Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Human Rights Foundation", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One problem with removing the sources is that now much of the article is unsourced. Jim1138 (talk) 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This username is NOT representing no one organization because "Human Rights Foundation" is a generic term which is describing a foundation which operates on the field of human rights. If you can make any connection between this username and an organization which have the exclusive right to use "Human Rights Foundation" than I request to change my username but otherwise because it's actually not representing a specific organization it's unnecessary. Removing sources which are WP:SELFSOURCE WP:PROMOTION WP:CITESPAM or WP:NOTADVOCATE are necessary in order to maintain the encyclopedic structure of Wikipedia. If you feel that now the article are "unsourced" than please consider requesting to delete that article. Human Rights Foundation (talk) 08:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humour. Best wishes. Winged Blades ^Godric 10:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Your manner of interacting with another user, activites at Talk:Human Rights Foundation--is not productive for a collaborative community like our's.As such, you have been already told multiple times to amend your ways and we don't necessarily appreciate un-founded stubbornness.Thus,consider this to be your final warning. Winged Blades ^Godric 10:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: Funny, exactly this what I posted on your talk page. Anything you do will hit back my friend specially when Wikimedia Foundation today will get involved. Human Rights Foundation (talk) 10:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Winged Blades of Godric has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 10:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]