Cannabis Indica

How this document has been cited

—incriminating nature of rifle not immediately apparent; improper to seize serial number of rifle for later check at the National Arms Information Center
—police actions of removing rifles from defendant's closet, examining them, and copying down serial numbers during the execution of a warrant that directed only the seizure of alcoholic beverages could not be justified under the plain view doctrine
Several of the lower court precedents with which the Seventh Circuit bolstered its decision are clearly overruled by Hicks.
—invalidating seizure of rifles during warrant search for liquor offenses, since “it was not 'immediately apparent'that the rifles were'evidence incriminating the accused
- in Model Rules for Law Enforcement
—where warrant authorized search for illegally stored beer, officers could not seize rifle and later check serial number

Cited by

22 F. Supp. 2d 627 - Dist. Court, ED Michigan 1998
879 P. 2d 971 - Wash: Court of Appeals, 2nd Div. 1994
895 F. 2d 1113 - Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit 1990
746 F. Supp. 1563 - Dist. Court, SD Georgia 1990
810 F. 2d 574 - Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit 1987
826 F. 2d 930 - Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit 1987
25 Ohio St. 3d 301 - Ohio: Supreme Court 1986
800 F. 2d 692 - Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 1986
374 NW 2d 866 - ND: Supreme Court 1985

Leave a Reply