How this document has been cited
Before the implementation of the CTB regulations, the United States characterized foreign entities for tax purposes based on a resemblance test that considered the concurrence of four corporate features, including: limited liability; continuity of life; centralized management, and free transferability of interests (known as “Kintner test”).
- in The'OECD Saving Clause': An American-Tailored Provision Made to Measure the … and 19 similar citations
—holding that an "association" under state law could also be treated as a corporation for purposes of the Code because the Code may be more expansive than categories enumerated under state law
- in Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc. v. US, 2019 and 17 similar citations
These regulations, however, were only useful to the extent that an association or similar entity was not incorporated under state laws but was still taxed as a corporation.
- in WICHITA CTR. FOR GRADUATE MED. EDUC. v. US, 2019 and 17 similar citations
その後, S 法人選択よりも LLC など他のパススルー課税が認められる法形式の事業体の選択が広がるなか, パススルー課税の選択が租税回避につながることがないようにとのことで, 連邦財務省は, 1960 年にキントナー規則 (Kintner Regulations
- in アメリカにおける営利/非営利ハイブリッド事業体をめぐる会社法と税法上の論点: 社会貢献活動 … and 15 similar citations
—the Ninth Circuit affirmed the trial court's finding that a group of doctors who were operating a clinic under "articles of association" should be taxed as a corporation under the
- in Zuckman v. United States, 1975 and 13 similar citations
—the federal district court and the Ninth Circuit determined that an association of medical professionals that had more corporate than non-corporate characteristics was taxable as a corporation for federal tax purposes.
- in Beyond Economic Substance: Interrogating the Full Impacts of Third-Party … and 10 similar citations
—state law partnership imbued with sufficient corporate characteristics to adopt corporate qualified retirement plan
- in Benefits and Burdens of Subchapter S in a Check-the-Box World and 9 similar citations
Prior to 1962, however, a partner who performed services for his partnership was not considered an employee for the purposes of those provisions, with the results that the partnership was not entitled to a deduction and the partner was currently taxable on his proportionate share of contributions made for his benefit to the partnership's profit-sharing plan.
- in Hill, Farrer & Burrill v. Commissioner, 1976 and 10 similar citations
—several doctors who had practiced medicine as a partnership dissolved the partnership and established an unincorporated association.
- in Farley Funeral Home, Inc. v. Commissioner, 1974 and 9 similar citations
"Michigan cannot, by its decisions and laws governing questions over which it has final say, also decide issues of federal tax law and thus hamper the effective enforcement of a valid federal tax levied against earned income
- in Informal Partnerships: Their Status under Federal and State Tax Law and 9 similar citations
Cited by
66 TC 159 - Tax Court 1976
413 F. 2d 97 - Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 1969
301 F. Supp. 1016 - Dist. Court, SD Florida 1969
272 F. Supp. 851 - Dist. Court, D. Colorado 1967
286 F. Supp. 839 - Dist. Court, SD Florida 1968
294 F. Supp. 1225 - Dist. Court, ED Arkansas 1968
232 F. Supp. 134 - Dist. Court, SD Florida 1964
Court of Federal Claims 2014
106 TC 418 - Tax Court 1996
62 TC 150 - Tax Court 1974