The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tarantella (1995 film)[edit]

Tarantella (1995 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. There’s a review from TV Guide. Needs one more review in order to be eligible. I found no other suitable or reliable sources or reviews to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 22:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Boston Globe review [1] DonaldD23 talk to me 00:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• I withdraw this nomination per NEXIST since there are two reviews from TV Guide and The Boston Globe. Excellent work to User:Donaldd23. The Film Creator (talk) 00:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.