Furthermore, the Court finds that, as in the case of non-immunized witnesses who are allowed to speak with counsel outside the Grand Jury room at all times, so as to protect their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, a "reasonable and workable accommodation of the traditional investigatory role of the grand jury" and the needs of the immunized witness …

Counsel may, however, wait outside of the grand jury room; and, at any and all times during questioning, a witness may leave the room to consult with his attorney.

It may be that a putative defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege will be adequately preserved by a procedure whereby, in addition to warnings, he is told that he has a right to consult with an attorney prior to questioning, that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him, that during the questioning he may have that attorney wait outside the grand jury room …

Moreover, the rule of this circuit is that the fifth amendment generally does not prohibit potential defendants from being summoned before a grand jury.

Actual prejudice is that prejudice resulting from a delay that has so impaired the defendant's capacity to prepare a defense as to amount to an infringement on his right to a speedy trial.

—tests as: their demeanor while on the stand; any interest they might have in the outcome of the case; any bias or prejudice for or against either party; their opportunity to observe; any reason to remember or forget; the inherent probability of their testimony; its consistency or lack of consistency; and its corroboration or lack of corroboration with other credible evidence. The …

The Rule further requires admission of a statement in its entirety "to ensure a `fair and impartial understanding'of the admitted portion. "Id

Cooper's explanation provides important context and ensures that the jury receives a "fair and impartial" understanding of Cooper's statements.