The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:18, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vsev Krawczeniuk[edit]

Vsev Krawczeniuk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 15:38, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 18:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 18:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as none of this satisfies WP:ENTERTAINER, analyzing everything found nothing convincing. SwisterTwister talk 21:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Of the sources presented, the only one that means anything in terms of WP:N is a very brief mention in a local newsletter. SpinningSpark 20:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as he fails WP:GNG, that is, significant independent coverage. JTtheOG (talk) 22:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.