Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | Fusion power (Log · Page History) |
| User | Maury Markowitz (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 83 |
| Minor edits | 24 (28.9%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 3 (3.6%) |
| Reverted edits | 1 (1.2%) |
| atbe1 | 89.3 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 27,441 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -11,487 |
Minor edits
·
24 (28.9%)
Major edits
·
59 (71.1%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
3 (3.6%)
Manual edits
·
80 (96.4%)
Reverted edits
·
1 (1.2%)
Unreverted edits
·
82 (98.8%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-12 12:30 | Diff · History | 208 | (reverted) Undid revision 1158599101 by 74.69.121.158 (talk) I'm undoing this. The statement is correct as worded as it did reach Q>1 for one definition of Q. That it does not meet some other definition of Q is not a reason to remove the statement. It suggests we need that discussion here. |
| 2023-06-09 14:05 | Diff · History | 281 | →Lawson criterion: temperature and speed are the same in this case, let us keep to his original statement |
| 2023-06-09 13:55 | Diff · History | -31 | reword lede |
| 2021-09-05 11:06 | Diff · History | -1 | |
| 2021-09-05 11:00 | Diff · History | -3,225 | returning lede to previous state, was expanded beyond any practical limit and filled with trivia and unexplained terminology. |
| 2021-04-09 14:30 | Diff · History | 572 | →Triple product: density, temperature, time: |
| 2021-04-09 14:24 | Diff · History | -36 | →Triple product: density, temperature, time: neither quoted paper has anything about 30% and I cannot see any reason it might |
| 2021-04-09 14:21 | Diff · History | 9 | →Lawson criterion: |
| 2021-04-09 13:12 | Diff · History | 58 | →Mechanism: |
| 2020-10-04 16:32 | Diff · History | 8 | Fixed grammar |
| 2019-08-07 19:14 | Diff · History | -31 | |
| 2019-08-07 19:12 | Diff · History | 103 | touchup lede |
| 2019-07-22 14:57 | Diff · History | 25 | →Inertial confinement: |
| 2019-07-22 14:56 | Diff · History | 242 | →Inertial confinement: move z-machine to icf |
| 2019-07-22 14:54 | Diff · History | 1 | →Inertial confinement: |
| 2019-07-22 14:54 | Diff · History | 88 | →Inertial confinement: yikes. ok so first off nuckolls proposed indirect, which one can see in the paper. it's also the most widely used of these techniques so it goes first. Megajoule is not direct drive, although papers on the topic (and NIF) exist. fast ignition failed |
| 2019-07-22 14:03 | Diff · History | 333 | →Magnetic confinement: |
| 2019-07-22 13:59 | Diff · History | 1,775 | →Methods: moved plasma behaviour to methods, as that is what it is about (not the process of fusion itself) |
| 2019-07-22 13:58 | Diff · History | -1,776 | →Background: moving... |
| 2019-07-22 13:57 | Diff · History | 617 | →Triple product: density, temperature, time: actually explain triple product's effects on size |
| 2019-07-22 13:47 | Diff · History | 0 | sp |
| 2019-07-22 13:46 | Diff · History | -13 | proton-boron is not a confinement technique |
| 2019-07-22 13:46 | Diff · History | -48 | methods already discussed below, some GR cleanup |
| 2019-07-22 13:37 | Diff · History | -15 | →Magnetic or electric pinches: |
| 2019-07-22 13:37 | Diff · History | -18 | →Magnetic or electric pinches: the z-machine is a variation on ICF, not a z-pinch. it's complicated,but definitely does not belong here |
| 2018-06-16 11:36 | Diff · History | 1 | →Other: |
| 2018-06-16 11:36 | Diff · History | -140 | →Other: no one has ever used that term |
| 2018-06-14 11:35 | Diff · History | 5 | |
| 2018-06-14 11:31 | Diff · History | 50 | |
| 2017-10-14 12:30 | Diff · History | -34 | |
| 2017-09-05 12:42 | Diff · History | 76 | mention devices too |
| 2017-08-28 19:24 | Diff · History | 175 | →Mechanism: |
| 2017-07-28 13:25 | Diff · History | 112 | →Energy capture: |
| 2017-07-24 12:35 | Diff · History | 1,045 | →Energy capture: |
| 2017-07-24 12:30 | Diff · History | 1 | →Lawson Criterion: |
| 2017-07-24 12:30 | Diff · History | 34 | →Lawson Criterion: these losses also occur with collisions with non-fuel atoms of any sort, which is why super-high-vacuum systems and diverters are so important |
