The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  11:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Terror in Meeple City[edit]

Terror in Meeple City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. I can find sources that mention this game, but none that are reliable enough to confer notability. Tchaliburton (talk) 22:06, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the article to add supporting references I was able to find, ensuring they are from 3rd-party sources not affiliated with the game. The game (as Rampage) has been featured in a video related to the TableTop YouTube series created by Geek and Sundry and hosted by Wil Wheaton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcIsRmb6A_8. I also thought that the name change presumably due to potential copyright infringement was notable, although admittedly I have not found any reliable sources for that information. I will let those more familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines decide whether this confers enough significance to warrant an article or not. STLocutus (talk) 06:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable mean more than just being third-party. Those references don't appear to cut it. I suggest taking a look at WP:RELIABLE. Tchaliburton (talk) 06:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It seems quite notable to me and it's going straight onto my Xmas shopping list too. Andrew D. (talk) 13:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Some English sources that look good are [1] and [2]. Lots of non-English sources. I can't easily evaluate them for reliability as I'm pretty much English only. Though many look quite professional. [3] is a list and [4] is an example. Hobit (talk) 19:59, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - While BoardGameGeek itself is not a reliable source, it does a great job of tracking articles/reviews about board games. See this game's page there. A few it points to: coverage at Tric Trac (popular French board game site), Board Game Quest review, Rock Paper Shotgun review, Brettspiele Magazin review (German), Boardgame.de / Kulkmann's Gamebox review (doesn't appear great, but the site appears to be popular in the board game world), Die Poppelkiste review (German), Hunter & Cron review (German), Ludoversum review (German), Metagames review, Gioconomicon review (Italian), ISlaytheDragon review... (there are others, but these appear to be the better). --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:18, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: (Notability due to Wheaton.) I am so going to own this. It has terror and meeples.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 09:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.