The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:32, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Star Breach[edit]

Star Breach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to have received the necessary attention to meet WP:N yet. A forum, some blogs, a gaming website, and that's about it. Nothing reliable in Google news, only 65 Google hits overall[1] is pretty low for a current subject from an English speaking country. Fram (talk) 11:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Fram thanks for reviewing the article. I put it up as it's a game that's relatively recent, having just come out of testing several months back, but it's already gaining traction with some of the popular tabletop gaming Youtubers like Guerrilla Miniature Games and Tabletop Minions (even being voted game of the year by Gaminggeek). It's also talked about quite a bit on online gaming forums such as Dakkadakka and Lead Adventure Lowyhong (talk) 12:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 11:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 11:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2020-05 ✍️ create

• Delete absolute dearth of reliable sourcing in either news outlets or the literature. ——Serial ^# 16:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — basically what SN already said. Celestina007 (talk) 17:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.