Hello, Es715, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

The article Ethan Shulman 715 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shulman family pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. EricSerge (talk) 23:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shulman family pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.   ARASH PT  talk  15:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ethan Shulman 715 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ethanshulman715.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jinkinson (talk) 00:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ethan Shulman 715, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gggg.com. Since you had some involvement with the Gggg.com redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Hz. tiang 09:56, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ethan Shulman 715, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ///EuroCarGT 23:50, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ms. Murdo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. --Animalparty-- (talk) 00:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to The Fairly OddParents (season 9), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] I think it's fairly clear from my edit summaries in the edit history that this content needs to be sourced per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:V. These are basic Wikipedia concepts. If you are not willing to provide sources, then your edits will be reverted, and future submissions will be considered disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please avoid making test edits in article space even if you intend to change them back later. Though I understand you might be curious how things work at Wikipedia, some of your edits, like those where you seem to be experimenting with page protection templates, are disruptive because both the edits and the reversions are showing up in other editors' watchlists. For example: [2][3][4][5][6], and so on. Since you are not an administrator, these edits do nothing for the article and are typically reverted by bots. If you'd like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Max & Shred has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references or indication of notability; should be redirected to List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon if no reliable sources can be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jinkinson talk to me 03:08, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for evading an active block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Es715 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I promise I will not evade an active block. I will continue editing.

Decline reason:

Given the long-term issues of disruptive editing and block evasion, no. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Es715 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have no editing privelages forever. The answer to a permanent block with this user is no. My edits are actually correct, you think they are incorrect. Wikipedia should always have correct facts. Please do NOT think correct facts are disruptive. I will never do block evasion again.

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, a standard offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 00:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Es715 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's been a few months now. It's time to unblock this user.

Decline reason:

This user needs to re-read the WP:STANDARDOFFER. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, this is the user Es715, 5 years later. I am very sorry for the edits that you considered vandalism. I understand much better now than I did 4-5 years ago. Instead of vandalizing pages, I just want to contribute, and add reliable, factual information, and also wont edit as much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.96.163.210 (talk) 04:33, 18 January 2021 (UTC) Es715 (talk) 04:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Es715 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi. I am really sorry for vandalizing pages 5 years ago. I am much better at understanding it than say, 4-5 years ago. In addition, I will try and be careful, and not use it as much. I just badly want to get back in the game. I will also be editing more bio articles than TV show articles, which is what I vandalized 5 years ago. Es715 (talk) 16:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

With the consent of the blocking admin, and the consensus of both myself and Deepfriedokra, unblocked. Welcome back, happy editing! Yamla (talk) 22:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a checkuser, I see no evidence of recent block evasion or sockpuppetry or logged-out editing from this user. Checkuser evidence cannot rule out the possibility but I think it unlikely. --Yamla (talk) 17:24, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: May we, then? Don't wanna get defrocked due to impetuosity. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This was never a checkuser block, so I'm just providing some context. If you think they are a good candidate for unblocking, I suggest discussing with the blocking admin. I doubt Cyphoidbomb even remembers about a block they made more than five years ago, so I expect they'll have no problem if you think Es715 is a good candidate. :) --Yamla (talk) 19:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla and Deepfriedokra: No objection from me. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Endorse unblock. Been five years. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:19, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]