The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rudolf von Marogna-Redwitz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is not sufficient to establish public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:50, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RüdigerSchleicher.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• German copyright law states nothing according to what uploader says it does. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Safeway 1923.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I see no evidence this is in the public domain, and the source is far too vague to prove otherwise. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - trainweb images are non-free, and this image is being used in a gallery, which is a violation of both WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#3a. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:49, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Western Pacific 41.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Per http://www.trainweb.com/photos/photohdr.htm (crucial points bolded for emphasis),

Before using a photograph from TrainWeb, examine the page where you found the photograph. Make sure there is a TrainWeb copyright at the bottom of the page where you found the photo and make sure that there is no other indication on the page that the photo belongs to someone else. When TrainWeb uses photos from others on our pages, we do so with permission and make it very obvious that we do not own the rights to those photographs. The above free use policy applies only to photos owned and copyright by TrainWeb. There are many railroad related web sites hosted on the TrainWeb server. If you do not see a TrainWeb copyright at the bottom of the web page, then we do not own the photos on that page and the free use policy does not apply to those photos.

Trainweb-owned images can be seen at http://www.trainweb.com/, where at the bottom is "Copyright © 1996-2010 TrainWeb, LLC"

http://www.trainweb.org/chris/comet.html and http://www.trainweb.org/chris/SantaFe.html do not bear this copyright message and are "by Chris Guenzler". Their images are not TrainWeb free images. To use them on Wikipedia, they have to comply with all 10 criterion of WP:NFCC. Jappalang (talk) 02:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly which criterion of WP:NFCC don't they comply with? And if Chris Guenzler is a member of TrainWeb, aren't his images subject to the same copyright regulations as everybody else's on TrainWeb? ----DanTD (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TrainWeb's instructions are clear: no copyright notice = not their image = not free. They clearly stated "There are many railroad related web sites hosted on the TrainWeb server"; unless TrainWeb's copyright notice is on that page, the images on that page are not TrainWeb's free images. Furthermore, the onus to supply fair use rationale for copyrighted images is on those who wish to use them, not on others. If you wish to learn more about using copyrighted images, please refer to Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria and Wikipedia:Non-free content. Jappalang (talk) 06:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep provisionally - marked {{subst:nrd}}. I am skeptical it can even fit any non-free rationales - only if the train is no longer in a museum. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ATSF FM H-12-44TS 543.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 3#File:Western Pacific 41.jpg. Jappalang (talk) 02:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: provisional keep. See #File:ATSF_FM_H-12-44TS_543.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Fe FP45 5923.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 3#File:Western Pacific 41.jpg Jappalang (talk) 02:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - see #File:Western_Pacific_41.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:05, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa CF-7 2509.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 3#File:Western Pacific 41.jpg Jappalang (talk) 02:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: provisional keep - see #File:Santa_Fe_FP45_5923.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Fe SD-45-2 5704.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 3#File:Western Pacific 41.jpg Jappalang (talk) 02:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nogor Baul-James.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Album cover? Eeekster (talk) 03:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: provisional keep - see #File:Santa_Fe_FP45_5923.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slumbercoach.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 3#File:Western Pacific 41.jpg Jappalang (talk) 03:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahfuzjames.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derived from album cover: http://www.surerbhubone.com/album-Thik-Achee-Bondhu-248.html Eeekster (talk) 03:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TraumaTowers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• licensed as PD-self but watermarked (c) Ridemad.com Skier Dude (talk 04:00, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suzana.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be professional headshot; no source; no metadata Skier Dude (talk 04:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:G&Wportrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• (c) comic characters, no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:G&WSxCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:G&WLoveCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:G&WFameCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:G-Burg Trojans.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GA-LOGO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; sourced to their website; unlikely uploader is (c) Holder Skier Dude (talk 06:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GAK SEAL B&W.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• frat logo; sourced to JOanne Rapadas; unlikely uploader is (c) Holder Skier Dude (talk 06:16, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GAMUT Systems Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) Holder Skier Dude (talk 06:16, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GARAWebHosting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) Holder Skier Dude (talk 06:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GEC Logo.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coverix4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• DVD cover, copyright unlikely to belong to the uploader. — ξ^xplicit 07:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - WP:CSD#F9; no sense in changing to fair use because it's not in use in the article namespace. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:OLDY CHURCHY.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Nominating on behalf of 58.71.79.8 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) who wrote in edit summary, "The author written is TZO, initials of Thadeo Z Ouano former mayor of Mandaue. User Dmitri Cortes should provide a written permit from the author to upload this image in wikipedia." and on File talk:OLDY CHURCHY.png: "The author says the image is owned by Thadeo Z. Ouano. Did wikipedia receive a written permit from him to publish this image?" I cannot rule out this is not a copyrighted file so bringing it here for more comments. Kimchi.sg (talk) 08:42, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Kimchi.sg (talk) 08:42, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Site ryan.cyberemail logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.