- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Vajra Enterprises. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tibet: The Roleplaying Game[edit]
- Tibet: The Roleplaying Game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This doesn't meet notability guidelines in the slightest. I can't find any reliable sources on the game. Pretty self explanatory. It seems to be a non-notable indie RPG game, which is fine and all, but it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Inanygivenhole (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This could also be merged into parent article Vajra Enterprises. Inanygivenhole (talk) 21:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Vajra Enterprises. Not notable, but there's room for some of this information in the parent article. DoctorKubla (talk) 07:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.