mr Ya Miss. This site is not considered as a reliable source. You can check these [1] [2] [3] and this [4]. Thanks.Sid95Q (talk) 15:22, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sid95Q:  Done You did that first before I was preparing to remove those edits. No problem. Keep up the good work. WP:ADMIT WP:AGF

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mr Ya Miss, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mukesh Kumar and Juhi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot:  Done Thanks for pointing out my mistakes. Wait, why did I write this message? 😗 Like you would reply!? 😂 Harsh Rathod 10:59, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this, as previously discussed at Talk:Hate Story 4, the Indian film editing community doesn't see the need for industry nicknames. Please stop adding these until you have established a community-wide consensus. A good place to start might be WT:ICTF. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb:  Done The discussion had already started. You can give your views there, since you got problem with many of my edits. Please let my edits on those pages be as it is until the discussion ends. No cheers for you. Harsh Rathod 04:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, re: this, there's nothing inherently constructive with removing all of the white space in an infobox. Though you note that an example of your preferred formatting exists at Template:Infobox film, there also exists an example of all the fields neatly laid out. While the space-less version is preferred by some, the spaced version is also preferred by some because it's easier to read and to negotiate. While there is no consensus for either version, the general attitude is: if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Unless you're trying to solve some specific formatting problem, it's best to leave this formatting alone and find other ways to contribute. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you leave me alone? What I am doing is justified and I also gave proof examples for it. You are an admin, if you feel bad about what I am doing, then just simply block me! I bet, you will feel so good after doing so. Block me, for two months. I have no objections. On the contrary, this will buy me time to get more equiped on the subjects. 😠 Harsh Rathod 14:54, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Why don't you leave me alone? Because some of your edits are not consistent with established community practices and my duty is to bring changes back into alignment with community standards and educate inexperienced editors as well. If your plan is to go article to article and make changes without regard to community norms, you're naturally going to draw the scrutiny of other editors. Maybe a smarter approach than blindly reverting other editors is to consider that there are people far more experienced than you at Wikipedia who are far more familiar with how the community wants articles to look. It's nothing personal. If you like film articles, you should familiarise yourself with our Manual of Style for film. You might also consider looking at our general Manual of Style so that you know how to do basic things like format numerals and dates, etc. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:53, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Thankyou for telling me about this. Like I didn't knew about WP:MOS till now. No doubt, why this person left wikipedia. Harsh Rathod 16:06, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, re: your edit summary, I had to refresh my memory on this. While the |music= parameter is intended chiefly for the background score composer, there might be a justification to include other information, like song writers. Please take a look at this discussion under "Music_by:" and see what you think. Per one of the experienced editors, there are times when the score composer isn't as important. Just a thought. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: My theory is that if the film has got a background score composer who is officially asigned, employed and credited for this work then we ought to use only background score artist in the music parameter since the infobox is for film and not for soundtrack album. If no background score composer is available then populate music parameter with soundtrack album artists with no hesitation. Harsh Rathod 06:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I support your views on "Music_by:" but not of the one who provided input. 😤 He was so ignorant of the efforts taken in composing background score saying that it is the incidental music between the musical numbers, which generally uses thematic material from the songs. God, why such people exist on earth? Harsh Rathod 08:22, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think his response comes from a place of ignorance. I think what he's trying to say, is that if a film is built as a true musical, like Oklahoma!, where the songs are crucial to the structure of the film's narrative, as opposed to being entertaining diversions that contribute nothing to the story (as sometimes is the case with Indian films,) then that music would be of greater importance than the score that connects everything together, and maybe editor discretion is warranted rather than using a "rules-are-rules" approach. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: No objection. Harsh Rathod 02:05, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Regarding your request to see that link where YRF denied that Katrina Kaif had to reshoot scenes:

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/katrina-kaifs-action-scenes-thugs-hindostan-wont-be-re-shot-yrf-763648 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolagrawal1999 (talk • contribs) 10:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The correct place to request page move permissions is at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover, not at WP:RFA. Prince of Thieves (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Prince of Thieves: Can you please delete my RFA page? I think I did it too early. Harsh Rathod 17:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Prince of Thieves: But let's see how many people will support me. 🤔 Obviously, I will be rejected. Harsh Rathod 17:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFA page has now been deleted, but you can apply for the pagemover right instead if you like. Prince of Thieves (talk) 18:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Prince of Thieves: Okay! I had requested for page mover permission. Let's see what happens. Harsh Rathod 18:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The automatic bot have detected your total edits count are currently is 800+, you need at least 3,000 edits and no any violation in edit warring, read Wikipedia:Page mover#Guidelines for granting. SA 13 Bro (talk) 19:13, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I'm not eligible for page mover too! 😫 Harsh Rathod 02:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

aw... You can still do simple pagemoves and G6 the redirect I suppose. Prince of Thieves (talk) 16:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:

• Sign up at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Participants
• List of the articles can be referred at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Topics
• Submit/report your articles/contributions at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/fountain/editathons/project-tiger-2018-en
• For more details, rules, FAQ etc. kindly refer: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest

Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Harsh Rathod, I am not sure what you meant by saying you couldn't understand the redirect help page. I'll try to make it simpler, though. To create a redirect, you need to know two things: the correct name of the page you want to redirect the reader to and that there isn't a page that already has the same name you want to redirect from. Let's use the following examples:

• intended destination (the page you want to redirect the user to): Foobar
• intended redirect (the page you want to redirect the user from): Foo bar

Note: neither of these are real links.

This is what you need to do:

1. Search for "Foo bar" in the search box

You should get a search results page that says this at the top: You may create the page "Foo bar", but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered. There will be search results below, hopefully including "Foobar"

2. Click the red link for "Foo bar"

You will see a page that titled "Creating Foo bar" with the standard page creation warnings/help and edit box.

