Hello, Innican Soufou, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Guy Macon (talk) 02:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Guy (help! - typo?) 22:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to my talk page! I don't think this will go the way you want it to go, but thanks for stopping by anyway. Innican Soufou (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It did not go the way he wanted it to go. Innican Soufou (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, please read's Chess' statement [1] on WP:BLPCRIME in relation to your case: we can't say a living person is a murderer until they have actually been convicted of a murder. This is one aspect of a key content policy on Wikipedia. Further violations may incur consequences. starship.paint (exalt) 13:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He didn't technically call a living person a murderer. He said there was a murder "by police". Not a far leap to assume he meant the officer who killed her, but there's no living person publicly associated with that role. If this counts as a BLP violation, so too should repeatedly suggesting the two named people not even accused of murdering Brian Sicknick or using bear spray murdered him with bear spray. Or pepper spray, tear gas, mustard gas, oxygen, burning jet fuel or whatever else JzG wants to bother me with and speculate about next (see diff from today, 11:59, for the latest). InedibleHulk (talk) 14:58, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in my revert of your edits, white privilige, whiteness studies, whiteness, white people, whites, white trash, white supremacy, etc, are not proper nouns and as such do not receive capital letters unless it begins a sentence. SaltySaltyTears (talk) 00:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's referring to White people, which should be capitalized.

But not black? I am going to assume good faith and assume your edits were just negligent and sloppy. SaltySaltyTears (talk) 00:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If someone wants to go through the article and capitalize black, I wouldn't stand in their way. I'll assume good faith and assume your comments are just negligent and sloppy. Innican Soufou (talk) 01:25, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2022 Sweden riots, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 08:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 03:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]