Cannabis Indica

How this document has been cited

—they need not, however, wait until the evidence is in the process of being destroyed before entering the residence.
- in US v. Clement, 1988 and 4 similar citations
Florida courts have long recognized that small amounts of drugs are easily disposable, and thus may be difficult to obtain as evidence.
The jury is permitted to consider the size of the transaction in determining whether a scheme to distribute drugs existed.
- in US v. Bennett, 1992 and one similar citation
This court has approved the use of the amount and value of controlled substances as proper circumstantial evidence to infer an intent to distribute as distinguished from mere possession for personal use.
When executing an arrest warrant in a residence, officers may perform a protective sweep incident to the arrest to protect themselves or others.
- in Lyles v. City of Barling, 1998 and one similar citation
—once inside, a quick and cursory viewing of the apartment is permissible to check for persons who may present a security risk
- in Lyles v. City of Barling, 1998 and one similar citation
Rejecting the construed to require knowledge that the evidence is actually being removed or destroyed, the omission of a single word should not be given such significance, especially in light of the facts in Vale.
The destruction/removal exception allows the broader pre-Chimel search under the proper circumstances

Cited by

586 F. 2d 1283 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit 1978
Ala: Court of Criminal Appeals 2021
367 So. 3d 1152 - Ala: Court of Criminal Appeals 2021
Dist. Court, WD Arkansas 2018
FA Equations-Warrantless -
PD DIANA FISHBEIN - FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 1998
17 F. Supp. 2d 848 - Dist. Court, WD Arkansas 1998
D Fishbein… - FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 1998

Leave a Reply