3. Type this: #REDIRECT [[Foobar]]

4. Type "Created as a redirect to [[Foobar]]" in the "Edit summary" box

5. Click the "Publish changes" button

Congratulations, you've created the redirect. Simple. I hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Eggishorn: I was in confusion of weather to add this chunk of code: ''#REDIRECT [[Target]]'' at the top of existing page or to create new page wih it. Thanks, for the help. Keep up this good work becuase it will never end. Harsh Rathod 16:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I was able to help. Thanks. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blackmail (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhoomi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks, for notifying me! As if it matters to you!!! 😂 Harsh Rathod 10:39, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See this policy.Going through the lead will be sufficient to quench your query:)~ Winged Blades^Godric 11:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: To be logical, I didn't comment anything on him. I just presented facts about him. Everything I wrote about him is verifiable. Harsh Rathod 11:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Me & Primefac edit conflicted on the closure so I'll say my peace here:
WBoG said and I quote "*Why the fuck, an encyclopedia cares, who the director dedicated the film to, unless that has been covered by other reliable-media and/or has some special significance?! We aren't a storehouse of useless trivia or a data-dump?" - Saying fuck in this context is not nor will it ever be actionable - If they said "Fuck off" or worse then under certain circumstances that could be actionable .... but saying it as "Why the fuck" is not,
It's no different to them saying "What the fuck" or "How the fuck" .... get what I mean ? ....
I would strongly suggest you resolve whatever issues you have with said editor or failing that move on and contribute to the 5 million articles we have,
Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: Why is he removing verfiable info? Harsh Rathod Poke me! 16:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't know and quite honestly I don't care - You need to ask WBoG not me. –Davey2010^Talk 16:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: Then why the heck do non-admins interfere? This place is filled with people who simply don't care but know very well how to interfere. 😤 Harsh Rathod Poke me! 16:30, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Then why the heck do non-admins interfere?" - Because you posted at ANI ? .... You're more than welcome to ignore my advice but you'd do well to read it, understand it and follow it, You say you've been here for three years yet you act like you've been here 2 days tops ..... You can either work with us or against us but again just some advice the latter will without a doubt see you blocked, Your choice. –Davey2010^Talk 18:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: The discussion is clossed there. Moreover, you came to my talk page out of nowhere giving advices. Even Primefac is not interfering. At least first get thorough knowledge of the subject and then I will more than consider your advice. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 03:09, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because that is how this place works. It is community run. The community decides article content, not the administrators. The community decides behavioral standards, not the administrators. The community doesn't give a fuck if you say fuck. "Fuck you" is a slightly different animal. From your comments on the talk page in question, it appears the things I've mentioned above are certainly not the only things you do not understand about Wikipedia. This isn't a fansite. If you cannot figure why a producer of a film's website might not be the best source for factual information about a film, you probably should get a blog and leave the creation of encyclopedia articles to those who do. John from Idegon (talk) 17:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@John from Idegon: 🤗🙏 Thankyou, I am working here for three years and today I understood how WP works. 😑😔 Again someone came up with another crap. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 18:27, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Printed Rainbow shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Notifying you, since, a warning is mandated by policy.As, I said, the next revert will result in a trip to WP:3RRN. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 09:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi User:Harshrathod50, just to let you know that since a user has requested that you no longer post to their talk page—as per WP:OWNTALK they were entitled to do—your edit has been refactored. That this was in order to mis-use a templated warning—for whiich you could receive a templated warning—does not provide you an exception to this request. Happy editing! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 10:43, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Serial Number 54129: This warning is purely unreal and I can remove it. You can check. I reverted only two edits. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 10:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Harshrathod50, yes it's "your" talk page so you can remove (almost but not quite) anything you like per the same guidelines. Re. edit-warring, it's not a purely numbers-based mathematical exercise, it's an assessment of the spirit of the reverts: if someone is defending their edits with blind reverts and no discussion, then that is the spirit of edit-warring and the numbers become of less relevance. I think it's that that you should be considering. Incidentally, when one has three years' tenure and over 1,000 edits one need no longer describe oneself as a noob, for the purposes of WP:BITE. Happy editing! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 10:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Serial Number 54129: It is not like I am reverting with no edit summaries or without participating at any discussion. I wrote to every to every discussion that took place. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 11:04, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop throwing shade like you did here. You obviously don't understand that you've got to edit here in a reasonable manner. There was also the other post on Cyphoid's page demanding his response. Likewise, the other aspect of running to ANI without bothering to discuss anything. At this point in time you're doing nothing more than wasting the time of productive editors and if this continues then your editing privileges may be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 10:59, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff: I know. How can you blindly say that T'm running to ANI without bothering to discuss anything? First, watch things carefully. On the contrary, other editors are wasting my time, bringing in debates to talk pages. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 11:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I have observed enough of your actions on other pages and here, treat this as a warning to stop this behavior. —SpacemanSpiff 11:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please enlist the instances where my behaviour is objectionable. I'll work on them. Too much of my time has been wasted and now I don't want to debate with an admin. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 11:23, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Before you waste more of other people's time, read the many many messages that multiple people have left you. In addition to those, this post is absurd to say the least. As for your time being wasted, that is entirely something you've inflicted on yourself by your behavior here. —SpacemanSpiff 11:28, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... very grave things I had done. 😑 Harsh Rathod Poke me! 11:36, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Harsh @ Harsh Rathod, If you permit I want to make very minor corrections on your user page, something looking wrong there... And you can of course undo my changes if you disagree with them ... thanks -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 19:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just do it. As visible, User:Davey2010 removed link to my facebook account, I didn't protest. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 19:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

