The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:5.5 Metre World Championship medallists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused medal table all the content is on 5.5 Metre World Championship with improved referencing I propose deleting the template. yachty4000 ( (talk) 21:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. Primefac (talk) 12:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Myarchive (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template can only be used by a single user. Should be moved to userspace. WOSlinker (talk) 18:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I must have missed the policy that forbids us to make templates for personal use, and I have used this one for many many years. Can you please update me.--Berig (talk) 20:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no problem with transcluding things from your user space that are for your personal use. However, template space is for all wiki users to use, as it is the common place for transcludeable content. Therefore, it should at least be generalizable; no-one wants to use the archive box specifically for Berig. In that case, we have the generalized template living at {{archives}} and do not need this template for that reason. (See also WP:Template namespace and WP:TFD#REASONS.)

Userfying is a common outcome in these scenarios, so I expect this will be moved to User:Berig/archives or similar; you can transclude it with {{User:Berig/archives}} at that point. Izno (talk) 03:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Userfy per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Userfy, of course. Good for WOSlinker for going through the motions of a TFD. I would have just moved it as uncontroversial. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• move to userspace. Frietjes (talk) 17:51, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:De-en (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Transcluded in just one editor's user subpage, which has not been worked on since 2015. No documentation or categories. Created in 2015. Subst into that page and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Dateheader (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org mystery spot sandbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Abandoned article draft created in template space. It was transcluded at User:Briellecfarmer/sandbox, where I have substed it. This page should be deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:In Donetsk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:In Lugansk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Article content. Created in April 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep probably no transclusions because they're substituted each time, which is a respectable (if lazy) "lifehack" for repetitive content on multiple articles. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Are you sure? The code isn't set to support substitution. I'm actually concerned if this was used for that matter and now requires a lot of cleanup. Gonnym (talk) 10:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Huh, I thought it was mere text (with links and refs), but looking at the source code it appears it's something quite different. I don't actually know if it's substituted since I don't edit in this area, but I've made article-text templates for substitution before and thought that this was similar. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 19:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and merge to one template with a switch if it was used as claimed above in substitution, then replace with transcluded version so any future editing will give the same text. Delete if it hasn't. Gonnym (talk) 10:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, clearly not substituted since there is no "safesubst:" and many parser functions in the templates. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Izno (talk) 22:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Chicago wards 2010s (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Inline SVGs do not work yet. Userfy until T334372 is implemented. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Userfy per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 June 30. Primefac (talk) 12:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Reese–Connor_family_tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bulgarian princesses by marriage (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All the blue links are duplicated on Template:Princesses of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha by marriage. DrKay (talk) 16:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep because the Kingdom of Bulgaria was an independently sovereign state. While Bulgarian princesses were members of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha-Koháry, and therefore princesses of the independent Duchy of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, their status as princesses of the Bulgarian kingdom is separate from their status as princesses of a German territory. This template includes princesses of this house who were also British princesses or Belgian princesses, which have their own templates, because cadet branches of this house ruled over various regions. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I would like to mention that there is a template for Bulgarian princesses by birth already, separate from the template of princesses of Saxe Coburg and Gotha by birth. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Readers are not served by having the same set of links in several navboxes regardless of whatever claim to historical accuracy is being made above. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 09:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination and Pppery. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:New! (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Undocumented and uncategorized template. Transcluded only on one page belonging to a blocked editor. On that page, because of the way the template is coded, the template renders nothing. Subst and delete.

Note: There is a previous TFD for a template with the same name but different content. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NFL game (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Proposed in 2007 but not adopted, or replaced by something that works. The links do not work. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:North West England MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:North Carolina FC current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:North Carolina A&T Aggies baseball roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article content with a single transclusion in one editor's sandbox. Subst into that page and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).