Welcome! Hello my visitor, welcome to my page. I am a happy contributor. I have been on wikipedia since 2006. I am an engineer by professional. My main interest on wikipedia is to defend and protect knowledge. This is no second to protecting and defending women and children of any background. I am a new page and recent changes patroller. I don't like this nor did i join to do this job. It is only that i have to do it to defend credible knowledge.

I have interest also in mathematics, engineering (more into Biomedical and Aeronautical engineering), African history, Politics (bits) and life in Jesus. Hope you will learn something by visiting both my page and talk page.

fresh fish This user is a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit. This user is an expert mathematician. This user is a recent changes patroller. This user participates in WikiProject Citation cleanup. This user is an engineer. This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify) knowledge is power. I will protect and defend it for whatever the cost I believe in protecting womens' rights everywhere in the world. check what i ve done on wiki by clicking the link [[1]]

Userboxes This user has been on Wikipedia for 18 years, 7 months and 23 days. This user uses Google as a primary search engine.

I'm a member of Wikimedia UK We are a group of local Wikimedians helping to create "a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge". Love Wikimedia? Live in the UK? Donate, Volunteer, and Get Involved!

knowledge is power, once acquired, can not be stolen by a silly person until dat day!

Related pages

Archives

2009 June–December 2009

achieved data on september 22nd, 2009. Freshymail-user_talk:fngosa--the-knowledge-defender 21:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you exercise this edit? How should this biography article become more wikified? There's also an external link, which cover's all the material in the article... Seems like you clicked a little too fast, sorry! lil2mas (talk) 22:55, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'Reply Thank you my friend. I have removed wikify template. God bless. Freshymail-user_talk:fngosa--the-knowledge-defender 23:01, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I see you revert your own edits, i would like to be able to fix the invidual pages so there ther eown articles. but unfortnally using List of bla bla bring sin the entire pag ei know that in other projects they have edited it so it only brings in the table and not the entire page but i am unaware how to do such edits if you are please feel free to fix the code so the table could be included only and the rest of the page can be made a proper article. the main article which i stillc ant link to is List of channels on Sky Digital--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 23:37, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you my wonderful friend. i am a new page and recent changes patroller. i was trying to fix one of your references, but it was a wrong references which you added. i will have a look at your article again. thank you for contributing to wikipedia. Freshymail-user_talk:fngosa--the-knowledge-defender 08:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you requested deletion on this article? It is of a fully-professional athlete who has made an appearance in a fully professional league. GauchoDude (talk) 19:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. please find explaination at the article's talk page. cheers. Freshymail-user_talk:fngosa--the-knowledge-defender 19:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• So what the heck was that all about? Just trying to delete articles to clean up wikipedia without doing your own background research to see if they should or shouldn't be included in the first place? While I appreciate you removing your unjustified deletion request, I hope we don't meet again as I will be adding a lot more WPS players in the near future, many like the Frisk article ... But fear not! Most of my edits (as you can check) are football/soccer related ... I know what I'm doing, kthx. GauchoDude (talk) 19:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. As i mentioned on the article talk page, the article did not have enough content initially. please draft you article with sufficient content and references before publishing it... if published without sufficient content, you may add appropriate template to tell editors that the article is been edited. article with insufficient content, no references, poorly written, attacking, blatant hoax, vandalism need not to be on wikipedia. I don't target any one in my new page patrol. thank you mate once more. 19:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

• Funny that you mention "the article did not have enough content initially", but I didn't add anything to the article before you removed the request. Just saying. GauchoDude (talk) 19:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, good night. thanks for contributing to wikipedia project. 19:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I've removed the speedy deletion tags you have placed on several articles. {{db-g6}} does not apply to Nickelodeon (Korea) because this article is a valid stub. {{db-afd}} does not apply to Marginal lending facility because this topic has never been discussed in an AfD debate. Please read an essay by Balloonman (talk · contribs), Wikipedia:Why I hate Speedy Deleters, which is about how incorrect speedy tagging harms the encyclopedia. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:20, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you friend for checking over some articles which i listed for speed deletion. as you mentioned on the article Wikipedia:Why I hate Speedy Deleters, it is good that you agree that our work is vital to protect credible knowledge, not to promote knowledge shared in bad faith such as attacks, adverts, writing about unknown celebrities by vandals etc. yes, some times an article OBVIOUSLY illegible for speed deletion may be given a wrong CSD tag. i personally tend to give obvious deletable articles House keeping tag to keep it simple. If i feel that the deletion of an article will be contested, i always provide explanation on the article's talk page.

Every advise is welcome and i always take it seriously. Thank you my friend. thank you also for contributing to wikipedia. Freshymail-user_talk:fngosa--the-knowledge-defender 13:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why Wikipedia:Patent_nonsense applies to Plumber's Mait. It is incomplete, yes, but it does explain what the stuff is, and the article is hardly gibberish. PGibbons (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: Hi mate, some articles are given wrong speed deletion tags for convenient. It is not a big deal, at the end of the day, what ever tag i give it, it will still be deleted. The article in question is an ambiguous advertisement. wikipedia is not here to protect your products, it is not an advertising website like ebay. we all know that wiki entry comes up first on google, and it will be wrong for product to come up first on wiki, then direct the customer to your website indicated as a reference. please, provide Tertiary sources for your articles, directing readers to website selling the named product in articles is really bad. it is not the policy of Wikipedia community to advertise goods. I hope i have provided explanation why your article Plumber's Mait was tagged for speed deletion. thank you for contributing to wikipeddia. 17:34, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

That one's not G11. Not even close. Prod or AfD if you want, but it is not speedy-able. Tim Song (talk) 17:45, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to the article's talk page. add a bit more, providing references from tertiary sources and the speed deletion will be void.