done and i see Davey removed your Facebook link, I Am not surprised though.. ok bye good night .. happy editing --Adamstraw99 (talk) 19:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Me too! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 09:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Missing (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Abraham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Harsh Rathod Poke me! 09:51, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In your user page you wonder why Anupam Kher is playing that loser prime minister? The answer is simple... Anupam Kher is a legendary actor and the role of a loser dummy puppet(and possibly corrupt) prime minister must be challenging i guess.. and anupam kher is the most versatile actor in currently active lot i guess(yes, of course with Naseeruddin Shah)... I AM not sure whether you have seen his lesser known films like Saaransh and Daddy (1989 film), but he received much acclaim for his work in these films though these roles were offered to others and they rejected them but Kher performed them with brilliance.. whether its a funny type villain in ChaalBaaz or a supporting cum funny cum serious role of Lamhe you can see him taking these characters from imagination to liveliness.. I Am sure he will do the same to the character of maun mohan singh too.. looking forward to this movie too.. cheers --Adamstraw99 (talk) 18:49, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstraw99: Yes, you are right. I appreciate Anupam's work. Though I did see your above mentioned movies, but can't remember them now. I won't waste my money on this film. Will download the pirated version. I hope Neeraj Pandey creates Naam Shukla for Anupam. Kher is desperate on doing that film. 😎 Harsh Rathod Poke me! 03:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Blackmail (2018 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are at 3 reverts on this page and have multiple editors disagreeing with you. You need to discuss this on the article talk page before making any further reverts. I will open a discussion on the article talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 14:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire: Thanks, for this meaning less warning! It is you who is at fault here as I had mentioned in my first edit to the Pizza (2012 film) page that anybody having problem then come to my talk page; we'll discuss the matter. I didn't make more than two reverts. For the blackmail film page, I need a detailed explanation addressing how ubl is of use there. There is no explanation for accessibility on the Template:Infobox film page. It is you people that I learnt how to argue, now face it. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 14:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you can't dictate terms like that. Edits can and will get reverted and often the edit summary is the explanation. At that point, you should start the discussion on why it was reverted. Generally, for article edits discussions should happen on the ARTICLE talk page, not the the user talk page for enhanced visibility. So please discuss the article issues there. Ravensfire (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire: The main problem is that you are undoing many of my good faith edits on the Pizza (2012 film) page. If you still want ubl there then let me revert one more time and make some more tweaks. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 14:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated. On why did I revert all of your changes, the change basically looked like just a formatting change for no real reason. I'm personally not a fan of using crore on the film articles as readers not familiar with South Asian numbering systems will have no clue what that means, while everyone understands millions/billions. I also won't revert your change on that as I note that it's often used, especially on newer articles. There's a note in MOS:INDIA about how best to handle those, but unless a film article is going for FA status, it's not something I've got the desire to push. Generally though, it's good to stick with an existing style in an article so long as it meets the MOS. Ravensfire (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire: Appreciated. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 15:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Namaste dear Hardhathod50! Can you make an article about short film Makhmal starring Jackie Shroff and find poster? Thank you! --178.66.99.129 (talk) 04:53, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, notability issue! I find this film nowhere to be notable. It deserves no place here. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 05:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this edit, what was the point? Didn't we discuss this? Weren't you ultimately convinced that the primary topic of language is the language? Should I expect that other discussions where you ultimately understood community preferences are going to be slowly reverted over time? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: No, don't take it wrong. I was just about write at your talk page. I was rethinking about this. My logic is that we had already linked Hindi in the infobox then why not link respective cinema in the lead? What do you think? 