Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Turkey–Islamic State conflict, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298 Online events: New: Alphabet run O & P | Black women Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcement Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event. Tip of the month: AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, Wikipedialuva. Thank you for your work on Chippenham Hospital (Richmond, Virginia). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan_Army_F.C.

Karachi_Football_League

can these articles be checked for format typos; first one should have added jersey colour symols where missing (one hand/sock), and second one linked " association football" at behinning. longer story how some people go for "revert over content", sadly. appreciate in advance! 93.138.225.202 (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you even have a life beyond sitting there and clicking "revert" on people's factual edits? are you in your mother's basement or an IT office? I made some edits to the vote counts because i found out about the miscounted ballots in those counties from the past 36 years, and you have nothing better to do in your life than revert them. The trolling commences 135.134.184.29 (talk) 02:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

135.134.184.29, please see Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:Dispute resolution pages. — AP 499D25 (talk) 02:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301 Online events: New: Alphabet run Q & R | Art+Feminism | Find Her Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements Celebrate Women – All content gender gap events, in every language Wikipedia, in March 2024 Francophone Women★ Writers Fortnight 2024 Feminism and Folklore 2024 Writing Contest Tip of the month: When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi Wikipedialuva :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry about my attitude. I just thought the other user was being very unreasonable considering I was just removing stuff that was backed up by a false source and he accused me being 'unconstructive' or something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.140.53.34 (talk) 09:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also just so you know he keeps edit warring and bringing back this false info even though I've said numerous times the information is false and the source is not reliable nor does the info in the unreliable source even say what is being claimed on the page. Look at history for A Thousand Times Repent I have said this before and he keeps vandalizing the page with the false info with false source.

No worries. After your edit summary, I stopped reverting because you clarified why you were making the edits you were. I could see why you were removing the edits, as the edits you reverted did cite sources that the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources had ranked "generally unreliable" (though not being deprecated or blacklisted). It's best to clarify why you do something in every edit summary, not just certain ones. It's also important to remember that even if you are "right", the edit warring/3-revert-rule still applies and should generally not be reverted without first discussing the issue on the article's talkpage and coming to a consensus. In general, try to make sure every edit explains why you are making the edit; if an edit does get reverted, reach out to the edit on their talk page or ping them on the article's talk page; and try to avoid reverting more than three times, as this is considered edit warring (even if you are "right"). If you find yourself getting very frustrated when editing (which happens to almost everyone), the essay "Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot" can be helpful. (Posting to IP talkpage as well). Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to ask you to get you further involved but do you think think you can maybe restore my edits? Cuz he won't quit and I just wanted to help by keeping incorrect info off the page. Idk what his problem is. Thanks for your kind attitude. Just asking if you could do that for me cuz any time I try to restore it he always comes back so long as it's done by me. It's definitely vandalism since he persists in re-adding false / improperly sourced information....

It appears AlphaBetaGamma has already done so. Wikipedialuva (talk) 10:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]