The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talisman City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My before yeilded nothing of substance. Article has been tagged for notabilty for 3 years. Article was created in 2003 so nobody is working to fix it up Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Well, reviews from Games International and Shadis are noted, for starters. There may be more. BOZ (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I started this article, so it would make me sad to see it deleted. But whatever's better for Wikipedia is best. There is a new expansion for the latest version of Talisman that could be added to the article, but of course, that's all moot if the article's deleted. The article is just about the version for the Second Edition of the game, but Talisman is now on the Fourth Edition. The editions has significant differences, as do the expansions, such as City. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 01:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment if the expansion cannot stand alone as an article then it's probably better to merge cited info back to Talisman (board game). --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, I think the above reviews plus http://www.boardgame.de/reviews/talcity.htm (which is niche but looks reliable) probably gets us over the WP:N bar. Editorially it might make sense to merge it back to the main game--I'm not sure we need a separate article for this expansion. I'm 95% sure I played the original back in the day... But keep and discuss merge on the talk page is where I'm at. Hobit (talk) 03:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP I have added relevant comments from the Shadis review and from a review in an Italian magazine, which when combined with the review from Games International, I believe firmly establishes notability. Guinness323 (talk) 07:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep based on improvements made by Guinness323. BOZ (talk) 12:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, in the end, somebody was working to fix it up. Geschichte (talk) 09:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.