Index · Statistics · Log |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Foodservice WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Foodservice related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Food and drink|foodservice=yes}}
project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Foodservice articles by quality and Category:Foodservice articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions[edit]
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Foodservice WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions[edit]
Quality assessments[edit]
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WPFOOD}} project banner on its talk page: {{WPFOOD|class=???|foodservice=yes}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Foodservice articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Foodservice articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Foodservice articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Foodservice articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Foodservice articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Foodservice articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Foodservice articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Foodservice articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Foodservice articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Quality scale[edit]
Rating criteria[edit]
When reviewing articles, it is requested you use the following criteria for assigning a quality rating:
Class | Criteria |
---|---|
A |
An article may be rated an A if and only if it has been rated GA. Any article that has been demoted from FA should be assigned an A-class rating. |
B |
|
C |
|
Start |
The article has a meaningful amount of good content and has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
However, it is still weak in many areas and may not adhere to Neutral Point of View policies. |
Any Wikipedia contributor can assign a quality assessment, however Good and Featured Articles assessments must be made through the proper nomination processes.
Importance assessment[edit]
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WPFOOD}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Foodservice articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Foodservice articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Foodservice articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Foodservice articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Foodservice articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Foodservice articles) | ??? |
Importance scale[edit]
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Comics.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Requesting an assessment[edit]
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- The article Chipotle Mexican Grill has had significant changes since last rated, and I believes it needs assessment for a new rating. Angryapathy (talk) 17:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Assessment log[edit]
Foodservice taskforce: Index · Statistics · Log |
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
May 30, 2024[edit]
Removed[edit]
- Draft:Quebec Smoked Meat (talk) removed.
May 29, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Papa John's (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Pendennis Club (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Fortezza Medicea restaurant (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
May 28, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Smörgåsbord renamed to Smorgasbord.
Reassessed[edit]
- Esquina Común (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Mac Tonight (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Category:Restaurants in Omaha, Nebraska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Russian restaurants (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Smorgasbord (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
May 27, 2024[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- Hugo Ortega (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
May 26, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Astrance (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- KFC advertising (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Category:Restaurants on the National Register of Historic Places in West Virginia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
May 24, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- Draft:Alcalde (restaurant) (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Café des Artistes (Puerto Vallarta) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)