| 2017-07-24 12:28 | Diff · History | 79 | →Cross Section: as the graph clearly shows, this statement is not true without this proviso |
| 2017-07-24 12:26 | Diff · History | -26 | →Mechanism: |
| 2017-07-24 12:25 | Diff · History | -6 | dont need cites in lede |
| 2017-04-16 12:46 | Diff · History | 110 | |
| 2017-04-16 12:41 | Diff · History | -2 | |
| 2017-04-16 00:19 | Diff · History | 15 | |
| 2017-04-15 13:02 | Diff · History | -4 | |
| 2017-04-15 13:01 | Diff · History | 776 | rewrite lede. as no design to date has actually generated power, I removed that statement |
| 2016-02-22 15:26 | Diff · History | 211 | →Accident potential: |
| 2015-05-29 19:29 | Diff · History | 8 | →1950s: |
| 2015-05-29 19:17 | Diff · History | 559 | →1950s: |
| 2015-05-29 19:02 | Diff · History | -363 | →1940s: |
| 2015-05-29 18:54 | Diff · History | 60 | →Heating: |
| 2015-05-29 18:51 | Diff · History | 28 | →Cross section: |
| 2015-05-29 18:49 | Diff · History | 0 | →Mechanism: |
| 2015-05-29 18:48 | Diff · History | 271 | →Mechanism: cleanup |
| 2013-10-10 12:02 | Diff · History | -1 | |
| 2013-10-10 11:24 | Diff · History | -1 | Disambiguated: induction → Electromagnetic induction; Unlinked: Blanket (disambiguation) |
| 2013-10-09 12:41 | Diff · History | 681 | GR has zero to do with fusion. This, on the other hand, does. other changes, including removal of wires array and MIF, which are both inertial approaches |
| 2012-10-19 17:34 | Diff · History | -746 | staged is not important enough for a section of its own, especailyl in a section about thw 1950s! |
| 2011-12-21 18:48 | Diff · History | -847 | more clippage, country list not needed, DEMO doesn't exist. removed numbers from NIF part of LEAD |
| 2011-12-21 18:33 | Diff · History | -910 | cutting down lead, no need for comparisons to fission here |
| 2011-10-11 12:46 | Diff · History | 73 | touchups in intro, remove statement about "largely harmless", as tritium is a serious concern. also remove statement about "little overlap", as that definitely is not the case for NIF |
| 2011-01-10 22:42 | Diff · History | 957 | mention some advances |
| 2011-01-10 16:17 | Diff · History | 130 | more touchups |
| 2011-01-10 16:06 | Diff · History | 262 | move cross section down a bit, remove a small amount of redundant text that resulted as part of the move, other touchups |
| 2010-12-01 12:19 | Diff · History | 315 | touchups |
| 2010-11-29 13:45 | Diff · History | 470 | +ref |
| 2010-11-29 13:38 | Diff · History | 2,477 | more work on the history side, add section on the "bad era" after the teller meeting |
| 2010-10-08 11:44 | Diff · History | 2,302 | pinch was a UK invention and early development happened there |
| 2010-10-05 00:52 | Diff · History | 2,857 | work... |
| 2007-05-10 03:54 | Diff · History | 224 | sectionized history |
| 2007-05-10 03:50 | Diff · History | 160 | cleanup fusor section |
| 2007-05-10 03:47 | Diff · History | 4,424 | re-writing history section, which was seriously weird |
| 2007-05-10 02:58 | Diff · History | -68 | oops, I think this is what I was trying to do |
| 2007-05-10 02:58 | Diff · History | 38 | Reverted edits by AF985 (talk) to last version by 75.24.43.155 |
| 2007-05-05 18:35 | Diff · History | 6 | |
| 2007-04-10 11:57 | Diff · History | 23 | |
| 2007-01-10 13:15 | Diff · History | 455 | add other definition to the intro |
| 2007-01-04 13:20 | Diff · History | 572 | cleanup fuel cycle area |
| 2006-12-22 13:12 | Diff · History | -638 | removing Sven's other edit (sorry Sven, this isn't personal) about conversion of hydrogen to helium -- the "large amounts" would be ~ a few hundred kg per year, more falls from space |
| 2006-12-22 13:09 | Diff · History | -1,690 | "social impacts" removed, they were completely speculative, historically incorrect in many cases (it was nitrogen chemistry that made WWI, not steam) and had absolutely nothing to do with fusion power |
| 2006-12-18 19:59 | Diff · History | 66 | |
| 2006-11-23 19:09 | Diff · History | 307 | separate out point about tritium handling, which seems to be pretty important |
| 2006-10-23 19:13 | Diff · History | 1,786 | more on risks |
| 2004-10-25 12:21 | Diff · History | -817 | workign on cleaning it up, moving heating (it only applies to one style of fusion) |
| 2003-02-25 13:25 | Diff · History | 1,128 |
All times are in UTC.