DangerousPanda (talk | contribs) You have been blocked from editing to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. (TW) |
Dandandandandandandan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
== March 2014 == |
== March 2014 == |
||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:DangerousPanda|<font style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">D</font>]][[User talk:DangerousPanda|<font style="color:#000000;background:white;">P</font>]]</span> 21:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:DangerousPanda|<font style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">D</font>]][[User talk:DangerousPanda|<font style="color:#000000;background:white;">P</font>]]</span> 21:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
||
{{unblock|reason=Erm, I've not "Edit warred" per the definitions of it. I don't understand why you've blocked me after just two undo edits - I guess you are ''assuming'' that I'm a sock. That's a bit shit, isn't it? Assuming guilt - and hey, we'll check the evidence later? [[User:Dandandandandandandan|Dandandandandandandan]] ([[User talk:Dandandandandandandan#top|talk]]) 21:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)}} |
|||
Revision as of 21:52, 4 March 2014
Welcome
|
Dandandandandandandan, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Dandandandandandandan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Confirmation
I have granted your request at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed. This is truly a rare event. Congratulations. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Paolo Giubellino
Hello! Your submission of Paolo Giubellino at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 15:25, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pee po belly bum drawers, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Hell In A Bucket (talk) 21:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. DP 21:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Dandandandandandandan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Erm, I've not "Edit warred" per the definitions of it. I don't understand why you've blocked me after just two undo edits - I guess you are ''assuming'' that I'm a sock. That's a bit shit, isn't it? Assuming guilt - and hey, we'll check the evidence later? [[User:Dandandandandandandan|Dandandandandandandan]] ([[User talk:Dandandandandandandan#top|talk]]) 21:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Erm, I've not "Edit warred" per the definitions of it. I don't understand why you've blocked me after just two undo edits - I guess you are ''assuming'' that I'm a sock. That's a bit shit, isn't it? Assuming guilt - and hey, we'll check the evidence later? [[User:Dandandandandandandan|Dandandandandandandan]] ([[User talk:Dandandandandandandan#top|talk]]) 21:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Erm, I've not "Edit warred" per the definitions of it. I don't understand why you've blocked me after just two undo edits - I guess you are ''assuming'' that I'm a sock. That's a bit shit, isn't it? Assuming guilt - and hey, we'll check the evidence later? [[User:Dandandandandandandan|Dandandandandandandan]] ([[User talk:Dandandandandandandan#top|talk]]) 21:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}