The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zella Day[edit]

Zella Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artists, doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG let alone WP:MUSICBIO. The only coverage I can find of her is either brief mentions, short reviews, or interviews, nothing to demonstrate her suitability for a Wikipedia artist. TOOSOON? Primefac (talk) 08:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 23:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 23:20, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. One quick glance here suggests there are numerous reliable sources for her to meet the WP:GNG. Not only that; her wikipage is getting hundreds of pageviews daily, an unofficial sign of interest in her work, while not a specific reason for notability. Further, another unofficial sign of notability is a YouTube video with almost two million views.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A slightly longer glance would show that those articles are almost all name-drops, brief mentions, or interviews. Exactly what I found BEFORE I created this AfD. YouTube numbers are useless; there are cat videos that get that much attention. Popularity =/= notability. Primefac (talk) 07:44, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Her album was reviewed in the NY Times. She gets in-depth treatment in the Chicago Sun Times. More in-depth treatment in the Birmingham Suntimes. Her photo is prominently displayed in the Los Angeles Times here at the popular SXSW festival. Or, in-depth treatment in Playboy magazine. Her music was reviewed in the Washington Times. An in-depth interview here. None of these are "name drops"; clearly Zella Day is getting serious media attention.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 10:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Zella Day is getting serious media attention as Tomwsulcer pointed out.Sofiamar (talk) 23:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep! Zella is playing on alt radio stations across the US and performed on Conan!--‎23.241.204.9 (talk)‎

Zella Day on Conan.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:26, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The artist is getting the needed attention to get an article on Wikipedia.--Paparazzzi (talk) 17:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.