The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Katherine Rundell Parents[edit]

Draft:Katherine Rundell Parents (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

Completely pointless. There's no point in creating an article on her parents if we don't know who they were (it's also biased). ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as clearly not intended as article content. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As an unsourced BLP. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete but the only reason to delete is that it is an unsourced biography of a living person for unnamed living persons. Other than that, it would only need declining or rejecting. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Unsourced BLP of (probably non-notable) unknown persons. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 21:08, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.