Content deleted Content added
Schmarrnintelligenz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
All members of this category should be notified of the RfC at Wikipedia_talk:User_categories#Request_for_comment_on_our_proposed_policy_for_users_remaining_in_redlinked_categories |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
All members of this category should be notified of the RfC at [[Wikipedia_talk:User_categories#Request_for_comment_on_our_proposed_policy_for_users_remaining_in_redlinked_categories]]. --[[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 04:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
{{delete|Talk page of a deleted page, see [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_March_2#Category:Wikipedians_with_red-linked_categories_on_their_user_talk_page]]}} |
|||
==Possible recreation== |
|||
[[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_March_2#Category:Wikipedians_with_red-linked_categories_on_their_user_talk_page]] is not necessarily correct. Having this category be created does not necessarily defeat its purpose. After all, if you were a member of 2 other red categories then having this be a blue category would not invalidate that. |
|||
Conversely, if this is the ONLY red-linked category then [[:Category:Wikipedians with a red-linked category on their user talk page]] would be more appropriate, since only 'Wikipedians' but not 'Categories' should be plural. |
|||
This would only make sense to be red if relying on it to be a complimentary 2nd red category supplementing 1 initial red category. [[User:Ranze|Ranze]] ([[User talk:Ranze|talk]]) 14:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:42, 1 February 2017
All members of this category should be notified of the RfC at Wikipedia_talk:User_categories#Request_for_comment_on_our_proposed_policy_for_users_remaining_in_redlinked_categories. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)