Cannabis Indica

thcscience_admin

In re al-Nashiri

791 F. 3d 71 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit, 2015 - Google Scholar
791 F.3d 71 (2015). In re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed AL-NASHIRI, Petitioner. No.
14-1203. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit …
Save Cite Cited by 96 How cited All 2 versions

In re al-Nashiri

921 F. 3d 224 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit, 2019 - Google Scholar
… See In re Al-Nashiri (Al-Nashiri II), 835 F.3d 110, 113 (DC Cir. 2016) … 2015) (denying petition for
writ of mandamus); In re Al-Nashiri, No. 09-1274, 2010 WL 4922649, at *1 (DC Cir. Nov …
Save Cite Cited by 61 How cited All 2 versions

In re Al-Nashiri

47 F. 4th 820 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit, 2022 - Google Scholar
… explained to Al-Nashiri before, "[m]andamus is inappropriate in the presence of an obvious means
of review: direct appeal from final judgment." In re Al-Nashiri, 791 F.3d 71, 78 (DC Cir …
Save Cite Cited by 6 How cited All 2 versions

IN RE AL-NASHIRI

577 F. Supp. 3d 1285 - 2021 - Google Scholar
… crewmember. See In re Al-Nashiri (Al-Nashiri II), 835 F.3d 110, 113-16 (DC Cir. 2016 … They
are: In re Al-Nashiri, No. 21-001, at *2, *5 (CMCR Sept. 20, 2021 …
Save Cite All 2 versions

In re al-Nashiri

835 F. 3d 110 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit, 2016 - Google Scholar
… In re Al-Nashiri, 791 F.3d 71, 75 (DC Cir. 2015). The government is seeking the death
penalty. B. The … met. In re Al-Nashiri, 791 F.3d 71, 78 (DC Cir. 2015) …
Save Cite Cited by 54 How cited All 2 versions

IN RE JUSTICES OF SUPERIOR COURT DEPT. OF MASS.

218 F. 3d 11 - Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit, 2000 - Google Scholar
In re JUSTICES OF the SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF the MASSACHUSETTS TRIAL
COURT, Petitioner. No … In re Recticel Foam Corp., 859 F.2d 1000, 1005 (1st Cir.1988) …
Save Cite Cited by 215 How cited

Schlesinger v. Councilman

420 US 738, 95 S. Ct. 1300, 43 L. Ed. 2d 591 - Supreme Court, 1975 - Google Scholar
… See Hiatt v. Brown, 339 US 103, 111 (1950); In re Grimley, 137 US 147, 150 (1890) … [12] See
also In re Yamashita, 327 US 1, 8 (1946); In re Vidal, 179 US 126 (1900). Cf …
Save Cite Cited by 1153 How cited All 3 versions

In re Al Baluchi

952 F. 3d 363 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit, 2020 - Google Scholar
… the exercise of our appellate jurisdiction later"—mandamus disrupts the "important purpose"
served by the Military Commission's final judgment rule, In re al-Nashiri ("Al-Nashiri I"), 791 F …
Save Cite Cited by 17 How cited All 2 versions

Sinochem Intern. v. Malaysia Intern. Shipping

549 US 422, 127 S. Ct. 1184, 167 L. Ed. 2d 15 - Supreme Court, 2007 - Google Scholar
… 1563, 143 L.Ed.2d 760 (1999), in turn quoting In re Papandreou, 139 F.3d 247, 255 (CADC1998)) …
Accord In re Papandreou, 139 F.3d, at 255; Monde Re, 311 F.3d, at 497-498 …
Save Cite Cited by 3257 How cited All 2 versions

Honig v. Doe

484 US 305, 108 S. Ct. 592, 98 L. Ed. 2d 686 - Supreme Court, 1988 - Google Scholar
… a party under the constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States takes such a form that the
judicial power is capable of acting upon it, then it has become a case." In re Pacific Railway …
Save Cite Cited by 4169 How cited All 3 versions

Leave a Reply