🤔 Harsh Rathod Poke me! 03:08, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By that logic, if we link to a director in the infobox, should we link to another topic in the lead off of the director's name? No, the infobox exists to summarise content found elsewhere in the article. If it duplicates content found in the lead, that's expected, just as it's expected that the lead will duplicate content found elsewhere in the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Cyphoidbomb: But still the text "Hindi" appears on both the links. Why not link both of them like this: [[Bollywood|Hindi]]? Harsh Rathod Poke me! 03:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• @Cyphoidbomb: I agree with the infobox exists to summarise content found elsewhere in the article. If it duplicates content found in the lead, that's expected, just as it's expected that the lead will duplicate content found elsewhere in the article. You are saying this on the basis of American film articles that you had read. The content in the lead of those articles can also be found in other sections. But after reading many many [Indian film articles] I had found that this is not the case with [them]. I can't find anything written in the lead in the other sections of the [there]. Don't you agree? Exception: Featured articles. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 06:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what argument you're trying to set up. That since many Indian articles may not be consistent with community standards, we should have separate rules for linking the word Hindi? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Most of the times people just don't get what I'm trying to say. To put it simple, since you don't like this change, I'm dropping this idea. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 13:36, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Per your edits on Chun-Li (song), we don't italicize song titles, we only do that to an album. It's also not "redundant to use 'song' in the land type 'single' in the infobox", a single is a song after all. You also can't record a single, you record a song. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hayman30: I was desperately waiting for someone to interfere. Please provide me with discussion which mentiones that song titles aren't italicized. Or else your edits will be undone. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 03:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you threatening me right now? There's no such discussion—that's how things are. Hayman30 (talk) 05:04, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hayman30: No, I'm not threatening you in any way. You say that's how things are. What makes you think WP works this way? That way you are doing nothing but pushing your own preferences. You need community consensus to do that. You are an experienced editor. So start the discussion in the talk page right away. Also you saying that one can't record a single is an absolute wrong statement because a single is a song which can be recorded. If you think I'm still wrong then please summon more editors here to make me understand. I too want to edit in the constructive manner. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 05:24, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Lol you are the one who's "pushing your own preferences". Just go find a random song article and see if the title is italicized or not. You should be the one to start a talk page discussion because you're the one who's seeking for a change. Hayman30 (talk) 05:32, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• (talk page stalker) Best place to look for the answer is MOS:NOITALIC. Ravensfire (talk) 13:27, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire: Thanks! You saved me from another head pain of starting a discussion. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 13:32, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please note that if there is a disagreement on certain content, it is never wise to just forcefully push your edit back into the article over and over again, as it might spark or already appear as an edit war. In such scenarios, WP:STATUSQUO tells us to reset the part affected by the dispute before it actually happened (the ubl was introduced by you in this edit). Because of this, please just undo the change and discuss if really necesarry. Also, you shouldn't say that my edit is invalid because I based my edit on personal preference and then go on to present your personal preference as justification for your changes, that's just illogical. There is no concrete guideline on how and when to use template redirects, but retaining the version prior to the dispute is an age-old tradition-made-guideline. Lordtobi (✉) 17:49, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is explicit nonsense. Concising is not personal preference. As you can see there, one editor edited my revision to concise it. I asked you to be more specific with your reasons, but you came up here with policies. I could have wrote the same thing to your talk page, too. Please gain consensus for your preference, first. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 18:09, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other editor doing something else is just WP:OTHERSTUFF and not clear-cut consensus to perform the change everywhere, especially not when it is challenged (in this very case, Rhain fixed grammatical flow; the edit is not in the farthest related what we are fighting about). If you really want to discuss this, go ahead, but do not just revert back given prior guidelines. Lordtobi (✉) 05:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lordtobi (✉) 09:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lordtobi: It is just you who got problems, so you do that. Those edits are not at all disruptive. This is nonsense. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 09:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is your burden to prove why your edit is viable through discussing it with others, if you are reverted, you are to either stop redoing it or start discussing it. Reverting the reversion of your edits and such breaking WP:STATUSQUO, WP:EW (as pointed out numerous times), and then challenging the reverter to go about why your edit should not stay is illogical and not good behaviour for an encyclopedic project. Neither version is "wrong" but you have to either discuss the inclusion of your change on the article's talk page, if you are really bothered by those few more characters in the infobox, or drop the stick. Lordtobi (✉) 09:26, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Harshrathod50. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Shan (actor), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: no valid reason provided for deletion. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 05:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff: Please see this for reference. If you still don't want to delete it then I can understand. No problem. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 06:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You should have mentioned that in the nomination then, as db-g6 allows for rationales. Alternately, next time on, for such requirements use {{db-move}}. I'll delete it now. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 06:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff: I need one more help, please. Actually, I had been in edit war with Mr. Tobi on Red Dead Redemption 2. He is watching my talk page. So when you posted this message here. He suddenly woke up and performed all the works that I wrote on GB fan's talk page. He moved "Shan (Tamil actor)" to "Shan (actor)". Okay no problem he did all that but he also got deleted all the redirects. Now nothing links to the new page. This is so immoral. This person hastily did all this just to piss me off. Can you please bring back all those redirects so that I can change the links which are connected to those redirects to this new page? Since you are admin, all those redirects are still visible to you. Thankyou, I hope you understand. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 08:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff: Now AnomieBOT has also reported something to the page Shan (actor). This Mr. Tobi futher messed up everything. People always hinder my works. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 08:35, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Given your behavior and picking up fights so easily and refusing to listen to or even acknowledge other viewpoints that's a bit rich coming from you, complaining about someone else's behavior. You've first got to learn to edit collegially and collaboratively for others to extend the same courtesy to you. —SpacemanSpiff 09:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff: Now I will never touch this filthy page. At one point I thought to give it my time to expand it. You are right that my behaviour towards others is not good but what can I do, you know, my head pains really really bad even then I work here because it hurts even more to see the wrong information. And I didn't make many edits this whole day because I was so angry that he moved the page that I wanted to. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 14:41, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Namaste Nahsharathod50! Can you make an article about Bhojpuri movie Balidaan (2011 film) starring Jackie Shroff and find poster? Thank you! --178.67.238.36 (talk) 12:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You know, it is always so fucking easy to ask. But I will see what to do. It took whole day to write "Nagraj (2018 film)" article today. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 13:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harshathod50 Sorry! forgive me please I politely said, but I liked your article Nagraj (2018 film)! Thank you! --178.67.238.36 (talk) 14:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive my bad language. Cheers! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 14:19, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Sorry, I can't write the article you had requested as there is not a single featured news article on the subject. It will be a subject WP:CSD. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 20:36, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thank you for your contributions. Just a few comments regarding your edits at Nagaraj. First of all, please don't use cut and paste to move the contents of entire pages, as this breaks up the page history, please use the "Move" function instead (see Help:How to move a page). Now, the new title Nagraj (disambiguation) isn't optimal, as the spelling variant used doesn't appear to be the most common one: it's usually best to have an article title using the most common spelling.

Also, there is a distinction between a disambiguation page and an article about a personal name (see the last paragraph of MOS:DABNAME). There's no rush to create articles about names, but once such an article exists, there's no reason to convert it back into a disambiguation page. A separate disambiguation page can be created if it's needed, but I'm not sure I see the need in this particular case: the various articles can be easily linked using hatnotes. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 19:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: Thanks for response, I appreciate your time to write to me. Please give me two days to check into the matter, as it is night here and I am going to sleep now. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 19:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: Yes, you were right. Thanks for notifying me. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 03:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The budget of october is 45crore not 20crore I am sure Salma.mastani (talk) 10:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So why don't you prove it? For others to verify. At least first read this discussion. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 10:24, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October, paraphrasing, etc.

Hi there, re: this discussion, if you're going to write prose content like this, I really think you should brush up on how to write summaries and how to properly format quotations. I don't mean that as an insult, but there are certain writing skills that editors need fundamental mastery of if they hope to bring encyclopedia articles up to par, and it's not equitable that the burden of education should shift to other editors. This video might be helpful. One thing to keep in mind, is that if you, the person summarising, can say something better or clearer than the person who's speaking, then you should. If we need to express a person's opinion and we can't figure out a good way to say "Sircar felt ___", then we should put the opinion back in his mouth. "I felt ___". Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: The video was very helpful. I appreciate criticisms now. It will take some time for me rewrite the content. Meanwhile, can you please help get the Page Mover flag that I had requested as I need it very badly to disambiguate some files. I'm not listing them here because this page watched and that user might make those changes beforehand. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 18:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb and Vivek Ray: The matter had been taken care by Vivek Ray. But the problem is that he broke my previously submitted statement into five parts and the reference is with the last one. It would be more than divine if Mr. Vivek can integrate those parts back to one long statement because it would give any new reader a feel that all the info came from one place. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 14:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's OK because it has been mentioned that it's from an interview. Also, as a single sentence, it might get too long. In its present state, a reader might read the whole passage and then go to the referred webpage and read some more. What say? Thanks Vivek Ray (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Or, maybe the reference can be moved up? Vivek Ray (talk) 15:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivek Ray: Yes, since you suggested it you can do that. I also thought about it at some point. Also, you don't need ping me if you are writing to my talk page. No need to ping the person whose talk page you are writing to because he will be notified even without that. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 15:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. And I messed up the edit summary! Also, thank you for your advice about pinging. Vivek Ray (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About this edit, MusicAloud is a website maintained by Vipin Nair himself. Cheers! Vivek Ray (talk) 14:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivek Ray: Is that so? Then feel free to revert my edit! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 14:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I revert only vandalism LOL! You can change it if you want or I might add it back later. Thanks Vivek Ray (talk) 14:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivek Ray: Hmm... gentleman. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 15:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Just wanted to say that this graph looks really weird! The article looked better without it, I guess. Vivek Ray (talk) 10:24, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivek Ray: I appreciate your views. Please give me some time to make it look good. I know that the current form is breaking mobile web compatibility, but I'm working to resolve it and if I could not then I will remove it. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 10:30, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I was thinking. Maybe it can be shifted to one side. I am not sure about this but Template:Align might help. Thanks Vivek Ray (talk) 10:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivek Ray: I was working with <div>...</div>. It can be a great help here. But the problem is that I forgot I all the CSS styling properties that I had learnt three years ago. This is becoming such a pain in head. {{Align}} will do nothing but just align the graph on right but the problem is I want add many styles at once. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 10:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivek Ray: Okay done! Now it is looking okay. You can tweak it further if you want to. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 10:48, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, saw that. But I think there is no need for the graph. What you have written in the paragraph explains it already. What do you think? Vivek Ray (talk) 11:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivek Ray: Yes, you are right, even Cyphoidbomb says so, but it is needed there simply because not everyone reads everything that had been written to this page. We are already occupied with the information here since the very beginning so there will be no problems for us to understand but since not everyone is a bibliomaniac (with exception of Wikipedians), the graph is doing more than good to summarise the "Box office" section prose to an illustration which is digestible to general public in the blink of an eye. What do you think? A recent incident: I asked my cousin to read this page but all she was read a few words in the infobox, watch the images, scrolled down to bottom and said it is nice! She didn't even read the lead section completely! Diversity is mother of Jesus. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 10:32, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha... Well, can't blame her! It really does look nice. And, after the tweaks done by Cyphoidbomb and you, it looks even better. Let's see what other editors have to say. Vivek Ray (talk) 12:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivek Ray: Request: Can you bring some useful info from other sections to another para in the lead? I'm not doing this because of lack of quality English. Just like Raman Raghav 2.0 which was recently GAed. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 04:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I will try! Thanks Vivek Ray (talk) 04:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did some editing. Please have a look. You want to add something? Vivek Ray (talk) 05:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivek Ray: Thankyou! Now, I'm waiting for someone to review this page. I hope it it becomes a GA soon. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 08:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, I think it might be hard to get a GA rating. The article needs to be developed further to get GA. Maybe it will get a C or even a B in its present state. But we can always hope for a GA rating! Vivek Ray (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivek Ray: Please list the items that this article lacks so that we can improve it. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 11:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As of now, 'Production' and 'Controversy' need to be worked on. 'Themes' may be introduced as I saw it mentioned in some of the sources. Additionally, 'Audience response' can be added if some RS is found to back it. You have anything else in your mind? Thanks Vivek Ray (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Veere Di Wedding shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]